Amendment_01.pdf

MPLS 12-0013A

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Purpose: To amend Sections M-1(C) and M-2(B) of the solicitation.

POC:

Contract Administrator: Andrew S. Sorensen; andrew .sorensen.1@us.af.mil; (210) 671-6088.

Contracting Officer: Jenifer Lash; jenifer.lash.1@us.af.mil; (210) 671-0790.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 26-Aug-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA3047-15-R-0059

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

17-Aug-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

25-Aug-2015

CODE

502D CONTRACTING SQUADRON

1655 SELFRIDGE AVE

JBSA LACKLAND TX 78236-5253

FA3047 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA3047-15-R-0059

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FOR AWARD

M-1 SOURCE SELECTION

A. Basis for Contract Award

This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15, Contracting by Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS), DoD Source Selection Procedures, Appendix A, and Air Force Mandatory Procedures 5315.3.

These regulations are available electronically at the Air Force (AF) FAR Site, http://farsite.hill.af.mil. A contract may be awarded to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR Subpart 9.1, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors to represent the lowest price technically acceptable proposal.

While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

B. Number of Contracts to be Awarded

The Government intends to award one contract in response to this solicitation.

C. Discussions

The Government intends to award without discussions; therefore, offerors should submit proposals that represent their best efforts. If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. In the event discussions are to be conducted, the competitive range will be established IAW FAR 15.306(c).

D. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable.

E. Evaluation Process

The evaluation process to be used is as follows:

Step 1: Perform price evaluations on all proposals and rank them from lowest to highest.

Step 2: Conduct technical evaluations beginning with the lowest priced proposal. If the lowest priced proposal is determined to be technically unacceptable, then the next lowest priced proposal will be evaluated.

Technical evaluations will continue until the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal is identified. The Government, at its discretion, may continue technical evaluations until the Contracting Officer determines that a sufficient number of technically acceptable proposals have been identified to permit determination of price fair and reasonable based on adequate price competition.

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/

Step 3: Once a proposal has been deemed technically acceptable, the Contracting Officer will evaluate the past performance submitted with the proposal to determine acceptability. The Government reserves the right to verify third party information and/or additional sources. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror will be determined to have unknown past performance and shall be considered “Acceptable”.

The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. The Government reserves the right to perform both price and technical evaluations on unacceptable offerors to determine if it is in its interest to open discussions. Only those offerors determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award.

M-2 EVALUATION FACTORS

A. Evaluation Factors

The following evaluation factors will be used to evaluate each proposal. The Government will evaluate proposals for acceptability, but will not rank the proposals by the non-price factors.

Factor 1: Price Factor 2: Technical Factor 3: Past Performance

B. Price Factor The evaluated price shall be the total price proposed by the offeror in Section B. The evaluated price must be determined “reasonable” as defined in FAR 31.201-3. Proposals will then be ranked from lowest to highest based on evaluated price. Price analysis will be done using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404-1.

C. Technical Factor

For the purposes of technical evaluation, the term “offeror” will include any proposed teaming arrangements.

The Government’s technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each factor. Any factor evaluated as “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, may not be eligible for award. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

The proposal shall be evaluated against the following technical factor:

Factor: Proposed Schedule

Description: This factor evaluates the schedule proposed by the offeror.

TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Standard: This requirement is met when the offeror submits a schedule that captures all SOW requirements and execution timelines. The offeror must demonstrate project completion showing all major elements of work to include percentage of each work element (i.e. a schedule using an AF Form 3064 which can be located on http://www.e-publishing.af.mil).

D. Past Performance The Contracting Officer shall seek past performance information on offerors based on the past efforts provided by the offeror and/or data independently obtained from other Government and commercial sources.

The proposal shall be evaluated against the following past performance factor:

Factor: Past Performance

Description: This factor evaluates whether the offerors present/past performance is acceptable/unacceptable to the subject solicitation.

Standard: The requirement is met when the offeror demonstrates recent and relevant past performance. The offeror must provide evidence of three (3) to five (5) projects within the past five (5) years involving the repair/replacement of concrete and/or paver sidewalks. The project cited as evidence must have a construction cost of at least $1,000,000. Evidence/documentation shall include:

• The project title

• A description of the project’s scope

• The project’s location (city/base and state)

• The project’s original award amount and the final cost

• Contact information (name, email address and current telephone number) of the project’s owner.

(End of Proposal Evaluation)

(End of Summary of Changes)

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.