EA PUP Sect L Atch 1-6.doc - - 07-19-2011.doc
DOC document 142 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Professional, Administrative and Management Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8540-11-R-0004
About this file
Attachments 1 - 6
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions Round 2 10 Aug 2011.pdf | ||
| FA854011R0004_______0002.pdf | ||
| FA854011R0004_______0001.pdf | ||
| Questions Round 1 29 Jul 2011.pdf | ||
| AFMC Form158.pdf | ||
| EA PUP SIGNED PWS 8 JUNE 11.pdf - - 07-19-2011.pdf | ||
| FD2060 11 30011 DD Form 254 3 NOV 10.pdf - - 03-07-2011.pdf | ||
| FA854011R0004.pdf - - 07-20-2011.pdf | ||
| O A Labor Categories.pdf - - 02-25-2011.pdf | ||
| Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan.doc | DOC document | |
| Form158 1130011 00.xfdl - - 03-07-2011.xfdl | XFDL file | |
| FD2060 11 30011 Intel Sec Addend NOV 10.pdf | ||
| Form1653_1130011_00.doc - - 03-07-2011.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment8(Schedule Structure for Qty Ranges.doc - - 02-25-2011.doc | DOC document | |
| App C FD2060-11-30011.pdf - - 03-09-20112.pdf | ||
| Form158 1130011 00.doc - - 07-19-2011.doc | DOC document | |
| EA PUP1423s.pdf - - 07-19-2011.pdf | ||
| FD2060_11_30011_DD_Form_254_3_NOV_10.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP FA8540-11-R-0004
ATTACHMENT 1
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Present/Past Performance “FACTS Sheet” (TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR, JOINT VENTURE PARTNER, AND IF APPLICABLE, CRITICAL SUBCONTRACTOR) Complete a separate FACTS Sheet for each relevant contract. See Clause L-900 of this RFP for detailed instructions and limits on number and recency of contracts. Provide frank, concise comments regarding present/past performance on the program identified in B. below.
A. (1) Name (Company/Division), (2) Address: (3) CAGE Code) B. PROGRAM TITLE and CONTRACT NUMBER:
C. NAME OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY OR CUSTOMER:
D. CONTRACT TYPE(S) – PLEASE LIST ALL THAT APPLY (firm fixed price, time & materials, etc.)
E. CONTRACT $ VALUE:(If you performed work as a subcontractor, identify your contract $ value and the PRIME’s contract $ value, if know.)
1. Original contract $ value and current $ value:
2. Estimated value at completion and primary causes of changes:
3. If Award Fee Contract, what percentages of the fee have been awarded in each of last 3 years:
F. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EFFORT AS: _____ PRIME _____ SUBCONTRACTOR
1. As a part of this narrative description, highlight portions considered most relevant to the current acquisition; addressing how and to what extent the proposed effort relates to the program identified in B. above. To supplement the data provided in response to this paragraph, complete the following regarding relevancy of the effort identified in paragraph B to the proposed effort. This is limited to two pages beyond the page limitation of the FACTS sheet information.
| Category |
| Fill-in for the Proposed Effort (GOVT IPT completes) |
| Fill-in for the Effort Identified in para. B above (Offeror completes) |
| 1. Nature of Business Area(s) Involved |
| Development and production |
| 2. Required Levels of Technology |
| a.Signal trackers, b.DRFM, c.Hardware/Software integration |
d.EW systems e.Digital receivers
| 3. Materials and Production Processes |
| a.RF component production |
b.CCA manufacture
c. Sub-assembly installation
| 4. Performance Location |
| Facility 1: Design, prototype and prototype test location Facility 2:Production location |
| 5. Contract Type(s) |
| FPIF or FFP |
| 6. Quantities produced |
| See RFP Schedule B |
| 7. Program Similarity |
| Design and test of receivers with signal tracking, sorting, and prioritizing and DRFM technology and hardware/software integration into either EA Pods or Internal EA systems |
| 8. Program Phase |
| Design, fabrication, integration, test, and production |
| 9. Extent of subcontractor involvement |
| Design and test of receivers with either signal tracking, sorting, and prioritizing and DRFM technology or software/hardware integration into either an EA pod or an Internal EA system |
2. This paragraph shall also include details to support your record for on-time delivery, technical quality and cost control for this effort identified in paragraph B. above.
3. If you are small business, or, if you are a large business and a Small Business Subcontracting Plan per FAR 52.219-9 was NOT required by this effort, indicate your compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, by competing the following. Even if FAR 52.219-8 was NOT included in this effort, when subcontracting possibilities existed, did you award subcontracts to small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance?
| Utilization of Small Business Concerns |
| Small Business |
| Large Business |
No subcontracting possibilities
In compliance
Not in compliance (address why)
4. If you are a large business, identify whether a subcontracting plan in accordance with FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, was required by this effort. If one was required, complete the following regarding subcontracting goals and status-to-date. If goals were not met, please explain.
Required:( Not Required: (___
| Category |
| Goals |
| Achieved-to-Date |
Small Business
Small Disadvantaged Business
Women-Owned Small Business
HUBZone Small Business
Veteran-Owned Small Business
Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business
HBCU/MI
G. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: (If you performed work as a subcontractor, identify your POP, and the PRIME’s POP, if known)
1. Original schedule and current schedule for ongoing or final for completed contracts:
2. Estimate @ completion (ongoing contract):
3. How many times changed and primary causes of changes:
H. PRIMARY POINTS OF CONTACT: (The offeror is responsible for exerting its best efforts to ensure that current information is provided for all individuals.)
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
| Name and Office Symbol |
| Phone Number |
| FAX Number |
| 1. Procuring Contracting Officer |
| DSN & Comm |
| DSN & Comm |
| 2. Program Manager |
| DSN & Comm |
| DSN & Comm |
| 3. Administrative Contracting Officer |
| DSN & Comm |
| DSN & Comm |
| 4. Other (Please Specify) |
| DSN & Comm |
| DSN & Comm |
I. If the offeror, joint venture partner or critical subcontractor (if applicable) is a newly formed entity who either has no prior contracts or does not possess relevant corporate past performance, but does have key personnel with relevant past performance while employed by another company, specify by name, such key individual(s) who will participate in the proposed effort under this acquisition who also participated in the program identified in B. above, and indicate their contract role. Describe how participation of these key personnel contributed to the success of the previous effort and how this indicates probability of success on the proposed effort.
J. Use this space to address any aspect about this program considered unique. Describe quality awards or certifications that indicate the offeror possesses a high-quality process for developing and producing the product/service required.
K. Summarize contract issues relative to the number and severity of quality deficiencies recorded/contract discrepancy reports issued, cure notices, show cause letters, termination for default or cause, disputes, claims, latent defects; and, corrective actions taken for the contract listed in paragraph B. above.
L. Additionally, for those efforts where you are cognizant of unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports previously assessed by customers or clients, but feel that significant progress has been made but not yet credited or formally documented, provide the program name, contract number, customer location and a narrative explaining "fixes" made to date, or any other information regarding the unfavorable/marginal assessment. This narrative portion is limited to one (1) additional page beyond the FACTS sheet required page limitation. It is not presumed that performance has been perfect. Rather, the proposal should contain evidence of the offeror's ability to isolate the root causes of problems and should describe programs or actions taken to resolve those causes. Demonstrated corrective actions (not just planned or promised), and the overall work record will be considered. Problems not addressed by the offeror, but found by the Government during the evaluation of the information in this volume, will be assumed to still exist. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/ circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.
M. Was this contract effort (as identified in paragraph B. above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous WR-ALC procurement. Yes No . If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.
PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror's opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
RFP FA8540-11-R-0004
ATTACHMENT 2
NOTE TO OFFERORS: This procurement could be similar to commercial supplies/services. Therefore, to assist the Government’s Past Performance Team in assessing your present and past performance on relevant commercial contracts, the following letter must be sent to your points of contact (POCs) for those commercial efforts that you identify to us in your past performance volume. Should you propose to use critical subcontractors, teaming contractors, and/or joint venture partners, you must obtain a similar client authorization letter from each entity. HOWEVER, it is your sole responsibility, as the offeror, to then send out these authorization letters with the Present/Past Performance Questionnaire to your own POCs and to those of your subcontractors, teaming contractors, or joint venture partners and include a copy in your past performance volume.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Client Authorization Letter
(TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY OFFEROR)
Dear (Client):
We are currently responding to the Department of the Air Force (AF), Robins Air Force Base (RAFB), Request For Proposal (RFP) FA8540-11-R-0004 for the procurement of the EA Pod Upgrade Program.
As you know an offeror’s past performance has become an element of increased emphasis in the AF’s acquisitions. They are requesting that clients of companies who submit proposals in response to their RFP for the EA Pod Upgrade Program be contacted, and that their participation in the validation process be requested. We, therefore, respectfully request and hereby authorize you to complete the attached Questionnaire with regards to work we have performed for you, and submit it either electronically or by mail. If sending electronically, the following applies:
Exchanges of source selection information between government and questionnaire respondents will be controlled by the Contracting Officer. Email may be used to transmit such information only if the email can be sent and encrypted, and must include “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104” in the subject line of the email. In order to facilitate the sending and receiving of encrypted emails, a questionnaire respondent must use MS Outlook email configured to support encryption, or, a different email product that is S/MIME compatible and configured to support encryption. If you intend to submit your completed questionnaire via an encrypted email, you will need to contact the Buyer/Contracting Officer indicated below, prior to that first submittal, in order to exchange certificates used for encryption. To insure the process is working correctly, send a test encrypted message first (without including any source selection information). Email to: Jason.Grizzard@Robins.af.mil If mailing, the outside envelope must be marked as follows:
NOTE: TO BE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY
The completed questionnaire should be contained in a second envelope marked with the mailing address and the following legend:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Mail directly to:
WR-ALC/GRWKA
ATTN: Jason Grizzard 460 Richard Ray Blvd, Suite 200 Robins AFB, GA 31098-1607 Reference: RFP: FA8540-11-R-0004 Sincerely, [OFFEROR'S POINT OF CONTACT]
RFP FA8540-11-R-0004
ATTACHMENT 3
Transmittal Letter for Government Sources to Accompany Present/Past Performance Questionnaire
[TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR]
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
MEMORANDUM FOR: [OFFEROR’S /JOINT VENTURE PARTNER’S OR CRITICAL SUBCONTRACTORS POC]
FROM:
[OFFEROR’S ADDRESS AND POINT OF CONTACT]
SUBJECT:
Present/Past Performance Questionnaire for Contract(s) .
1. We are currently responding to the Department of the Air Force (AF), Robins Air Force Base (RAFB), Request For Proposal (RFP) FA8540-11-R-0004, for the procurement of the EA Pod Upgrade. This RFP is being conducted as a Tradeoff Source Selection and specifically requires that we, as an offeror, do the following:
The offeror shall send out -- and track the completion of -- the Present/Past Performance Questionnaire to each of the offeror’s, critical subcontractors’, teaming contractors’ and/or joint venture partners’ Points of Contact (POCs). The responsibility to send out the Present/Past Performance Questionnaires rests solely with the offeror - i.e., it shall not be delegated to any subcontractors, teaming contractors, and/or joint venture partners. The completed Present/Past Performance Questionnaire shall be submitted directly to the Government not later than [OFFEROR FILL-IN RFP CLOSING DATE]. Each of the offeror’s POCs may submit its completed Present/Past Performance Questionnaire either electronically or by mail. If sending electronically, the following applies:
Exchanges of source selection information between government and questionnaire respondents will be controlled by the Contracting Officer. Email may be used to transmit such information only if the email can be sent and encrypted, and must include “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104” in the subject line of the email. In order to facilitate the sending and receiving of encrypted emails, a questionnaire respondent must use MS Outlook email configured to support encryption, or, a different email product that is S/MIME compatible and configured to support encryption. If you intend to submit your completed questionnaire via an encrypted email, you will need to contact the Buyer/Contracting Officer indicated below, prior to that first submittal, in order to exchange certificates used for encryption. To insure the process is working correctly, send a test encrypted message first (without including any source selection information). Email to: Jason.Grizzard@Robins.af.mil If mailing, mail directly to:
WR-ALC/GRWKA
ATTN: Jason Grizzard 460 Richard Ray Blvd, Suite 200 Robins AFB, GA 31098-1607 If mailing, the outside envelope must be marked as follows:
NOTE: TO BE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY
The completed questionnaires should be contained in a second envelope marked with the mailing address and the following legend:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
2. We have identified subject contract(s) as relevant to this acquisition and you as our POC. As such, please take a few moments of your time to fill out the attached questionnaire and send it directly back to Robins AFB. The information contained in the completed Present/Past Performance Questionnaires is considered sensitive and cannot be released to us, the offeror. If you have any questions about the acquisition or the attached questionnaire, your questions must be directed back to the Government’s points of contact identified above. Thank you for your timely assistance.
Sincerely, [OFFEROR’S POINT OF CONTACT]
1 [2?] ATCH
Present/Past Performance Questionnaire [Client Authorization Letter(s), if applicable]
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
RFP FA8540-11-R-0004
ATTACHMENT 4
NOTE TO OFFERORS: Past performance information concerning subcontractors and teaming partners cannot be disclosed to a private party without the subcontractor's or teaming partner's consent. Because a prime contractor is a private party, the Government will need that consent before disclosing subcontractor/teaming partner past and present performance information to the prime during exchanges. In an effort to assist the Government's Past Performance Team in assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following consent form be completed by the major subcontractors/teaming partners identified in your proposal. The completed consent forms should be submitted as part of your Past Performance Volume.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SUBCONTRACTOR/TEAMING PARTNER CONSENT FORM FOR THE RELEASE OF PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION TO THE PRIME CONTRACTOR
Dear (Contracting Officer) We are currently participating as a (subcontractor/teaming partner) with (prime contractor or name of entity providing proposal) in responding to the Department of the Air Force, (location) Request for Proposal FA8540-11-R-0004 for the EA Pod Upgrade Program.
We understand that the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value in source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process we are signing this consent form to allow you to discuss our past and present performance information with the prime contractor during the source selection process.
(Signature and Title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company) Company Name:
Address:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ATTACHMENT 5
PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
RFP Number
FA8540-11-R-0004
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT YOURSELF:
Name/Signature and Role Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager): _____________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Agency or Business: ____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone No. _______________________________ FAX No. ____________________________________ Return your completed questionnaire either electronically or by mail. The completed questionnaire can be emailed to Jason.Grizzard@robins.af.mil.
If mailing, mail directly to:
WR-ALC/GRWKA
ATTN: Jason Grizzard 460 Richard Ray Blvd, Suite 200 Robins AFB, GA 31098-1607 If mailing, the outside envelope must be marked as follows:
NOTE: TO BE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND SHALL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.
Part I. SPECIFIC PROGRAM INFORMATION.
Contractor/Business: _________________________________________ CAGE Code: __________ Program Title and Brief Description: _______________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Role in the Program/Work Performed As: _____Prime _____Subcontractor _____Vendor/Supplier Contract Number: ___________________________ Number of Years?: Basic:________ Option: _________ Contract Type(s): List all applicable contract types, i.e. Firm-Fixed-Price, Time & Materials, Cost, etc.__________________________________________________________________________________________
PART II. GENERAL PROGRAM INFORMATION.
Period of Performance:
1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date _________ through ____________
2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date _________ through ____________
3. Reason for difference (if applicable): _____________________________________________________ Contract Dollar Value:
1. Original MAX Contract $ Value (assuming all options exercised): ______________________________
2. Current MAX $ Value (assuming all options exercised): _____________________________________
3. Primary Causes of Changes: ____________________________________________________________ NOTE: In Part III., should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” on page 4 of 5.
PART III. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS.
Please check the appropriate rating for each of the following questions:
N/A=Not Applicable U=Unsatisfactory M=Marginal S=Satisfactory V=Very Good E=Exceptional
| N/A |
| U |
| M |
| S |
| V |
| E |
1. Extent to which Company’s products and/or services met the specification /performance requirements:
2. Configuration Management (first product delivered same as last):
3. Quality of Completed Product:
4. Overall management of subcontracting efforts:
5. Quality of Technical Manuals or Commercial Manuals:
6. Customer’s Satisfaction with warranty response times and corrective actions:
7. Adequate Number of Dedicated Resources For Your Program:
8. Timely recognition and notification of administrative, engineering, production, problems affecting the program:
9. Company performed independently without significant customer direction/oversight?
10. Utilization of Critical Technology Elements with appropriate technology readiness levels:
11. Implementation of reliability and maintainability requirements:
12. Monitoring of Program Schedules and Critical Milestones:
| N/A |
| U |
| M |
| S |
| V |
| E |
13. Completed Work on Time:
14. Company demonstrated positive responsiveness to unscheduled requirements or contract changes:
15. Has action been initiated to cancel or terminate the contract for default? If yes, explain. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
16. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.
17. Describe the contractor’s or company’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
18. If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
19. Do you feel you “got what you paid for”? Please explain. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
20. Additional Remarks.
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
RFP NUMBER FA8540-11-R-0004
PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM
E EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.
NOTICE TO QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONDENTS: Please do not include this page when returning the completed questionnaire.
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
RFP FA8540-11-R-0004
ATTACHMENT 6
CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX
TECHNICAL
RQMTS
| CLIN |
| Section |
L Section M
| CDRL |
| Proposal (Offeror Completes) |
DOC
| SPEC para 3.2.1.3.2 |
| 0001 |
| D.4.B.1 |
| 2.A.I.1 |
| N/A |
| SPEC para 3.2.1.3.4 |
| 0001 |
| D.4.B.1 |
| 2.A.I.1 |
| N/A |
| SPEC para 3.2.1.3.6 |
| 0001 |
| D.4.B.1 |
| 2.A.I.1 |
| N/A |
| SPEC para 3.2.1.4 |
| 0001 |
| D.4.B.1 |
| 2.A.I.1 |
| N/A |
| SPEC para 3.2.1.4.1 |
| 0001 |
| D.4.B.1 |
| 2.A.I.1 |
| N/A |
| SPEC para 3.2.1.4.2 |
| 0001 |
| D.4.B.1 |
| 2.A.I.1 |
| N/A |
| SPEC para 3.2.4.2 |
| 0001 |
| D.4.B.2 |
| 2.A.I.2 |
| N/A |
| SPEC para 3.2.4.3 |
| 0001 |
| D.4.B.2 |
| 2.A.I.2 |
| N/A |
| SPEC para 3.2.6.1 |
| 0001 |
| D.4.B.2 |
| 2.A.I.2 |
| N/A |
| SPEC para 3.2.6.2 |
| 0001 |
| D.4.B.2 |
| 2.A.I.2 |
| N/A |
| PWS para 4.16.6 |
| 0006 |
| D.4.B.3 |
| 2.A.I.3 |
| A0AC |
| PWS para 4.16.5 |
| 0006 |
| D.4.B.4 |
| 2.A.I.4 |
| A0AB |
The purpose of the cross reference matrix is to show critical interrelationships and dependencies among the technical requirements document (Performance Work Statement (PWS), EA PUP System Specification), the Contract Line Item Number (CLIN), the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL), Section L (Instructions to Offerors) and Section M (Evaluation Basis for Award). This matrix is a tool which helps ensure all the evaluation criteria and proposal submittal requirements identified in the solicitation have been responded to. The offeror shall fill out the cross reference matrix indicating where in their proposal the information can be found. Failure by the offeror to complete the matrix will result in the offeror being considered as failing to meet the RFP terms and conditions.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .