Attachment_III_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

ATTACHMENT III

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 & FAR 3.104 For Official Use Only

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FA4877-16-R-A002, Repair/Sustain Control Tower Fac 306

The below-named contractor is being considered for award of a contract for the aforementioned

Solicitation. The scope of work includes efforts involving repair, sustainment, renovation, and/or construction of this facility on Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ 85707.

A primary consideration in our selection process is the contractor’s history of performance of similar efforts. Please make every effort to be thorough in your answers and comments. Return the completed questionnaire to the following address:

Primary Alternate

355 CONS/MSCAA 355 CONS/MSCAA

Attn: Ms.Tamrah Pehrson Attn: Mrs. Natalie Collins

3180 S. Craycroft Road 3180 S. Craycroft Road

Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ 85707 Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ 85707

E-Mail: Tamrah.Pehrson@us.af.mil E-Mail:

Natalie.Collins@us.af.mil

Please refer any questions to: Ms. Tamrah Pehrson at (520) 228-4185 or

Tamrah.Pehrson@us.af.mil.

A. GENERAL INFORMATION

Contractor’s Name: ______________________________________________________________

Address: _______________________________________________________________________

Telephone Number: _______________________ Point of Contact: ________________________

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION

Name: _________________________________ Title: ___________________________________

Organization & Address: __________________________________________________________

Telephone: __________________ Fax: ___________________ Email: _____________________ mailto:Tamrah.Pehrson@us.af.mil

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 & FAR 3.104 For Official Use Only

C. CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contract Number/Title: ___________________________________________________________

Period of Performance: ____________________ Dollar Amount of Contract: ________________

Services Performed:

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

A ACCEPTABLE - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

UA UNACCEPTABLE – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement; in addition to corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE

Please use the above ratings to describe the contractor’s performance in the following areas:

1. History Completing Efforts Involving Design, Carpentry, Road Repair, Roofing, Excavation, Interior and Exterior Electrical, Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning, Plumbing, Sheet Metal, Painting, Demolition, Concrete Masonry, and Welding. (Price

Range: Greater Thank $1 Million)

a. Contractor had professional and qualified management team. A UA N/A

b. Contractor provided submittals timely. A UA N/A

c. Contractor was able to complete project within budget. A UA N/A

d. Contractor successfully completed construction as designed. A UA N/A

e. Were Contractor change order/equitable adjustment requests reasonable. A UA N/A

f. Contractor’s overall quality of service A UA N/A

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

2. Management Effectiveness

a. Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirements.

A UA N/A

b. Contractor maintained appropriate staffing (number/ qualifications). A UA N/A

c. Contractor effectively managed material requirements (i.e., maintained adequate stock levels).

A UA N/A

d. Contractor effectively oversaw/managed subcontractors. A UA N/A

e. Contractor’s overall management effectiveness. A UA N/A

3. Quality of Service and Workmanship

a. Contractor maintained acceptable standards of workmanship. A UA N/A

b. Contractor provided acceptable-quality materials. A UA N/A

c. Contractor’s overall quality of service. A UA N/A

4. Timeliness/Adherence to Schedules

a. Contractor completed scheduled tasks within stated time frames. A UA N/A

b. Contractor was proactive in keeping you informed of schedule changes if they were going to occur.

A UA N/A

c. Contractor responded to emergency requirements in a timely manner. A UA N/A

d. Overall contractor timeliness. A UA N/A

5. Quality Control

a. Contractor provided an adequate quality control plan. A UA N/A

b. Contractor adhered to its quality control plan. A UA N/A

c. Contractor’s quality control resulted in little/no work on your part to achieve acceptable service (i.e.-few failed inspections).

A UA N/A

d. Contractor documented quality control checks/corrective actions. A UA N/A

e. Contractor’s overall quality control. A UA N/A

6. Customer Satisfaction

a. Contractor maintained a professional working relationship. A UA N/A

b. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in resolving complaints. A UA N/A

c. Contractor was flexible in responding to customer requirements. A UA N/A

d. Overall customer satisfaction. A UA N/A

7. Compliance With Labor & Safety Requirements

a. Labor laws. A UA N/A

b. Workplace safety. A UA N/A

c. Overall compliance. A UA N/A

OVERALL PAST PERFORMANCE RATING:

8. If a Government contract, did the contractor receive any Contract Discrepancy Reports, Letters of Concern, or Cure Notices? If yes, please describe:

9. If given the opportunity, would you award another contract to this contractor? Please explain response.