SRD_Amendment.pdf

B-1B Bomb Rack Unit (BRU)-56

Modification Program

SYSTEMS REQUIREMENT

DOCUMENT

SUPPORTING ENGINEERING AND

MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PHASE

September 5, 2018 ii

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

i

B-1B BRU-56 Modification Program

Systems Requirement Document

Supporting Engineering and Manufacturing

Development Phase

September 5, 2018

SUBMITTED BY

Elizabeth N. Blanche David E. Bourbonnais II

BRU-56 Program Engineer (AFLCMC/WWDNB) BRU-56 Program Manager (AFLCMC/WWDP)

APPROVAL

Jeffrey G. Vaughn Lance B. Reynolds, Col, USAF

B-1 Chief Engineer (AFLCMC/WWD) B-1/B-52 System Program Manager (AFLCMC/WWD) ii

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

iii

CHANGE HISTORY

Change Version Date

INITIAL RELEASE 1.0 2/1/2018

AMENDMENT I 2.0 9/5/2018

iv

CONTENTS

Contents

1 SCOPE

1.1 Program Description

1.2 Program Status

2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

2.1 Government Documents

2.1.1 Specifications, Standards, and Handbooks

2.1.2 USAF Publications

2.1.3 Other Government Documents, Drawings, and Publications

2.2 Order of Precedence

3 REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Operations

3.1.1 Peacetime Operations

3.1.2 Wartime Operations

3.1.3 Operational Requirements

3.2 System Capability Requirements

3.2.1 Weapon Carriage and Release

3.2.2 Flight Limits for Safe Carriage, Employment, and Jettison

3.2.3 Weapons Carriage

3.2.4 Profile

3.2.5 Weapon Load Time

3.2.6 Mission Support

3.2.7 Aircraft Software

3.2.8 System Modifications

3.3 Mission Planning

3.3.1 Software

3.4 Cybersecurity

3.4.1 AFI 17-100 Cyber

3.4.2 Security Controls

3.5 Weapon/Data Bus Interface

3.6 Logistics

3.6.1 Support Equipment

v

3.6.2 Availability

3.6.3 Reliability

3.6.4 Compatibility with Existing MPRL

3.6.5 Technical Data

3.6.6 Training Equipment

3.6.7 Training

3.7 Human Systems Integration

3.7.1 Manpower & Personnel

3.7.2 Human Factors Engineering, Safety, and Occupational Health

3.8 Aircraft Requirements

3.8.1 Survivability

3.8.2 Electromagnetic Interface/Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMI/EMC)

3.8.3 Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health (ESOH)

3.8.4 Failure Modes and Effects Criticality Analysis (FMECA)

3.8.5 Environmental Qualification

3.8.6 Hazards to Electronic Ordinance (HERO) Qualification

4 VERIFICATION PROVISIONS

4.1 Verification Methods

4.1.1 Demonstration

4.1.2 Test

4.1.3 Analysis

4.1.4 Inspection

4.1.5 Special Verification Methods

5 REQUIREMENTS TRACEABILITY MATRIX

6 ACRONYMS

7 APPENDIX

1 SCOPE

1.1 Program Description

The Air Force requires additional capabilities for the BRU-56 as part of the B-1 Bomber mission requirements. The BRU-56 was originally designed to carry nuclear weapons with 30-inch lug spacing. Certain safety and functional issues have arisen over the years with existing racks, requiring modification to correct. Furthermore, additional munitions capability and flexibility, operational reliability and effectiveness, and reduced total ownership cost (RTOC) are needed.

A modification and upgrade to the BRU-56 ejector rack on the Multi-Purpose Rotary Launcher

(MPRL), to include 14-inch lug spacing capability, would contribute to increased safety, quicker sortie generation rates, lower maintenance time, increased reliability, and lower maintenance personnel requirements.

The BRU-56 Modification program modifies the B-1B BRU-56 Line Replaceable Unit (LRU) hardware and aircraft software. These modifications will ensure increased capability to carry 14 and 30-inch weapons on the bomb rack in a mixed load configuration in all 3 bays, with the ability to drop them in any sequence.

1.2 Program Status

The BRU-56 Modification program is in pre-award.

2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

2.1 Government Documents

2.1.1 Specifications, Standards, and Handbooks

Document Date Title

MIL-HDBK-516C 12 Dec 2014 Air Worthiness Certification Criteria

MIL-STD-882E 11 May 2012 Department of Defense Standard Practice for System

Safety

MIL-STD-1760 24 Oct 2007 Aircraft/Store Electrical Interconnection System

MIL-STD-1553 30 Apr 1978 Aircraft Internal Time Division Command/Response

Multiplex Data Bus

MIL-STD-2088 29 May 2007 Bomb Rack Unit (BRU) Aircraft

MIL-STD-461G 2 Mar 2015 Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics

Requirements for Equipment

MIL-STD-464 1 Dec 2010 Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Requirements for

Systems

MIL-STD-38784 25 Aug 2011 Standard Practice for Manuals, Technical: General Style and Format Requirements

2.1.2 USAF Publications

Document Date Title

1B-1B-2-94GS-00 1 Feb 2017 Technical Manual, Weapons

1B-1B-33-2-1 1 Jun 2014 Technical Manual, Nonnuclear Munitions Loading

Procedures

11B29-3-75-2 15 November 2017 Technical Manual, Operation and Maintenance

Instructions with Illustrated Parts Breakdown, Aircraft

Ejector Bomb Rack (Ejector Rack) BRU-56/A, PN

L641031

00-5-1 14 Jun 2016 AF Technical Order System

AFI 63-101/20-

16 Sep 2016 Integrated Life Cycle Management

AFI 63-104 21 Jan 2005 The SEEK EAGLE Program

AFI 21-101 21 May 2015 Aircraft and Equipment Maintenance Management

DoDI 5000.02 2 Feb 2017 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System

AFPD 90-8 14 Mar 2017 Environment, Safety & Occupational Health

Management and Risk Management

AFI 17-100 2 Feb 2017 Risk Management Framework (RMF) for Air Force

Infromation Technology (IT)

2.1.3 Other Government Documents, Drawings, and Publications

Document Date Title

L6410301-081 BRU-56/A Aircraft Ejector Bomb Rack, NSN:

1095014120831MW, Drawings and Associated Data

List

L6314022 14-inch Ejector Rack Hook Drawings/List

CP2569A06 Part I 2 Nov 1999 Specification for Rack, Ejector, 30-inch

CP2569A06 Part II 2 Nov 1999 Prime Item Product Fabrication Specification for Rack, Ejector, 30-inch

CP2569A04 Part I 18 Jan 1985 Specification for Rack, Ejector, 14-inch ejector rack specification

CP2569A04 Part II 14 Nov 1985 Prime Item Product Fabrication Specification for Rack, Ejector, 14-inch

GS2569A05B 24 Feb 1983 General Specification for Thermodynamic

Environment Design and Test Criteria

GS2569A03C 26 Jan 2016 General Specification for Vibration, Acoustic Noise, Shock and Acceleration Criteria

SS2569A01C 30 Sep 2014 B-1 Systems Specification

Program Protection

Plan

July 2017 B-1 Weapon System Protection Plan

Cybersecurity

Strategy

September 2017 Cybersecurity Strategy B-1 Weapon System Platform, Version 1.0

B-1 Lancer Weapon

System Security

Plan

12 Dec 2017 System Security Plan for the B-1

BRU-56 SPI BRU-56 Special Packaging Instructions

2.2 Order of Precedence

Unless otherwise noted herein or in the contract, in the event of a conflict between the text of this document and the references cited herein, the text of this document takes precedence. Nothing in this document, however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations unless a specific exemption has been obtained.

3 REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Operations

3.1.1 Peacetime Operations

During peacetime operations, the BRU-56 shall be utilized for the following:

Testing

Training

Familiarization

Proficiency

These operations ensure the availability of BRU-56 to its fullest capabilities during wartime operations.

3.1.2 Wartime Operations

The BRU-56 shall be able to utilize mixed loads of 14 and 30-inch weapons in all 3 weapons bays during wartime operations.

3.1.3 Operational Requirements

The BRU-56 shall be utilized by all operational B-1B units performing a conventional weapon mission.

3.1.3.1 Lethality

The BRU-56 shall not degrade B-1 lethality. The BRU-56 provides mission lethality as a function of the specific weapon employment. Specific weapon lethality is contained within the weapon requirements documents.

3.2 System Capability Requirements

The BRU-56 shall carry/employ all weapon and weapon variants identified in 3.2.1. The BRU-56 shall meet SEEK EAGLE certification in accordance with (IAW) AFI 63-104. The BRU-56 shall be interoperable with the Multi-purpose rotary launcher (MPRL). Hardware (H/W) and software

(S/W) solutions shall be analyzed, considered, and recommended to meet the requirements for successful aircraft integration.

3.2.1 Weapon Carriage and Release

3.2.1.1 Cluster Munitions Carriage Analysis and Safe Separation

The BRU-56 shall allow for the carriage and safe release of the following cluster munitions from the B-1B weapons bay.

Cluster Bomb Unit (CBU)-87

CBU-89

CBU-103

CBU-104

CBU-105

CBU-107

3.2.1.2 500 Pound Class Carriage Analysis and Safe Separation

The BRU-56 shall allow for the carriage and safe release of the following 500 pound class weapons from the B-1B weapons bay.

Bomb Dummy Unit (BDU)-50 Air Inflatable Retarder (AIR)

BDU-50 Low Drag General Purpose (LDGP)

Mark (MK)-82 AIR

MK-82 LDGP

MK-62

Guided Bomb Unit (GBU)-38(V)1/B (MK-82 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM))

GBU-38(V)4/B (Bomb Live Unit (BLU)-126 JDAM)

GBU-38(V)5/B (BLU-129 JDAM)

GBU-54(V)1/B (MK-82 Laser Joint Direct Attack Munition (LJDAM))

GBU-54(V)5/B (BLU-129 LJDAM)

3.2.1.3 2000 Pound Class Carriage Analysis and Safe Separation

The BRU-56 shall allow for the carriage and safe release of the following 2000 pound class weapons from the B-1B weapons bay.

BDU-56 LDGP

BDU-56 JDAM

MK-84 LDGP

MK-84 (Inert)

GBU-31(V)1/B (MK-84 JDAM)

GBU-31(V)3/B (BLU-109 JDAM)

GBU-31(V)5/B (BLU-119 JDAM)

GBU-31(V)7/B (BLU-121 JDAM)

MK-65

3.2.1.4 Missile Carriage Analysis and Safe Separation

The BRU-56 shall allow for the carriage and safe release of the following missiles from the B-1B weapons bay.

Air-to-Ground Missile (AGM)-158A (Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM))

AGM-158B (Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile Extended Range (JASSM-ER))

AGM-158C (Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM))

AGM-158D (JASSM-ER+) **This weapon variation has not fielded yet, but will field prior to BRU-56 Modification completion, creating a threshold requirement.

3.2.2 Flight Limits for Safe Carriage, Employment, and Jettison

The BRU-56 shall maintain Operational Safety, Suitability, and Effectiveness (OSS&E) for the B-

1B. The BRU-56 shall meet the following requirements for Carriage, Employment, and Jettison:

Carriage: All weapons shall be carried up to 562 Knots Calibrated Airspeed (KCAS) or 0.9 indicated Mach (M), whichever is less.

Employment: Weapon variant employment limits shall be no less than those currently authorized and dictated in the aircrew weapons delivery manual (T.O. 1B-1B-34-2-1).

Jettison: Weapon variant jettison limits shall be no less than those currently authorized and dictated in the aircrew weapons delivery manual (T.O. 1B-1B-34-2-1).

3.2.3 Weapons Carriage

Weapon employment altitudes are defined by the individual weapon variant characteristics and

Concept of Operations (CONOPS). Weapon employment maximum and minimum altitudes are defined by the aircrew weapons delivery manual (T.O. 1B-1B-34-2-1). The BRU-56 shall maintain specific carriage and employment envelopes and procedures recommended by the Air Force SEEK

EAGLE Office (AFSEO) and approved by the B-1 System Program Office (SPO) for weapon integration into the B-1B weapons bays. The weapon specific carriage and employment envelopes and procedures are determined through thorough wind tunnel testing.

3.2.3.1 Mixed Loads

The BRU-56 shall support solutions of mixed load weapon configurations in the B-1B weapons bay. Mixed load configuration is defined as a load of differing weapon families (e.g. Cluster, 500 lb, 2000 lb, Missile) and variants (e.g. BDU-56, MK-84, GBU-31) on the same launcher.

3.2.4 Profile

The BRU-56 Modification shall not move the position within the bay for which weapons currently sit. The modification shall not result in a change to weapon spacing and fit. The modification shall remain inside the existing BRU-56 envelope.

3.2.5 Weapon Load Time

Weapon load time shall not be increased from existing weapon load time IAW AFI 21-101 (load and unload: 8x JASSM = 3 hr 10 min, 8x 2000 lb class JDAM 1 hr 15 min, Alternate Mission

Equipment (AME) 45 min) on the BRU-56.

3.2.6 Mission Support

Minimize need for additional special tools and support equipment, or modifications/changes to existing support equipment. The BRU-56 shall be shipped in the existing shipping containers

IAW Special Packaging Instructions for the BRU-56.

3.2.7 Aircraft Software

The BRU-56 modification program shall modify aircraft S/W and mission data files to allow the user to command and status the weapons in the weapons bay. The BRU-56 modification operational software baseline shall be the current B-1B Sustainment Block (SB). This baseline includes all aircraft (A/C) hardware and software associated with the current SB. The BRU-56 modification shall operate with the existing aircraft data bus, status monitoring and control signals, and function in the same manner as for weapons currently loaded on the MPRL, SECBM, and

CBM-28.

3.2.8 System Modifications

The existing BRU-56 shall be modified to include the following features:

3.2.8.1 Lugs

The existing BRU-56 shall be modified to attach and employ a 14-inch lug-spaced store in addition to the existing 30-inch lugs IAW MIL-STD-2088. Each rack shall have both 14-inch and 30-inch lugs.

3.2.8.2 Hook/Latch

The existing BRU-56 mechanism shall be modified to provide an independent hook latch/close actuation, or the forward pair of hooks must latch/close independently from the aft pair of hooks.

Either option will be acceptable as long as the weapons interface is not altered or compromised.

The existing BRU-56 mechanism shall be modified to provide a dependent hook unlatch/open actuation.

3.2.8.3 Lock/Unlock Indicators

The Modified BRU-56 shall include lock/unlock indicators on the operation levers that are visible to the maintainer.

3.2.8.4 Piston Forces

The Modified BRU-56 shall include selectable forward and aft variable piston forces. The piston forces shall be selected during load only and be mechanical.

3.2.8.5 Safety Lock Solenoid

The existing BRU-56 nuclear solenoid (P/N LE458-0001-4003) shall be replaced with an equivalent function safety lock solenoid.

3.2.8.6 Locks

The Modified BRU-56 shall retain the existing BRU-56 ground safety lock mechanism for current weapons.

3.2.8.7 Sway Brace Pads

The existing BRU-56 sway brace pads shall be chamfered or edges rounded so that damage to the bombs is prevented.

3.2.8.8 Hardness

The Modified BRU-56 shall comply with the existing BRU-56 hardness critical requirements.

3.2.8.9 Hook Indicators

The Modified BRU-56 independent hook latch/close mechanism shall have viewable indicators and shall have access for tools. The Modified BRU-56 dependent hook unlatch/open mechanism shall have viewable indicators and shall have access for tools.

3.2.8.10 Fail-Safe Linkage

If the Modified BRU-56 linkage fails anytime before ejection, or during upload/download of the store; then the store shall be retained and the hooks shall remain closed.

3.3 Mission Planning

The BRU-56 modification program shall provide mission planning flexibility to effectively integrate warfighter tactics, techniques, and procedures. The BRU-56 shall ensure current munition mission planning procedures remain the same, except for the addition of showing 500 lb and CBU class munition capability on the rotary launcher. The BRU-56 Modification program shall interface with mission planning organizations to solve all mission planning related incompatibilities.

3.3.1 Software

The BRU-56 shall use the Joint Mission Planning System (JMPS) for mission planning support.

The BRU-56 shall provide mission planning for all currently supported weapons utilizing the

JMPS.

3.4 Cybersecurity

3.4.1 AFI 17-100 Cyber

The BRU-56 Modification shall be designed IAW AFI 17-100.

3.4.2 Security Controls

The BRU-56 modification shall satisfy the tailored BRU-56 Security Controls Traceability Matrix as approved by the B-1 SPO.

3.5 Weapon/Data Bus Interface

The BRU-56 shall utilize the existing MIL-STD-1553 and MIL-STD-1760 interfaces.

3.6 Logistics

3.6.1 Support Equipment

The BRU-56 shall use existing common and B-1 peculiar support equipment and minimize the development of new specific support equipment. The BRU-56 support equipment shall be deployable and mobile within maintenance facilities.

3.6.2 Availability

The BRU-56 shall follow the same maintenance cycle of current racks IAW 11B29-3-75-2. The

BRU-56 shall have a materiel availability of 84% and an operational availability of 98%.

Materiel Availability o 1044 racks will be modified o 1028 racks will be utilized with 16 as spares o 24 racks per jet o 36 combat jets o 1028/24 = 42.8 o 36/42.8 = 0.84

Operational Availability o 2 years = 104 weeks o 2 years between 2 week backshop time o Available 102/104 weeks = 0.98

3.6.3 Reliability

The modified BRU-56 shall not degrade reliability of the existing rack.

The BRU-56 shall have a minimum Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) of 1300 hours, with a reliability of 99%.

The BRU-56 shall have a MTBF of 1300 hours. None of the new items in the modification shall have an individual reliability of less than 99%. The probability of success is determined by where t = planning factor sortie duration:

R_M = e(-t/MTBF) = e(-13 hrs/1300 hrs) = 0.990

3.6.4 Compatibility with Existing MPRL

The modified BRU-56 shall not require any alterations to the MPRL.

3.6.5 Technical Data

The BRU-56 shall be maintained with modified technical data. Technical data is required to support all phases of system operations, to include storage, inspection, testing, repair, transportation, delivery, loading, unloading, and Explosive Ordinance Disposal (EOD) procedures.

The BRU-56 technical data shall support the system throughout all life cycle phases and includes

T.O.s, Flight Manuals, Job Guides, drawings, and specifications. Technical data shall be developed to the level of the technician performing maintenance or inspection tasks IAW TO 00-5-1 and

MIL-STD-38784. Formal (certified and verified) BRU-56 T.O.’s shall be available prior to fielding the first system.

3.6.6 Training Equipment

The BRU-56 modification program shall update all training devices currently utilized by the AF with the required hardware and software.

3.6.7 Training

The BRU-56 modification program shall provide training to the maintainers on all updated training devices currently utilized.

3.7 Human Systems Integration

3.7.1 Manpower & Personnel

The BRU-56 modification shall be maintained by AF maintainers and shall not require additional maintenance manpower. The BRU-56 shall not require any special skills beyond what is already required for maintenance of the existing rack. The BRU-56 shall not exceed existing maintenance man-hour requirements IAW AFI 21-101 (24 month inspection = 12 hr per rack, flush = 1 hr per rack) for routine maintenance.

3.7.2 Human Factors Engineering, Safety, and Occupational Health

The BRU-56 modification shall meet Chemical, Biological, and Radiological (CBR) requirements.

The BRU-56 shall allow loading and maintenance activities to be accomplished while wearing arctic or chemical ensembles. Aircrew wearing the chemical warfare aircrew ensembles (MOPP-

4) will be able to safely and effectively preflight the MPRL and loaded weapons, and employ weapons using the MPRL in a contaminated environment.

3.8 Aircraft Requirements

3.8.1 Survivability

The BRU-56 shall not degrade the aircraft survivability IAW MIL-HDBK-516C.

3.8.2 Electromagnetic Interface/Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMI/EMC)

The BRU-56 individual H/W components and the system configuration shall satisfy the EMI/EMC requirements set forth in MIL-STD-461G and MIL-STD-464. The BRU-56 shall ensure all Safety of Flight (SoF) and Flight Essential Systems (FES) remain operational during system operations.

3.8.3 Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health (ESOH)

The BRU-56 modification program shall comply with all environmental, safety, and occupational health regulations. The BRU-56 shall comply with AFPD 90-8 requirements. The BRU-56 shall not utilize hazardous materials. The BRU-56 shall perform a Programmatic Environmental, Safety, and Health Evaluation (PESHE) IAW the requirements of MIL-HDBK-516C, DoDI 5000.02, and

AFI 63-101.

3.8.4 Failure Modes and Effects Criticality Analysis (FMECA)

The BRU-56 shall accomplish a FMECA identifying all feasible failure modes. The FMECA shall specifically address:

1) BRU-56 internal linkage failure

2) Hung Stores

3) Wrong Weapon Selection

4) Inadvertent Weapon Release

5) Conventional Weapons Interface Unit (CWIU) Failure

The BRU-56 shall analyze and document risk levels and mitigation strategies of the failure modes.

3.8.5 Environmental Qualification

The BRU-56 shall meet the environmental qualification requirements stated in GS2569A05B, and

GS2569A03C.

3.8.6 Hazards to Electronic Ordinance (HERO) Qualification

The BRU-56 shall meet the HERO qualification standards IAW MIL-STD-464.

4 VERIFICATION PROVISIONS

4.1 Verification Methods

The BRU-56 requirements stated within this document shall be verified to show they have been met. The following methods shall be utilized to perform requirement verification.

4.1.1 Demonstration

Demonstration is the operation of the system, subsystem, or a part of the system relying on observable functional operation not requiring the use of instrumentation, special test equipment, or subsequent analysis.

4.1.2 Test

Test is the operation of the system, subsystem, or a part of the system, using instrumentation or other special test equipment to collect data for later analysis.

4.1.3 Analysis

Analysis is the processing of accumulated data obtained from other qualification methods.

Examples of analysis are reduction interpolation, or extrapolation of test results.

4.1.4 Inspection

Inspection is the visual examination of system components, documentation, and drawings.

4.1.5 Special Verification Methods

Special verification methods are used when verification cannot be accomplished by demonstration, test, analysis, or inspection alone. Special verification methods for the system or subsystem include special tools, techniques, procedures, facilities, acceptance limits, use of standard samples, preproduction or periodic samples, pilot models, or pilot lots.

5 REQUIREMENTS TRACEABILITY MATRIX

The BRU-56 modification requirements stem from AFGSC 1067 13-114 and the existing BRU-

56 System Specification (CP2569A06 Part I and CP2569A04 Part II). Requirements traceability is important to ensure that the system performs as specified and can complete the intended mission.

See Appendix B for Traceability and Verification Matrix.

6 ACRONYMS

A/C Aircraft

AFSEO Air Force Seek Eagle Office

AGM Air-to-Ground Missile

AIR Air Inflatable Retarder

AME Alternate Mission Equipment

BDU Bomb Dummy Unit

BLU Bomb Live Unit

BRU Bomb Rack Unit

CBM Conventional Bomb Module

CBR Chemical, Biological, and Radiological

CBU Cluster Bomb Unit

CONOPS Concept of Operations

CVAR Cybersecurity Vulnerability Analysis Report

CWIU Conventional Weapons Interface Unit

EMC Electromagnetic Compatibility

EMD Engineering and Manufacturing Development

EMI Electromagnetic Interface

EOD Explosive Ordinance Disposal

ESOH Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health

FES Flight Essential Systems

FMECA Failure Modes and Effects Criticality Analysis

GBU Guided Bomb Unit

HERO Hazards to Electronic Ordinance

H/W Hardware

IAW In Accordance With

JASSM Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile

JASSM-ER Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile Extended Range

JDAM Joint Direct Attack Munition

JMPS Joint Mission Planning System

KCAS Knots Calibrated Airspeed

LDGP Low Drag General Purpose

LJDAM Laser Joint Direct Attack Munition

LRASM Long Range Anti-Ship Missile

LRU Line Replaceable Unit

M Mach

MK Mark

MPRL Multi-Purpose Rotary Launcher

OSS&E Operational Safety, Suitability, and Effectiveness

PESHE Programmatic Environmental, Safety, and Health Evaluation

PIDS Prime Item Development Specification

PIT Platform IT

PPP Program Protection Plan

RTOC Reduced Total Ownership Cost

SB Sustainment Block

SCTM Security Controls Traceability Matrix

SECBM 1760 Enhanced Conventional Bomb Module

SoF Safety of Flight

SPO System Program Office

SSP System Security Plan

S/W Software

T.O. Technical Order

ZRF Zero Retention Force

7 APPENDIX

Appendix A – Key Performance Parameters (KPP)/Key System Attributes (KSA)

Appendix B – Requirements Traceability & Verification Matrix

APPENDIX A: KEY PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS/KEY SYSTEM ATTRIBUTES

A.1.0 Key Performance Parameters (KPP):

KPP Title Description Threshold (T) & Objective (O)

14-inch Lug

Capability

Add 14-inch lug capability to existing 30-inch lug-spaced rack

IAW MIL-STD-2088. Rack shall be capable of employing all qualified weapons for both 14 and 30-inch lugs in a mixed load

(Threshold). Future considerations (Objective).

T = Safely carry and employ all current weapons fielded on B-1B:

Cluster Munitions: CBU-87, CBU-89, CBU-103, CBU-104, CBU-105, CBU-107

500 Pound Class: BDU-50 AIR, BDU-50 LDGP, MK-82 AIR, MK-82 LDGP, MK-62, GBU-

38(V)1/B (MK-82 JDAM), GBU-38(V)4/B (BLU-

126 JDAM), GBU-38(V)5/B (BLU-129 JDAM),

GBU-38(V)1/B (MK-82 JDAM), GBU-54(V)1/B

(MK-82 LJDAM), GBU-54(V)5/B (BLU-129

LJDAM)

2000 Pound Class: BDU-56 LDGP, BDU-56

JDAM, MK-84 LDGP, MK-84 (Inert), GBU-

31(V)1/B (MK-84 JDAM), GBU-31(V)3/B (BLU-

109 JDAM), GBU-31(V)5/B (BLU-119 JDAM),

GBU-31(V)7/B (BLU-129 JDAM), MK-65

Missiles: AGM-158A (JASSM), AGM-158B

(JASSM-ER), AGM-158C (LRASM), AGM-158D

(JASSM-ER+)

O = Future Considerations: Modification shall not prevent the incorporation of future weapons or weapon variants of currently fielded weapons.

PDU-5/B (14-inch Lugs), QS-64J (30-inch Lugs), JDAM-ER, SDB I (BRU-61 compatibility), SDB

II (BRU-61 compatibility), GBU-56, GBU-12

Paveway II (14-inch Lugs), GBU-10 Paveway II

(30-inch Lugs), JSOW C-1

Safe Weapons

Loading/

Retention

Design of rack shall correct previously identified safety deficiency and minimize safety and health hazards of loaders

Design features shall minimize

(Threshold)/eliminate (Objective) safety/health hazards, and constraints IAW MIL-STD-882E and

MIL-STD-2088.

IAW MIL-STD-882E and MIL-

STD-2088.

A.2.0 Key System Attributes (KSA):

KSA Description Paragraph Threshold (T) & Objective (O)

1 Materiel Availability 3.5.2

T = Modified rack shall follow same maintenance cycle of current rack IAW 11B29-3-75-2. (Shall have a materiel availability of 84% to be successful)

T = O

2 Operational Availability 3.5.2

T = Modified rack shall have an operational availability of 98%.

T = O

3 Reliability 3.5.3

T = Modified rack shall not degrade current reliability. MTBF of 1300 hours and reliability of

99% to be successful.

T = O

Compatibility with existing

Multi-Purpose Rotary Launcher

(MPRL)

3.5.4 T = No alterations for the existing MPRL.

T = O

5 Manpower 3.6.1

T = Modified rack shall not exceed existing maintenance man-hour requirements (24 month inspection = 12 hrs per rack, flush = 1 hr per rack).

O = Decrease maintenance man-hours required by

5%.

6 Ownership Cost 3.6.1

T = Minimize need for additional special tools and support equipment, or modifications/changes to existing support equipment

O = No additional special tools and support equipment or modifications.

APPENDIX B: TRACEABILITY & VERIFICATION MATRIX

B.1.0 Verification Matrix

The following matrix depicts verification of each individual SRD requirement. The legend below indicates what type of validation(s) are to be accomplished.

D – Demonstration

T – Test

A – Analysis

I – Inspection

PARAGRAPH DESCRIPTION KPP/KSA D T A I

3.1.3 Operational Requirements

3.2 SYSTEM CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

3.2.1.1 Cluster Munitions Carriage Analysis and Safe Separation KPP 1 X X

3.2.1.2 500 Pound Class Carriage Analysis and Safe Separation KPP 1 X X

3.2.1.3 2000 Pound Class Carriage Analysis and Safe Separation KPP 1 X X

3.2.1.4 Missile Carriage Analysis and Safe Separation KPP 1 X X

3.2.2 Flight Limits for Safe Carriage, Employment, and Jettison KSA 2 X X

3.2.3 Weapons Carriage KPP 1 X X

3.2.3.1 Mixed Loads KPP 1 X X

3.2.4 Profile KSA 4 X X

3.2.5 Weapon Load Time KSA 2 X X

3.2.6 Mission Support KSA 6 X X

3.2.7 Aircraft Software KSA 4 X X

3.2.8 System Modifications

3.2.8.1 Lugs KPP 1 X X

3.2.8.2 Hook/Latch KPP 2 X X

3.2.8.3 Lock/Unlock Indicators KPP 2 X X

3.2.8.4 Piston Forces KPP 1 X X

3.2.8.5 Safety Lock Solenoid KPP 1 X X

3.2.8.6 Locks KPP 2 X X

3.2.8.7 Sway Brace Pads KPP 2 X X

3.2.8.8 Hardness KPP 1 X

3.2.8.9 Hook Indicators KPP 2 X X

3.2.8.10 Fail-Safe Linkage KPP 2 X X

3.3 MISSION PLANNING

3.3.1 Software KSA 2 X X

3.4 CYBERSECURITY

3.4.1 AFI 17-100 Cyber KSA 2 X

3.4.2 Security Controls KSA 2 X

3.5 WEAPON/DATA BUS INTERFACE

3.6 LOGISTICS

3.6.1 Support Equipment KSA 6 X X

3.6.2 Availability KSA 1 & 2 X X X

PARAGRAPH DESCRIPTION KPP/KSA D T A I

3.6.3 Reliability KSA 3 X X

3.6.4 Compatibility with Existing MPRL KSA 4 X X X

3.6.5 Technical Data KSA 6 X X

3.6.6 Training Equipment KSA 6 X X

3.6.7 Training KSA 6 X X

3.7 HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION

3.7.1 Manpower & Personnel KSA 5 X X X

3.7.2 Human Factors Engineering, Safety, and Occupational Health KSA 6 X X

3.8 AIRCRAFT REQUIREMENTS

3.8.1 Survivability KSA 3 X

3.8.2 Electromagnetic Interface/Electromagnetic Compatibility KSA 2 X

3.8.3 Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health KSA 1 X X

3.8.4 Failure Modes and Effects Criticality Analysis KSA 3 X

3.8.5 Environmental Qualification KSA 2 X X X

3.8.6 Hazards to Electronic Ordinance Qualification KSA 2 X