Amendment__6.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

-Update Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, para 4.13 VOL III - Price Proposal -Update Addendum to FAR 52.212-2, Para 2.3.2 Price Evaluation -Update Attachment 2 Price List Version 2, dated 24 Jul 15.

Offerors must submit the updated Attachment 2 Price List Version 2 dated 24 July 15 as part of their Vol 3 Price Proposal that complies w ith the instructions at FAR 52.212-1 para 3.1. Offerors w ho have already submitted their proposals only need to submit the updated Attachment 2 Price List Version 2 dated 24 July 15. An original, three (3) copies and a CD is still required, but are not required to be in four separate binders if Offerors have already submitted their proposals.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 18

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 27-Jul-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA2517-15-R-5004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

19-Jun-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

28-Jul-2015

CODE

FA2517 - 21 CONS

135 DOVER STREET, SUITE 1055

PETERSON AFB CO 80914-1117

FA2517 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA2517-15-R-5004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

52.212-1

52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial Items (Apr 2014)

(a) North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code and small business size standard. The NAICS code and small business size standard for this acquisition appear in Block 10 of the solicitation cover sheet (SF 1449). However, the small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, but which proposes to furnish an item which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b) Submission of offers. Submit signed and dated offers to the office specified in this solicitation at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. Offers may be submitted on the SF 1449, letterhead stationery, or as otherwise specified in the solicitation. As a minimum, offers must show --

(1) The solicitation number;

(2) The time specified in the solicitation for receipt of offers;

(3) The name, address, and telephone number of the offeror;

(4) A technical description of the items being offered in sufficient detail to evaluate compliance with the requirements in the solicitation. This may include product literature, or other documents, if necessary;

(5) Terms of any express warranty;

(6) Price and any discount terms;

(7) “Remit to” address, if different than mailing address;

(8) A completed copy of the representations and certifications at FAR 52.212-3 (see FAR 52.212-3(b) for those representations and certifications that the offeror shall complete electronically);

(9) Acknowledgment of Solicitation Amendments;

(10) Past performance information, when included as an evaluation factor, to include recent and relevant contracts for the same or similar items and other references (including contract numbers, points of contact with telephone numbers and other relevant information); and

(11) If the offer is not submitted on the SF 1449, include a statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offers that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be excluded from consideration.

(c) Period for acceptance of offers. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 30 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers, unless another time period is specified in an addendum to the solicitation.

(d) Product samples. When required by the solicitation, product samples shall be submitted at or prior to the time specified for receipt of offers. Unless otherwise specified in this solicitation, these samples shall be submitted at no expense to the Government, and returned at the sender’s request and expense, unless they are destroyed during preaward testing.

(e) Multiple offers. Offerors are encouraged to submit multiple offers presenting alternative terms and conditions or commercial items for satisfying the requirements of this solicitation. Each offer submitted will be evaluated separately.

(f) Late submissions, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers.

(1) Offerors are responsible for submitting offers, and any modifications, revisions, or withdrawals, so as to reach the Government office designated in the solicitation by the time specified in the solicitation. If no time is specified in the solicitation, the time for receipt is 4:30 p.m., local time, for the designated Government office on the date that offers or revisions are due.

(2)

(i) Any offer, modification, revision, or withdrawal of an offer received at the Government office designated in the solicitation after the exact time specified for receipt of offers is “late” and will not be considered unless it is received before award is made, the Contracting Officer determines that accepting the late offer would not unduly delay the acquisition; and—

(A) If it was transmitted through an electronic commerce method authorized by the solicitation, it was received at the initial point of entry to the Government infrastructure not later than 5:00 p.m. one working day prior to the date specified for receipt of offers;

or

(B) There is acceptable evidence to establish that it was received at the Government installation designated for receipt of offers and was under the Government’s control prior to the time set for receipt of offers; or

(C) If this solicitation is a request for proposals, it was the only proposal received.

(ii) However, a late modification of an otherwise successful offer, that makes its terms more favorable to the Government, will be considered at any time it is received and may be accepted.

(3) Acceptable evidence to establish the time of receipt at the Government installation includes the time/date stamp of that installation on the offer wrapper, other documentary evidence of receipt maintained by the installation, or oral testimony or statements of Government personnel.

(4) If an emergency or unanticipated event interrupts normal Government processes so that offers cannot be received at the Government office designated for receipt of offers by the exact time specified in the solicitation, and urgent Government requirements preclude amendment of the solicitation or other notice of an extension of the closing date, the time specified for receipt of offers will be deemed to be extended to the same time of day specified in the solicitation on the first work day on which normal Government processes resume.

(5) Offers may be withdrawn by written notice received at any time before the exact time set for receipt of offers. Oral offers in response to oral solicitations may be withdrawn orally. If the solicitation authorizes facsimile offers, offers may be withdrawn via facsimile received at any time before the exact time set for receipt of offers, subject to the conditions specified in the solicitation concerning facsimile offers. An offer may be withdrawn in person by an offeror or its authorized representative if, before the exact time set for receipt of offers, the identity of the person requesting withdrawal is established and the person signs a receipt for the offer.

(g) Contract award (not applicable to Invitation for Bids). The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror’s initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is in the public interest; accept other than the lowest offer; and waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received.

(h) Multiple awards. The Government may accept any item or group of items of an offer, unless the offeror qualifies the offer by specific limitations. Unless otherwise provided in the Schedule, offers may not be submitted for quantities less than those specified. The Government reserves the right to make an award on any item for a quantity less than the quantity offered, at the unit prices offered, unless the offeror specifies otherwise in the offer.

(i) Availability of requirements documents cited in the solicitation.

(1)

(i) The GSA Index of Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions, FPMR Part 101-29, and copies of specifications, standards, and commercial item descriptions cited in this solicitation may be obtained for a fee by submitting a request to--

GSA Federal Supply Service Specifications Section

Suite 8100 470 L’Enfant Plaza, SW Washington, DC 20407 Telephone (202) 619-8925)

Facsimile (202 619-8978).

(ii) If the General Services Administration, Department of Agriculture, or Department of Veterans Affairs issued this solicitation, a single copy of specifications, standards, and commercial item descriptions cited in this solicitation may be obtained free of charge by submitting a request to the addressee in paragraph (i)(1)(i) of this provision. Additional copies will be issued for a fee.

(2) Most unclassified Defense specifications and standards may be downloaded from the following ASSIST websites--

(i) ASSIST (https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/ ).

(ii) Quick Search (http://quicksearch.dla.mil/).

(iii) ASSISTdocs.com (http://assistdocs.com).

(3) Documents not available from ASSIST may be ordered from the Department of Defense Single Stock Point (DoDSSP) by—

(i) Using the ASSIST Shopping Wizard ( https://assist.dla.mil/wizard/index.cfm );

(ii) Phoning the DoDSSP Customer Service Desk (215) 697-2179, Mon-Fri, 0730 to 1600 EST; or

(iii) Ordering from DoDSSP, Building 4 Section D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, Telephone (215) 697/2197, Facsimile (215) 697-1462.

(4) Nongovernment (voluntary) standards must be obtained from the organization responsible for their preparation, publication, or maintenance.

(j) Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number. (Applies to offers exceeding $3,000, and offers of $3,000 or less if the solicitation requires the Contractor to be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database. The offeror shall enter, in the block with its name and address on the cover page of its offer, the annotation “DUNS” or “DUNS+4” followed by the DUNS or DUNS+4 number that identifies the offeror’s name and address.

https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/ http://quicksearch.dla.mil/ http://assistdocs.com/ https://assist.dla.mil/wizard/index.cfm

The DUNS+4 is the DUNS number plus a 4-character suffix that may be assigned at the discretion of the offeror to establish additional SAM records for identifying alternative Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) accounts (see FAR Subpart 32.11) for the same concern. If the offeror does not have a DUNS number, it should contact Dun and Bradstreet directly to obtain one. An offeror within the United States may contact Dun and Bradstreet by calling 1- 866-705-5711 or via the Internet at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. An offeror located outside the United States must contact the local Dun and Bradstreet office for DUNS number. The offeror should indicate that it is an offeror for a Government contract when contacting the local Dun and Bradstreet office.

(k) System for Award Management. Unless exempted by an addendum to this solicitation, by submission of an offer, the offeror acknowledges the requirement that a prospective awardee shall be registered in the SAM database prior to award, during performance and through final payment of any contract resulting from this solicitation. If the Offeror does not become registered in the SAM database in the time prescribed by the Contracting Officer, the Contracting Officer will proceed to award to the next otherwise successful registered Offeror. Offerors may obtain information on registration and annual confirmation requirements via the SAM database accessed through https://www.acquisition.gov.

(l) Debriefing. If a post-award debriefing is given to requesting offerors, the Government shall disclose the following information, if applicable:

(1) The agency’s evaluation of the significant weak or deficient factors in the debriefed offeror’s offer.

(2) The overall evaluated cost or price and technical rating of the successful and debriefed offeror and past performance information on the debriefed offeror.

(3) The overall ranking of all offerors, when any ranking was developed by the agency during source selection.

(4) A summary of rationale for award;

(5) For acquisitions of commercial items, the make and model of the item to be delivered by the successful offeror.

(6) Reasonable responses to relevant questions posed by the debriefed offeror as to whether source-selection procedures set forth in the solicitation, applicable regulations, and other applicable authorities were followed by the agency.

(End of Provision)

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS

The following additions/changes are made to FAR 52.212-1:

1.0 Acquisition Strategy. This contract will be awarded as a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract utilizing Performance Price Tradeoff Source Selection Process wherein Technical capabilities will be assessed on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. The Government’s award decision will be based upon a tradeoff between past performance and price for Offerors whose Technical Proposals are considered acceptable. Past performance is approximately equal to price when being evaluated.

The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition.

Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer’s opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional cost information will be requested.

However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, Offerors may be required to submit information other than cost or pricing data to support a determination of price reasonableness.

http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform https://www.acquisition.gov/

2.0 General Instructions. This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals, as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. Throughout this solicitation, the term “Offeror” includes subcontractors, teammates and/or joint venture partners. The Offeror’s proposal must include all data and information requested, and must be submitted in accordance with (IAW) these instructions. Any Offeror who submits an incomplete package may be considered non-responsive. The Offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the solicitation. A proposal that is sufficiently documented to support technical capability, past performance, and price in a complete, orderly, and specific detailed manner will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation. Non-compliance with the instructions and solicitation may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation and may be grounds to eliminate the proposal from consideration for contract award.

2.1 Submission Requirements. Documents submitted in response to this solicitation must be fully responsive to and consistent with requirements of the solicitation and Performance Work Statement (PWS), and Government standards and regulations pertaining to the PWS.

2.2 Representations and Certifications. Complete the necessary fill-ins, certifications, and provisions. The provisions FAR 52.212-3 shall be returned along with the proposal (see FAR 52.212-3(l) for those representations and certifications that the Offeror shall complete electronically).

2.3 Other Information Required. The offeror shall include a cover letter with its proposal which shall include the name, title, and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to the proposal and who can obligate the Offeror’s company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government. The cover letter shall also include the company/division’s street address, county code, and facility code; Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code; Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) code; size of business (large or small). Provide the name, title, and telephone number of the company/division point of contact of individuals who are authorized to represent its company to the Government for subcontractors of the proposed effort. The cover letter shall stand alone and shall not be included as its own volume or included in the Technical, Past Performance or Price Proposal volumes.

3.0 Proposal Preparation and Format Instructions. This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals in regards to the format and content of the proposal. Each volume shall be complete in itself. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale.

3.1 Page Limitations. Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. Total page count will be based on the printed proposal submission. If page limitations are exceeded, excess pages will not be read nor considered in the evaluation of the proposal. A page is defined as each face of an 8.5 x 11-inch sheet of paper containing information.

All information except for document numbers, page number, etc., shall be provided in an image area of 7 x 9 inches.

Two pages may be printed back-to-back on one sheet of paper. However, this will be considered two (2) pages for the purpose of page count. The background color of each page of the proposal submission shall be white or ivory stock only. The maximum number of pages for each volume is listed below. Price information is limited to the Price List. Excess pages will not be evaluated, but will be retained in the file. See table below for specific number of copies required and pages for each of the Volumes.

TITLE

NUMBER

OF COPIES

MAXIMUM NUMBER

OF PAGES

Volume I Technical Proposal

Original and 3 copies

1 Compact Disk

Limit to no more than fifteen

(15) pages total. Page limitations above shall include the Table of Contents, Index and Glossary.

Volume II Past Performance

Original and 3 copies

Limit to no more than ten (10) Citations; Each citation shall be

Information 1 Compact Disk limited to two (2) pages;

limitation twenty (20) pages total. Page limitations above exclude the overview which shall not exceed two (2) pages.

The 20-page limitation above also excludes the list of questionnaire recipients, consent letters, and/or client authorization letters.

Volume III Price Proposal

Original and 3 copies

1 Compact Disk

No page limitation. Only the proposed unit price list will be evaluated.

3.2 Text. Text type should be Times New Roman or Arial, no smaller than 12-point with normal proportional spacing. Illustrations and tables shall be no smaller than Times New Romans or Arial 10 point. Text lines will be, at a minimum, single-spaced.

3.3 Tables, Charts, Graphs, and Figures. Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible, and shall not exceed 11 x 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume, and count as a single page. Foldout pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams and schematics, and not for pages of text. For graphics, exhibits and figures, text shall be no smaller than Times New Roman or Arial 10-point font. Text within tables shall be no smaller than Times New Roman or Arial 10-point font.

These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals.

3.4 Binding and Labeling. Each volume (Technical, Past Performance and Pricing) of the proposal will be bound separately, with each volume in a standard loose-leaf three-ring binder. Each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated on a stand-alone basis. Cross-referencing between volumes is not permitted. Information required for proposal evaluation which is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted.

Elaborate format and binding are neither necessary nor desirable. The cover and spine of each binder will clearly identify the Offeror's name, volume number, Request for Proposal (RFP) number "FA2517-15-R-5004", RFP title "PAFB & CMAFS Custodial Service", and copy number, e.g., copy 2 of 2. The original for each volume will be clearly identified on the cover and the spine. All binders will allow for easy removal and replacement of pages.

Replacement pages in response to evaluation notices (if any), shall be colored stock with lines in the margin designating the change and the change highlighted.

3.5 Electronic Copies. The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. The CD-electronic (softcopy) proposal shall be in a Microsoft Operation System format and as a minimum have Office 2007® capabilities. The electronic copy of the proposal will be submitted on compact disk/read only memory (CD/ROM). Replacement disks will be required to update a final proposal resulting from discussions and updates, if any. Offers are advised to perform a computer virus check prior to submission. The Government will perform computer virus checks on all submitted electronic media and will immediately return for replacement any disk found to be infected. In the event of discrepancies between hard copies and electronic copies of a proposal, the hard copies will be used for evaluation.

3.6 Proposal Clarity. The proposal shall be clear and concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation of the Offeror’s capabilities and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The Offeror’s proposal shall not simply rephrase, reiterate, or restate the Government’s own language, but rather shall provide a convincing and clear rationale describing how it intends to fulfill the requirement. The Offeror shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of its capabilities, facilities and experience, and will base the evaluation on the information presented in the Offeror’s proposal.

3.7 Information Regarding Submission of Proposal. Deliver proposals to the following address not later than 12:01 p.m., Mountain Standard Time (MST), on 7 Aug 2015:

21CONS/LGCAB

Attn: Jeremy Rash or Tina Crosby Building 1324 580 Goodfellow Street Peterson AFB, CO 80914-1616

All proposals delivered in response to this solicitation shall reflect the following information on the address label:

(1) Solicitation Number FA2517-15-R-5004

(2) The legend "To be delivered unopened to the Contracting Officer/ Specialist"

(3) The volume and copy numbers contained in each box

(4) The “original” proposal shall be clearly marked “original”

Offerors are cautioned that Peterson AFB CO has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. SOME DELAY SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED WHEN HANDCARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at the bid depository PRIOR to the time specified for receipt. Offerors should be aware that the Government has experienced delays in the postal service to Peterson AFB. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f) “Late submission, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers.”

3.8 Acceptance of an Offer. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award. Offerors must agree to hold the prices in their offers firm for 300 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

4.0 Specific Proposal Instructions. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the Offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts; Volume I – Technical Proposal, Volume II – Past Performance, and Volume III – Price.

4.1 Volume I - Technical Proposal. Volume I shall consist of the Table of Contents, Index, Glossary, and Technical Proposal in the format as follows:

4.2 Tab 1: Table of Contents. Include a master table of contents of the entire proposal.

4.3 Tab 2: Index. Include an index for ease of referencing the required proposal information.

4.4 Tab 3: Glossary. Include a glossary of all acronyms and industry specific terminology used.

4.5 Tab 4: Technical Proposal. The Technical Proposal Volume shall be prepared in an orderly format and in sufficient detail to enable the Government to make a thorough evaluation of the Offeror’s technical competence and ability to comply with the PWS and Services Summary requirements. All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory. The Technical Proposal shall consist solely of the contractor’s Management Plan. The Management Plan shall clearly describe the Offeror’s approach to satisfy the Government’s requirements. The Offeror’s Management Plan shall demonstrate a clear understanding of the nature and scope of the work specified in the PWS. The Government will assess the Offeror’s Management Plan to successfully perform the major tasks and subtasks outlined in the PWS. Failure to provide a reasonable and complete Management Plan shall reflect a lack of capability to perform the work requirements and will result in a determination that the Offeror’s proposal is unacceptable. The Management Plan shall also specifically address the following:

1. The contractor’s approach to obtain security clearances, vehicle passes and badges for PAFB and CMAFS IAW the PWS.

2. The contractor’s approach to obtain its own escorts for PAFB and CMAFS as required IAW the PWS.

3. The contractor’s approach to ensure required immunizations and training are completed IAW the PWS.

4. The contractor’s approach to manage its workforce during fluctuating workloads in order to maintain continued services IAW the PWS.

5. The contractor’s approach to procure and use approved chemicals prior to the contract start and as changes occur IAW the PWS.

6. The contractor’s approach to ensure a Cleaning Frequency Schedule is submitted and all equipment is in place prior to contract start and as changes occur IAW the PWS.

7. The contractor’s approach to implement a key control program IAW the PWS.

8. The contractors approach to provide adequate manning, sufficient oversight and an effective work schedule to ensure uninterrupted custodial services at contract start date, and through the life of the contract IAW the

PWS.

4.6. Volume II - Past Performance Proposal. Each Offeror shall submit a past performance volume with its proposal, containing past performance information IAW the format below. Offerors are cautioned that the Government will use data provided by each Offeror in this volume and data obtained from other sources in the evaluation of past performance.

4.7 Tab 1: Overview. Each proposal shall include an overview which summarizes the content of the past performance volume, to include a list of citations and disseminated Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ).

4.8 Tab 2: Citations. Each citation shall address a single contract that the Offeror believes demonstrates recent and relevant past performance (see para 4.9). Citations shall state in which areas the Offeror believes that recent and relevant performance is demonstrated. Each Citation provided by the Offeror shall state the total number of buildings serviced, total square footage serviced and the types of services provided or types of buildings serviced (i.e., Child Care, Medical Facilities, Fitness Centers, Administrative Areas, Emergency Clean-up/Response and Distinguished Visitor Area Cleaning). The Offeror shall cite no more than ten (10) citations that the Offeror believes demonstrate recent and relevant past performance. For each citation, the Offeror shall disseminate no more than one (1) PPQ. Citations shall list the contract number and two (2) Government or commercial points of contact.

The Government will evaluate the quality of the Offeror’s performance for citations deemed recent and relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. Explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and current performance problems.

If this is a first-time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past and present relevant citations; however, the total number of citations for all parties in the agreement may not exceed ten (10) citations and twenty (20) pages. The subcontractors’ and partners’ past performance will be given the same weight as that given to the prime.

Furnish the following information for each contract referenced:

(i) Company/Division name

(ii) Product/Service

(iii) Contracting Agency/Customer

(iv) Contract Number

(v) Contract Dollar Value

(vi) Period of Performance

(vii) Narrative concerning why this reference is considered “relevant” (viii)Verified, up-to-date name, address, email, and telephone number of the contracting officer or commercial POC

(ix) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(x) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

4.9 Recent and Relevant Contracts. Citations shall address, as a minimum, Past Performance Information on recent contracts that the Offeror considers most relevant in demonstrating the Offeror’s ability to perform the proposed effort (see provision 52.212-2 paras 2.2.2. and 2.2.3.)

4.10 Tab 3: Questionnaire Recipient The proposal shall include a list of questionnaire recipients, including the specific POCs and current contact phone numbers and current email addresses. The Government intends to use the Past Performance Questionnaire in its evaluation. The Offeror will send out the Past Performance Questionnaire directly to each reference listed in the citations that the Offeror considers the most relevant and recent contracts.

The responsibility to send out the Past Performance Questionnaires and ensure submission to the Contracting Officer in a timely manner rests solely with the Offeror. The Offeror will direct the references to return completed questionnaires directly to the Government POCs listed in paragraph 3.7. The information contained in completed questionnaires will be considered sensitive and will not be released to the Offeror. The Government reserves the right to contact the references provided by the Offeror and any other references generated by the Government to discuss the Offeror's past performance.

The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition. In addition, the government may use past performance information obtained from other than the sources identified by the Offeror.

4.11 Subcontractor Consent. Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime Offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide, with the proposal, a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor. If there is a problem with the proposed subcontractor’s or teaming partner’s present/past performance, the Offeror may be notified of a problem but no details may be discussed without the subcontractor’s/teaming partner’s permission.

4.12 Commercial Customer. For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the Offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter, authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the Offeror's performance. Commercial customers include the prime contractor for subcontracting arrangements that support the Government.

4.13 Volume III - Price Proposal. SF 1449: Complete blocks 12, 17a, and 30a, b, and c. In doing so, the Offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the solicitation, with attachments. The solicitation constitutes the model contract.

The Offeror shall submit only pricing information that will be evaluated for award or become part of the resulting contract. Use the information provided in the PWS along with the Workload Estimate (Attachment 4) to complete and submit the Price List dated 24 July 2015 (Attachment 2 issued with Amendment 6). The Price List is for the five-year ordering period (there are no option periods). Supply costs and associated General and Administrative (G&A) cost plus profit or fee should be included in the unit price for each task listed in the Price List and shall be effective for the entire five-year ordering period. Wages will be subject to SCA/CBA increases over the contract life.

The Government will calculate the Total Evaluated Price for each Offeror using the Offeror’s proposed unit pricing, as displayed on the Price List. Offerors will provide their own annual and total five-year price calculations on the Government-provided Price List worksheet; for reference only. The Offeror’s proposed unit prices, as displayed on the Price List, will be incorporated into the contract and will be used to calculate the Government’s Total Evaluated Price as listed in Addendum 52.212-2 section 2.3.2. Offerors shall validate their calculations to ensure their proposed unit prices, as displayed on the Price List, account for rounding when determining their total annual price and five-year calculations on the Price List. The Government’s Total Evaluated Price, using the Offeror’s proposed unit prices as displayed on the Price List, takes precedence over any Offeror’s calculations.

4.14 Budget/Funding Information. For consideration in developing your proposal, the Custodial Services acquisition budget/funding is as follows:

Performance Period Budget Five-Year Ordering Period $9,999,000.00

4.15 Exceptions to Solicitation Requirements. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken. Provide rationale in support of the exception and fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, cost, and specific requirements of the solicitation. This information shall be provided in the format and content of the following Table:

Solicitation Exceptions Solicitation Document Page/Paragraph Requirement/Portion Rationale PWS, etc. Applicable page and paragraph numbers Identify the requirement or portion to which exception is taken

Describe why the requirement can/will not be met

52.212-2

52.212-2 Evaluation -- Commercial Items (Oct 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(1) TECHNICAL

(2) PAST PERFORMANCE

(3) PRICE

Past performance is approximately equal to price when being evaluated.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of Provision)

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2

EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS

The following additions/changes are made to FAR 52.212-2:

1.0 Basis for Contract Award. This contract will be awarded as Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) in which the Government will utilize a performance price tradeoff source selection process wherein Technical Acceptability will be assessed on an acceptable/unacceptable basis and the Government’s tradeoff decisions will be based upon a tradeoff between past performance and price where past performance is approximately equal to price. In evaluating past performance, the Government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation.

The Government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest-priced technically acceptable offer if that Offeror is judged to have a performance assessment rating of “Satisfactory Confidence” or higher. In that event, the Government shall make an integrated assessment best value award decision. This may result in an award to a higher-rated, higher-priced Offeror where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors, and the Source Selection Authority (SSA) reasonably determines that more highly assessed past performance of the higher-priced Offeror outweighs the price difference.

While the Government source selection evaluation team and the SSA will strive for maximum objectivity, this source selection process, by its nature, is subjective and, therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the Government to assess the Offeror’s experience in performing the effort described in the solicitation, based on the Offeror’s demonstrated present and past performance.

The Government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest-priced offeror. In that event, the Source Selection Authority shall make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

By submission of its offer in accordance with the instructions provided in clause FAR 52.212-1, Instructions To Offerors, the Offeror accedes to the terms of this model contract and all such offers shall be treated equally except for their prices and performance records.

1.1 Evaluation Process. Technical proposals will be evaluated for technical acceptability. Past Performance will be evaluated for Recency, Relevancy, and Quality as the basis for the overall Performance Confidence assessment assigned to each Offeror. Price will be evaluated for reasonableness and affordability.

2.0 Evaluation Factors. In evaluating proposals, the Government will select the proposal that is most advantageous to the Government. To arrive at a decision, the SSA will assess each offer in accordance with the following evaluation factors for the contract:

Factor 1: Technical Factor 2: Past Performance Factor 3: Price

2.1 Technical Factor. The Technical evaluation provides an assessment of the Offeror’s demonstrated approach to meet the Government’s requirements and will be rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described in the Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Table (para 2.1.1). If an Offeror receives an “unacceptable” rating for the Technical factor, the Offeror will be ineligible for award.

2.1.1 Technical Evaluation. The Government will evaluate the Management Plan to assess the Offeror’s approach to determine if it is sufficient to successfully perform the major tasks and subtasks outlined in the PWS. Failure to provide a reasonable and complete Management Plan shall reflect a lack of capability to perform the work requirements and will result in a determination that the Offeror’s Management Plan is unacceptable. The Management Plan shall be evaluated for clear demonstration of the Offeror’s proposed approach to successfully accomplish the following:

1. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s Management Plan and its proposed approach to obtain security clearances, vehicle passes and badges for PAFB and CMAFS. To receive an Acceptable rating, the Management Plan shall demonstrate the Offeror’s proposed approach is sufficient to successfully obtain security clearances, vehicle passes and badges for PAFB and CMAFS IAW the PWS. Ref: PWS Para 5.5 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm

2. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s Management Plan and its proposed approach to obtain its own escorts for PAFB and CMAFS. To receive an Acceptable rating, the Management Plan shall demonstrate the Offeror’s proposed approach is sufficient to successfully obtain its own escorts for PAFB and CMAFS as required IAW the PWS. Ref: PWS Para 5.5.2.5

3. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s Management Plan and its proposed approach to ensure required immunizations and training are completed. To receive an Acceptable rating, the Management Plan shall demonstrate that the Offeror has adequate processes to successfully ensure required immunizations and training are completed IAW the PWS. Ref: PWS Paras 1,5.5.1.8.11

4. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s Management Plan and its proposed approach to manage its workforce during fluctuating workloads in order to maintain continued services. To receive an Acceptable rating, the Management Plan shall demonstrate the Offeror’s proposed approach is sufficient to successfully manage its workforce during fluctuating workloads in order to maintain continued services IAW the PWS. Ref:

PWS Para 1

5. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s Management Plan and its proposed approach to procure and use approved chemicals prior to the contract start date and as changes occur. To receive an Acceptable rating, the Management Plan shall demonstrate the Offeror’s proposed approach is sufficient to successfully procure and use approved chemicals prior to contract start and as changes occur IAW the PWS. Ref: PWS Para 5.9

6. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s Management Plan to ensure the proposed approach includes a Cleaning Frequency Schedule as required in the PWS and all equipment is in place prior to contract start and as changes occur. To receive an Acceptable rating, the Management Plan shall demonstrate the Offeror’s proposed approach is sufficient to successfully submit an adequate Cleaning Frequency Schedule and to ensure all equipment is in place prior to contract start and as changes occur IAW the PWS. Ref: PWS Para 5.19

7. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s Management Plan and its proposed approach to implement a key control program. To receive an Acceptable rating, the Management Plan shall demonstrate the Offeror’s proposed approach is sufficient to successfully implement a key control program IAW the PWS. Ref: PWS Para 5.18

8. The Government will evaluate the contractor’s Management Plan and its proposed approach to provide adequate manning, sufficient oversight and an effective work schedule to ensure uninterrupted custodial services at contract start date, and through the life of the contract. To receive an Acceptable rating, the Management Plan shall demonstrate the Offeror’s proposed approach is sufficient to successfully provide adequate manning, sufficient oversight and an effective work schedule to ensure uninterrupted custodial services at contract start date, and through the life of the contract IAW the PWS. Ref: PWS Para 1

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Table

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

2.2 Past Performance Factor. The past performance evaluation will assess the degree of confidence the Government has in an Offeror’s experience to perform the required services. The purpose of the evaluation is to determine whether an Offeror will meet the Government’s needs based on a demonstrated record of performance.

The overall confidence rating will be based on Recency, Relevancy, and Quality. The Government intends to use the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) in its evaluation.

2.2.1 Past Performance Evaluation. The Government intends to use both data provided by the Offeror and data obtained from other sources, including any combination of past performance information available. This may include data gathered from Offeror-provided references, PPQs, or through the use of interviews. Furthermore, the Government may use data independently obtained from other governmental and commercial sources, other customers known to the Government, consumer protection organizations, contractor performance evaluations (e.g., Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) information), interviews with Government customers and fee determining officials, DCMA officials, DCAA officials, and, if applicable, commercial clients, and any other source that may have relevant and useful information.

In evaluating past performance, the Government will first make a Recency determination, followed by an evaluation of Relevancy of the past performance submitted, and finally, a performance Quality assessment will be made.

Based on Recency, Relevancy, and Quality, an overall Performance Confidence Rating will be assigned.

2.2.2 Recency assessment. An assessment of the past performance information will be made for each citation to determine if it is recent. To be considered recent, the performance must have been within the past three (3) years as of the solicitation release date. Present/past performance information that is not recent will not be evaluated for relevancy and quality.

2.2.3 Relevancy assessment. The Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of all…