Sec_L_-_ALQ-213_CM_Assy_and_NVIS_faceplate_FINAL_Rev_00.docx
DOCX document 49 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Countermeasures Assembly and Night vision Imaging System Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8232-17-R-3031
About this file
SECTION L
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FD2020-17-51664
3 August 2017, Rev 00
SECTION L
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO)
F-16 ALQ-213 INTEGRATION
SOURCE SELECTION
PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES
The Government intends to select one small business contractor for the ALQ-213 Integration program. However, the Government reserves the right to award no contract if the Source Selection Authority (SSA) determines it is in the Government's best interest. The SSA will consider the Government's expected volume of work, available funding, adequate competition, and the availability of best value proposals. The Government reserves the right to award this contract without discussions.
Budget/Funding Information – Funding will be obligated on each task order awarded under the basic contract.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as specific instructions on format and content. The Offeror's proposal shall include all data and information requested and shall be submitted in accordance with these instructions. Any Offeror who submits an incomplete package may be considered non-responsive and eliminated from the competition. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Statement of Work (SOW), Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs), and Model Contract. Non-conformance with these instructions may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.
The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal shall not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the Offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the proposal.
Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.
The proposal acceptance period is specified in Block 12 of Section A (front page) of the model contract/solicitation. Offerors providing less than the specified calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due may be considered non-responsive and may be eliminated.
In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the Offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.
Point of Contact – The Contracting Officer (CO) is the sole point of contact for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns you may have to the CO. Written requests for clarification may be sent to the CO at the address below:
AFLCMC/WWMK
Attn: Daniel E. Olsen 6072 Fir Ave Bldg 1233 Hill AFB, UT 84056 Office (801) 775-5189 Daniel.Olsen@us.af.mil
Pre Award Debriefings - The CO will promptly notify Offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range, whereupon they may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505.
Post Award Debriefings - The CO will notify unsuccessful Offerors in the competitive range of the source selection decision in accordance with FAR 15.506. Upon such notification, unsuccessful Offerors may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors desiring debriefing must make their request in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.
Discrepancies – If an Offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the Offeror shall immediately notify the CO in writing with supporting rationale. The Offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions.
Electronic Reference Documents – All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website at http://www.fedbizopps.gov. Potential Offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.
Oral Presentation – Oral presentations will not be allowed.
Amendments to Solicitation – If this Request for Proposal (RFP) is amended, all terms and conditions that are not amended remain unchanged. Offerors shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment to this request by the date and time specified in the amendment(s) by signing and returning the front page of each.
Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal of Proposals
Proposals and modifications to proposals shall be submitted in both paper and electronic media to the address located in paragraph 2.6 of this document, showing the time and date specified for receipt, the solicitation number, and the name and address of the Offeror. Late proposals will only be considered IAW FAR 15.208.
Acceptable evidence to establish the time of receipt at the Government installation includes the time/date stamp of that installation on the proposal wrapper, other documentary evidence of receipt maintained by the installation, or oral testimony or statements of Government personnel.
Proposals may be withdrawn by written notice received at any time before award. Proposals may also be withdrawn in person by an Offeror or an authorized representative, if the identity of the person requesting the withdrawal is established and the person signs a receipt for the proposal before award.
Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits
The title page of each volume must show:
Solicitation Number
Company name, address, cage code and DUNS
Primary point of contact name, telephone number and email address
Volume number and name (e.g. Volume II, Cost/Price) and copy number (i.e. Original, copy 1, copy 2, etc.)
The Offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Proposal Organization table below. The titles and contents of the volumes shall be as defined in this table, all of which shall be within the required page limits and with the number of copies specified. The volumes identified in the table shall be separately bound in three-ring, loose-leaf binders. The contents of each proposal volume are described in the ITO paragraph as noted in the table below.
Table 1 - Proposal Organization
| VOLUME |
| SECTION L PARAGRAPH # |
| TITLE |
| COPIES |
| PAGE LIMIT |
| I |
| 3.0 |
| Technical Capability |
| Original plus 1 Hardcopy, and 2 CDs |
| 50 |
| II |
| 4.0 |
| Complete Model Contract/Contract Documentation |
· Include TEP Worksheet
| Original plus 1 Hardcopy, and 1 CD |
| Unlimited |
Page Limitations – Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal. Page limitations may be placed on responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) if applicable. The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the Offerors. Each page shall be counted except the following: blank pages, title pages, tables of contents, tabs, glossaries, Cross Reference Matrix, and those noted in the Proposed Organization Table as “Unlimited.”
Pricing Information – All pricing information shall be addressed ONLY in the Price Volume.
Cross Referencing
Each volume shall be written on a standalone basis so that its contents may be evaluated without cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation that is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted.
The Offeror shall fill out a cross reference matrix in the format below, indicating the proposal reference information as it relates to the Section L – Instructions to Offerors, and Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award. This shall be included in the Technical Volume (Volume I). The cross reference matrix addresses each requirement within the SOW and subfactors. The Offeror shall fill in each section independently labeled with the appropriate paragraph number or page number from their proposal that addresses the requirement or subfactor.
Table 2 – Sample Cross Reference Matrix
| Document / Requirement |
| Section L |
| Section M |
| SOW |
| Proposal |
| Technical Factors/Req |
| Sect. 3 |
| Sect. 2.2 |
| Sect. 3.1, 3.2 |
| WBS |
| Sect. 3.3 |
| Sect. 2.2.5 |
| N/A |
| Schedule |
| Sect. 3 & 4.3.1 |
| Sect. 2.2.5 |
| Sect. 5 |
| Price/Cost Factor |
| Sect. 4.2 |
| Sect. 2.3 |
| N/A |
| CDRLs |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| Sect. 4 |
Indexing
Each volume shall contain a detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections.
Include an indexed list of Tables and Figures. Tables and Figures do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.
Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms – Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.
Page Size and Format
A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. Page size shall be 8.5 x 11 inches, not including foldouts, and printed on both sides. Sheets shall be double-sided which will count as two pages. Except for the reproduced sections of the solicitation document, the text shall be Times New Roman and font size shall be no less than 12 points and lines shall be single spaced. Tracking, kerning, and leading values shall not be changed from the default values of the word processing or page layout software. Use at least 1 inch margins on the top, bottom, and side. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume. These page format restrictions shall also apply to responses to ENs if applicable. These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals.
Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible and shall not exceed 11 by 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume, be printed only on one side, and count as a single page. Foldout pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams and schematics; not for pages of text. For tables, charts, graphs and figures, the text shall be no smaller than 10 point. These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals.
Binding and Labeling – Each volume of the proposal should be provided separately in black or white three-ring loose-leaf binders large enough to permit the volume to lie flat when open. Staples shall not be used. The outside of each binder shall include a cover sheet, clearly marked as to volume number and title, copy number, solicitation identification and the Offeror's name. The same identifying data should be placed on the spine of each binder. Be sure to apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(e), Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data, and 3.104-4, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information.
Electronic Offers – The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. In the event there is a discrepancy between the hard copy and electronic copy, the hard copy shall take precedence. For electronic copies, indicate on each CD the volume number and title. Use separate files for each volume to permit rapid location of all portions, including subfactor required plans, exhibits, annexes, and attachments, if any. The Offeror shall submit Volumes I and II in electronic format, using read only CDs (i.e. CD-R). Re-writable CDs (i.e. CD-RW) shall NOT be used. Each volume shall be on a separate CD. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included. The electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by Adobe Acrobat PDF, and/or Microsoft (MS) Word 2013, MS Excel 2013, MS-Project 2016 and MS-Power Point 2016, or later, as applicable
Distribution – The "original" proposal shall be identified. Proposals shall be addressed to the Contracting Officer and mailed or hand-delivered to:
AFLCMC/WWMK
Attn: Daniel E. Olsen 6072 Fir Ave Bldg 1233 Hill AFB, UT 84056 Office (801) 775-5189 Daniel.Olsen@us.af.mil
VOLUME I – TECHNICAL CAPABILITY
The Technical Capability Volume shall be specific and complete. Legibility, clarity and coherence are very important. Your responses will be evaluated against the Technical Subfactors defined in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award. Offerors should review Section M criteria to ensure the minimum requirements are met. Provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology you would use for accomplishing/satisfying each subfactor. It is imperative that you fully describe how you will meet the subfactor requirements. Do not simply copy and paste, rephrase or restate SOW/Technical Order language for the technical volume. The successful Offeror’s technical proposal shall be incorporated into the contract by reference.
The Offeror shall provide a Technical Proposal which includes a detailed explanation of their expertise and capabilities to perform and/or oversee the design, manufacturing, qualification testing, acceptance testing, packaging, and kitting actions required to satisfy sections 3, 4 and 5 of the SOW and Section M. The Technical Proposal is divided into the following Sub-Factors; Sub-Factor 1: Production, Facilities and Resource Capabilities, Sub-Factor 2: Program Management Approach.
1.1. Sub-factor One: Production, Facilities and Resource Capabilities
Information provided under this sub-factor is intended to provide the government with the data necessary to determine if the Offeror has the production, facilities, resources and manufacturing capabilities and processes required to meet the requirements as described in SOW section 3. The Offeror shall provide the information and artifacts necessary for the government to determine if their proposal meets the criteria as described below. The information shall include details to substantiate types of machines and resources Offeror owns or has access to perform required tasks, key elements to be addressed under this sub-factor:
End-mill machine, or drill press and water jet cutter, or 3-axis CNC Assembly tools (e.g. Rivet installation equipment and drill/driving tools) Electrical equipment to include: milliohm meter capable of measuring 2.5 Milliohms, multimeter / digital volt meter, function generator, oscilloscope and 28V power supply Equipment (e.g. Printer) and materials (e.g. Shrink tubing) capable of harness wiring identification per 16PR145 section 3.2 Crimping tools (e.g. in line-crimping tools, Daniels kit or equivalent), and soldering tools (e.g. HT900 hot air solder tool or equivalent) Dark room, photometer, microspectar lens, and foot-lambert meter or equivalent light measuring equipment.
Aerospace grade aluminum sheet and plate stock Chemical film and aerospace grade primers and paints as well as industry qualified paint facilities Assembly hardware (aerospace grade rivets/bolts/nuts/washers) SAE AS9100 certified
Sub-factor Two: Program Management Approach
The proposal shall describe the Offeror’s program management approach with the elements listed in the SOW section 3.
Information provided under this sub-factor is intended to provide the government information regarding the Offeror’s ability to plan and execute a program that meets the technical requirements defined in the SOW Section 3, and evaluation criteria located in Section M of this RFP. The key elements to be addressed:
A work break down structure (WBS) demonstrating an understanding of requirements that is consistent with all sections/deliverables identified in sections 3, 4 and 5 of the SOW.
A Schedule demonstrating completion times for milestones and deliverables defined in sections 3, 4 and 5 of the SOW. Offeror should demonstrate an understanding of the activities and tasks sufficient to account for the entire program under contract. All tasks/activities in the schedule should be logically linked together showing predecessor/successor relationships. Reference paragraph 4.3.1 for additional guidance on the Schedule.
2. VOLUME II – COMPLETE MODEL CONTRACT/CONTRACT DOCUMENTATION
Model Contract/Representations and Certifications – Provide copies in the formats and quantities identified in Table 1.
Section A – Solicitation/Contract Form: Complete blocks 12 (Offerors must input 120 days for acceptance), 15A, 15B, 16, 17 and 18 of the SF33. Signature by the Offeror on the SF33 constitutes an offer, which the Government may accept.
Section B – Supplies or Services and Costs/Prices: Do not input pricing information in Section B of the model contract. All required prices shall be proposed in the TEP Worksheet.
Section F—Deliveries or Performance: Delivery schedules are described in Section F and/or in the line item descriptions. Failure to meet required delivery will result in ineligibility for award.
Section H—Special Contract Requirements
Section I – Contract Clauses
Section K – Representations, Certifications, and other Statements of Offerors: Complete representations, certifications, acknowledgments and statements. Offeror must have filled out an online provision 52.204-08 Annual Representations and Certifications (JAN 2005), Online Reps and Certs (ORCA) at http://orca.bpn.gov. Offer shall ensure certification as a small business under NAICS 336413.
Exceptions to Solicitation Requirements – Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken. Provide rationale in support of the exception and fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, cost, and specific requirements of the solicitation. This information shall be provided in the format and content of Table 3.
Table 3 – Solicitation Exceptions
SOLICITATION
Document Page/ Paragraph Requirement/ Portion Rationale
| SOO, SOW, SPEC, Model Contract, ITO, etc. |
| Applicable Page and Paragraph Numbers |
| Identify the requirement or portion to which exception is taken |
| Describe why the requirement can/will not be met |
COST/PRICE PROPOSAL – GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
The price evaluation criteria of completeness, reasonableness, and Total Evaluated Price (TEP) as defined in Section M of the RFP will be assessed from the information provided in this volume. Offerors should review Section M criteria to ensure the minimum requirements are met.
Cost or Pricing Information Requirements – In accordance with FAR 15.402, 15.403-1(b) and 15.403-3(a), “information other than certified cost or pricing data” may be required to support price reasonableness. If after receipt of proposals, the CO determines that there is insufficient information available to determine the reasonableness of the proposed pricing the Offeror may be required to submit additional information other than certified cost or pricing data. If, during the source selection process, the CO determines that adequate competition no longer exists, then certified cost and pricing data may be required. The costs associated with preparing this data will not be reimbursed separately.
Pricing Assumptions - Summarize all significant pricing assumptions, scope limitations and/or qualifications of the Price proposal.
Estimating Techniques and Methods – Offerors shall use generally accepted estimating techniques to develop their estimates for the category rates in the TEP.
2.1. Additional Information Required
Schedule
The intent of this section is to obtain a functionally integrated understanding of the proposal with clear tracks between the technical, cost, schedule, management, etc., in a way that provides the Government confidence that the program is structured to be executable for the resources indicated. The schedule shows detailed task, logical flow, and timing of the work efforts required to complete the effort on time. The schedule tasks will be directly traceable to the WBS, SOW, and CLINs.
The Offeror shall provide a top-level schedule as part of the proposal submittal. The more detailed levels of the schedule, as well as updates, will be submitted after contract award as a CDRL deliverable. All tasks/activities in the schedule should be logically linked together showing predecessor/successor relationships. The activities and tasks will be sufficient to account for the entire program under contract. Key elements of the schedule include but are not limited to:
Milestone/Event - A specific definable accomplishment in the program/project network, recognizable at a particular point in time.
Activity or Task - A time consuming element, e.g., work in progress between interdependent events, represented in an activity box. Activities are numbered and are contained within an activity box. The left side represents the beginning of the activity, and the right side is the completion of the activity.
Duration - The length of time estimated to accomplish an activity (disregarding the “calendar impact"). Any unusual aspects of their proposed approach to the program shall also be described.
Authorized Offeror Personnel – Provide the name, title, telephone number, and email address of the company/division point of contact responsible for negotiating with the Government.
In accordance with FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting, at least 50 percent of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for employees of the concern. Submit evidence that your company will be able to comply with the limitations on Subcontracting.
Small businesses who intend to count the performance of other small businesses in meeting the 50 percent requirement, must include in their Contract Documentation Volume III, evidence of a formal/informal joint venture.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .