Attachment_4_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 159 KB Posted

Attached to
Legacy Application Systems Study RFQ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8734-17-R-0003_RFQ_Legacy_App
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Wright Patterson Air Force Base

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire - Legacy App Study

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Legacy Application Systems Study RFQ, newest first.
File Type Posted
RFQ_Legacy_Application_Study.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_GFI_-_Master_Application_List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_1_-_Provisions_and_Clauses.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_Legacy_App_Systems_PWS_1Jun17.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Legacy Application Study Attachment 4

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE SURVEY

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Prime or Subcontractor for this Contract:

C. Contractor CAGE Code:

D. Contract Number:

E. Contract Type:

F. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No ______

G. Period of Performance:

H. Initial Contract Cost:

I. Current/Final Contract Cost:

J. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs, if any:

K. Identify roles/responsibilities of prime contractor and partners/subcontractors:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or Agency Name:

B. Customer or Agency Description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, multistate, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands (describe):

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

VG VERY GOOD – During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well.

Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

S SATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

UN UNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

Evaluation VG S UN N/A

1. How would you rate the contractor's demonstrated knowledge and experience with Oracle Enterprise Business Suite?

Remarks:

2. How would you rate the contractor’s demonstrated performance in conducting a fit-gap analysis and providing recommendations on transitioning business process capability from one system to another?

3. How would you rate the contractor’s demonstrated implementation of Human

Systems Integration?

4. How would you rate the contractor’s demonstrated performance in developing a meta-data repository?

Evaluation VG S UN N/A

5. How would you rate the contractor’s demonstrated performance in developing documentation that is both useable and of quality required for your task?

6. Overall, how did the vendor perform with respect to maintaining cost, schedule and performance?

1. Please discuss every response for which you indicated UN (unsatisfactory) in the remarks section of each of the questions above (please use additional sheets if necessary).

2. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes ____ Default ____ Convenience ____ Pending Termination ____ No ____

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

If you have questions or need assistance, please contact

Amanda Davenport, Contracting Officer, at (210) 565-6100 or

Gabby Torres, Contract Specialist, at (210) 565-2690.

Please return this completed survey to: amanda.davenport.2@us.af.mil and gabriela.torres.1@us.af.mil.

mailto:amanda.davenport.2@us.af.mil mailto:gabriela.torres.1@us.af.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .