17-Q-2004_Technical_Eval_Sheet.pdf
PDF 98 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Armor Plate Carriers Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA542217Q2004
About this file
Technical Evaluation Sheet
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 17-Q-2004_Responses_to_Questions__2.pdf | ||
| 17-Q-2004_Responses_to_Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQ_Combo_FA5422-17-Q-2004_Plate_Carrier.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA5422-17-Q-2004
Plate Carriers
Technical Evaluation
PR#: Plate Carriers COMPANY:
RFQ #: FA5422-17-Q-2004 EVALUATOR:
Yes NO
1. Is this a brand name quote?
ANY UNACCEPTABLE RESPONSE WILL DEAM THE CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL AS
INELIGIBLE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THIS REQUIREMENT
Acceptable Unacceptable
2. Does the plate carrier come in sizes ranging from small to extra-large?
If found unacceptable, explain:
3. Does the plate carrier have pre integrated level III armor?
If found unacceptable, explain:
4. Is the plate carrier capable of carrying side, front, and back armor (ceramic plates) to advance the capabilities to level IV?
5. Does the system allow for the carry of six M4 magazines and 1 radio pouch (either by attachment or pre-existing pouches)?
6. Is the plate carrier either OCP pattern or Coyote brown/tan?
If found unacceptable, explain:
7. Does the plate carrier have a quick release system built in (I.E. Clips at the shoulders or pull tab on the chest)?
8. Is the system designed as a “plate carrier system” rather than a full tactical vest, concealed armor, or chest rig? (Should be light-weight while still incorporating armor mentioned above)
FA5422-17-Q-2004 - Technical Evaluation Page 1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .