Attachment_3_-_Technical_Response_Questionnaire_3_Feb_16.doc

DOC document 167 KB Posted

Attached to
Hard Chrome Plating Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4610-15-R-0039
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Space Command

About this file

Technical Response Questionnaire dated 3 Feb 16

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Hard Chrome Plating, newest first.
File Type Posted
Question_and_Answers_-_Drawings_dtd_30_Mar_2016.docx DOCX document
Attachment_1_-_PWS_Hard_Chrome_Plating_Amendment_02_(30_Mar_2016).doc DOC document
Attachment_1_-_PWS_Hard_Chrome_Plating_(27_Jan_2016).doc DOC document
Attachment_2_-_WD_05-2063_Rev_17.docx DOCX document
FA4610-15-R-0039_Hard_Chrome_Solicitation.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

HARD CHROME, ELECTROLESS NICKEL AND GOLD CADMIUM PLATING

TECHNICAL RESPONSE QUESTIONNAIRE

Source Selection Sensitive (when filled-out) IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

INSTRUCTIONS: For each sub-factor below, in the first table provide a detailed description of specific tasks performed for that sub-factor. Use the reference table to provide up to five (5) references per sub-factor to support the experience claimed in the first table. [Reference Addendum to FAR 52.212-1].

Factor 1. Ten (10) years of experience within the last ten (10) years preceding the release of this request for proposal performing each of the tasks described in sub-factors 1a through 1e inclusive of Attachment 3 of the Request for Proposal (RFP).

STANDARD OF ACCEPTABILITY

To Be Considered Technically Acceptable for Factor 1: The contractor’s responses - which must include references and contact information to support the experience claimed by offeror - evidence that the contractor has ten (10) years of experience - within the last ten (10) years preceding the release of this request for proposal - performing each of the specific tasks described in sub-factors 1a through 1e inclusive of Attachment 3 of the Request for Proposal (RFP) and specifically set forth below.

Sub-Factor 1a: At least ten (10) years of experience performing Hard Chroming tasks identified in the table immediately below within the last ten (10) years preceding the release of this request for proposal. Use the narrative block in the table immediately below to provide a detailed description of specific tasks performed evidencing Hard Chrome Capability.

Hard Chroming Capability
Ten (10) Years of Experience within last 10 years

- Ability to Hard Chrome Plate Class II non-decorative chrome in accordance with military, missile, & aerospace corporation Class II listed specs.

- Do you work to the certifications listed in

Factor 1 for the Hard Chrome processes

Listed? Please describe in detail.

Ref: PWS Part 2, paragraphs 2.2 & 2.2.1.

Yes or No

Narrative:

Reference #1, Sub-factor 1a At least 1 reference, but up to 5 maximum references for sub-factor 1a.

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

Check as appropriate

FORMCHECKBOX

P FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Phone #:

Email:

Reference #2, Sub-factor 1a

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #3, Sub-factor 1a

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #4, Sub-factor 1a

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #5, Sub-factor 1a

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Sub-Factor 1b: At least ten (10) years of experience performing Plating & Temper Etch Process tasks identified in the table immediately below within the last ten (10) years preceding the release of this request for proposal. Use the narrative block in the table immediately below to provide a detailed description of specific tasks performed evidencing Plating & Temper Etch Process Capabilities.

Plating & Temper Etch Process Capabilities
Ten (10) Years of Experience within last 10 years

Ability to perform:

- Cadmium Plating

- Electroless Nickel Plating

- Temper Etch Testing Please explain your process for each of these.

Ref: PWS Part 2, paragraphs 2.2.2, 2.2.3 & 2.2.4) Yes or No

Narrative:

Reference #1, Sub-factor 1b

At least 1 reference, but up to 5 maximum references for sub-factor 1b.

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #2, Sub-factor 1b

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #3, Sub-factor 1b

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #4, Sub-factor 1b

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #5, Sub-factor 1b

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Sub-Factor 1c: At least ten (10) years of experience performing Non-destructive Inspection (NDI) & Mechanical Cleaning Process within the last ten (10) years preceding the release of this request for proposal. Use the narrative block in the table immediately below to provide a detailed description of specific tasks evidencing Non-destructive Inspection (NDI) & Mechanical Cleaning Process.

NDI & Mechanical Cleaning Process
Ten (10) Years of Experience within last 10 years

Ability to perform:

- Non-Destructive Inspection (NDI)

(Please explain your NDI processes in general. Please submit your NDI certifications for your processes with

RFP)

- Explain your process for mechanical cleaning of parts.

Ref: PWS Part 2, paragraphs 2.2.5 & 2.26 Yes or No

Narrative:

Reference #1, Sub-factor 1c

At least 1 reference, but up to 5 maximum references for sub-factor 1c.

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #2, Sub-factor 1c

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #3, Sub-factor 1c

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #4, Sub-factor 1c

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #5, Sub-factor 1c

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Sub-Factor 1d: At least ten (10) years of experience performing Size and Weight Handling of Large Parts and Expedited Work within the last ten (10) years preceding the release of this request for proposal. Use the narrative block in the table immediately below to provide a detailed description of specific tasks evidencing Size and Weight Handling of Large Parts and Expedited Work.

Size and Weight Handling of large parts And Expedited work
Ten (10) Years of Experience within last 10 years

Ability to:

- Chrome, plate, and process all parts based on size & weight of items. Please explain what size and weight of parts you can process.

Ref: PWS Part 2, paragraphs 2.2 & 2.2.1 Yes or No

Narrative:

Reference #1, Sub-factor 1d

At least 1 reference, but up to 5 maximum references for sub-factor 1d.

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #2, Sub-factor 1d

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #3, Sub-factor 1d

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #4, Sub-factor 1d

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #5, Sub-factor 1d

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Sub-Factor 1e: At least ten (10) years of experience performing Transportation within the last ten (10) years preceding the release of this request for proposal. Use the narrative block in the table immediately below to provide a detailed description of specific tasks evidencing Transportation Capabilities.

Transportation Capability
Ten (10) Years of Experience within last 10 years
Does contractor have the proper transportation capability (e.g., trucks, flatbed trailer, etc.) to meet size, weight, and timelines of pickup and delivery of parts? (Please explain your transportation capabilities) Ref: PWS Part 2, paragraph 3.4
Yes or No

Narrative:

Reference #1, Sub-factor 1e

At least 1 reference, but up to 5 maximum references for sub-factor 1e.

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #2, Sub-factor 1e

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #3, Sub-factor 1e

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #4, Sub-factor 1e

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Reference #5, Sub-factor 1e

Contract #
Period of Performance
Total Value
Contract Type

(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)

Performed By (provide name of company)
Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)?

FORMCHECKBOX

S

POC Name:

Factor 2: Teaming Arrangements Information. If your company is not performing ALL the work, you must fill-in the contemplated teaming arrangement in Table 1 below for percentage of work performed by teaming partner and then fill in the percentage of work in Table 2 that will be performed by your company as the Prime Contractor. Teaming arrangements include, but are not limited to, the following types of relationships: prime/sub-contractor, mentor/protégé, joint venture, etc. If a teaming arrangement is not applicable and ALL the work will be performed by your company as the Prime Contractor, please indicate 0% in Table 1 and complete all field in Table 2 with 100% for below as your response.

STANDARD OF ACCEPTABILITY:

To Be Considered Technically Acceptable for Factor 2: The contractor’s response provides sufficient information to determine whether or not the contactor contemplates a teaming arrangement and, if so, indicates the name of each teaming partner (i.e. subcontractor), identifies the tasks and the percentage of work to be performed by each party (i.e. prime and subcontractor), and provides sufficient information for the Government to determine that the offeror as a whole (i.e. prime/sub combined) has the ability to perform the requirements of this solicitation.

Table 1

Name of Teaming Partner(s):
Percentage of Work Performed by Teaming Partner
Work Description Teaming Partner Would Perform

Table 2

Prime Contractor (Name Here)
Percentage of Work Performed by Prime Contractor
Work Description Prime Contractor Would Perform

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO)

FA4610-15-R-0039

Attachment 3 Technical Questionnaire

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .