Atch_3_Past_Perf_Quest.docx

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire – Solicitation FA4626-15-R-0018 The 341st Contracting Squadron of the Air Force Global Strike Command is in the process of competitively selecting a source for Municiple Solid Waste Management services. The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, tools, materials, vehicles, supervision, and other items and services necessary to perform integrated solid waste management collection and recycling services at Malmstrom AFB, Great Falls, Montana. The contractor shall perform to the standards in the contract as well as all local, state, and federal regulations.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 08 March 2016. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically or by hand and e-mailed to Sarah Markovich, sarah.markovich@us.af.mil or Jennifer George, jennifer.george.3@us.af.mil or faxed to 406-731-3748 (Attention: Sarah Markovich or Jennifer George). Please call Sarah Markovich at 406-731-4462 or Jennifer George at 406-731-3625 prior to fax transmission or if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Description of work performed:

G. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date ____________ through ______________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date ____________ through ______________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

H. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

I. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

J. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Followed approved quality control plan.

4. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

5. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

6. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

7. Identified problems as they occurred.

8. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

9. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

10. Developed realistic collection schedules.

11. Met established collection schedules.

12. Provided timely response for out of cycle container collection .

13. Was responsive to contract changes.

14. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

15. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

16. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

17. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

18. What was the annual tonnage of refuse/recycling collections performed?

____Greater than or equal to 3,312 tons ____Greater than or equal to 2,875 tons ____Less than 2,875 tons

19. Has the contractor had any violations or fines due to regulation non-compliance or deficiencies? If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes ☐ No

20. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.

☐ Yes

21. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

☐ Yes

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire NO LATER THAN 16 FEBRUARY 2016 to:

Mailing Address:

341ST Contracting Squadron Attention: Sarah Markovich or Jennifer George 7015 Goddard Drive, Bldg 145 Malmstrom AFB MT 59402-6863

FAX: 406-731-3748

E-Mail to: sarah.markovich@us.af.mil Jennifer.george.3@us.af.mil For Official Use Only Page 7 of 7