FA4800-15-T-0006__Amendment_01.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to update the CLIN description for CLINs 0004, 1004, 2004, 3004, and 4004 to reflect the Not-To-Exceed pricing of $10,000.00 per year. Offerors shall not price this CLIN in their quotes. Update FAR 52.212-2 to reflect the aformentioned changes to the subject CLINs.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 21-Jul-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA4800-15-T-0006

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

30-Jun-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

21-Jul-2015

CODE

633 CONS/LGCD

74 NEALY AVENUE

LANGLEY AFB VA 23665

FA4800 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA4800-15-T-0006

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0004

The CLIN extended description has changed from The contractor shall perform the necessary repairs in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). to The contractor shall perform the necessary repairs in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). THIS

CLIN WILL NOT BE PRICED BY OFFERORS FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE SOLICITATION. THIS CLIN IS

NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.00..

CLIN 1004

accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). to The contractor shall perform the necessary repairs in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). THIS

CLIN 2004

accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). to The contractor shall perform the necessary repairs in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). THIS

CLIN 3004

accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). to The contractor shall perform the necessary repairs in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). THIS

CLIN 4004

accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). to The contractor shall perform the necessary repairs in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). THIS

The following have been modified:

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) This competitive Request for Quote (RFQ) will be conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition

Regulation (FAR) Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items, and FAR Part 13, Simplified Acquisition Procedures.

The Government will award a contract resulting from this RFQ to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the RFQ will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1. Price

2. Technical Acceptability

3. Past Performance

All offerors will be ranked by total contract price from low to high, and will then be evaluated for both Technical and Past Performance. Technical and Past Performance will be evaluated on a “Pass/Fail” basis. Offerors shall receive a “Pass” rating for both Technical and Past Performance in order to be eligible for award. The government will evaluate the 4 (four) lowest priced offerors for technical acceptability, past performance acceptability and price reasonableness. Should the lowest priced offerors not receive an acceptable technical and past performance rating and cannot be remedied through minor corrections, the process will continue in order of price until 4 (four) offerors with acceptable technical and past performance rating and fair and reasonable price - are identified. Award will be made to the offeror with the lowest proposed price and receiving a “Pass” rating for both Technical and Past

Performance.

Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in these preparation instructions.

Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond.

A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror by the

Government within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). In accordance with FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, the Government will evaluate 50% (or 6 months’ worth) of the final option year price to determine the price to be fair and reasonable in the case that this extension clause needs to be utilized.

(c) By submission of its offer, in accordance with the instructions in clause 52.212-1 “Instructions to

Offerors”, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and Performance Work Statement requirements. All offers shall be treated equally for technical portions and performance records. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

EVALUATION OF PRICE

Price will be evaluated using techniques established in FAR 15.404-1 to ensure the Government receives a fair, reasonable and balanced price. If the Government cannot determine the proposed pricing to be fair and reasonable, other than cost and pricing data will be obtained from the offerors. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all CLINS including basic period, option years, and fifty percent (50%) of the last option period price to cover the option to extend services IAW clause 52.217-8.

There is a great expectation of competition for this requirement; offerors are cautioned to present their best price proposal up-front. The offeror’s price proposal shall represent the offeror’s best effort to respond to the solicitation.

NOTE: Evaluation of the option periods shall not obligate the Government to exercise such options.

NOTE: OFFERORS SHALL NOT PRICE CLINS 0004, 1004, 2004, 3004, AND 4004 FOR THE PURPOSES OF

THIS SOLICITATION. THESE CLINS ARE NOT TO EXCEED PRICES ESTABLISHED BY THE

GOVERNMENT.

Option to Extend Services. Both the solicitation and resultant contract shall contain FAR Clause 52.217-8, entitled

“Option to Extend Services”. This clause allows for up to an additional 6 month continued contract performance if required. Interested offerors shall not include pricing in their proposal for this clause as fifty percent (50%) of the last option period shall be used for the pricing only if clause 52.217-8 is required.

Materially Unbalanced Offer: If the contracting officer sees a wide variation in prices, the contracting officer can consider the need to amend the solicitation or ask the offeror(s) appropriate questions. Unbalanced pricing poses an unacceptable risk to the Government and may be a reason to reject an offeror’s proposal.

EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL

The technical rating reflects the degree to which the offeror’s proposal meets or does not meet the minimum performance or capability requirements. The focus is on the ability of the offerors proposal to meet the minimum requirements of the PWS. Each offeror shall submit information clearly identifying how they will meet the following technical criteria. Offerors shall submit at a minimum the following information:

Each technical quote shall be evaluated on how the offeror will:

Factor 1 - Offeror shall detail the necessary qualifications and experience to perform the work as outlined in the

Performance Work Statement and the offerors ability to provide personnel with the necessary qualifications.

Factor 2: Offeror shall provide the capability to respond within the required time for services calls, during Standard and Non-Standard Duty Hours. Offeror shall provide outlined procedures to meet this requirement

Technical will be evaluated on a “Pass/Fail” basis. To receive a rating of “Pass,” the offeror must adequately address their plan to meet the above mentioned technical criteria. Offerors must receive a rating of “Pass” for technical in order to be eligible for award. Proposals that exceed the evaluation criteria will not receive higher ratings.

TABLE 1. Technical

Rating Description

Pass Proposal clearly meets the minimum technical requirements of the solicitation.

Fail Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum technical requirements of the solicitation.

EVALUATION OF PAST PERFORMANCE

There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to determine whether the offeror’s performance information is recent and second, is the performance information relevant to the effort to be acquired in this acquisition. The third aspect is to determine how well the offeror performed on those contracts and the quality of product or service provided.

The past performance information to be evaluated on each offeror will be information available in CPARS and

PPIRS as well as information available through other government sources (i.e. key government officials) regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement. The government will evaluate the past performance references provided by the offeror as part of their past performance volume in the response to the solicitation.

The Government evaluators will conduct an in-depth review and evaluation of all available performance data to determine how closely the work performed under those efforts relates to the proposed effort. The evaluation will consider the recency, relevancy, and quality of each performance reference as it relates to this acquisition when assigning the past performance rating. The main purpose of the past performance evaluation is to appropriately consider each offeror’s demonstrated record of contract compliance by supplying products and services that meet users’ needs, including business relations, management, schedule and performance quality constraints.

Recency. Recency will be assigned a rating of “Recent” or “Not Recent” for each relevant CPARS, PPIRS, other government agency-provided reference and references provided by the offeror. Performance occurring within the last three (3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation will be considered “recent”. Reports on contracts with less than six months of performance will not be considered.

Relevancy. In evaluating relevancy, the Government will assign a rating of “Relevant” or “Not Relevant”. Relevant performance for this acquisition is to have effectively provided services similar to scope of this requirement, to include services for commercial as well as federal or DoD agencies.

Performance Quality. The Government will evaluate the quality of work performed for each past performance contract reference reviewed. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s demonstrated record of contract compliance in supplying products and/or services that meet user’s needs, including quality, cost and schedule.

Performance assessed as “Satisfactory”, “Very Good”, or “Exceptional” shall be considered compliant with contract requirements. Any performance area assessed as “Marginal” or “Unsatisfactory” shall be considered unfavorable.

Past Performance shall be evaluated on a “Pass/Fail” basis. In the event of negative comments of a offerors past performance, the contracting officer shall make a determination based on the factors listed in Table 2 below. If an offeror is determined to have “marginal” or “unsatisfactory” past performance ratings, they will be given an overall past performance rating of “Fail.”

TABLE 2. Past Performance

Pass Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. To be rated acceptable, no Unsatisfactory ratings can be found in the past performance information.

Fail Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. To be rated “Fail”, a negative rating of Marginal or

Unsatisfactory will be identified by this office and validated by the Contracting

Officer.

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)