Atch_7_-_11-_Past_Performance_Documents.pdf

FA4600-15-R-0035 ITW/AA

Attachment 7

ATTACHMENT 7

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SHEET

Provide the information requested in this form for each contract/program (citation) being described. Provide frank, concise comments regarding your performance on the contracts you identify. Provide a separate completed form for each contract/program submitted. Limit the number of citations submitted and the length of each submission to the limitations set forth at Table 2.0, of “Instructions to Offerors” for this solicitation.

A. Offeror Name (Company/Division): ____________________

CAGE Code: ____________________

DUNS Number: ____________________

(NOTE: If the company or division performing this effort is different than the offeror or the relevance of this effort to the instant acquisition is impacted by any company/corporate organizational change, note those changes. Refer to the "Organizational Structure Change History" you provided as part of your Past Performance Volume.)

B. Program Title: ____________________

C. Contract Specifics: ____________________

1. Contracting Agency or Customer _____________________

2. Contract Number _____________________

3. Contract Type _____________________

4. Period of Performance _____________________

5. Initial Contract Cost/Price _____________________

6. Current/final Contract Cost/Price _____________________

7. Annual Contract $ Value _____________________

8. If Amounts for 5 and 6 above are different, provide a brief description of the reason

D. Brief Description of Effort as __Prime or __Subcontractor

(Please indicate whether it was development and/or production, or other acquisition phase and highlight portions considered most relevant to current acquisition)

E. Completion Date:

1. Original date: ____________________

2. Current Schedule: ____________________

3. Estimate at Completion: ____________________

4. How Many Times Changed: ____________________

5. Primary Causes of Change _______________________________________

Attachment 7

F. Primary Customer Points of Contact: (For Government contracts, provide current information on all three individuals. For commercial contracts, provide points of contact fulfilling these same roles.)

1. Program Manager: Name ____________________

Office ____________________

Address ____________________

Telephone ____________________

2. Contracting Officer: Name ____________________

Office ____________________

Address ____________________

Telephone ____________________

3. Administrative Name ____________________

Contracting Officer Office ____________________

Address ____________________

Telephone ____________________

G. Address any technical (or other) area about this contract/program considered unique.

H. For each of the applicable Factors and Subfactors Section M3.0 illustrate how your experience on this program applies to that Factor and Subfactor.

I. Specify, by name, any key individual(s) who participated in this program and are proposed to support the instant acquisition. Also, indicate their contractual roles for both acquisitions.

J. Describe the nature or portion of the work on the proposed effort to be performed by the business entity being reported here. Also, estimate the percentage of the total proposed effort to be performed by this entity and whether this entity will be performing as the prime, subcontractor, or a corporate division related to the prime (define relationship).

Attachment 8 Pages 1

ATTACHMENT 8

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: _____________________________________________________________________________

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________

C. Contract number: _______________________________________

D. Contract type:Cost-Reimbursement: CPIF---- CPAF---- Other (explain)________________________

Fixed Price: FFP----FPIF---- Other (explain) _______________________________________

D. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No ____

E. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

F. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

G. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

H. Contractor performed work as Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Joint Venture. For Sub-Contractor or Joint Venture, please indicate actual dollar value of work completed $____________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _________________________

J. Description of service provided:______________________________________________________________

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: _________________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

Pages 2

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: _________________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: __________________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ______________________________________________________________

D. E-mail Address:___________________________________________________________________

E. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

Pages 3

Evaluation Ratings

The Contractor:

Sub-Factor 1: ITW/AA Scenarios Acceptable Unacceptable 1 The offeror demonstrated experience in generating dynamic

ITW/AA simulations to be used on the Processing and Display Sub-system Migration (PDS-M), the Missile Analysis Reporting System (MARS), the Force Survivability Analysis and Management (FSAM), Global Command and Control System (GCCS), and related products as generated from the scenario request.

2 The offeror demonstrated experience in executing ITW/AA scenarios through the Test Development Facility (TDF) and capture outputs when necessary.

3 The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to generate exercise simulation inputs for the Mobile Ground System compatible to scenario request and intent.

4 The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to develop Scenario Injection and Generation System (SIGS) input files.

5 The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to develop, submit, and track test objective worksheet (TOW) for exercises.

6 The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to generate ground based sensor response and support simulations for requested scenarios and requested sensor locations.

Sub-Factor 2: Configuration Management Acceptable Unacceptable 1 The offeror demonstrated experience in providing a configuration management scheme for the generation and maintenance of scenarios and define applicable quality control methods.

Sub-Factor 3: NORAD and USNORTHCOM, Joint Training and Exercise Support

Acceptable Unacceptable

1 The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability in providing Correlation Center Emulator (CCE) software engineering, software and simulation enhancement, and command and control (C2) system virtualization and integration support in accordance with the

PWS.

2 The offeror demonstrated experience in modeling missiles and missile warning radars and space based infrared sensors; supporting the missile warning and missile defense portion of the Tier 1 Combatant Commander exercises.

Sub-Factor 4: Distributed Missile Warning/Missile Defense Training Capability Support

Acceptable Unacceptable

1 The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to develop and support an interface between MDA’s Missile Defense Training Support System (TSS), IC2S strategic missile warning capability -- Combatant Commanders Integrated Command and Control System (CCIC2S) and Global Command and Control System (GCCS).

Pages 4

Sub-Factor 5: Graphic User’s Interface (GUI) Integration Acceptable Unacceptable 1 The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to integrate the output of the GUI with the existing Correlation Center Emulator (CCE), the PDU Converter, the Global Sensor Integration on Networks (GSIN) and the GCCS in accordance with the PWS.

Sub-Factor 6: Product Sustainment and Configuration Management Acceptable Unacceptable 1 The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to provide formal configuration management, testing, and validation/verification of product development and integration.

Sub-Factor 7: Transition Acceptable Unacceptable 1 Ensured no interruption or degradation of services during the transition period

2 Ensured adequate staffing with appropriately qualified personnel to meet all PWS requirements from award to full performance

3 Identified transition risks and effective mitigation measures

4 Successfully mitigated identified transition risks using those mitigation measures

Customer Satisfaction/General Information Acceptable Unacceptable 1 How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

2 Based on this contractor's overall performance, would you award this contractor a similar contract?

Yes ______ No______

3 Has the contractor received any quality awards or certifications for work performed on this contract?

Yes ______ No______

4 Has the contractor ever been given a cure notice, show cause notice, suspension of progress payments, or letters of direction?

Yes ______ No______

If yes, please explain

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Acceptable/Unacceptable in response to the questions above, use additional sheets, if necessary

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

Pages 5

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Email Address: Theresa.Bryant@us.af.mil, Paula.Owen.1@us.af.mil Or FAX to: 402-294-0430 (COMM), 271-0430 (DSN) mailto:Theresa.Bryant@us.af.mil mailto:Paula.Owen.1@us.af.mil

Attachment 9 Pages 1

ATTACHMENT 9

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

Corporate Letterhead

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (Date)

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

The 55th Contracting Squadron of the Air Force Installation Contracting Agency (AFICA) is in the process of selecting a contractor for the Integrated Tactical Warning/Attack Assessment (ITW/AA) Simulation Support contract at United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM), Offutt AFB NE and NORAD and United States Northern Command (USSNORTHCOM) at Peterson AFB, CO.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of your past performance on contracts that are relevant to the proposed effort. The 55th Contracting Squadron and (insert name of your corporation and division) are depending on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with our efforts.

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Noncommercial Firm- Fixed Price (FFP) contract at Offutt AFB, NE.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. Please complete the questionnaire and email it to Ms. Paula R. Owen at Paula.Owen.1@us.af.mil.

Questionnaires may also be faxed to (402) 294-0430. Please call Ms. Paula R. Owen at (402) 232-8661 prior to faxing the document, or if you have questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

THERESA H. BRYANT

Contracting Officer

1 Atch ITW/AA Past and Present Performance Questionnaire http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/af_afmc/far/Far02.doc#T2101 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/af_afmc/far/FAR03.DOC#b3104

Attachment 10

ATTACHMENT 10

SUBCONTRACTOR/TEAMING PARTNER CONSENT LETTER

FOR THE RELEASE OF PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

TO THE PRIME CONTRACTOR

Past performance information concerning subcontractors and teaming partners cannot be disclosed to a private party without the subcontractor’s or teaming partner’s consent. Because a prime contractor is a private party, the Government will need that consent before disclosing subcontractor/teaming partner past and present performance information to the prime contractor during exchanges. In an effort to assist the Government’s Performance Confidence Assessment Group (PCAG) in assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following consent letter be completed by the major subcontractors/teaming partners identified in your proposal. The completed consent letters should be submitted as part of your Present/Past Performance Volume.

SAMPLE

Dear “Contracting Officer:”

We are participating as a (subcontractor/teaming partner) with (prime contractor or name of entity providing proposal) in responding to the Department of the Air Force, Offutt Air Force Base, Request for Proposal FA4600- 15-R-0035 for the Integrated Tactical Warning/Attack Assessment (ITW/AA) Simulation Support contract.

We understand that the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value in source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process we are signing this consent letter to allow you to discuss our past and present performance information with the prime contractor during the source selection process.

(Signature and title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company)

Company Name:

Address:

Attachment 11

ATTACHMENT 11

CLIENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER

Past performance information concerning private sector contractors, subcontractors and joint venture partners cannot be disclosed to the Government without their consent. Client authorization letters are required for each identified effort. This letter will authorize release to the Government of requested information on the offeror's performance.

The Government will need that consent before contacting customers to assess the offeror’s past performance. In an effort to assist the Government's Performance Confidence Assessment Group (PCAG) in assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following client authorization letter be completed by any customers identified in your proposal. The completed client authorization letters should be submitted as part of your Present/Past Performance Volume.

Offerors should send with their list of references a letter similar to the following authorizing the reference to provide past performance information to the Government.

Dear “Client:”

We are responding to a Department of the Air Force, Offutt Air Force Base Request for Proposal FA4600-15-R- 0035 for the Integrated Tactical Warning/Attack Assessment (ITW/AA) Simulation Support contract.

In their acquisitions, the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance as a source selection factor.

They are requiring those clients of entities responding to their solicitation to be identified, and their participation in the evaluation process is requested. In the event that you are contacted for information on work performed, you are hereby authorized to respond to those inquiries.

We have identified Mr./Ms.____________________________ of your organization as the point of contact based on his/her knowledge of our work. Your cooperation is appreciated. Any questions may be directed to

Sincerely,