Hurlburt_COCESS_Solicitation_FA4417-12-R-0010.pdf

1 SOCONS

350 TULLY ST.

HURLBURT FIELD FL 32544

850-884-1260

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

11. DELIVERY FOR FOB

RFQ

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

IFB RFP

CODE

SEE ADDENDUM

BLOCK IS MARKED

DESTINATION UNLESS

12. DISCOUNT TERMS

(No Collect Calls)

750 EMP

13b. RATING

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

X

CODE

FA4417-12-R-0010 03-Apr-2013

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

884-3265

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

12:00 AM 03 May 2013

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER) 31c. DATE SIGNED

ADDENDA X ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

22. UNIT 23. UNIT PRICE 24. AMOUNT21. QUANTITY

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

UNRESTRICTED

FAX: NAICS:

TEL:

CODE 18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BYOFFEROR

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TEL.

FA4417

SIZE STD:

9. ISSUED BY

FACILITY

CODE

17a.CONTRACTOR/

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

15. DELIVER TO CODE F2F323 16. ADMINISTERED BY

1SOCES

KEITH SORENSEN

415 INDEPENDENCE RD BLDG 91500

HURLBURT FIELD FL 32544-5267

TEL: 850-884-4414 FAX:

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

DAVID R. FONDACARO

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.X

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

SEE SCHEDULE

332510

TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND DELIVER ALL ITEMS

SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY ADDITIONAL SHEETS

SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED HEREIN.

SB

HUBZONE SB

SET ASIDE: % FOR

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

TEL: EMAIL:

2 COPIES

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

.OFFER DATED YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN 29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REFERENCE

X

8(A)

SVC-DISABLED VET-OWNED SB

EMERGING SB

X

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

SEE SCHEDULE

19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES 21. QUANTITY 22. UNIT 24. AMOUNT

PAGE 2 OF

23. UNIT PRICE

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005) BACK

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

FA4417-12-R-0010

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

BASE YEAR

FFP

FOB: Destination

SIGNAL CODE: A

NET AMT

0001AA

Base Year- Standard Business Hours

FFP

Standard Business Hours

High use store stocked items purchased IAW Statement of Work (SOW). This

CLIN includes origin/destination prices of discounted material/supplies and the duties assigned to maintain the COCESS store between normal business hours in accordance with the SOW.

Items purchased under this CLIN will be priced based on the discounts shown below for each category which will then constitute a firm fixed price (FFP). The discounts shown below for Plumbing, Electrical, and HVAC will be from the manufactures price shown in TRA PRO (Southeast Region). (The offerors discount for electrical category will be based on TRA-SER Pro’s Column three (3) listed prices.)

The discounts shown below for Building Supplies (lumber, roofing, sheetrock, etc), hardware, and Lawn and Garden will be deducted from prices available at local supply stores.

*NOTE* The discounted percentages entered below shall also be entered into the

COCESS Discount Bid Sheet (Attachment 3) of this solicitation as described in

FAR Clause 52.212-2 as amended in paragraph (3) sample bid sheet.

Discounts per category:

Plumbing _______________ weighted 30% of total CLIN

Electrical _______________ weighted 30% of total CLIN

HVAC__________________ weighted 20% of total CLIN

Structures______________ weighted 20% of total CLIN

This CLIN is weighted 90% of total base year

The total CLIN average from the COCESS Discount Bid Sheet (Attachment 3) shall be entered into the NET Amount for each CLIN

0001AB

Base Year - Non Standard Business Hours

Non-Standard Business Hours duties assigned to maintain the COCESS store between Non-standard Hours described in accordance with the SOW.

below for each category, which will then constitute a firm fixed price (FFP). The discounts shown below for Plumbing, Electrical, and HVAC will be from the manufactures price shown in TRA PRO (Southeast Region). (The offerors discount hardware, and Lawn and Garden will be deducted from open markt prices available at local supply stores.

This CLIN is weighted 10% of total base year

OPTION OPTION YEAR 1

FFP

1001AA

Option 1 - Standard Business Hours discounts shown below for Plumbing, Electrical, and HVAC will be from the manufactures price shown in TRA PRO (Southeast Region). (The offerors discount

1001AB

Option 1 - Non Standard Business Hours discounts shown below for Plumbing, Electrical, and HVAC will be from the manufactures price shown in TRA PRO (Southeast Region). (The offerors discount

OPTION OPTION YEAR 2

FFP

2001AA

Option 2 - Standard Business Hours discounts shown below for Plumbing, Electrical, and HVAC will be from the manufactures price shown in TRA PRO (Southeast Region). (The offerors discount

2001AB

Option 2 - Non Standard Business Hours discounts shown below for Plumbing, Electrical, and HVAC will be from the manufactures price shown in TRA PRO (Southeast Region). (The offerors discount

OPTION OPTION YEAR 3

FFP

3001AA

Option 3 - Standard Business Hours discounts shown below for Plumbing, Electrical, and HVAC will be from the manufactures price shown in TRA PRO (Southeast Region). (The offerors discount

3001AB

Option 3 - Non Standard Business Hours discounts shown below for Plumbing, Electrical, and HVAC will be from the manufactures price shown in TRA PRO (Southeast Region). (The offerors discount

OPTION OPTION YEAR 4

FFP

4001AA

Option 4 - Standard Business Hours discounts shown below for Plumbing, Electrical, and HVAC will be from the manufactures price shown in TRA PRO (Southeast Region). (The offerors discount

4001AB

Option 4 - Non Standard Business Hours discounts shown below for Plumbing, Electrical, and HVAC will be from the manufactures price shown in TRA PRO (Southeast Region). (The offerors discount

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

List of Attachments:

1. Statement of Work

2. Top 250 Items Sold

3. Discount Bid Sheet

4. Past Performance Questionnare

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government

0001AA Destination Government Destination Government

0001AB Destination Government Destination Government

1001 Destination Government Destination Government

1001AA Destination Government Destination Government

1001AB Destination Government Destination Government

2001 Destination Government Destination Government

2001AA Destination Government Destination Government

2001AB Destination Government Destination Government

3001 Destination Government Destination Government

3001AA Destination Government Destination Government

3001AB Destination Government Destination Government

4001 Destination Government Destination Government

4001AA Destination Government Destination Government

4001AB Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

0001 POP 01-JUN-2013 TO

31-MAY-2014

N/A 1SOCES

KEITH SORENSEN

415 INDEPENDENCE RD BLDG 91500

HURLBURT FIELD FL 32544-5267

850-884-4414

F2F323

0001AA POP 01-JUN-2013 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

0001AB POP 01-JUN-2013 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1001 POP 01-JUN-2014 TO

31-MAY-2015

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1001AA POP 01-JUN-2014 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1001AB POP 01-JUN-2014 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2001 POP 01-JUN-2015 TO

31-MAY-2016

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2001AA POP 01-JUN-2015 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2001AB POP 01-JUN-2015 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3001 POP 01-JUN-2016 TO

31-MAY-2017

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3001AA POP 01-JUN-2016 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3001AB POP 01-JUN-2016 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4001 POP 01-JUN-2017 TO

31-MAY-2018

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4001AA POP 01-JUN-2017 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4001AB POP 01-JUN-2017 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984

52.203-11 Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To

Influence Certain Federal Transactions

SEP 2007

52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal

Transactions

OCT 2010

52.203-13 Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct APR 2010

52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber

Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011

52.204-99 (Dev) System for Award Management Registration (Deviation) AUG 2012

52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Items FEB 2012

52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items JUN 2010

52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990

52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons FEB 2009

52.223-3 Hazardous Material Identification And Material Safety Data JAN 1997

52.223-5 Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information MAY 2011

52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging

While Driving

AUG 2011

52.225-1 Buy American Act--Supplies FEB 2009

52.225-2 Buy American Act Certificate FEB 2009

52.225-25 Prohibition on Engaging in Sanctioned Activities Relating to

Iran--Certification.

NOV 2011

52.227-1 Authorization and Consent DEC 2007

52.227-2 Notice And Assistance Regarding Patent And Copyright

Infringement

DEC 2007

52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997

52.233-2 Service Of Protest SEP 2006

52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996

52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004

52.237-2 Protection Of Government Buildings, Equipment, And

Vegetation

APR 1984

52.237-3 Continuity Of Services JAN 1991

52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995

52.242-15 Stop-Work Order AUG 1989

52.245-1 Government Property AUG 2010

52.245-1 Alt I Government Property (Aug 2010) Alternate I AUG 2010

52.246-2 Inspection Of Supplies--Fixed Price AUG 1996

52.247-34 F.O.B. Destination NOV 1991

52.253-1 Computer Generated Forms JAN 1991

252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights JAN 2009

252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

NOV 2011

252.205-7000 Provision Of Information To Cooperative Agreement Holders DEC 1991

252.209-7001 Disclosure of Ownership or Control by the Government of a

Terrorist Country

JAN 2009

252.209-7002 Disclosure Of Ownership Or Control By A Foreign

Government

JUN 2010

252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By

The Government of a Terrorist Country

DEC 2006

252.212-7000 Offeror Representations and Certifications- Commercial Items JUN 2005

252.223-7001 Hazard Warning Labels DEC 1991

252.223-7006 Prohibition On Storage And Disposal Of Toxic And

Hazardous Materials

APR 2012

252.225-7000 Buy American--Balance Of Payments Program Certificate JUN 2012

252.225-7001 Buy American Act And Balance Of Payments Program OCT 2011

252.225-7012 Preference For Certain Domestic Commodities JUN 2012

252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving

Reports

MAR 2008

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006

252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991

252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment MAR 1998

252.247-7023 Transportation of Supplies by Sea MAY 2002

252.247-7023 Alt III Transportation of Supplies by Sea (May 2002) Alternate III MAY 2002

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.203-2 CERTIFICATE OF INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION (APR 1985)

(a) The offeror certifies that --

(1) The prices in this offer have been arrived at independently, without, for the purpose of restricting competition, any consultation, communication, or agreement with any other offeror or competitor relating to –

(i) Those prices,

(ii) The intention to submit an offer, or

(iii) The methods of factors used to calculate the prices offered:

(2) The prices in this offer have not been and will not be knowingly disclosed by the offeror, directly or indirectly, to any other offeror or competitor before bid opening (in the case of a sealed bid solicitation) or contract award (in the case of a negotiated solicitation) unless otherwise required by law; and

(3) No attempt has been made or will be made by the offeror to induce any other concern to submit or not to submit an offer for the purpose of restricting competition.

(b) Each signature on the offer is considered to be a certification by the signatory that the signatory --

(1) Is the person in the offeror's organization responsible for determining the prices offered in this bid or proposal, and that the signatory has not participated and will not participate in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this provision; or

(2) (i) Has been authorized, in writing, to act as agent for the following principals in certifying that those principals have not participated, and will not participate in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this provison ______________________________________________________ (insert full name of person(s) in the offeror's organization responsible for determining the prices offered in this bid or proposal, and the title of his or her position in the offeror's organization);

(ii) As an authorized agent, does certify that the principals named in subdivision (b)(2)(i) above have not participated, and will not participate, in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) above; and

(iii) As an agent, has not personally participated, and will not participate, in any action contrary to subparagraphs

(a)(1) through (a)(3) of this provision.

(c) If the offeror deletes or modifies subparagraph (a)(2) of this provision, the offeror must furnish with its offer a signed statement setting forth in detail the circumstances of the disclosure.

(End of clause)

52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (APR 2010)

(a)(1) The Offeror certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that-

(i) The Offeror and/or any of its Principals-

(A) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any Federal agency;

(B) Have ( ) have not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property (if offeror checks “have”, the offeror shall also see 52.209-7, if included in this solicitation); and

(C) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with, commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this provision.; and

(D) Have [ballot], have not [ballot], within a three-year period preceding this offer, been notified of any delinquent

Federal taxes in an amount that exceeds $3,000 for which the liability remains unsatisfied.

(1) Federal taxes are considered delinquent if both of the following criteria apply:

(i) The tax liability is finally determined. The liability is finally determined if it has been assessed. A liability is not finally determined if there is a pending administrative or judicial challenge. In the case of a judicial challenge to the liability, the liability is not finally determined until all judicial appeal rights have been exhausted.

(ii) The taxpayer is delinquent in making payment. A taxpayer is delinquent if the taxpayer has failed to pay the tax liability when full payment was due and required. A taxpayer is not delinquent in cases where enforced collection action is precluded.

(2) Examples. (i) The taxpayer has received a statutory notice of deficiency, under I.R.C. Sec. 6212, which entitles the taxpayer to seek Tax Court review of a proposed tax deficiency. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek Tax Court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(ii) The IRS has filed a notice of Federal tax lien with respect to an assessed tax liability, and the taxpayer has been issued a notice under I.R.C. Sec. 6320 entitling the taxpayer to request a hearing with the IRS Office of Appeals contesting the lien filing, and to further appeal to the Tax Court if the IRS determines to sustain the lien filing. In the course of the hearing, the taxpayer is entitled to contest the underlying tax liability because the taxpayer has had no prior opportunity to contest the liability. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek tax court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(iii) The taxpayer has entered into an installment agreement pursuant to I.R.C. Sec. 6159. The taxpayer is making timely payments and is in full compliance with the agreement terms. The taxpayer is not delinquent because the taxpayer is not currently required to make full payment.

(iv) The taxpayer has filed for bankruptcy protection. The taxpayer is not delinquent because enforced collection action is stayed under 11 U.S.C. 362 (the Bankruptcy Code).

(ii) The Offeror has ( ) has not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, had one or more contracts terminated for default by any Federal agency.

(2) Principal, for the purposes of this certification, means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager;

head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The Offeror shall provide immediate written notice to the Contracting Officer if, at any time prior to contract award, the Offeror learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

(c) A certification that any of the items in paragraph (a) of this provision exists will not necessarily result in withholding of an award under this solicitation. However, the certification will be considered in connection with a determination of the Offeror's responsibility. Failure of the Offeror to furnish a certification or provide such additional information as requested by the Contracting Officer may render the Offeror nonresponsible.

(d) Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by paragraph (a) of this provision. The knowledge and information of an Offeror is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

(e) The certification in paragraph (a) of this provision is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making award. If it is later determined that the Offeror knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Government, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract resulting from this solicitation for default.

(End of provision)

52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (FEB 2012)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--

Administrative proceeding means a non-judicial process that is adjudicatory in nature in order to make a determination of fault or liability (e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Proceedings, Civilian

Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings, and Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings). This includes administrative proceedings at the Federal and State level but only in connection with performance of a Federal contract or grant. It does not include agency actions such as contract audits, site visits, corrective plans, or inspection of deliverables.

Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than $10,000,000 means--

(1) The total value of all current, active contracts and grants, including all priced options; and

(2) The total value of all current, active orders including all priced options under indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity, 8(a), or requirements contracts (including task and delivery and multiple-award Schedules).

Principal means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager; head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The offeror ( ) has ( ) does not have current active Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than

$10,000,000.

(c) If the offeror checked “has” in paragraph (b) of this provision, the offeror represents, by submission of this offer, that the information it has entered in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) is current, accurate, and complete as of the date of submission of this offer with regard to the following information:

(1) Whether the offeror, and/or any of its principals, has or has not, within the last five years, in connection with the award to or performance by the offeror of a Federal contract or grant, been the subject of a proceeding, at the Federal or State level that resulted in any of the following dispositions:

(i) In a criminal proceeding, a conviction.

(ii) In a civil proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in the payment of a monetary fine, penalty, reimbursement, restitution, or damages of $5,000 or more.

(iii) In an administrative proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in--

(A) The payment of a monetary fine or penalty of $5,000 or more; or

(B) The payment of a reimbursement, restitution, or damages in excess of $100,000.

(iv) In a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding, a disposition of the matter by consent or compromise with an acknowledgment of fault by the Contractor if the proceeding could have led to any of the outcomes specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), or (c)(1)(iii) of this provision.

(2) If the offeror has been involved in the last five years in any of the occurrences listed in (c)(1) of this provision, whether the offeror has provided the requested information with regard to each occurrence.

(d) The offeror shall post the information in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(iv) of this provision in FAPIIS as required through maintaining an active registration in the Central Contractor Registration database via https://www.acquisition.gov (see 52.204-7).

Excerpts from 52.212-1 - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS –

COMMERCIAL ITEMS (Feb 2012)

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (Feb 2012)

THIS SECTION IS FOR SOLICITATION PURPOSES ONLY. THIS SECTION WILL BE PHYSICALLY

REMOVED FROM ANY RESULTANT AWARD, BUT WILL BE DEEMED INCORPORATED BY

REFERENCE.

https://www.acquisition.gov/

Addendum to 52.212-1(c), Period for Acceptance of Offers. The paragraph is tailored as follows: “The offeror agrees to hold the percentages in its offer firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.”

ADDENDA TO 52.212-1 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

NOTE: A Site Visit will be conducted in accordance of Clause 5352.215-9001 included in this contract.

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts; Part I - Percentage Proposal, Part II - Technical Proposal, and Part III - Past Performance

Information.

1. One Original signed copy of the SF1449 Solicitation (ensure CLINS show percentage) and all SF30

Amendments acknowledged including all three parts

2. Part I – Percentage Proposal - Attachment 3, Discount Percentage Sheet –(Submit one completed Excel spreadsheet hardcopy and one completed Excel spreadsheet on a CD)*

3. Part II – Technical Proposal (Submit two copies )

4. Part III- Past Performance (Submit two copies)

*If hard copy and CD differ, the hard copy shall take precedence

B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price.

C. Specific Instructions:

1. PART I – PERCENTAGE PROPOSAL- Submit one completed Excel spreadsheet hardcopy and one completed Excel spreadsheet on a CD

* If Offerors submit proposals in electronic format, only one paper copy of all Volumes must be submitted.

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/15.htm

(a) Discounts will be based on Attachment 2, 250 High Use Items..

(b) Proposals will be evaluated based on a weighted average (total average).

(c) The total average will be calculated as follows:

Offerer’s will fill-in the HIGHLIGHTED cells only using the digital EXCEL SPREADSHEET. Do not attempt to alter any fields other than the highlighted cells. Each year, including the base year (5 years), will contain 2 CLINs (standard business hours and non-standard business hours), and each CLIN will contain the 4 categories of items. A discount will be offered in each category in every CLIN in every option year. Each discount will be averaged together with the other discounts in that CLIN to provide a

CLIN average. The two CLIN averages will be averaged together to form the year average (see 52.212-

2 for formulas). Then all 5 year averages will be averaged to form a total average. Once the highlighted cells are filled in, the total average will be automatically calculated.

(d) Complete blocks 12, and 17a and 30a, b, and c of the SF1449. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the Solicitation, with attachments. This document constitutes the model contract.

(e) Insert proposed discounts in each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN), including base year and all option periods.

(f) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in all sections. All sections that require a fill in shall be returned in its entirety. No distinction will be made between stocked items and non-stocked items for the purposes of evaluation.

(g) Attachment 2, High Use Items, is divided into 4 categories: (a) Plumbing, Electrical, HVAC and

Structures. The following is a brief explanation of Attachment 2, High Use Items, and how the government selected the items: See Section 52.212-2 for evaluation methodology.

(1) The sample consists of 250 historical high use items.

(2) The population was divided into 4 catagories:

(i). Plumbing

(ii). Electrical

(iii). HVAC

(iv). Structures

(3) The pricing of these items was determined by a survey of the open market on DATE: Dec 16

2012. Only the prices provided on Attachment 2 shall be used in calculating your discount percentages.This is to ensure a fair playing field for all offereors.

(4). The offeror will propose:

(i) A discount (per category), based upon the items on the list of the top 250 items.

(ii) Any major differences (+/- 20%) in the government-inserted price or any item description deficiencies noted in the 250 high use item list that would prevent the offeror from making a discount or pricing decision should be brought to the Contracting Officer’s attention within five work days of the effective date of the RFP.

(iii) Discounts proposed by offerors will be uniform for each category above, regardless of item shown in the market basket. Discounts proposed for each category will be consistent with discounts inserted into, CLINs.

(4) EVALUATIONS WILL BE BASED ON THE HIGHEST DISCOUNT PERCENTAGES

AND NOT ON PRICE.

(5) Responsibility of Contractor/Offeror: the contractor/offeror is responsible for validating all numbers he/she entered and for calculationg amounts to ensure correctness.

2. PART II – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Offerors shall not simply restate Statement Of Work requirements, but shall include their technical capabilities in fulfilling requirements. Offerors will include the contractor Quality Control Plan as part of their technical information. Offerors will include a Transition Plan that outlines how they will assume performance from the incumbant contractor. The technical documents will be rated on the factors that are coherent, logical, and complete in coordination with the Statement of Work. Technical rating is either

“acceptable,” or “unacceptable”. Only those offers whose technical proposals are rated “acceptable” will proceed to the past performance evaluation step. Technical information shall be limited to no more than ten

(10) pages.

3. PART III – PAST PERFORMANCE. Only references for same or similar type contracts are desired.

Submit original plus two (2) copies

(a) Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Three Years:

Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for same or similar type contract. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, etc.

(b) Past Performance Surveys: The Government will evaluate the quality and extent of offeror’s experience deemed relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will use information submitted by the offeror and other sources such as other Federal Government offices and commercial sources, to assess experience. Provide a list of no more than five (5) contracts, performed for Federal Agencies and commercial customers that have been performed within the last three (3) years. Relevant contracts include, but are not limited to, those contracts where COCESS requirements are relevant to the Hurlburt Field Statement of Work. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition. In addition, the government may use past performance information obtained from other than the sources identified by the offeror.

Furnish the following information for each contract referenced:

(1) Company/ Contracting Agency name

(2) Service

(3) Contract Number

(4) Contract Type (e.g. firm fixed price, time & material, etc.)

(5) Period of performance.

(6) Contract Dollar Amount (Initial, final and an explanation of the difference).

(7) Names, address, telephone and Fax number of the Contracting Officer.

(8) Contracting Officers Representative’ s name, address, telephone & Fax numbers.

(9) Types and number of personnel

(10) Brief Summary of the Requirements.

(11) Problems encountered and their resolutions.

(c) Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor.

If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past and present relevant contracts.

(d) The Government may evaluate offerors’ financial history as part of past performance which may include past payments to employees, suppliers and/or subcontractors.

D. GENERAL INFORMATION: Submitted documents must be fully responsive to and consistent with the RFP

1. Requirements of the RFP (CLINs and PWS) and government standards and regulations pertaining to the

PWS.

2. Evaluation Factors for Award in Evaluation Factors section of this RFP.

3. Any limitation on the number of proposal pages. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this section will not be read or evaluated, and will be removed from the proposal.

4. Format for proposal Parts II and III shall be as follows:

(a). The proposals will be 8 ½” x 11” paper except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17.”

(b). A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information.

(c). Typing shall not be less than 12 pitch.

(d). Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required.

E. QUESTIONNAIRES. Each offeror shall send out Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment 4) to each of the offerors past performance references, to each of the Points of Contact identified in the contracts listed in the contractor’s Past Performance Information. The responsibility to send out Past Performance Questionnaires rests solely with each offeror – IT SHALL NOT BE DELEGATED TO ANY OTHER ENTITY. The Transmittal

Letter/Questionnaire Attachment 4 shall be used by the offeror in sending out Past Performance Questionnaires.

1. Complete Section A, General Information, of the Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

Attachment 4 and mail, fax or email the attached Transmittal Letter and Past and Present Performance

Questionnaire to all past performance references listed in the contractor’s Past Performance Information.

Evaluators are only allowed to use the Attachment 4, Past and Present Performance Questionnaire. Altered or substituted questionnaires will not be evaluated. Offerors are responsible to ensure questionnaires are transmitted to their references, and to indicate which references the questionnaire was sent to (see “PART

III PAST PERFORMANCE” above).

2. Once the Past and Present Performance Questionnaires are completed by the evaluator’s POCs, the information contained in the Questionnaires shall be considered source selection sensitive and not released to you, the offeror. Questionnaires shall be sent directly to the Government.

3. Past Performance Questionnaires are to be completed and sent directly to the Government by the evaluator completing the Questionnaire. It is the sole responsibility of the offeror to track the submission of

Past and Present Performance Questionnaires and ensure that the Government receives them NO LATER

THAN THE DUE DATE AND TIME ESTABLISHED IN THIS RFP FOR PROPOSAL SUBMISSION.

It is also the sole responsibility of the offeror to inform the evaluators of any extensions the Government approves to the date and time proposal are due to be submitted.

4. The evaluator shall fax or e-mail questionnaires to the attention of Mr. Michael Wenrick at 850-884-

5373 or at michael.wenrick@hurlburt.af.mil AND Lt David Fondacaro at 850-884-2955 or at david.fondacaro@hurlburt.af.mil. If the questionnaires cannot be faxed or e-mailed, mail the questionnaire to: 1st Special Operations Contracting Squadron/LGCA, Attention Lt David Fondacaro or Mr. Michael

Wenrick, 350 Tully Street, Bldg. 90339, Hurlburt Field, FL 32544.

5. If the offeror claims there is no past performance, then that status must be identified to the contracting officer not later than the date/time proposals are due from all offerors.

F. GENERAL INFORMATION

1. INFORMATION REGARDING SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL: Faxed proposals will NOT be accepted. Proposals will be accepted by mail or hand carried delivery to: 1 SOCONS/LGCA, 350 Tully

St., Bldg 90339, Hurlburt Field, FL, 32544. The sealed envelope or package used to submit your proposal must show the time and date specified for receipt, solicitation number and name address of the offeror.

2. Offerors are cautioned that Hurlburt Field, FL has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. SOME DELAY SHOULD BE

ANTICIPATED WHEN HAND CARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and to deliver the proposal PRIOR to the time specified for receipt.

3. To obtain a visitor pass, the offeror shall contact the office in block 9 of Standard Form 1449, PRIOR to the date and time specified for receipt.

4. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f) “Late submission, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers.”

FEDERAL HOLIDAYS: The following Federal Legal Holidays are observed by this base:

New Year’s Day 1 January

Martin Luther King’s Birthday Third Monday in January

Presidents Day Third Monday in February

Memorial Day Last Monday in May

Independence Day 4 July

Labor Day First Monday in September

Columbus Day Second Monday in October

Veterans Day 11 November

Thanksgiving Day Fourth Thursday in November

Christmas Day 25 December

5. JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENTS - Joint Ventures are allowable on competitive 8(a) set-asides, however, the joint venture agreement must be received by SBA prior to proposal due date and approved before award of any resulting contract. If you are contemplating a joint venture on this project, you must advise your assigned SBA Business Opportunity Specialist (BOS) as soon as possible. It is also recommended that the agreement be submitted as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with established regulations. Any corrections and/or changes needed can be made only when your BOS has adequate time mailto:michael.wenrick@hurlburt.af.mil mailto:david.fondacaro@hurlburt.af.mil for a thorough review before the proposal due date. NO CORRECTIONS AND/OR CHANGES ARE

ALLOWED AFTER TIME OF SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL OR BIDS.

(End of Addendum)

Excerpts from 52.212-2 - EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN

1999)

(a) The government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, percentage and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(1) PERCENTAGE

(2) TECHNICAL

(3) PAST PERFORMANCE

Technical and Past Performance, when combined, are significantly more important than Percentage when being evaluated.

(b) Options. The government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total percentage for all options to the total percentage for the basic requirement. The government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option percentages are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

ADDENDUM TO CLAUSE 52.212-2

(1). This acquisition will utilize a best value approach, in which the Government seeks to award to an offeror who provides the greatest confidence that they will meet the Government’s requirements affordably. The Best Value technique chosen for this particular acquisition will be Performance Price Tradeoff (PPT).

(2). The PPT approach permits tradeoffs between price/cost and past performance, and will include an evaluation for technical acceptability. All proposals shall first be ranked in order of percentage from highest to lowest. Then, the first five (5) of the highest percentaged proposals shall be evaluated for technical acceptability. In the event that the first five (5) evaluated proposals do not yield an offer with an acceptable technical rating, the evaluation process will continue one offer at a time , until a technically acceptable proposal is identified. Contract award will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements, is considered technically acceptable, and will provide the best value to the Government, considering percentage and past performance. For this acquisition, technical and past performance, when combined, are significantly more important than price/cost.

(a). Proposals that are unrealistic in terms of technical acceptability or percentage may be rejected at any time during the evaluation process. Discussions or negotiation may be conducted with all offerors in the competitive range.

Offerors may be required to participate in telephone discussions or in face-to-face oral discussions at the 1 st Special

Operations Contracting Squadron, 350 Tully Street, Hurlburt Field, FL.

(b). Offerors are cautioned to follow the detailed instructions fully and carefully, as the Government reserves the right to make an award based on initial offers received, without discussion of such offers.

(c). Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, the relevance of past performance information) or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system.

(3). Price/Cost Evaluation. Initially proposals shall be ranked in order of percentage from highest to lowest. Then, the first five (5) of the higest percentaged proposals shall be evaluated, including any option percentages (if applicable). Each offerors' percentage will be evaluated for completeness and reasonableness. Unrealistically low proposed costs/percentages may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that either the offeror does not understand the requirement or the offeror has made an unrealistic proposal.

**Note** Discounts will be based on 250 High Use Items pricing (Attachment 2). The pricing information contained in this spreadsheet was downloaded from TeraServ Pro during December 2012. All though not current pricing, the contractor shall base their bid discount percentages on this pricing information.

Proposals will be evaluated based on a weighted average (total average) of all of the above discounts.

The total average will be calculated as follows:

Each year, including the base year (5 years), will contain 2 CLINs (standard business hours and non-standard business hours), and each CLIN will contain the 4 categories of items. A discount will be offered in each category in every CLIN in every option year. Each discount will be averaged together with the other discounts in that CLIN to provide a CLIN average (according to the weight of the category see note below). The two CLIN averages will be averaged together to form the year average (see note below for CLIN average weights). Then all 5 year averages will be averaged to form a total average. (See sample bid sheet below).

OFFERER FILL-IN DO NOT ALTER

Plumbing

30%

Electrical

30%

HVAC

20%

Structures

20%

CLIN

Average

Year

Average

Base Year CLIN 1 Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In

#VALUE!

90%

CLIN 2 Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In

#VALUE!

10% #VALUE!

Option Year 1 CLIN 1 Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In

90%

CLIN 2 Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In

Option Year 2 CLIN 1 Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In

90%

CLIN 2 Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In

Option Year 3 CLIN 1 Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In

90%

CLIN 2 Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In

Option Year 4 CLIN 1 Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In

90%

CLIN 2 Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In Fill-In

Total Discount #VALUE!

*Year Average is calculated by an average of the CLIN averages with weights of 90% of CLIN 1 and 10% CLIN 2.

Note: The category discounts will carry the following weights in the CLIN average:

Plumbing: 30%

Electrical: 30%

HVAC: 20%

Structures: 20%

Note: The CLIN weights will carry the following weights in the year average:

Standard Business Hours: 90%

Non Standard Business Hours: 10%

Upon award of the contract, the awardee will offer the discounts they submitted on the sample items on the requirements. TeraServ Pro and the local retail prices of Home Depot, Lowes, and Ace Hardware will provide the baseline for the discounts to be applied to. Local business prices will only be used in the event that an item is not listed the TeraServ Pro spreadsheet provided with the solicitation. Current market prices will be updated as needed in the customer’s database.

(4). Technical Evaluation. Offers shall be evaluated independently of the cost/price proposal evaluation to determine the offerors compliance with the technical requirements of this solicitation. The government may make a final determination as to the rating of an offer based on the proposal as submitted without requesting any further information. Technical acceptability is defined by meeting the minimum requirements as defined by the factors identified below:

(a). Offerors proposals will be evaluated against the following factors:

(i). Quality Control Plan – as outlined in the Statement of Work, paragraph 4.4.1.1 through 4.4.1.5

(ii). Transition Plan – as outlined in the Statement of Work, paragraph 4.3.1.2.1.1 through 4.3.1.2.1.4

(b). Evaluators shall assign a rating, which falls within one of the following ranges according to the degree to which the offeror meets the minimum requirements described above:

(i). ACCEPTABLE – Meets evaluation criteria and minimum requirements. Proposal is acceptable.

(ii). UNACCEPTABLE – Fails to meet minimum requirements. Deficiencies are significant and require major revisions to the proposal to make it acceptable. If determined to be unacceptable, this will render the entire proposal as technically unacceptable and eliminate the offeror from further consideration.

(c). If all offerors are deemed unacceptable, the government may establish a competitive range and enter into discussions.

(5). Past Performance Evaluation. Using Attachment 4, Past Performance Survey, the contracting officer shall seek performance information for only those offerors rated technically acceptable.

(a). Each proposal shall provide current and relevant information regarding an offerors actions under previously awarded contracts. Offerors shall identify past or current contracts (including Federal, State, local government, and private) for efforts similar to the Government requirement as stated in this solicitation.

(b). Performance Confidence will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2). Performance confidence ratings assess the probability of the offeror successfully accomplishing the proposed effort based on the offerors past performance. In assessing past performance confidence, the evaluators will primarily rely on information provided by offerors ‘completed past performance questionnaires. However, the Government may use data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources to be used in the evaluation process.

(c). The Government will evaluate the offerors ability to successfully complete projects based on demonstrated past and present experience under recent and relevant contracts. Recency is defined as projects performed in the last three (3) years. Relevancy is defined as contracts involving other COCESS or similar type service.

(d). The following relevancy definitions, apply:

(i). VERY RELEVANT: Past/present performance effort involved essentially the same magnitude of effort…