Atch_2_PPQ.pdf
PDF 183 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Architect-Engineer (A-E) Title I & II Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA486117RA400
About this file
Atch 2_PPQ (Past Performance Questionnaire)
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 17RA400_Synopsis_Amend_1_23Jun17.pdf | ||
| 17RA400_A-E_Q&As_23Jun17.pdf | ||
| Atch_1_SF330-16a.pdf | ||
| Atch_2_PPQ.pdf | ||
| Atch_1_SF330-16a.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FA4861-17-R-A400
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 3.104
A-E TITLE I & TITLE II SERVICES, NELLIS AFB NV
Instructions to firms:
(1) Firm is to complete Section 1 and forward form to customer.
(2) Customer is to complete Sections 2 through 6 and return to firm.
(3) Firm is to include completed form in its entirety with SF 330 package submission.
(4) Any adverse comments noted by customers are to be addressed by firm and submitted with SF 330 package.
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Firm Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Point of Contact:
Email Address:
Firm Cage Code:
Firm Tax ID Number:
Firm DUNS Number:
Contract Number:
Project Title:
Dollar Amount:
Contract Type:
Contract Period of Performance:
Performed As: Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor / Consultant /
Team Member Percent of Work Performed: ___________% Description of Project:
Description of A-E Firm’s Responsibilities:
Are there Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Evaluation or other Past Performance Reports available for this contract?
YES NO
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
Customer or Agency Name:
Customer or Agency description (if applicable):
Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
Evaluator’s name:
Evaluator’s title:
Evaluator’s phone/fax number:
Evaluator’s email address:
Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by marking the performance scale indicated in the appropriate block.
* Please provide narrative summary for each item you indicated as “Did Not Meet” or “Exceeded” below.
ITEM FACTORS TO BE RATED Did Not Meet* Met Exceeded*
Design Services:
1 Overall skill level and technical competence of A-E’s personnel.
2 A-E’s ability to identify and resolve design issues expeditiously.
3 A-E’s responsiveness to design review questions.
4 A-E’s ability to effectively coordinate, integrate and manage their consultants/subcontractors/team.
5 A-E’s effectiveness and responsiveness in interfacing with the Client’s staff.
6 Overall accuracy, completeness and coordination of final design documents. (Quality)
7 A-E’s ability to provide detailed, accurate cost estimates.
8 A-E’s ability to meet contract schedule.
Follow-On Construction Support Services:
9 Thoroughness and timely review of construction submittals.
10 Timely resolution of construction design issues.
11 Overall quality, responsiveness and timeliness of A-E follow-on construction support services.
LEED (If Applicable):
12 Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of LEED documentation.
13 A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall LEED process.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ITEM FACTORS TO BE RATED Did Not Meet* Met Exceeded*
BIM (If Applicable):
14 Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of BIM documentation.
15 A-E’s ability and understanding of the overall BIM process.
Owner’s Representative on Design/Build Projects (If Applicable):
16 Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of requirements documents and bridging documents.
17 A-E’s ability, thoroughness, timeliness and support as Owner’s
Representative throughout the project.
Overall:
18 How would you rate the A-E’s ability to control cost?
19 How would you rate the A-E’s overall management performance on this contract?
20 How would you rate the A-E’s overall technical/quality performance on this contract?
21 Would you use this A-E again? (If “No”, please comment in the
Narrative Summary) YES NO
SECTION 5 – NARRATIVE SUMMARY (if applicable)
ITEM COMMENTS
SECTION 6 – CUSTOMER ENDORSEMENT
Evaluator’s Signature Date
| Firm Name: |
| Address: |
| Telephone Number: |
| Point of Contact: |
| Email Address: |
| Firm Cage Code: |
| Firm Tax ID Number: |
| Firm DUNS Number: |
| Contract Number: |
| Project Title: |
| Dollar Amount: |
| Contract Type: |
| Contract Period of Performance: |
| undefined: |
| Description of AE Firms Responsibilities: |
| Customer or Agency Name: |
| Customer or Agency description if applicable: |
| Geographic description of services under this contract ie local nationwide worldwide other commands: |
| Evaluators name: |
| Evaluators title: |
| Evaluators phonefax number: |
| Evaluators email address: |
| Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: |
| Did Not MeetDesign Services: |
| MetDesign Services: |
| ExceededDesign Services: |
| Did Not MeetOverall skill level and technical competence of AEs personnel: |
| MetOverall skill level and technical competence of AEs personnel: |
| ExceededOverall skill level and technical competence of AEs personnel: |
| Did Not MeetAEs ability to identify and resolve design issues expeditiously: |
| MetAEs ability to identify and resolve design issues expeditiously: |
| ExceededAEs ability to identify and resolve design issues expeditiously: |
| Did Not MeetAEs responsiveness to design review questions: |
| MetAEs responsiveness to design review questions: |
| ExceededAEs responsiveness to design review questions: |
| Did Not MeetAEs ability to effectively coordinate integrate and manage their consultantssubcontractorsteam: |
| MetAEs ability to effectively coordinate integrate and manage their consultantssubcontractorsteam: |
| ExceededAEs ability to effectively coordinate integrate and manage their consultantssubcontractorsteam: |
| Did Not MeetAEs effectiveness and responsiveness in interfacing with the Clients staff: |
| MetAEs effectiveness and responsiveness in interfacing with the Clients staff: |
| ExceededAEs effectiveness and responsiveness in interfacing with the Clients staff: |
| Did Not MeetOverall accuracy completeness and coordination of final design documents Quality: |
| MetOverall accuracy completeness and coordination of final design documents Quality: |
| ExceededOverall accuracy completeness and coordination of final design documents Quality: |
| Did Not MeetAEs ability to provide detailed accurate cost estimates: |
| MetAEs ability to provide detailed accurate cost estimates: |
| ExceededAEs ability to provide detailed accurate cost estimates: |
| Did Not MeetAEs ability to meet contract schedule: |
| MetAEs ability to meet contract schedule: |
| ExceededAEs ability to meet contract schedule: |
| Did Not MeetFollowOn Construction Support Services: |
| MetFollowOn Construction Support Services: |
| ExceededFollowOn Construction Support Services: |
| Did Not MeetThoroughness and timely review of construction submittals: |
| MetThoroughness and timely review of construction submittals: |
| ExceededThoroughness and timely review of construction submittals: |
| Did Not MeetTimely resolution of construction design issues: |
| MetTimely resolution of construction design issues: |
| ExceededTimely resolution of construction design issues: |
| Did Not MeetOverall quality responsiveness and timeliness of AE followon construction support services: |
| MetOverall quality responsiveness and timeliness of AE followon construction support services: |
| ExceededOverall quality responsiveness and timeliness of AE followon construction support services: |
| Did Not MeetLEED If Applicable: |
| MetLEED If Applicable: |
| ExceededLEED If Applicable: |
| Did Not MeetOverall accuracy completeness timeliness and coordination of LEED documentation: |
| MetOverall accuracy completeness timeliness and coordination of LEED documentation: |
| ExceededOverall accuracy completeness timeliness and coordination of LEED documentation: |
| Did Not MeetAEs ability and understanding of the overall LEED process: |
| MetAEs ability and understanding of the overall LEED process: |
| ExceededAEs ability and understanding of the overall LEED process: |
| Did Not MeetBIM If Applicable: |
| MetBIM If Applicable: |
| ExceededBIM If Applicable: |
| Did Not MeetOverall accuracy completeness timeliness and coordination of BIM documentation: |
| MetOverall accuracy completeness timeliness and coordination of BIM documentation: |
| ExceededOverall accuracy completeness timeliness and coordination of BIM documentation: |
| Did Not MeetAEs ability and understanding of the overall BIM process: |
| MetAEs ability and understanding of the overall BIM process: |
| ExceededAEs ability and understanding of the overall BIM process: |
| Did Not MeetOwners Representative on DesignBuild Projects If Applicable: |
| MetOwners Representative on DesignBuild Projects If Applicable: |
| ExceededOwners Representative on DesignBuild Projects If Applicable: |
| Did Not MeetOverall accuracy completeness timeliness and coordination of requirements documents and bridging documents: |
| MetOverall accuracy completeness timeliness and coordination of requirements documents and bridging documents: |
| ExceededOverall accuracy completeness timeliness and coordination of requirements documents and bridging documents: |
| Did Not MeetAEs ability thoroughness timeliness and support as Owners Representative throughout the project: |
| MetAEs ability thoroughness timeliness and support as Owners Representative throughout the project: |
| ExceededAEs ability thoroughness timeliness and support as Owners Representative throughout the project: |
| Did Not MeetOverall: |
| MetOverall: |
| ExceededOverall: |
| Did Not MeetHow would you rate the AEs ability to control cost: |
| MetHow would you rate the AEs ability to control cost: |
| ExceededHow would you rate the AEs ability to control cost: |
| Did Not MeetHow would you rate the AEs overall management performance on this contract: |
| MetHow would you rate the AEs overall management performance on this contract: |
| ExceededHow would you rate the AEs overall management performance on this contract: |
| Did Not MeetHow would you rate the AEs overall technicalquality performance on this contract: |
| MetHow would you rate the AEs overall technicalquality performance on this contract: |
| ExceededHow would you rate the AEs overall technicalquality performance on this contract: |
| COMMENTSRow1: |
| COMMENTSRow2: |
| COMMENTSRow3: |
| COMMENTSRow4: |
| COMMENTSRow5: |
| COMMENTSRow6: |
| COMMENTSRow7: |
| COMMENTSRow8: |
| COMMENTSRow9: |
| COMMENTSRow10: |
| COMMENTSRow11: |
| COMMENTSRow12: |
| COMMENTSRow13: |
| COMMENTSRow14: |
| COMMENTSRow15: |
| COMMENTSRow16: |
| Date: |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Description of Project: |
| ITEMRow15: |
| ITEMRow14: |
| ITEMRow13: |
| ITEMRow12: |
| ITEMRow11: |
| ITEMRow10: |
| ITEMRow9: |
| ITEMRow8: |
| ITEMRow7: |
| ITEMRow6: |
| ITEMRow5: |
| ITEMRow4: |
| ITEMRow3: |
| ITEMRow2: |
| ITEMRow16: |
| ITEMRow1_3: |
| Check Box5: Off |
| Check Box8: Off |
| Check Box9: Off |
| Check Box10: Off |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .