Atch 6 PPQ.doc
DOC document 63 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair Airfield/Base Pavement (IDIQ) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4809-10-R-0009
About this file
Atch 6 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 40
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE ON CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
1. The contractor named in paragraph 3 is being considered for award of the Repair Airfield and Base Pavements (IDIQ) at Seymour Johnson AFB, NC, with a maximum capacity of $35,000,000.00 for a base and four option year periods. The scope of work includes but is not limited to: furnishing all plant, labor, equipment and material to perform asphalt pavement repair and/or replacement. Relevant past performance is contract performance relating to airfield pavement and general pavement repairs, each equal to or exceeding $50,000.00, within the recency timeframe during the period of 01 Jan 2008 – 01 Jan 2011.
2. A primary consideration in our selection process is the contractor’s performance on relevant projects within the last three (3) years. Relevant projects are those that involved work as defined in the scope of work in paragraph 1 and had a dollar value greater than $50,000.00, performed within period of 01 Jan 08 through 01 Jan 11. Please make every effort to be thorough in your answers and comments. Include for instance in your response the type of work performed and what it consisted of, i.e., asphalt pavement repair and/or replacement, walk repair and/or replacement, concrete pavement repair and/or replacement, curb and gutter repair and/or replacement, clearing and grubbing, excavation, fill, aggregate base course, milling of bituminous pavement, inlets, catch basins, drainage pipe, pavement markings, seeding, trees and shrubs, soil erosion and control, railroad work and airfield/street/area lighting.
3. GENERAL INFORMATION (The contractor being evaluated) Contractor’s Name: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: __________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ Point of Contact: _____________________________________
4. RESPONDENT INFORMATION (The organization who is preparing this questionnaire) Name: _________________________________ Title: __________________________________________
Organization & Address: ____________________________________________________________________
Telephone: _______________ Fax: ___________________ Email: _________________________________
5. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON:
Contract Number/Title: ______________________________________________________________________
Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________________________ Dollar Amount of Contract: __________________________________________________________________ The contractor was ( ) was not ( ) the prime.
Scope of work performed: ___________________________________________________________________
6. RELEVANCY: In your opinion, is the scope of work described in paragraph 1 similar in nature, complexity and magnitude to the work that the contractor performed for you? ___________________________________
7. Did the scope of work of the contract referenced above in paragraph 5 include airfeld work or concrete placement/repair associated with an airfield? Please describe the work accomplished. __________________________________________________________________________________________
8. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: When responding to the following questions, choose the letter on the below scale that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance. If the question is not applicable, circle the letter "N". Comments are encouraged for all questions; however, if you respond with either an “E” or “U”, please explain in the lines below the question.
(E) Exceptional The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceed many (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
(V) Very Good The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some
(requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
(S) Satisfactory The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
(N) Neutral Not applicable - No performance record identifiable; unable to provide a score.
(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Quality Control
a. Describe the quality of workmanship, adequacy of the contractor’s quality
E V S N M U control (CQC), quality of CQC documentation, and implementation of the CQC plan.
b. Were required materials properly submitted, delivered, and stored?
E V S N M U
c. Were as-builts drawings accurate and submitted when required?
d. Was identification/correction of deficient work accomplished in a timely
E V S N M U manner? Were suggested solutions adequate and did the contractor display initiative to implement solutions?
e. Did the contractor provide effective quality control that resulted in a
E V S N M U quality finished product?
Timely Performance
a. Was the required performance period of the contract met?
b. Were submittals proper and were they provided in a timely manner? Did the
E V S N M U submittals match the contract requirements?
c. Were realistic progress schedules developed? Were established progress
E V S N M U schedule dates met?
d. Were updated and revised progress schedules submitted to resolve delays? E V S N M U
e. Did the contractor correct punch list items in a timely manner?
Management Effectiveness
a. Did the contractor provide experienced managers and supervisors that
E V S N M U possessed the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements?
b. Were experienced subcontractors hired? Were subcontractors/suppliers paid E V S N M U in a timely manner?
c. Did the contractor have sufficient personnel available at all times with
E V S N M U authority to make decisions or take action during project performance?
d. Was accurate, complete and reasonable supporting price/cost information
E V S N M U provided for modifications (not over inflated or under estimated)?
e. Was all contract work completed prior to requesting final inspection?
E V S N M U
f. Were timely and satisfactory responses to warranty issues provided after
E V S N M U project completion?
g. Did the contractor ensure compliance with all contract requirements?
E V S N M U
h. Did the contractor pay subcontractors and suppliers timely?
E V S N M U
i. Did contractor cooperate to resolve problems by attending meetings
E V S N M U (as applicable) and were communications maintained to assure satisfactory resolution?
Pricing
a. Were drawings provided to the contractor understood in sufficient detail to estimate and construct the project requirement?
b. Did the contractor estimate the project(s) within the stated dollar E V S N M U magnitude?
c. Were modifications required due to contractor errors?
E V S N M U
d. Were the estimates prepared and submitted within the E V S N M U timeframes identified in the contract?
e. Were the contractor’s initial estimates for quantities fair and reasonable?
E V S N M U
f. How was the contractor’s overall pricing performance?
Management/Superintendent
a. Did the Site Manager/Superintendent ensure compliance with contract
E V S N M U requirements and safety regulations? Did they act promptly to resolve problems and ensure work quality?
b. Did the Site Manager/Superintendent have sufficient authority to make
E V S N M U decisions or take action during project performance? Were they consistently present on site while work was being performed?
c. How was the overall Management/Effectiveness of the performance?
E V S N M U Compliance with Labor Standards
a. Did the contractor submit complete and correct payrolls in a timely manner?
E V S N M U
b. Did the contractor comply with all applicable labor laws and regulations?
E V S N M U Compliance with Safety Standards
a. Was the contractor’s safety plan adequate, implemented properly and enforced by the contractor throughout performance of work?
b. Were there any safety violations or accidents/injuries? Is so, please describe.
E V S N M U
Overall Performance Evaluation of the Contractor
COMMENTS/REMARKS: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Other Considerations: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I would definitely ( ), would possibly ( ), would not ( ) enter into another contract with this contractor.
Printed Name and Signature of Completing Individual
Telephone Number Date__________________ Please return completed questionnaire via facsimile to: 919-722-5421, or email to matthew.rowe@seymourjohnson.af.mil RFP No. FA4809-10-R-0009
Attachment 6 pg. 1 of 6
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .