Attachment 5 PastPerformanceQuestionaire_10 Mar 10.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- COCESS Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4800-12-R-0001
About this file
Past Performance Questionaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA4800-12-R-0001-0007.doc | DOC document | |
| FA4800-12-R-0001-00005.doc | DOC document | |
| FA4800-12-R-0001.doc | DOC document | |
| SF 30 0005.pdf | ||
| SF 30 001.pdf | ||
| SF 30 002.pdf | ||
| SF 30 003.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 Client Auth Form_COCESS.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 4 QASP.pdf | ||
| SOW Appendix 1-1 Historical Purchase Data.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FA4800-12-R-0001 COCESS - 13Feb12 | — | |
| Attachment 3 WD 2005-2543 Rev 13.docx | DOCX document | |
| COCESS RFP Bid Schedule 18JAN12.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ACC COCESS SOW - Revised 17JAN 12.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation No: FA4800-12-R-0001
Attachment 5
Solicitation No: FA4800-11-R-0009
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
The below-named contractor/offeror is being considered for award of a contract for Contractor Civil Engineer Supply Store (COCESS) at Langley Air Force Base, VA, 23665. A primary consideration in our selection process is the contractor’s history of performance of similar efforts. Please make every effort to be thorough in your answers/comments. Completed questionnaires can be returned via fax, email or mail to the following:
FAX: 757-764-3884
EMAIL: Patrick.smith12@langley.af.mil
| MAIL: | Attn: Mr. Patrick E. Smith |
| 37 Sweeney Blvd, Rm 151 | |
| Langley AFB, VA, 23665-XXX |
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
Offeror’s Name: B3/CC Distributors
| Address: | 37 Sweeney Blvd Rm 148 |
| Langley AFB, VA, 23665 |
Telephone Number: 757-865-1702,1703 Point of Contact: Mr. Bobby Coleman
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION
Name: Patrick E. Smith Title Chief, Logistics Support
Organization & Address: 633d Civil Engineer Squadron/CEOSM 37 Sweeney Blvd, Rm 151 Langley AFB, VA, 23665
Telephone: 757 846-6495 FAX: 757 764-3884 Email: patrick.smith12@langley.af.mil
C. CONTRACT INFORMATION
Contract Title: ServMart Contract Period of Performance: 1 Nov 05 - 31 Oct 10 Contract Number: FA480006C0001 Dollar Amount of Contract:_$0.01_ Services Performed: Provide all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, supplies, and materials to manage and operate a hardware supply store, comparable to a full-service, commercial retail store, on Langley AFB. The contractor shall research, cross-reference, identify, procure, issue, deliver, and stock a variety of materials, equipment, parts, tools, and supplies for construction, grounds maintenance, and facility maintenance and repair for use by base personnel.
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
The Air Force will use your survey responses to determine a level of confidence, based on the offeror’s past performance record, concerning the offeror’s ability to successfully perform our requirement in accordance with the contract. Please assign the following performance level codes to each of the questioned areas listed below based on the contractor’s performance at your organization or installation. The confidence codes selected will indicate the degree of doubt concerning performance in each area.
RESPONDENT WILL NOT FURNISH ANY PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION TO OFFEROR SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL FOR THIS SOLICITATION.
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| CODE |
| PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| E |
| EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| VG |
| VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| S |
| SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or was satisfactory. |
| M |
| MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| US |
| UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| N/A |
| NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score. |
Please provide detailed narrative comments to support your ratings. At a minimum, please discuss each response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions below (use additional sheets, if necessary).
E. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AREAS
Please use the above ratings and their assigned definitions to describe the offeror’s performance in the following areas:
| 1. Contractor’s ability to provide user access to the system via a web browser without requiring client software |
| E x |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| N/A |
2. Contractor ability to provide a fully functional web-based purchasing system with standard industry capabilities to include, but not limited to, the ability to conduct product market research across multiple supplier websites, transmit/receive transactions via the Internet, view order history, view live order tracking/status and modify/cancel orders not shipped yet by individual work order number, attach notes to the purchase order (for internal use only), and the ability to delete purchase order either singularly or by “batch” prior to release.
x
3. Contractor’s ability to track orders and receive status of orders
| 4. Contractor’s ability to perform a search using a generic description or keyword for items listed in the catalogs |
| x |
| 5. Overall contract compliance in providing correct the commodity items on time and at a fair and reasonable price |
| x |
| 6. Contractor maintained acceptable level of stock items for immediate issue/purchase |
| x |
| 7. Contractor provided on-time delivery within original delivery date |
| x |
| 8. Contractor’s overall quality of customer service |
| x |
| 9. Contractor’s willingness and effectiveness in correcting identified deficiencies |
| x |
| 10. Overall quality of service |
| x |
| 11. Contractor met all applicable environmental requirements |
| x |
| 12. Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirements |
| x |
| 13. Contractor effectively managed materials requirements: (i.e. maintained adequate stock levels) |
| x |
| 14. Contractor maintained records/reported data |
| x |
| 15. Contractor’s overall management and responsiveness |
| x |
COMMENTS/REMARKS________________________________________________________________________
5. If a government contract, did the contractor receive any Contract Discrepancy Reports, Letters of Concern, or Cure Notices?_____No________ If yes, please describe:
6. If given the opportunity, would you award another contract to this contractor?___Yes____
Please explain response below:
633d CES is charged with the vital mission to maintain infrastructure here at LAFB. The ServMart operation is an integral part in helping the squadron achieve this goal. The staff provides superior service in assisting personnel in product research and helps ensure we have the proper materials to do the job. B3 has demonwith a professionalism to be superior in every category. ____________________________________________________________________________________________
7. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance? E VG G M US N/A
Excellent
Signature of Respondent___________________________________ Date____________
Job Title:________________________________________________________________
Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire.
LEGEND OF TERMS
OFFEROR: The contractor in which past performance is being evaluated
SOLICITATION NUMBER: The procurement document number the government uses to identify a specific Request for Proposal (RFP)
RESPONDENT: The person and/or organization evaluating past performance
CONTRACT NUMBER: If the offeror had a contract or purchase order with your company/firm, the identifying contract number associated with awarded contract/purchase order
CONTRACT TITLE: Project title of work performed
CONTRACT VALUE: Contract/purchase order total dollar value
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Describe type of working being performed
| 1 |
| Attachment 5 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .