FA8126-12-Q-0152.pdf
PDF 239 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Ramp Gate Service Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8126-12-Q-0152
About this file
Ramp Gate Replacement Solicitation
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA8126-12-Q-0152 Amend.pdf | ||
| SOW - Ramp Gate Replacment.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OC-ALC/PKEA (CO)
TODD ALLEN/405-739-3146
3001 STAFF DR 2S76
TINKER AFB OK 73145-3303
405-739-3146
405-734-1142
UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)
11. DELIVERY FOR FOB
RFQ
SEE SCHEDULE
14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION
IFB RFP
CODE
SEE ADDENDUM
BLOCK IS MARKED
DESTINATION UNLESS
12. DISCOUNT TERMS
(No Collect Calls)
12.5m
13b. RATING
13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER
X
CODE
FA8126-12-Q-0152 23-Feb-2012
b. TELEPHONE NUMBER
405-739-3146
8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME
12:00 PM 15 Mar 2012
5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION
PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE
STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.212
(TYPE OR PRINT)
(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER) 31c. DATE SIGNED
ADDENDA ARE
26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )
22. UNIT 23. UNIT PRICE 24. AMOUNT21. QUANTITY
CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS
UNRESTRICTED
FAX:
NAICS:
TEL:
CODE 18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BYOFFEROR
SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER
17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT
BELOW IS CHECKED
TEL.
FA8126
SIZE STD:
9. ISSUED BY
FACILITY
CODE
17a.CONTRACTOR/
18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK
15. DELIVER TO CODE F3YCHT 16. ADMINISTERED BY
F3YCHT
DEBORAH HEDRICK
7447 SE 74TH ST BLDG 9001
TINKER AFB OK 73145-3354
TEL: 405-582-4717 FAX:
7. FOR SOLICITATION
INFORMATION CALL:
a. NAME
ALLEN TODD
2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER
(TYPE OR PRINT)
30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.
25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
1. REQUISITION NUMBER
19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES
SEE SCHEDULE
561621
TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND DELIVER ALL ITEMS
SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY ADDITIONAL SHEETS
SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED HEREIN.
SB
HUBZONE SB
SET ASIDE: 100 % FOR
OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30
SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS
F3YCHT2023A001
ARE NOT ATTACHED
27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED
TEL: EMAIL:
1 COPIES
(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE
SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:
.OFFER DATED YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION
28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN 29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REFERENCE
X
8(A)
SVC-DISABLED VET-OWNED SB
EMERGING SB
X
X
32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE
SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS
(CONTINUED)
SEE SCHEDULE
19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES 21. QUANTITY 22. UNIT 24. AMOUNT
PAGE 2 OF
23. UNIT PRICE
ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________
32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN
RECEIVED INSPECTED
32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT
REPRESENTATIVE
32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT
REPRESENTATIVE
32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE
37. CHECK NUMBER
FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE
36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED
CORRECT FOR
34. VOUCHER NUMBER
FINAL
33. SHIP NUMBER
PARTIAL
38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY
41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT
41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE
42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)
42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)
42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS
STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005) BACK
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.212
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION
PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE
FA8126-12-Q-0152
Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
0001 1 Lot Gate 115 at B3001 with ER System
FFP
Gate 115 at B3001 with ER System
FOB: Destination
PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: F3YCHT2023A001
NET AMT
0002 1 Lot Gate 191 at B3105 with ER System
FFP
Gate 191 at B3105 with ER System
0003 1 Lot Gate 119 at B2280 with ER System
FFP
Gate 119 at B2280 with ER System
0004 1 Lot Gate 184 at B2136 with ER System
FFP
Gate 184 at B2136 with ER System
0005 1 Lot One Year Warranty and Service
FFP
One Year Warranty and Service
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS
Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:
CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY
0001 Destination Government Destination Government
0002 Destination Government Destination Government
0003 Destination Government Destination Government
0004 Destination Government Destination Government
0005 Destination Government Destination Government
DELIVERY INFORMATION
CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC
0001 60 dys. ADC 1 F3YCHT
DEBORAH HEDRICK
7447 SE 74TH ST BLDG 9001
TINKER AFB OK 73145-3354
405-582-4717
F3YCHT
0002 60 dys. ADC 1 (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
0003 60 dys. ADC 1 (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
0004 60 dys. ADC 1 (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
0005 60 dys. ADC 1 (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
52.202-1 Definitions JAN 2012
52.204-7 Central Contractor Registration APR 2008
52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract
Awards
JUL 2010
52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Items JUN 2008
52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certification--Commercial Items NOV 2011
52.212-3 Alt I Offeror Representations and Certifications--Commercial Items
(NOV 2011) Alternate I
APR 2011
52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items JUN 2010
52.212-5 (Dev) Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement
Statutes or Executive Orders--Commercial Items (Deviation)
JAN 2012
52.222-3 Convict Labor JUN 2003
52.222-19 Child Labor -- Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies JUL 2010
52.223-3 Hazardous Material Identification And Material Safety Data JAN 1997
52.223-4 Recovered Material Certification MAY 2008
52.223-5 Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information MAY 2011
52.223-11 Ozone-Depleting Substances MAY 2001
52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging
While Driving
AUG 2011
52.225-1 Buy American Act--Supplies FEB 2009
52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases JUN 2008
52.225-18 Place of Manufacture SEP 2006
52.225-25 Prohibition on Engaging in Sanctioned Activities Relating to
Iran--Certification.
NOV 2011
52.232-15 Progress Payments Not Included APR 1984
52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--Central Contractor
Registration
OCT 2003
52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996
52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004
52.247-34 F.O.B. Destination NOV 1991
52.253-1 Computer Generated Forms JAN 1991
252.204-7004 Alt A Central Contractor Registration Alternate A SEP 2007
252.211-7003 Item Identification and Valuation JUN 2011
252.212-7001 Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement
Statutes or Executive Orders Applicable to Defense
Acquisitions of Commercial Items
DEC 2011
252.223-7001 Hazard Warning Labels DEC 1991
252.225-7001 Buy American Act And Balance Of Payments Program OCT 2011
252.225-7002 Qualifying Country Sources As Subcontractors APR 2003
252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving
Reports
MAR 2008
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
1) Basis for Contract Award
This acquisition will utilize Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) procedures.
Technical tradeoffs will not be made and no additional credit will be given for exceeding acceptability. Award will be made to the technically acceptable offeror with the lowest evaluated cost or price and whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by FAR
52.212-1 and its Addendum of this solicitation). The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined necessary by the Contracting Officer.
2) Number of Contracts to be Awarded:
The Government intends to select one contractor for this acquisition. However, the Government reserves the right not to award a contract at all, depending on the quality of the proposals and prices submitted and the availability of funds.
3) Correction Potential of Proposals:
The Government will consider throughout the evaluation, the “correction potential” of any proposal aspect evaluated as “unacceptable”. The judgment of such “correction potential” is within the sole discretion of the Government. If an aspect of an Offeror's proposal not meeting the Government's requirements is not considered correctable or if the amount of corrections needed to meet the Government requirement is impractical, the Offeror may be eliminated from the competitive range.
4) Rejection of Unreasonable Offers
The Government may reject any proposal that is evaluated to be unreasonable in terms of program commitments, including contract terms and conditions, or unreasonably high or low in cost when compared to Government estimates, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program.
5) Competitive Range Determination
During the evaluation process multiple competitive range determinations may be made that eliminate Offerors from the competition. A competitive range determination may eliminate
Offerors based on their initial proposal evaluation results, after discussions (if necessary), prior to issuance of the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) request or for efficiency. If Offerors are excluded from the competitive range they may request a debriefing IAW FAR 15.505.
6) Evaluation Factors
Evaluation factors used to evaluate each proposal:
Award will be made to the offeror proposing the combination most advantageous to the
Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors described below:
Factor 1: Technical
Factor 2: Cost/Price
7) Evaluation Methodology:
The Government will evaluate all factors concurrently for the four (4) lowest priced proposals.
Should one of those four (4) proposals not be found technically acceptable the next one (1) lowest priced offeror will be reviewed for technical acceptance. Initial ratings and evaluated price will be established for each offeror. Only those offerors determined to be technically acceptable, either initially, or as a result of discussions will be considered for award. Award will be made to the lowest evaluated priced proposal meeting the acceptability standards for the non-cost factor, Technical, and who has been determined to be responsible IAW item 10 below.
8) Factor 1 – Technical
Each proposal will be evaluated for technical acceptability based on the criteria listed below. To be determined technically acceptable at the factor level, the Offeror must meet all the criteria listed below. Failure to meet any criteria will result in an unacceptable technical rating. The technical ratings are defined as follows:
Rating Description
Acceptable The proposal meets specified minimum requirements necessary for acceptable contract performance.
Unacceptable The proposal fails to meet specified minimum requirements necessary for contract performance. Proposals with an Unacceptable rating are not awardable.
By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation technical requirements and will be determined technically acceptable. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL ADEQUACY CHECKLIST
SOW, 1.0 Program Objectives
a. Design of gate #115 located near building 3001
b. Design of gate #119 located near building 2280
c. Design of gate #184 located near building 2136
d. Design of gate #191 located near building 3105
e. Description detailing operation of gates
f. Detailed description for operation and integration of Click2Enter
System with existing DSX Access Control System
g. The Contractor will have to identify any power requirements. The government will identify location of power source. Contractor will be responsible for routing power to locations.
SOW, 8.0 References
a. Ensure industry standards and regulations are met
b. Ensure Air Force regulations are met
c. Ensure Tinker Air Force Base standards are met
Warranty:
a. The contractor shall provide a 1 year warranty on all equipment. All
Contractor or Manufactures warranty information shall be filed by the contractor in the government's name. All warranties shall be identified by product with a listing of the name and address of the company and the expiration date of the guarantee or warranty.
9) Past performance will be rated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis using the ratings in Table A-2.
Table A-2. Past Performance Evaluation Ratings
Rating Description
Acceptable Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the
Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
Unacceptable Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the
Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”
A.2.1.2.1 Aspects of Past Performance Evaluation. The past performance evaluation results is an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the solicitation requirements.
Past performance information shall be obtained from any other sources available to the Government to include, but not limited to, PPIRS or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee-Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency.
10) Factor 2 – Cost or Price
a. The offeror’s price proposal will be evaluated for award purposes by adding the total price for basic requirements (basic award) .Total Evaluated Price. Price analysis will be performed to determine the reasonableness of the offeror’s price proposal.
Reasonableness will be based on the total evaluated price. The total evaluated price will be calculated as the sum of the Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) as defined in the solicitation.
b. Unreasonably Low Costs or Prices. Unreasonably low proposed costs or prices, initially or subsequently, may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that the offeror does not understand the requirement or the offeror has made an unreasonable proposal.
c. Unbalanced Pricing. Offerors are cautioned against submitting an offer that contains unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing may increase performance risk and could result in payment of unreasonably high prices. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. The Government shall analyze offers to determine whether they are unbalanced with respect to separately priced line items. Offers that are determined to be unbalanced may be rejected if the contracting officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.
11) Determination of Contractor Responsibility.
To be eligible for award, an offeror must be determined responsible. A Determination of
Contractor Responsibility will be conducted in accordance with FAR 9.1. The government will assure that the contractor is certified in CCR, ORCA and EPLS.
12) Discussions
The Government intends to award without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if necessary. Therefore, it is imperative that Offerors submit their best terms initially. However, if, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, Offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs), and the
Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the SS decision. If a Request for
FPR is issued, offeror responses to ENs Notices must be included in the FPR in order to be considered in the final evaluation.
13) Solicitation Requirements – Terms and Conditions
Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and mission requirements, in addition to those identified as factors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the
Offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. In the case that a discrepancy exists between the Instruction to Offerors (ITO) and the Evaluation Factors for
Award, the evaluation criteria in 52.212-2 will take precedence.
(b) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.
Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
(End of provision)
52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)
This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):
http://farsite.hill.af.mil
(End of provision
252.232-7003 ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PAYMENT REQUESTS AND RECEIVING REPORTS
(MAR 2008)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--
(1) Contract financing payment and invoice payment have the meanings given in section 32.001 of the Federal
Acquisition Regulation.
(2) Electronic form means any automated system that transmits information electronically from the initiating system to all affected systems. Facsimile, e-mail, and scanned documents are not acceptable electronic forms for submission of payment requests. However, scanned documents are acceptable when they are part of a submission of a payment http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ request made using Wide Area WorkFlow (WAWF) or another electronic form authorized by the Contracting
Officer.
(3) Payment request means any request for contract financing payment or invoice payment submitted by the
Contractor under this contract.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this clause, the Contractor shall submit payment requests and receiving reports using WAWF, in one of the following electronic formats that WAWF accepts: Electronic Data Interchange, Secure File Transfer Protocol, or World Wide Web input. Information regarding WAWF is available on the Internet at https://wawf.eb.mil/.
(c) The Contractor may submit a payment request and receiving report using other than WAWF only when--
(1) The Contracting Officer authorizes use of another electronic form. With such an authorization, the Contractor and the Contracting Officer shall agree to a plan, which shall include a timeline, specifying when the Contractor will transfer to WAWF;
(2) DoD is unable to receive a payment request or provide acceptance in electronic form;
(3) The Contracting Officer administering the contract for payment has determined, in writing, that electronic submission would be unduly burdensome to the Contractor. In such cases, the Contractor shall include a copy of the
Contracting Officer's determination with each request for payment; or
(4) DoD makes payment for commercial transportation services provided under a Government rate tender or a contract for transportation services using a DoD-approved electronic third party payment system or other exempted vendor payment/invoicing system (e.g., PowerTrack, Transportation Financial Management System, and Cargo and
Billing System).
(d) The Contractor shall submit any non-electronic payment requests using the method or methods specified in
Section G of the contract.
(e) In addition to the requirements of this clause, the Contractor shall meet the requirements of the appropriate payment clauses in this contract when submitting payments requests.
(End of clause)
5352.201-9101 OMBUDSMAN (AUG 2005) (AFFARS)
(a) An ombudsman has been appointed to hear and facilitate the resolution of concerns from offerors, potential offerors, and others for this acquisition. When requested, the ombudsman will maintain strict confidentiality as to the source of the concern. The existence of the ombudsman does not affect the authority of the program manager, contracting officer, or source selection official. Further, the ombudsman does not participate in the evaluation of proposals, the source selection process, or the adjudication of protests or formal contract disputes. The ombudsman may refer the party to another official who can resolve the concern.
(b) Before consulting with an ombudsman, interested parties must first address their concerns, issues, disagreements, and/or recommendations to the contracting officer for resolution. Consulting an ombudsman does not alter or postpone the timelines for any other processes (e.g., agency level bid protests, GAO bid protests, requests for debriefings, employee-employer actions, contests of OMB Circular A-76 competition performance decisions).
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a076/a76_rev2003.pdf
(c) If resolution cannot be made by the contracting officer, concerned parties may contact the Center/MAJCOM ombudsmen, Business & Mission Support Division Chief, Directorate of Contracting, OC-ALC/PKC, Tinker AFB
OK 73145, Phone: 405-736-3273. Concerns, issues, disagreements, and recommendations that cannot be resolved at the MAJCOM/DRU level, may be brought by the concerned party for further consideration to the Air Force ombudsman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary (ADAS) (Contracting), SAF/AQC, 1060 Air Force Pentagon, Washington DC 20330-1060, phone number (703) 588-7004, facsimile number (703) 588-1067.
(d) The ombudsman has no authority to render a decision that binds the agency.
(e) Do not contact the ombudsman to request copies of the solicitation, verify offer due date, or clarify technical requirements. Such inquiries shall be directed to the Contracting Officer.
(End of clause)
TAFB 100-16. WAWF DODAAC AND EMAIL DISTRIBUTION TABLE (COMBO)
In order to properly transmit your invoices electronically using WAWF https://wawf.eb.mil
<https://wawf.eb.mil/> you must insert the following codes in order to transmit through the system each invoice:
Invoice Type: INVOICE AND RECEIVING REPORT (COMBO)
*Contract Number: SEE BLOCK 2
*Delivery Order:
*Issue Date: SEE BLOCK 3
*Issue DODAAC: FA8126
*Admin DODAAC: FA8126
Inspected By DODAAC/Ext: SAME AS SHIP TO
*Ship To Code/Ext:
Ship From Code:
LPO DODAAC/Ext:
*Pay DODAAC: F03000
ADDITIONAL EMAIL NOTIFICATIONS:
1. dana.burge@tinker.af.mil
2. jay.palmer@tinker.af.mil
3. christopher.allen@tinker.af.mil
4.
5.
6.
Payments may be expedited electronically via the Internet through the Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) system.
WAWF may be accessed at https://wawf.eb.mil.
WAWF Training may be accessed online at http://www.wawftraining.com.
Payment information may be accessed using the DFAS website at https://www.dfas.mil. Your purchase order/contract number or invoice will be required to inquire status of your payment.
https://wawf.eb.mil/ https://wawf.eb.mil/
TAFB 100-17. “TRUCK ENTRY GATE” NOTICE
IMPORTANT DELIVERY INFORMATION
Tinker Air Force Base has constructed a “Truck Entry Gate” (Gate 33), which is located at the corner of 59th Street and Air Depot Blvd (southwest corner of the base). The gate will be opened beginning 15 September 2004.
Gate 33 shall be used for all deliveries by truck to this base.
(Trucks will not be allowed to gain access through any other gate.)
Since your firm’s delivery on this order is affected, please advise your delivery carrier to use the new gate. This should minimize the impact of your delivery.
DELIVERIES TO BUILDING 3001 (B / 3001)
Be advised that delivery vehicles destined for B / 3001 are prohibited from using “Staff Drive”.
Delivery vehicles may make deliveries only in designated unloading areas.
Since your firm’s delivery may be affected, ensure that your delivery carrier receives proper instructions on delivery / unloading requirements for B / 3001. Unloading in designated unloading areas will minimize any inconvenience, and, attendant ramifications, which may accrue, to your delivery / delivery carrier for failure to adhere to this requirement.
TAFB 100-18. IMPORTANT DELIVERY INFORMATION
If Block 15 “Deliver To”, Page 1 of the Standard Form 1449, directs delivery to the “Transportation Officer, BLDG
506, Door 22” be advised of the following:
1. All deliveries to Building 506, Door 22, will require appointments twenty-four (24) hours in advance. Any unscheduled delivery will be refused. Additionally, any carrier that arrives late may, at the receiving personnel’s discretion, be required to reschedule the appointment or wait for an available time slot the same day. No redelivery charges will be paid for rescheduled appointments. Delivery hours are Monday through Friday
7:00 AM (0700 Hours) – 1:00 PM (1300 Hours), excluding holidays, for local LTL carriers.
2. Carriers assigned standing appointments will be required to call for any additional deliveries (more than one per day). Delivery appointments will be made by contacting (405) 739-2349 from 7:00 AM (0700 Hours) – 3:00
PM (1500 Hours) Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. When calling for a delivery appointment, please specify trailer size, indicate whether load is palletized, and all pertinent information regarding the load (i.e., hazardous, explosives, oversized cargo, specialized, etc.). Carriers will ensure that all material to be delivered to the
Building 506 receiving dock is tailgated/staged to the back of the trailer, any failure to comply with this request will cause the carrier to be turned away and their appointment will be rescheduled.
3. Delivery hours for long-haul drivers and air freight 7:00 AM – 6:00 PM. Should a long haul driver arrive after hours indicated above, the driver shall call the DDOO ESOC (405) 739-2488, 730-5612, and 739-5613 for delivery instructions.
TAFB 300-9. Material Safety Data Sheet Mailing Instructions
Vendor shall mail MSDS to:
ATTN: Don Riddle
72 AMDS/SGPB
BIOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
8941 ENTRANCE ROAD A STE 266
TINKER AFB OK 73145-3339
ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MUST BE LABELED AS SPECIFIED IN 29 CFR 1910.1200.
NOTE: ***********************************************************************
MSDS must be sent five (5) days prior to shipment of material. The Government may withhold payment if MSDS is not received.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .