Solicitation Amendment FA812524R00040001 SF 30.pdf
PDF 590 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AUSS Mobile System Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA812524R0004
About this file
This document is a solicitation notice for an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity procurement of mobile automated ultrasonic scanning systems to be delivered to Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma. The Air Force Materiel Command Air Force Sustainment Center is seeking quotes by the closing date stated on page 1 of the solicitation for mobile systems that can perform ultrasonic scanning in accordance with the Statement of Work. Quotes should include pricing on pages 4-5 along with net amount and delivery times. Offerors must complete all fill-in provisions and clauses as identified, and provide a written statement explaining how their system will meet the technical requirements specified in clause 52.212-2. Any questions must be submitted in writing two days prior to the closing date.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Amendment - FA812524R00040001.pdf | ||
| SOW_AUSS Mobile System_21Dec2023.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA812524R0004.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
R
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER
NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
16C. DATE SIGNED
Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
CODE FACILITY CODE
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
The purpose of this Amendment is to update the minimum and maximum quantities, update Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):
Clause 52.212-2, and extend the closing date.
FIRST: The min and max quantities are hereby updated.
FROM: Minimum quantity of 5 TO: Minimum quantity of 1 FROM: Maximum quantity of 10 TO: Maximum quantity of 15
SECOND: Update the Technical Evaluation Criteria located in Clause 52.212-2.
THIRD: Extend the closing date as follows:
FROM: 22 January 2024, 12:00 pm CST TO: 29 February 2024, 12:00 pm CST
FOURTH: All other terms and conditions remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
Solicitation/Contract Form
The following changes have been made:
INFORMATION FROM TO
Response Due Date 22 Jan 2024 29 Feb 2024
Supplies or Services & Prices or Costs
Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:
This solicitation/contract is issued in accordance with FAR 6.302-1 - 10 USC 2304(c)(1).
IDIQ INFORMATION
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE / LINE ITEM
Ordering Period I (Months 1-12) / 0001 - 0002 Ordering Period II (Months 13-24) / 1001 - 1002 Ordering Period III (Months 25-36) / 2001 - 2002 Ordering Period IV (Months 37-48) / 3001 - 3002
Line Item Numbers 0001 through 0002 represent items that may be acquired in the Ordering Period I. Line Item Numbers 1001 through 1002 represent items that may be acquired in the Ordering Period II. Line Item Numbers 2001 through 2002 represent items that may be acquired in the Ordering Period III. Line Item Numbers 3001 through 3002 represent items that may be acquired in the Ordering Period IV. There is no funding assigned to the Basic Contract document. Orders to the Basic Contract will be placed with fully funded Delivery Orders. The Min/Max listed in table below represents the Minimum order as referenced in clause 52.216-22. The Maximum quantity assigned to each CLIN may vary.
INFORMATION MIN / MAX
In accordance with clause 52.216-22, the quantities of supplies specified in the schedule below are estimates only and are not purchased by the basic contract. The maximum CLIN quantity and dollar value of actual awarded delivery orders may vary. The total of all delivery orders (including all ordering periods) shall not exceed the total maximum contract value stated below.
MIN/MAX QTY AND VALUES
The minimum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than quantity and contract value stated in the following table:
MIN AMOUNT: $TBD Upon Award
CLIN 0001 Mobile AUSS Min Qty: 1
FA812524R00040001
CLIN 0002 On-Site Training Min Qty: 1
The maximum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity and contract value stated in the following table:
CLIN 0001, 1001, 2001 and 3001 Mobile AUSS Max Qty: 15
CLIN 0002, 1002, 2002 and 3002 On-Site Training Max Qty: 4
MAX AMOUNT: $TBD Upon Award
ESTIMATED QUANTITY (EQ) OF ORDERS for Ordering Periods 1 - 3 are listed below in the following table.
**Quantities are subject to change between each ordering period but shall not exceed the maximum.
CLIN 0001 EQ: 4
CLIN 0002 EQ: 1
CLIN 1001 EQ: 5
CLIN 1002 EQ: 1
CLIN 2001 EQ: 3
CLIN 2002 EQ: 1
CLIN 3001 EQ: 3
CLIN 3002 EQ: 1
Evaluation Factors for Award
Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:
Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 - Evaluation Factors for Award
As prescribed in 12.301(c), the Contracting Officer may insert a provision substantially as follows:
Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible vendor whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government; price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
1. Basis for Contract Award:
The Award will be conducted and evaluated under the provisions of FAR Part 12, Commercial Items and FAR Part 13, Simplified Acquisition Procedures. Technical tradeoffs will not be made and no additional credit will be given for exceeding acceptability. Award will be made to the acceptable vendor with the lowest evaluated cost or price, which is deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation and whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements. The solicitation requirements include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by FAR 52.212-1 of this solicitation. The Government reserves the right to award without interchanges. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct interchanges if determined necessary by the Contracting Officer.
The responsible vendor(s) must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database (available at: https://www.sam.gov/portal/public /SAM/) and submit a completed copy of the Offeror Representations and Certifications - Commercial Items with their response. Lack of registration in SAM will disqualify the vendor and declare them ineligible for award.
The Oklahoma City Air Logistics Center (AFSC/PZIMA) at Tinker Air Force Base Oklahoma intends to issue a commercial firm fixed price contract for this acquisition.
2. Number of Contracts to be Awarded:
The Government intends to select one vendor for contract award. However, the Government reserves the right to award no contract at all;
depending on the quality of the proposals, prices submitted and the availability of funds, or other factors identified by the Contracting Officer.
3. Rejection of Unreasonable Offers:
The Government may reject any proposal that is evaluated to be unrealistic in terms of program commitments, including contract terms and conditions, or unrealistically high or low in cost/price when compared to Government estimates; such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program, item, or service.
4. Correction Potential of Proposals:
The Government will consider, throughout the evaluation, the "correction potential" of any proposal uncertainty. The judgment of such "correction potential" is within the sole discretion of the Government. If an aspect of a vendor's proposal not meeting the Governments requirements is not considered correctable, the vendor may be eliminated.
5. Evaluation Factors
Factor 1--Technical Proposal Factor 2--Cost/Price
a. Evaluation Methodology:
The Government will evaluate all technical factors concurrently for the three (3) lowest priced proposals. Should one of those three (3) proposals not be found technically acceptable, the next one (1) lowest priced offeror will be reviewed for technical acceptance. Then, price will be evaluated and the lowest priced proposal will be selected, either initially or as a result of clarifications.
Award will be made to the lowest evaluated priced proposal meeting the acceptability standards for the non-cost factors.
b. Technical Factor:
Acceptable - The proposal meets specified minimum technical evaluation requirements necessary for acceptable contract performance. Unacceptable - The proposal fails to meet specified minimum technical evaluation requirements necessary for contract performance. Proposals with an unacceptable rating are not awardable.
FA812524R00040001
https://www.sam.gov/portal/public
Technical acceptability will be based on an evaluation of proposals against the criteria stated below and other technical specifications in the Item Description. Offerors are required to present all the information as stated in the Instructions to Offerors, FAR 52.212-1. The minimum technical evaluation requirement is met when the Offeror's proposal thoroughly substantiates all the following essential criteria:
"CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO EXPLAIN HOW THEY ARE MEETING THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA LISTED BELOW. A STATEMENT OF "I CONCUR" OR "CONCUR" WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AND COULD DEEM YOUR PROPOSAL TECHNICALLY UNACCEPTABLE. THE WRITTEN STATEMENT IS ESSENTIAL FOR YOUR QUOTE TO BE
RESPONSIVE AND BE REFERRED FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW."
Technical Evaluation Criteria
AUSS Mobile System to include the following components:
AUSS-Mobile System PN: 15-5-A21
Variable Stroke Scanner and Track Assembly Kit PN: 15-5-A22
Transducer, 64 Element Array, 5 MHz, 0.050"P, 0.500", HW Delay, IPEX Connector, 15' Cable. PN: 99-580-S164
VACRS Array Shoe Assembly PN: 11-5-A24
Long Yoke #8-32 Mount Assy PN: 11-5-A234
AUSS, Mini MAUS Scanner PN: 15-5-A212
MAUS/AUSS , PE Ultrasonic Senor Set: 2 ea 5Mhz, 1 ea 2.25MHZ and 1 ea 10 MHZ PN: 15-5-A23
Cable Assy, AUSS Mobile IPEX to VSA Scanner 16' Long. PN: 15-510-C2141
AUSS, Resonance Sensor Set: 110kHz and 170kHz PN: 15-5-A24
AUSS, Resonance Sensor Set: 270kHz and 320kHz PN: 15-5-A25
AUSS, EDDY CURRENT SENSOR SET PN: 15-5-A26
Cable Assy, VSA Scanner to AUSS Mobile, 41Pin To Sensor PN: 15-510-C2142
AUSS Mobile, On-Site Training (4 Days) PN: Training-001
Vendor shall be a certified AUSS seller or re-seller and must send proof with proposal.
c. Cost/Price Factor:
Cost/Price Evaluation: The vendor's cost/price proposal will be evaluated for award purposes by adding the total price for basic requirements (basic award).
Total Evaluated Price: Price analysis will be performed to determine the reasonableness of the vendor's price proposal. Reasonableness will be based on the total evaluated price. The total evaluated price will be calculated as the sum of the Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) unit/extended prices plus other associated factors such as: first article testing costs, transportation costs, price evaluation adjustments for Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns, and application of labor hours to labor hour rates, etc.
Unreasonably Low Costs or Prices: Unreasonably low proposed costs or prices, initially or subsequently, may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that the offeror does not understand the requirement or the offeror has made an unrealistic proposal.
Unbalanced Pricing: Vendors are cautioned against submitting an offer that contains unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing may increase performance risk and could result in payment of unreasonably high prices. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. The Government shall analyze offers to determine whether they are unbalanced with respect to separately priced line items or subline items. Offers that are determined to be unbalanced may be rejected if the contracting officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.
6. Determination of Contractor Responsibility
To be eligible for award, a vendor must be determined responsible. A Determination of Contractor Responsibility will be conducted in accordance with FAR 9.1 (SAM and FAPIIS). A vendor who receives a determination of non-responsibility will not be eligible to receive the contract award.
7. Interchanges:
It is the Government's intent to award without interchanges; therefore, it is imperative that vendors submit their best terms initially. However, if during the evaluation period; it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold interchanges, those interchanges will be considered in making the source selection decision.
8. SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS, TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Vendors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sub-factors, and all technical specifications of the item description.
Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Vendors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. In the case that a discrepancy exist between the Instruction to Offerors (ITO) and the evaluation factors for award, the evaluation criteria in 52.212-2 will take precedence.
(End of provision)
| IDCode: |
| Page: 1 |
| Pages: 6 |
| AmendNo: 0001 |
| EffDate: 28 Feb 2024 |
| ReqNo: |
| ProjNo: |
| IssCode: FA8125 |
| AdmCode: |
| IssuedBy: FA8125 AFSC PZIMA |
3001 STAFF DR STE 2S76, CP 405 734 9107
TINKER AFB, OK 73145-3303
UNITED STATES
Linsey Laird, Email: linsey.laird@us.af.mil Telephone: 405-739-9117 AdminBy:
SCD: PAS:
| ContractorNameAdd: |
| Code: |
| FacCode: |
| SolChg: 1 |
| SolNo: FA812524R0004 |
| SolDate: 22 Dec 2023 |
| AwardChg: Off |
| AwardNo: |
| AwardDate: |
| Amended: 1 |
| OffrExt: 1 |
| OffrNoEx: Off |
| NoCopies: 1 |
| ApprData: See Section G - Contract Administration Data |
| ChgeOrd: Off |
| ChgeOrder: |
| Modify: Off |
| SuppAgre: Off |
| SuppAuth: |
| ModOthr: Off |
| OthrSpec: |
| NoReq: Off |
| Require: Off |
| Copies: |
| Descript: See Schedule |
| ContNameTitle: |
| CoNameTitle: Jason Shirazi |
| ContDate: |
| CODate: 28 Feb 2024 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .