SF_30_Amendment_1,_FA448617R0018.pdf

PDF 54 KB Posted

Attached to
Repair Security Lighting and Fall Protection at STF Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA448617R0018
Issued by
Department of the Air Force United States Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Repair Security Lighting and Fall Protection at STF, newest first.
File Type Posted
Site_Visit_Reservation_Form.pdf PDF
SF_30,_Amendment_2.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_Submittal_Register.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_Specifications.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_Project_Drawings.pdf PDF
Solicitation_FA448617R0018.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

TSAX 17-1000

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

This Amendment changes the Section L - Proposal Instructions and Section M - Evaluation Factors.

The POC for this Amendment is Ana Areias at ana.areias.pt@us.af.mil.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 26-Jul-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA448617R0018

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

25-Jul-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

26-Jul-2017

CODE

65 CONF/LGCA

65TH CONTRACTING FLIGHT

APO AE 09720-7710

FA4486 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA448617R0018

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SECTION L - PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, Offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of two (2) separate parts: Part I – Price Proposal and Part II – Technical Proposal.

B. The Contracting Officer (CO) has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the CO will review this determination and if, in the CO’s opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested and certification under Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the CO determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the CO to determine the reasonableness of the price.

C. The Government is soliciting two different options of the same project, in accordance with the Specifications (Attachment 1), Section 01 11 00, Paragraph 1.2.1. Depending on availability of funds, the Government will award one, and only one, of the options solicited, resulting in the award of a single line item.

In accordance with FAR 36.204(d), the magnitude of this project is between $250,000.00 and $500,000.00.

D. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS

1. PART I – PRICE PROPOSAL

(a) Complete blocks 14 through 20C of Section A in the Standard Form (SF) 1442. In doing so, the offeror assents to the contract terms and conditions as written in the Sections A through K. These sections constitute the model contract.

(b) Insert proposed unit and extended prices in Section B for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN).

(c) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Sections I through K. Section K shall be returned in its entirety. For Sections F through J, the offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.

(d) A letter of authorization for the Contracting Officer to verify offeror’s financial responsibility.

Include name, address and phone numbers for financial institutions to include points of contact.

(e) Acknowledgement of all amendments to the solicitation in accordance with the instructions on the

SF 30.

2. PART II – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - Limited to no more than 30 pages.

Technical Proposals will be rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis by sub-factors.

(a) SUB-FACTOR 1 – STAFFING PLAN

CRITERIA: Offerors must provide proposed methodology to meet the staffing and manning requirements relating to the project described in the Specifications (Attachment 1). Furthermore, include an organization chart with all key personnel with a description of work experience relating to projects similar in scope to those expected to work with this project. The offeror’s proposal shall include at a minimum the following positions:

(a) Project Manager

(b) Site Superintendent

(c) Quality Control Manager

(b) SUB-FACTOR 2 – ALVARA CERTIFICATION

CRITERIA: Offeror shall furnish their Alvara Certification.

E. GENERAL INFORMATION

1. Format for proposal Parts I & II shall be as follows:

(a) The proposals will be 8 1/2” x 11” paper or standard A4 paper, except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17”.

(b) A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information.

(c) Typing shall not be less than 10 point.

(d) Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required.

2. A pre-proposal site visit will be conducted on 7 August 2017 at 10:00h local time. Interested offerors should be outside the Lajes Field main gate by this time to proceed to the project site. Late arrival will disqualify the offeror from attending the pre-proposal site visit. Only one site visit will be conducted.

3. All contractor’s questions regarding this solicitation must be emailed to ana.areias.pt@us.af.mil and

65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil no later than 10 August 2017. The US Government will not be held responsible for answering any questions after this time. The answers to the questions received shall be disseminated in the same manner this Solicitation was.

4. The proposal must be completed and returned no later than 25 August 2017 at 15:00h local time. If submitting proposal by e-mail, only submit one copy and the maximum size of email shall not exceed 8MB.

Proposal can be divided over multiple e-mails: If sending multiple e-mails, offerors must ensure the subject line contains how many emails have been sent using the following format: “E-mail X of Y” (1 of 4, 2 of 4, etc.).

If the Offeror chooses to mail the offer via postal services, the Government will not be responsible for any non-receipt of the offer, or any failure of the offeror to verify receipt of the mailed offer. The mailing addresses are as follows:

Commercial:

Seccao de Contratos, Base Aerea No. 4 Attn: Ana Areias (or 65 CONF/LGCA) Avenida do Imperio, Edf. T-615 mailto:ana.areias.pt@us.af.mil mailto:65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil

Terceira, Azores, Portugal 9760-277

US Postal:

65th Contracting Flight Attn: Ana Areias (or 65 CONF/LGCA) Bldg. T-615, Rm. 203

APO AE 09720-7775

5. The proposal may also be delivered at the 65 Contracting Flight, Building T-615, room 203. Offerors should allow sufficient time to arrive and submit the proposals to Contracting Flight prior to the set closing time.

Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208 “Late Submission, Modifications, and Withdrawals of Proposals”. If a gate access is not granted, please contact the Flight immediately. The contractors are responsible for coordinating and processing gate pass requests in a timely manner. The Government shall not be responsible for any delays due to in-processing or out-processing the base

6. Notice to Offerors: Funds are not presently available for this effort. Therefore, offerors must ensure their proposal is valid until 30 September 2017. No award will be made under this solicitation until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

A. SOURCE SELECTION

1. Basis for contract award: This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Source Selection, conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) FAR Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation. This part supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS) and DoD Source Selection Procedures, Appendix C, dated 31 March 2016. These regulations are available electronically at the Air Force (AF) FARSite, http://farsite.hill.af.mil.

The Government will select the proposal with the lowest evaluated price from among those meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors. The award shall be made to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR Part 9.1, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and is determined, based on the evaluation factors and sub-factors, to represent the lowest price technically acceptable proposal.

2. Number of contracts to be awarded: The Government intends to award one (1) contract to Repair Security Lighting and Fall Protection at South Tank Farm (STF), Project TSAX 17-1000. The award will be made to Option A (CLIN 0001) or Option B (CLIN 0002) described in the Specifications (Attachment 1), Section 01 11 00, Paragraph 1.2.1. Depending on availability of funds, the Government will award one, and only one, of the options solicited, resulting in the award of a single line item.

3. Exchanges: The Government intends to make the award without conducting exchanges with any offerors.

Nevertheless, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to do so. The Government also reserves the right to conduct interchanges with some, all or none of the offerors.

B. EVALUATION FACTORS

1. Evaluation Factors and Sub-Factors: The following evaluation factors and sub-factors will be used to evaluate each proposal received in a timely manner. In this Source Selection, both factors are considered to have an approximately equal value.

FACTOR 1 – PRICE

All offerors must insert proposed unit and extended prices in Section B of the Standard Form (SF) 1442 for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN). All offerors must propose on all line items in Section B of the SF 1442.

The Government will evaluate the price of each CLIN/Option individually, since only one will be awarded. Offerors whose price is determined to be unreasonable, unbalanced, or unrealistic may not be considered for award.

Reasonableness: The offeror’s Price Proposal will be evaluated to ensure it is fair and reasonable, pursuant to FAR 15.404.

FACTOR 2 – TECHNICAL

The Government’s technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each sub-factor, in accordance with the measures of merit described below. Any sub-factor evaluated as “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, make it ineligible for award. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable will be considered for award.

TABLE 1 - TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

ACCEPTABLE Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

UNACCEPTABLE Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The Proposals shall be evaluated against the following technical sub-factors:

FACTOR 2, SUB-FACTOR 1 – STAFFING PLAN

CRITERIA: Offeror must provide proposed methodology to meet the staffing and manning requirements relating to the project described in the Specifications (Attachment 1). Furthermore, include an organization chart with all key personnel with a description of work experience relating to projects similar in scope to those expected to work with this project. The offeror’s proposal shall include, at a minimum, the following positions:

(a) Project Manager

MEASURE OF MERIT: This requirement is met when the offeror attests that they have a proposed methodology able to meet the Governments minimum requirements in the Specifications (Attachment 1) and provides an organizational chart identifying all key personnel associated with this requirement. At a minimum, offerors must provide information on the individual’s name, title, duty, years of experience, and experience level relating to similar projects in size and scope on the following key positions:

(a) Project Manager

FACTOR 2, SUB-FACTOR 2 – ALVARA CERTIFICATION

CRITERIA: Offeror shall furnish their Alvara Certification.

MEASURE OF MERIT: This requirement is met if the Alvara Certification is provided attesting that the offeror can conduct business in the country of Portugal using the scope and magnitude of this requirement.

C. AWARD PROCESS

1. The Government intends to award to the lowest priced offeror that meets the technical standards of this solicitation. The evaluation process will go as follows:

(a) The Government will evaluate all proposals for price, ranking the offerors from lowest to highest.

(b) The lowest priced proposal will then be evaluated for technical acceptability. The proposal must be rated “acceptable” in order to be considered for award.

(c) If the lowest priced proposal is “unacceptable”, the next second lowest priced proposal will be evaluated for technical acceptability. This shall continue until an offeror with an “acceptable” rating is identified.

(End of Summary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .