Report_3_Bridge_Inspection_Route_460_Bridge.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
Blue Ridge Parkway Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
DTFH71-16-B-00009
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

Report 3 - Bridge Inspection Route 460

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Blue Ridge Parkway, newest first.
File Type Posted
ROBO_-_FTNP-BLRI_1L8.pdf PDF
Amendment_0003_-_FNTP-BLRI_1L8.pdf PDF
Amendment_0002_-_BLRI_1L8.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001_-_FTNP_BLRI_1L8.pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
Report_1_NEPA.pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_BLRI_1L8.pdf PDF
Report_4_Bridge_Inspection_Route_652_Bridge.pdf PDF
Report_2_Pavement.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
VETS-100A-Form.pdf PDF
Plans_-_FTNP-BLRI_1L8.pdf PDF
Synopsis_-_FTNP_-_BLRI_1L8.doc DOC document
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

U.S. ROUTE 460 (OVERPASS) BRIDGE

U.S. ROUTE 460 OVER BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

LE

STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 10/16/12

Report prepared by: SS

MILE POINT: 105.80

Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 170.26 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P

U.S. ROUTE 460 (OVERPASS) BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/16/12

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... ARCH - DECK NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 41.3 FT (12.6 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 41.3 FT (12.6 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 95.7 FT (29.2 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 84.0 FT (25.6 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1M4 / 41910 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 53 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1982-JOINT REPAIR. PARK WAS PREVIOUSLY ASKED TO NOTIFY VDOT OF HOLE AT EAST

APPROACH.

LOCATION

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 105.80 (KM PT 170.26)

STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 1.0 MILES TO VA ROUTE 657

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ U.S. ROUTE 460

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete arch bridge is in fair to good condition overall. The structure consists of two parallel arches, one carrying U.S. Route 460 eastbound, the other carrying the westbound lanes. The main problems include severe erosion in front of the drop inlet at the west end of the south parapet, and collision damage to the approach median guardrails.

Other problems include minor deterioration of the parapet masonry mortar joints, erosion along the southeast wingwall, and an accumulation of debris and vegetation along the curblines and parapets. Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

Since the previous inspection, the vertical expansion joints have been sealed.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. THOMAS, R. TAYLOR (VOLKERT, INC.)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JOE THOMAS, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 2/28/13

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.6 CLEAN AND REPOINT PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS NECESSARY. 1 LS

58.7 STABILIZE ROTATING DROP INLETS AT WEST END OF BOTH PARAPETS, AND

PATCH SHOULDER PAVEMENT.

1 LS

222.3 REPAIR DAMAGED APPROACH MEDIAN GUARDRAILS AND POSTS. 1 LS

60.9, 222.5 FILL IN EROSION ALONG SOUTHEAST WINGWALL, END OF SOUTHWEST PARAPET

ALONG APPROACH ROADWAY, NORTH END OF WEST ABUTMENT, AND SOUTH

END OF EAST ABUTMENT.

1 LS

58.7 REMOVE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH FROM ALONG

CURBLINES AND PARAPETS.

1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL:

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

$0

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N

N N F N N N N G G

N G

G N N N N G F G F G N N

N N N N N N N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.2, 60.8 PARAPET EXPANSION JOINTS AND VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS

HAVE BEEN SEALED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.

58.3, 222.4 MODERATE RANDOM CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT.

58.5 MINOR CRACKING OF MEDIAN CURBS.

58.6 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS.

58.7, 222.5 MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG PARAPETS. MODERATE

ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG

MEDIAN CURBLINES. MINOR EROSION ALONG NORTH EDGE OF

PAVEMENT OVER WESTBOUND ARCH. MINOR SUBSIDENCE OF

SHOULDER EMBANKMENT AT VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS.

DROP INLETS AT WEST END OF BOTH PARAPETS HAVE ROTATED

AWAY FROM PARAPETS. SEVERE EROSION (5' DIAMETER X 30"

DEEP) IN FRONT OF DROP INLET AT WEST END OF SOUTH PARAPET

EXTENDS 3' IN FRONT OF GUARDRAIL ALONG APPROACH

ROADWAY.

59.3 MINOR VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON INTERIOR SPANDREL WALLS. MINOR RADIAL

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE EXTENDING FROM WEEP HOLES

ON ARCH UNDERSIDE. EXPOSED AND RUSTED REBAR CHAIRS IN

SEVERAL LOCATIONS.

MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH

SIDE OF EASTBOUND ARCH UNDERSIDE AT WEST END.

MINOR SPALLING ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINT ON WESTBOUND

ARCH UNDERSIDE. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINT AT NORTH END OF

EAST SPRINGLINE.

G G G F F N

N

G

N

N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 6

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS

(UNDERPASS ROADWAY)

N N F G P G N G G

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0

59.8 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE FROM RING STONE MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS.

60.6 MINOR EFFLORESCENCE FROM WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS.

60.7 WEEP HOLES ALONG EAST ABUTMENT OF WESTBOUND ARCH

PARTIALLY BLOCKED WITH SOIL.

60.9 MODERATE EROSION (UP TO 4' DIAMETER X 3' DEEP) AT END OF

SOUTHEAST WINGWALL CONTRIBUTING TO MODERATE EROSION

(UP TO 4' DIAMETER X 2' DEEP) AT MID-LENGTH OF WINGWALL.

MINOR EROSION AT NORTH END OF WEST ABUTMENT, WESTBOUND

ARCH, AND SOUTH END OF EAST ABUTMENT, EASTBOUND ARCH.

222.3 MODERATE COLLISION DAMAGE TO MEDIAN GUARDRAILS AT BOTH

APPROACHES.

222.9 EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY FROM RING STONES.

36.A PARAPET HEIGHT OF 1'-6" DOES NOT MEET CURRENT SAFETY

GUIDELINES FOR STRENGTH OR MINIMUM HEIGHT GUIDELINES OF

2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY BARRIERS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 33 30

HS 28 25 46 42

TYPE 3 25 23 41 37

TYPE 3S2 38 34 64 58

TYPE 3-3 48 44 80 73

DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... U.S. ROUTE 460 (OVERPASS) BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-022P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 022P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. ROANOKE

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1M4

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

513 - VIRGINIA (VA)

023 - BOTETOURT

161000010

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

U.S. ROUTE 460

5140022P0000000

1.0 MILES TO VA ROUTE 657

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

105.80 (KM PT 170.26)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

11 - ARCH - DECK

41.3 FT (12.6 M)

41.3 FT (12.6 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 28.0 TONS (25.4 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 46.0 TONS (41.7 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/12 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 84.0 FT (25.6 M)

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°21'21.00"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 79°50'08.10"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 6.1 FT (1.9 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

95.7 FT (29.2 M)

40.0 FT (12.2 M)

24.0 FT (7.3 M)

8.0 FT (2.4 M)

8.0 FT (2.4 M)

1 - OPEN MEDIAN

53 °

NO

42.0 FT (12.8 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

3 - PARAPET ONLY

9 - OTHER

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

1.50 FT (0.46 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

15.92 FT (4.85 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0111

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR. PARK WAS PREVIOUSLY ASKED TO NOTIFY VDOT OF HOLE AT EAST APPROACH.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:79�50'08.10 http:37�21'21.00

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-022P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD ROANOKE

PHOTO #2 - NORTH SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #5 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO EAST MEDIAN APPROACH RAIL

PHOTO #6 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO EAST END TREATMENT OF MEDIAN

APPROACH RAIL

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF PAVEMENT, EASTBOUND LANES

SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - EROSION AT SOUTHEAST WINGWALL END

PHOTO #9 - EROSION IN FRONT OF DROP

INLET AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL END; NOTE

ROTATION OF DROP INLET

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING OF PAVEMENT, EASTBOUND LANES

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH

ALONG PARAPETS, NORTH PARAPET SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - ROTATION OF NORTHWEST

DROP INLET

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL GRAVEL ACCUMULATION

ALONG MEDIAN CURBLINES, WESTBOUND

LANES SHOWN

PHOTO #14 - PARAPET EXPANSION JOINTS

HAVE BEEN SEALED SINCE PREVIOUS

INSPECTION, NORTHEAST PARAPET JOINT

PHOTO #15 - VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS

HAVE BEEN SEALED SINCE PREVIOUS

INSPECTION, NORTHWEST EXPANSION JOINT

SHOWN

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL EXPOSED REBAR

CHAIRS IN SLAB UNDERSIDE, WESTBOUND

ARCH SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CONSTRUCTION

JOINT AT NORTH END OF EAST ABUTMENT;

NOTE VERTICAL CRACKING ABOVE WEEP

HOLE

PHOTO #18 - SPALLING ALONG

CONSTRUCTION JOINT IN WESTBOUND ARCH

PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL LOSS OF FILL THROUGH WEEP HOLES ALONG

EAST ABUTMENT IN WESTBOUND ARCH

PHOTO #20 - GENERAL UNDERPASS ROADWAY VIEW

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON INTERIOR

SPANDREL WALLS, EASTBOUND ARCH SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT COVER ON

WEST INNER WALL

PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE

ALONG RING STONES, SOUTH RING STONES

SHOWN

PHOTO #24 - RANDOM CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH SIDE OF WEST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #25 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #26 - EROSION AT SOUTH END OF EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #27 - EROSION ALONG SOUTHEAST

WINGWALL

PHOTO #28 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF

UNDERPASS ROADWAY, NORTHBOUND LANE

UNDER EASTBOUND ARCH SHOWN

PHOTO #29 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE ACCUMULATION ON

UNDERPASS ROADWAY, NORTH SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #30 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALL MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS, NORTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN

PHOTO #31 - EROSION AT NORTH END OF WEST ABUTMENT

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .