120179-_Responses_to_Bidder_RFIs.pdf
PDF 10 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Construct Addition to Bldg 651 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8501-15-R-0008
About this file
RFI Answers
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q A_27_May_15.pdf | ||
| FA8501-15-R-0008_Bldg_651_Amendment_0001.pdf | ||
| Bldg_651.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Bldg_651_Site_Visit_List_of_Attendees.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_1_B651_Appendix_1_Drawings.pdf | ||
| FA8501-15-R-0008_Bldg_651_FINAL.pdf.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_B651_Final_Submittal_Drawings.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3_120179_-_Building_651_Final_Specs_10-24-14.pdf | ||
| Attachment_4_BASE_FACILITY_STANDARDS_22_Nov_2013.pdf | ||
| Attachment_6_120179_-_App_C_UHHZ_120179.pdf | ||
| Attachment_7_Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment_8_DAFARS_252.209-7992.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
UHHZ130207, B2390 Addition
Revision 1 (Addendum) Page 1 of 2
21 May 2015
BIDDER RFI RESPONSES
FOR
PROJECT UHHZ 120179
CONSTRUCT ADDITION TO B651
Responses to bidder RFIs for the above project are as follows:
1. Will the seismic design criteria indicated on sheet S-101 of Project UHHZ 080356
Building 651 be acceptable for use in the analysis and design of the building addition?
Govt. Response: The original project was constructed 5+ yrs ago and the criteria may no longer be valid. The seismic design criteria will be the current criteria required by the
UFCs and IBC (your design A-E will verify requirements).
2. We respectfully ask that the bid due date be postponed to May 29 due to the holiday and
D/B projects take a little more time to estimate as basic drawings need to be produced for competitive estimate?
Govt. Response: The date will be extended to May 29, same time.
3. Are the insulation requirements for the addition the same as the existing building?
Govt. Response: The insulation requirements are identified in Section 01020, 7.2.3.
4. Can the Government provide flow test from the nearest Fire Hydrant for preliminary design and job costing?
Govt. Response: Yes, see attached.
5. Will a project sign be required with job information and if so, will a rendering of the addition be required?
Govt. Response: No to both questions.
6. Will a UL certification be required for the lightning protection? Or will a UL letter of acceptance be acceptable?
UHHZ130207, B2390 Addition
Revision 1 (Addendum) Page 2 of 2
Govt. Response: No, full certification will be required (Section 01020, 10.7).
7. Is the existing lightning protection up to code?
Govt. Response: For the purposes of the bid, contractors shall assume that the existing system meets the codes. Contractor will perform testing to verify adequacy of the existing system prior to the start of work.
8. Are any contaminated soils expected in the area of construction?
Govt. Response: Soil report by Thompson Engineering was included as a part of the specifications. Refer to pg. 4-1 (pdf pg. 89 of 236) for results.
9. Is cathodic protection required for underground metal piping at Robins AFB?
Govt. Response: Per Section 01020, paragraph 9.3 (pdf pg. 36 of 236), yes.
--- END ---
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .