Attachment_5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 156 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Static Display Inspection, Maintenance and Painting Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA465918Q0033
About this file
Attachment 5 Past performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Combo_-_Air_Park.docx | DOCX document | |
| Pricing_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| PWS_Amendment_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Combo_-_Air_Park.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3_ND_Wage_Determination_2015-4973.pdf | ||
| Attachment_6_Past_Performance_Guidance_to_Offeror.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_Performance_Work_Statement.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_Pricing_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO)
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
319TH CONTRACTING FLIGHT (ACC)
GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA
19 Jun 2018
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
The 319th Contracting Flight of the Air Force Air Combat Command is in the process of selecting a con-tractor for a Static Display Inspection, Washing and Painting program. The contractor shall provide all services, materials, labor, and equipment to provide corrosion control, touch-up painting, major/full painting, repairs with area painting, and other sustainment work for eight (8) aircraft, two (2) missiles and one (1) missile tractor/transporter on static display in the airpark at Grand Forks AFB, ND, in accordance with (IAW) the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.
Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. As discussed in our initial phone contact with your office, our schedule is extremely tight and we need your written response no later than 5 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.
To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and emailed to nicque.robinson-dela_cruz@us.af.mil. Please call 1st Lt Nicque Robinson-Dela Cruz at 701 747 5682 prior to transmission or if you have any questions. Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this award.
_________________________ 1 Atch Signature Questionnaire
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO)
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
319TH CONTRACTING FLIGHT (ACC)
GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________________________
B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________
C. Contract number: _______________________________________
D. Contract type: ______________________________
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: ____________________________
J. Description of service provided: ________________________________________________________________
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name:
B. Evaluator's title:
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:
Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
The questions shown below should be tailored to the Factors/Subfactors of the instant acquisition.
Technical Performance B P G Y R N
T1 Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.
T3 Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts
T4 Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
T5 Ability to implement current standard practices for computer hardware design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control
T6 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures
Program Management B P G Y R N
P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements
P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations
P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
Program Management B P G Y R N
P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management
P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
Transition/phase-in B P G Y R N
T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.
Employee Retention/Attraction B P G Y R N
E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.
Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation B P G Y R N
S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan
S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.
2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Mailing Address: 319 CONF/LGCA
295 Steen Blvd., Bldg. 242 Grand Forks AFB ND 58205-6222
Or email to: nicque.robinson-dela_cruz@us.af.mil mailto:nicque.robinson-dela_cruz@us.af.mil
| Attachment 5 Past Performance Coversheet |
| Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire |
| SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION |
| SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION |
| ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________... |
| 2018-07-19T16:08:51-0500 | |
| SNEDKER.JEREMIAH.J.1255234435 |
| SECTION 1 CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION: |
| undefined: |
| Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: |
| Contract number: |
| No: |
| undefined_2: |
| Was this a competitive contract Yes: |
| Period of performance: |
| Currentfinal contract cost: |
| Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: |
| I 1: |
| I 2: |
| I 3: |
| I 4: |
| Description of service provided: |
| J 1: |
| J 2: |
| J 3: |
| J 4: |
| J 5: |
| Customer or agency name: |
| Customer or agency description if applicable: |
| C 1: |
| C 2: |
| Evaluators name: |
| Evaluators phonefax number: |
| Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: |
| Technical Performance: |
| BT1 Quality repeatability of operations maintenance: |
| PT1 Quality repeatability of operations maintenance: |
| GT1 Quality repeatability of operations maintenance: |
| YT1 Quality repeatability of operations maintenance: |
| RT1 Quality repeatability of operations maintenance: |
| NT1 Quality repeatability of operations maintenance: |
| BT3 Qualityintegrity of technical datareport preparation efforts: |
| PT3 Qualityintegrity of technical datareport preparation efforts: |
| GT3 Qualityintegrity of technical datareport preparation efforts: |
| YT3 Qualityintegrity of technical datareport preparation efforts: |
| RT3 Qualityintegrity of technical datareport preparation efforts: |
| NT3 Qualityintegrity of technical datareport preparation efforts: |
| T4 Adequacyeffectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract: |
| T5 Ability to implement current standard practices for computer hardware design: |
| BT6 Adequacyeffectiveness of environmental safety procedures: |
| PT6 Adequacyeffectiveness of environmental safety procedures: |
| GT6 Adequacyeffectiveness of environmental safety procedures: |
| YT6 Adequacyeffectiveness of environmental safety procedures: |
| RT6 Adequacyeffectiveness of environmental safety procedures: |
| NT6 Adequacyeffectiveness of environmental safety procedures: |
| Program Management: |
| P1 Effectiveness of overall contract management including ability to effectively: |
| undefined_3: |
| P3 Timelinesseffectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive: |
| BP4 Understandcomplied with customer objectives and technical requirements: |
| PP4 Understandcomplied with customer objectives and technical requirements: |
| GP4 Understandcomplied with customer objectives and technical requirements: |
| YP4 Understandcomplied with customer objectives and technical requirements: |
| RP4 Understandcomplied with customer objectives and technical requirements: |
| NP4 Understandcomplied with customer objectives and technical requirements: |
| BP5 Successfully responded to emergency andor surge situations: |
| PP5 Successfully responded to emergency andor surge situations: |
| GP5 Successfully responded to emergency andor surge situations: |
| YP5 Successfully responded to emergency andor surge situations: |
| RP5 Successfully responded to emergency andor surge situations: |
| NP5 Successfully responded to emergency andor surge situations: |
| BP6 Qualityeffectiveness of subcontracted efforts: |
| PP6 Qualityeffectiveness of subcontracted efforts: |
| GP6 Qualityeffectiveness of subcontracted efforts: |
| YP6 Qualityeffectiveness of subcontracted efforts: |
| RP6 Qualityeffectiveness of subcontracted efforts: |
| NP6 Qualityeffectiveness of subcontracted efforts: |
| Program Management_2: |
| P7 Effectiveness of material management including Government Furnished: |
| BP8 Effectiveness of acquisition management: |
| PP8 Effectiveness of acquisition management: |
| GP8 Effectiveness of acquisition management: |
| YP8 Effectiveness of acquisition management: |
| RP8 Effectiveness of acquisition management: |
| NP8 Effectiveness of acquisition management: |
| P9 Contractor proposed alternative methodsprocesses that reduced cost: |
| P10 Contractor implemented responsiveflexible processes to improve quality: |
| Transitionphasein: |
| BT1 Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel: |
| PT1 Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel: |
| GT1 Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel: |
| YT1 Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel: |
| RT1 Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel: |
| NT1 Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel: |
| Employee RetentionAttraction: |
| BE1 Ability to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort: |
| PE1 Ability to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort: |
| GE1 Ability to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort: |
| YE1 Ability to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort: |
| RE1 Ability to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort: |
| NE1 Ability to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort: |
| BE2 Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort: |
| PE2 Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort: |
| GE2 Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort: |
| YE2 Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort: |
| RE2 Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort: |
| NE2 Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort: |
| BE3 Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work: |
| PE3 Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work: |
| GE3 Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work: |
| YE3 Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work: |
| RE3 Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work: |
| NE3 Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work: |
| S1 Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business: |
| S2 Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical: |
| RU RedUnsatisfactory in response to the questions above use additional sheets if necessary: |
| If yes please explain eg inability to meet cost performance or delivery schedules etc 1: |
| If yes please explain eg inability to meet cost performance or delivery schedules etc 2: |
| If yes please explain eg inability to meet cost performance or delivery schedules etc 3: |
| If yes please explain eg inability to meet cost performance or delivery schedules etc 4: |
| SECTION 5 NARRATIVE SUMMARY 1: |
| SECTION 5 NARRATIVE SUMMARY 2: |
| SECTION 5 NARRATIVE SUMMARY 3: |
| SECTION 5 NARRATIVE SUMMARY 4: |
| SECTION 5 NARRATIVE SUMMARY 5: |
| SECTION 5 NARRATIVE SUMMARY 6: |
| 1: |
| 2: |
| 3: |
| 4: |
| 5: |
| 6: |
| 7: |
| 8: |
| 9: |
| 10: |
| critical and demanding programs 1: |
| critical and demanding programs 2: |
| critical and demanding programs 3: |
| critical and demanding programs 4: |
| critical and demanding programs 5: |
| critical and demanding programs 6: |
| Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractors performance as desired 1: |
| Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractors performance as desired 2: |
| Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractors performance as desired 3: |
| Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractors performance as desired 4: |
| Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractors performance as desired 5: |
| Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractors performance as desired 6: |
| Date: |
| Text1: JEREMIAH SNEDKER, GS-12, USAF |
| Text2: Contracting Office |
File details come from the government source that posted it.