Report_3_Bridge_Inspection_Route_460_Bridge.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Blue Ridge Parkway Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-16-B-00009
About this file
Report 3 - Bridge Inspection Route 460
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ROBO_-_FTNP-BLRI_1L8.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0003_-_FNTP-BLRI_1L8.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0002_-_BLRI_1L8.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0001_-_FTNP_BLRI_1L8.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Report_1_NEPA.pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_BLRI_1L8.pdf | ||
| Report_4_Bridge_Inspection_Route_652_Bridge.pdf | ||
| Report_2_Pavement.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| VETS-100A-Form.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_FTNP-BLRI_1L8.pdf | ||
| Synopsis_-_FTNP_-_BLRI_1L8.doc | DOC document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
U.S. ROUTE 460 (OVERPASS) BRIDGE
U.S. ROUTE 460 OVER BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
LE
STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 10/16/12
Report prepared by: SS
MILE POINT: 105.80
Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 170.26 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P
U.S. ROUTE 460 (OVERPASS) BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/16/12
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... ARCH - DECK NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 41.3 FT (12.6 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 41.3 FT (12.6 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 95.7 FT (29.2 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 84.0 FT (25.6 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1M4 / 41910 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 53 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1982-JOINT REPAIR. PARK WAS PREVIOUSLY ASKED TO NOTIFY VDOT OF HOLE AT EAST
APPROACH.
LOCATION
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 105.80 (KM PT 170.26)
STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 1.0 MILES TO VA ROUTE 657
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ U.S. ROUTE 460
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete arch bridge is in fair to good condition overall. The structure consists of two parallel arches, one carrying U.S. Route 460 eastbound, the other carrying the westbound lanes. The main problems include severe erosion in front of the drop inlet at the west end of the south parapet, and collision damage to the approach median guardrails.
Other problems include minor deterioration of the parapet masonry mortar joints, erosion along the southeast wingwall, and an accumulation of debris and vegetation along the curblines and parapets. Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
Since the previous inspection, the vertical expansion joints have been sealed.
INSPECTION TEAM: J. THOMAS, R. TAYLOR (VOLKERT, INC.)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
JOE THOMAS, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 2/28/13
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
58.6 CLEAN AND REPOINT PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS NECESSARY. 1 LS
58.7 STABILIZE ROTATING DROP INLETS AT WEST END OF BOTH PARAPETS, AND
PATCH SHOULDER PAVEMENT.
1 LS
222.3 REPAIR DAMAGED APPROACH MEDIAN GUARDRAILS AND POSTS. 1 LS
60.9, 222.5 FILL IN EROSION ALONG SOUTHEAST WINGWALL, END OF SOUTHWEST PARAPET
ALONG APPROACH ROADWAY, NORTH END OF WEST ABUTMENT, AND SOUTH
END OF EAST ABUTMENT.
1 LS
58.7 REMOVE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH FROM ALONG
CURBLINES AND PARAPETS.
1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL:
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
$0
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
OTHER
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
FOUNDATIONS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
PIER(S)
OTHER
SLOPE PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
EXPANSION JOINTS
WEEP HOLES
WINGWALLS
FOUNDATIONS
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
N
N N F N N N N G G
N G
G N N N N G F G F G N N
N N N N N N N
11.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
58.2, 60.8 PARAPET EXPANSION JOINTS AND VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS
HAVE BEEN SEALED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.
58.3, 222.4 MODERATE RANDOM CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT.
58.5 MINOR CRACKING OF MEDIAN CURBS.
58.6 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR
JOINTS.
58.7, 222.5 MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG PARAPETS. MODERATE
ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG
MEDIAN CURBLINES. MINOR EROSION ALONG NORTH EDGE OF
PAVEMENT OVER WESTBOUND ARCH. MINOR SUBSIDENCE OF
SHOULDER EMBANKMENT AT VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS.
DROP INLETS AT WEST END OF BOTH PARAPETS HAVE ROTATED
AWAY FROM PARAPETS. SEVERE EROSION (5' DIAMETER X 30"
DEEP) IN FRONT OF DROP INLET AT WEST END OF SOUTH PARAPET
EXTENDS 3' IN FRONT OF GUARDRAIL ALONG APPROACH
ROADWAY.
59.3 MINOR VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON INTERIOR SPANDREL WALLS. MINOR RADIAL
CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE EXTENDING FROM WEEP HOLES
ON ARCH UNDERSIDE. EXPOSED AND RUSTED REBAR CHAIRS IN
SEVERAL LOCATIONS.
MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH
SIDE OF EASTBOUND ARCH UNDERSIDE AT WEST END.
MINOR SPALLING ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINT ON WESTBOUND
ARCH UNDERSIDE. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINT AT NORTH END OF
EAST SPRINGLINE.
G G G F F N
N
G
N
N
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 6
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS 7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION 5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS 2.
1. APPROACH SLABS
(UNDERPASS ROADWAY)
N N F G P G N G G
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.
FOUNDATION 3.
WEEP HOLES 2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0
59.8 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE FROM RING STONE MASONRY
MORTAR JOINTS.
60.6 MINOR EFFLORESCENCE FROM WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR
JOINTS.
60.7 WEEP HOLES ALONG EAST ABUTMENT OF WESTBOUND ARCH
PARTIALLY BLOCKED WITH SOIL.
60.9 MODERATE EROSION (UP TO 4' DIAMETER X 3' DEEP) AT END OF
SOUTHEAST WINGWALL CONTRIBUTING TO MODERATE EROSION
(UP TO 4' DIAMETER X 2' DEEP) AT MID-LENGTH OF WINGWALL.
MINOR EROSION AT NORTH END OF WEST ABUTMENT, WESTBOUND
ARCH, AND SOUTH END OF EAST ABUTMENT, EASTBOUND ARCH.
222.3 MODERATE COLLISION DAMAGE TO MEDIAN GUARDRAILS AT BOTH
APPROACHES.
222.9 EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY FROM RING STONES.
36.A PARAPET HEIGHT OF 1'-6" DOES NOT MEET CURRENT SAFETY
GUIDELINES FOR STRENGTH OR MINIMUM HEIGHT GUIDELINES OF
2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY BARRIERS.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 33 30
HS 28 25 46 42
TYPE 3 25 23 41 37
TYPE 3S2 38 34 64 58
TYPE 3-3 48 44 80 73
DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... U.S. ROUTE 460 (OVERPASS) BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-022P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 022P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. ROANOKE
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1M4
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
513 - VIRGINIA (VA)
023 - BOTETOURT
161000010
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
U.S. ROUTE 460
5140022P0000000
1.0 MILES TO VA ROUTE 657
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
105.80 (KM PT 170.26)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
11 - ARCH - DECK
41.3 FT (12.6 M)
41.3 FT (12.6 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 28.0 TONS (25.4 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 46.0 TONS (41.7 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/12 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 84.0 FT (25.6 M)
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°21'21.00"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 79°50'08.10"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 6.1 FT (1.9 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
95.7 FT (29.2 M)
40.0 FT (12.2 M)
24.0 FT (7.3 M)
8.0 FT (2.4 M)
8.0 FT (2.4 M)
1 - OPEN MEDIAN
53 °
NO
42.0 FT (12.8 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
3 - PARAPET ONLY
9 - OTHER
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
1.50 FT (0.46 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
15.92 FT (4.85 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0111
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1982-JOINT REPAIR. PARK WAS PREVIOUSLY ASKED TO NOTIFY VDOT OF HOLE AT EAST APPROACH.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:79�50'08.10 http:37�21'21.00
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD ROANOKE
PHOTO #2 - NORTH SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #5 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO EAST MEDIAN APPROACH RAIL
PHOTO #6 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO EAST END TREATMENT OF MEDIAN
APPROACH RAIL
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF PAVEMENT, EASTBOUND LANES
SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - EROSION AT SOUTHEAST WINGWALL END
PHOTO #9 - EROSION IN FRONT OF DROP
INLET AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL END; NOTE
ROTATION OF DROP INLET
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL
CRACKING OF PAVEMENT, EASTBOUND LANES
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH
ALONG PARAPETS, NORTH PARAPET SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - ROTATION OF NORTHWEST
DROP INLET
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL GRAVEL ACCUMULATION
ALONG MEDIAN CURBLINES, WESTBOUND
LANES SHOWN
PHOTO #14 - PARAPET EXPANSION JOINTS
HAVE BEEN SEALED SINCE PREVIOUS
INSPECTION, NORTHEAST PARAPET JOINT
PHOTO #15 - VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS
HAVE BEEN SEALED SINCE PREVIOUS
INSPECTION, NORTHWEST EXPANSION JOINT
SHOWN
PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL EXPOSED REBAR
CHAIRS IN SLAB UNDERSIDE, WESTBOUND
ARCH SHOWN
PHOTO #17 - HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CONSTRUCTION
JOINT AT NORTH END OF EAST ABUTMENT;
NOTE VERTICAL CRACKING ABOVE WEEP
HOLE
PHOTO #18 - SPALLING ALONG
CONSTRUCTION JOINT IN WESTBOUND ARCH
PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL LOSS OF FILL THROUGH WEEP HOLES ALONG
EAST ABUTMENT IN WESTBOUND ARCH
PHOTO #20 - GENERAL UNDERPASS ROADWAY VIEW
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON INTERIOR
SPANDREL WALLS, EASTBOUND ARCH SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT COVER ON
WEST INNER WALL
PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE
ALONG RING STONES, SOUTH RING STONES
SHOWN
PHOTO #24 - RANDOM CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH SIDE OF WEST
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #25 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #26 - EROSION AT SOUTH END OF EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #27 - EROSION ALONG SOUTHEAST
WINGWALL
PHOTO #28 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF
UNDERPASS ROADWAY, NORTHBOUND LANE
UNDER EASTBOUND ARCH SHOWN
PHOTO #29 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE ACCUMULATION ON
UNDERPASS ROADWAY, NORTH SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #30 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALL MASONRY
MORTAR JOINTS, NORTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #31 - EROSION AT NORTH END OF WEST ABUTMENT
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .