Atch_4,_PPQ.doc
DOC document 51 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Special Needs Coordinator Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA5613-17-R-0006
About this file
Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions_&_Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch_5,_EMS_Flyer.pdf | ||
| Combined_Synopsis-Solicitation.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch_3,_Clauses&Prov.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch_2,_PWS_11Apr17.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch_1,_Pricing_Schedule.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 4, Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
FA5613-17-R-0006
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) This acquisition is for personal services of a Social Worker functioning in the capacity of a Special Needs Coordinator at the 86th Medical Group (86 MDG) located at Ramstein Air Base, Germany.
Past performance information is required for services of a licensed Social Worker.
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Address:
Telephone Number: ____________________
Email Address:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:
Contract Number*:
Contract Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor:
( YES ( NO
To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B.
RATER INFORMATION:
Name of Rater:
Title:
Address:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM WITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT TO:
Ina Hemmer/Contract Specialist Erika Voss-Elsaesser/Contract Specialist
700 CONS/LGCA
and
700 CONS/LGCA
ina.hemmer.de@us.af.mil erika.voss_elsaesser.1.de@us.af.mil +49-631-536-0080 or DSN 489-0080 +49-631-536- 6809 or DSN 489-6809
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and/or replace timely, if necessary, personnel during the contract period. |
| 2. |
| provided personnel with the proper educational requirements necessary for the service to be performed. |
| 3. |
| provided personnel with the required skills necessary for the service to be performed. |
| 4. |
| interfaced and cooperated with government quality assurance personnel during contract performance. |
| 5. |
| provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 6. |
| provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies pursuant to their quality control procedures and established procedures to prevent recurrence of discrepancy. |
| 6. |
| identified problems as they occurred and/or suggested alternative approaches to problem resolutions. |
| 7. |
| displayed initiative to solve problems and follow-up to ensure desired results were achieved. |
| 8. |
| was responsive to contract changes (if applicable). |
| 9. |
| How would you rate the vendor's overall performance? |
REMARKS/COMMENTS:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .