Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment 2.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS ARNOLD ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT CENTER (AFMC)

ARNOLD AIR FORCE BASE TENNESSEE

MEMORANDUM FOR

FROM: USAF Enterprise Acquisition Division Contracting Directorate 100 Kindel Drive, Suite A332 Arnold AFB TN 37389-1332

SUBJECT: Past/Present Performance Questionnaire for Request for Proposal FA9101-11-R-0037, VA- 1409 Compressor Rotor End Barrel

The Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC) is in the process of selecting a contractor for the VA-1409 Compressor Rotor End Barrel. This project is for providing all material, labor, and equipment for the delivery of one (1) rotor barrel discharge end for an Allis Chalmers VA-1409 axial compressor (S/N 5302). Relevance of present and past performance will be based upon the following:

a. Efforts involving forging, fabrication, precision machining, and testing of compressor rotor barrels with volumetric flowrate of 275,000 CFM (minimum) and discharge temperatures of 500 degrees F (maximum), that are similar or greater in scope, magnitude, and complexity than the effort described in this solicitation.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors’ past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror’s performance on those contracts.

Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaires. Due to an extremely tight schedule, we need your written response on or before 08 November 2011. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and “faxed” to (931) 454-7330 (Attention: Ms. Karen Buckner). Please call Ms. Karen Buckner at (931) 454-4405 prior to transmission or if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your help is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Karen J. Buckner

KAREN J. BUCKNER

Contracting Officer

Attachment (1 copy) Questionnaire

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Attachment 2

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

For VA-1409 Compressor Rotor Discharge End Barrel Fabrication

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (Who did the work for you?)

A. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________

C. Contract number: ______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided: (include compressor rotor size/type)

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________ B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________

C. Location:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________

Length of time (number of years) evaluator has with this type of work: ____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level.

Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well.

Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level.

Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

Technical Performance B P G Y R N/A

T1. How well did the contractor comply with the requirements of the detailed drawings and the contract specification?

T2. What was the quality and detail of the Test Plans, Tests, Certifications, and Test Examinations used during product acceptance testing?

T3. What was the quality and detail of Drawings and Technical Data submitted by the contractor?

T4. How well did the contractor implement current quality processes, standard practices for design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control?

T5. How well did the contractor fabricate the compressor rotor barrel housing?

T6. What was the quality of technical work performed by the contractor?

T7. What was the quality of the technical support and skilled support provided by the contractor?

T8. How well did the contractor document the condition of deliverables as received prior to commencing fabrication of the compressor rotor barrel housing?

Program Management B P G Y R N/A

P1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

P2. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with Customer program staff (including the ability to successfully resolve conflicts/disagreements/disputes)?

P3. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract

Program Management B P G Y R N/A problems without extensive customer guidance?

P4. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

P5. How did the contractor manage the quality and timeliness of sub-contracted support efforts?

P6. How effective was the contractor’s material management (including Customer Furnished Property and Materials)?

P7. Was the work accomplished as proposed by the contractor?

P8. How well did the contractor communicate submittals, progress schedule, and progress reports?

P9. How well did the contractor perform against the delivery schedules of the contract? In the remarks, specify if the contractor met, exceeded, or failed to meet contractual delivery dates and, if schedule slips occurred, state the number of slips and cumulative schedule variance.

P10. What was the quality of the received Documentation and Photographic Records?

P11. How timely did the contractor communicate technical surveillance schedule for product acceptance testing with the Customer?

P12. How timely did the contractor report rotor barrel housing anomalies, irregularities, and recommend corrective actions to the Customer?

P13. How adequate did the contractor prepare, package, and protect the rotor barrel housing to prevent damage or degradation to the rotor during transportation back to the Customer?

Cost Performance B P G Y R N/A

C1. How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?

Cost Performance B P G Y R N/A

C2. How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?

C3. How successfully did the contractor alert the customer of unforeseen corrective costs and negotiate projected additional contract costs prior to proceeding with repairs?

C4. How sufficient and timely was the contractor’s cost reporting?

Please provide the following information regarding cost/price:

(1) Original Contract Cost or Price $______________

(2) Value of Negotiated Contract Changes $______________

(3) Actual/Projected Cost to Complete $______________

(4) Baseline Estimate at Completion $______________

(5) Total Negotiated Changes EAC $______________

(6) Cost Under run/Over run (-) $______________

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___

No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address: AEDC/PKE 100 Kindel Drive, Ste A332 Arnold AFB TN 37389-1332 FAX to: 931-454-7330 E-Mail to: John.Lominac@arnold.af.mil

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION