FA445223Q0016 - Questions-Responses (6-7-2023).pdf
PDF 76 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Computer Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA445223Q0016
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 02.pdf | ||
| FA445223Q0016 - Questions-Responses - (rev 6-15-2023).pdf | ||
| PWS - Computer Support Services (rev 6-15-2023).pdf | ||
| FA445223Q0016 - Questions-Responses (rev 6-8-2023).pdf | ||
| Amendment 01.pdf | ||
| Combined Synopsis Solicitation - Computer Support Services (rev 6-8-2023).pdf | ||
| Combined Synopsis Solicitation - Computer Support Services.pdf | ||
| PWS - Computer Support Services (6-2-2023).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA445223Q0016
Computer Support Services
Questions and Responses (6-7-2023)
Q1) Is there a current incumbent or contract number?
R1) Yes. The current incumbent is Anderson, Clinton Edward, d/b/a CEA Information Technology Services. Contract number is FA445220P0005.
Q2) Incumbent: Is the incumbent eligible to rebid?
R2) Yes, as long as they meet all the eligibility requirements outlined in the Combined Synopsis/Solicitation.
Q3) Clarification on Scope: Are there any specific tasks or responsibilities that need further clarification or detail?
R3) Additional information is required to provide a response for this question. Refer to the PWS for all specific tasks and responsibilities that the awarded Vendor will be responsible for in the performance of the contract. If the Vendor that submitted this question requires further clarification and/or detail of any portion of the PWS, provide a question that references the specific PWS paragraph.
Q4) Evaluation Criteria: What are the key evaluation criteria that will be used to assess proposals? What is the relative importance of cost versus technical capability in the evaluation process?
R4) The evaluation criteria and basis of award are already stated in the Combined Synopsis/Solicitation document, refer to that document for the evaluation process. IAW FAR 13.106-1(a)(2)(iii) solicitations are not required to state the relative importance assigned to each evaluation factor, refer to the basis of award on the Government’s evaluation process.
Q5) Timeline: What is the expected timeline for the project? Are there any key milestones or deadlines that the contractor should be aware of?
R5) Refer to the Combined Synopsis/Solicitation paragraph (xv) for RFQ due dates, and paragraph (vi) for periods of performance. Contract award is anticipated on or about 6/30/2023.
Q6) Reporting Requirements: What are the reporting requirements? How often are reports expected and what should they include?
R6) Refer to the PWS for reporting requirements.
Q7) Performance Metrics: What performance metrics will be used to evaluate the success of the project?
R7) Refer to the PWS paragraph 6, Performance Requirements Summary for performance objectives/standards/thresholds.
Q8) Resources: What resources will be provided by the government, and what resources are expected to be provided by the contractor?
R8) This information is already in the PWS, refer to that document.
Q9) Security and Compliance: Are there any specific security or compliance requirements that the contractor should be aware of?
R9) Security/compliance requirements are already in the PWS, refer to that document.
Q10) Changes in Scope: What is the process for handling changes in scope or additional work that is not specified in the initial contract?
R10) There are various contract processes available. In-scope changes will likely be negotiated between both parties IAW FAR Clause 52.212-4(c) ‘Changes’, which will be in the contract. Additional work deemed out of scope will likely not be added to the contract.
Q11) Payment Terms: What are the payment terms? When can the contractor expect to receive payment for services rendered?
R11) FAR Clause 52.212-4(i)(2) states that the Government will make payment in accordance with the Prompt Payment Act ( 31 U.S.C.3903), which is usually 30-days after a proper invoice has been submitted. However, for small businesses the Prompt Payment Act requires that the head of an agency establish an accelerated payment date with a goal of 15 days after a proper invoice is submitted.
- NOTE: As the CLIN structure is based on a Unit of Issue of ‘Sessions’ as defined in the PWS, and the RFQ does not expressly provide specific billing/invoicing guidance, expect an Amendment to this RFQ to be provided in the near future with billing terms/conditions that allow for only 1 monthly invoice for the sessions performed that month.
Q12) Past Performance: How much weight is given to past performance in the evaluation process?
R12) Refer to R4) above.
Q13) Is this a new requirement? If not does it have an incumbent/current contract number?
R13) It is not a new requirement, refer to R1) above.
Q14) Response instructions request 3-pages for relevant experience, PWS relevancy, contract and POC info; is pricing to be included as part of the 3-page response or in addition to the 3-page response?
R14) Pricing is not included as part of the 3-page Relevant Experience document submission. The pricing quote is a separate submission.
End of Questions and Responses
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .