Past Performance Questionnaire Casualty Actuary Services.doc
DOC document 52 KB Posted
- Attached to
- (DOL) DFEC CASUALTY ACTUARY SERVICES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DOL110RQ20930
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS DOL110RQ20930.docx | DOCX document | |
| DOL110RQ20930-0001.rtf | RTF text file | |
| DOL110RQ20930 APRIL 5.rtf | RTF text file |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Part I- Past Performance Questionnaire (FACTOR 1) (To be completed and submitted by the Reference) Past Performance
(Due Not later than April 15, 2010, 3:00PM local time for Washington, DC)
1. Complete name of government agency, commercial firm or other organization
2. Complete address
3. Contract number or other reference
4. Date of contract award
5. Date work was begun
6. Date work was completed
7. Initial contract price
8. Final amount invoiced or amount invoiced to date
9. Technical point of contact (name, address, telephone no. and email address)
10. Location of work (country, state or province, county, city)
11. Description of contract work
All Questionnaires are due not later than April 15, 3:00PM Washington, DC local time
Mail or fax questionnaires to the following information:
OASAM Office of Procurement Services
Attn: Gladys Bailey
200 Constitution Avenue, NW
RM S4307
Washington, DC 20210
Fax: 202-693-4579
Tel: 202-693-4598
Past Performance Questionnaire (To be completed and submitted by the Reference) ***Please circle or type a response and any comments Performance History:
1. To what extent did the contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules?
Considerably surpassed minimum requirements
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
COMMENTS:
2. To what extent were the contractor’s reports and documentation accurate and complete?
Considerably surpassed minimum requirements
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
3. To what extent was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from government counterparts?
Considerably successful
Generally successful
Little success
No success
4. To what extent did the contractor display initiative in meeting requirements?
Displayed considerable initiative
Displayed some initiative
Displayed little initiative
Displayed no initiative
5. Did contractor commit adequate resources, in a timely fashion, to the contract to meet the requirements and to successfully solve problems?
Provided abundant resources
Provided sufficient resources
Provided minimal resources
Provided insufficient resources
6. To what extent was the contractor effective in interfacing with Government staff?
Extremely effective
Generally effective
Generally ineffective
Extremely ineffective
7. What was the overall performance of the contractor?
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Cost Management:
1. To what extent did the contractor meet the proposed estimates?
Less than estimated cost
Comparatively equal to estimate
Exceeded the costs
Considerably surpassed estimate
2. To what extent were there cost overruns?
No cost overruns
Little cost overruns
Some cost overruns
Considerable cost overruns
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .