E.6 Consent to Subcontract.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Recovery Audit Contractor Validation Contractor (RVC) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 75FCMC20R0017-Solicitation
About this file
This document is a subcontract consent checklist for the Recovery Auditor Validation Contractor (RVC) solicitation issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The solicitation seeks an RVC to review claim determinations made by Recovery Auditor Contractors regarding Medicare claims paid under Parts A and B of the Social Security Act, to ensure those claims were properly denied. The checklist outlines 13 considerations for consenting to subcontracts, including ensuring subcontracting complies with small business goals, that adequate price competition was obtained, technical requirements were properly translated, and that subcontractors are not excluded from the System for Award Management. Comments from the contracting officer are requested at the bottom.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
75FCMC20R0017 E.6 Consent to Subcontract
RECOVERY AUDITOR VALIDATION CONTRACTOR(RVC)
| SUBCONTRACT CHECKLIST |
| *FAR 44.202-2* |
CONTRACTOR:
CONTRACT:
SUBCONTRACTOR:
SUBJECT/DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED:
In accordance with FAR 44.202-2(a), Considerations: Review of Contractor's request for Consent to Subcontract is as follows:
(1) Is the decision to subcontract consistent with the contractor’s approved make-or-buy program, if any (see 15.407-2)?
(2) Is the subcontract for special test equipment, equipment or real property that are available from Government sources?
(3) Is the selection of the particular supplies, equipment, or services technically justified?
(4) Has the contractor complied with the prime contract requirements regarding—
(i) Small business subcontracting, including, if applicable, its plan for subcontracting with small, veteran-owned, service-disabled veteran-owned, HUBZone, small disadvantaged and women-owned small business concerns (see Part 19); and
(ii) Purchase from nonprofit agencies designated by the Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled (Javits-Wagner-O’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 48)) (see Part 8)?
(5) Was adequate price competition obtained or its absence properly justified?
(6) Did the contractor adequately assess and dispose of subcontractors’ alternate proposals, if offered?
(7) Does the contractor have a sound basis for selecting and determining the responsibility of the particular subcontractor?
(8) Has the contractor performed adequate cost or price analysis or price comparisons and obtained certified cost or pricing data and data other than certified cost or pricing data?
(9) Is the proposed subcontract type appropriate for the risks involved and consistent with current policy?
(10) Has adequate consideration been obtained for any proposed subcontract that will involve the use of Government-provided equipment and real property?
(11) Has the contractor adequately and reasonably translated prime contract technical requirements into subcontract requirements?
(12) Does the prime contractor comply with applicable cost accounting standards for awarding the subcontract?
(13) Is the proposed subcontractor in the System for Award Management Exclusions (see Subpart 9.4)?
COMMENTS:
DATE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .