D.1 QASP.docx
DOCX document 62 KB Posted
- Attached to
- G099--CERS - DC | Unrestricted - SAM. gov Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C24525R0092
About this file
This document is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for a Contracted Emergency Residential Services (CERS) contract with the Department of Veterans Affairs Washington DC Medical Center. The QASP outlines performance standards, surveillance methods, and evaluation criteria for a homeless veteran services program designed to house and stabilize homeless male and female veterans within 60-180 days. Key performance requirements include 24/7 residential services, individualized service planning, case management, therapeutic services, transportation assistance, admission processes, and comprehensive documentation.
The contract will serve up to 24 Bed Days of Care (BDOC) per day, not exceeding 35,040 BDOC for the contract's duration. The VA will conduct surveillance through methods including direct observation, periodic inspections, customer feedback, random sampling, and contractor documentation reviews. Performance will be rated using a five-tier system (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory) across multiple metrics such as patient safety, transportation, admissions, case management, therapeutic services, and critical incident reporting. The solicitation is expected to be issued on August 1, 2025, with proposals due by August 15, 2025, under NAICS Code 624221 with a small business size standard of $13.5M.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| D.6 NUTRITION INSPECTION FORM.pdf | ||
| D.5 HCHV CERS INSPECTION FORM.pdf | ||
| D.3 WAGE DETERMINATIONS 2015-4281.pdf | ||
| 36C24525R0092_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| D11. PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE.pdf | ||
| D.10 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION.pdf | ||
| D.9 HCHV MEDICATION INSPECTION CHECKLIST.pdf | ||
| D.8 HCHV INCIDENT REPORT.pdf | ||
| D.7 QUARTERLY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.pdf | ||
| D.2 VA HANDBOOK 6500.6, APPENDIC D, CONTRACTOR RULES OF BEHAVIOR.pdf | ||
| S02_36C24525R0092 - SAM.docx | DOCX document | |
| D.4 IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
The contractor will be evaluated in accordance with the following:
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
· What will be monitored?
· How monitoring will take place.
· Who will conduct the monitoring?
· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor through contract modification. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
a. Contracting Officer (CO) – The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.
Assigned CO: Paschal L. Dawson | paschal.dawson@va.gov Organization or Agency: VA
Assigned CS: George L. Sherrin | George.sherrin@va.gov Organization or Agency: VA
b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) – The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.
Assigned COR: Dr. Kate Elie | kate.elie@va.gov Organization or Agency: VA
3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The following employee(s) of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager(s) for this contract. Primary Program Manager:
Alternate Program Manager:
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)
4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The contractor is responsible for the performance of ALL terms and conditions of the contract. CORs will provide contract progress reports quarterly to the CO reflecting performance on this plan and all other aspects of the resultant contract. The performance standards outlined in this QASP shall be used to determine the level of contractor performance in the elements defined. Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine the level of Contractor performance to these standards.
The Performance Requirements are listed below in Section 6. The Government shall use these standards to determine contractor performance, and shall compare contractor performance to the standard and assign a rating. At the end of the performance period, these ratings will be used, in part, to establish the past performance of the contractor on the contract.
5. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE
Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.
a. DIRECT OBSERVATION. 100% surveillance: Observation may occur on site or through record reviews.
b. PERIODIC INSPECTION. Inspections will be conducted periodically and can be unannounced or scheduled. The VA can request to conduct an on-site inspection and file review at any time.
c. CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS/FEEDBACK. All complaints and participant feedback that is submitted by verified customers either through the Contractor or the VA will be reviewed.
d. RANDOM SAMPLING: All Veteran files can be reviewed at any time. During unannounced or scheduled inspections, a random sampling of Veteran files will be pulled to review.
e. DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR: All documentation and correspondence provided by the contractor can be reviewed to include but not limited to: incident reports, discharge summaries, case consultation progress emails or notes, sign-in sheets, emergency plans, staff training, personnel plans etc
6. QASP PERFORMANCE REPORT DATE:
Measures
PWS
Reference Performance Requirement Standard Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) Surveillance Method Met or Did Not Meet AQL
CPAR RATING & COMMENTS
Periodic Inspections 4 a,b,c, 9 d, e (1-8) Visual safety and sanitation inspection; review of emergency and disaster plan, audit of selected Veterans’ clinical records; and review of Veteran complaints and participant feedback.
For any deficiency that is noted during inspections, plans of correction with timeframes to correct the deficiency must be submitted by the Contractor within 15 days of notification.
Grievance process to address Veteran complaints with Contractor providing a response to the complaint to the VA within 3 business days 100% Direct Observation including scheduled and unannounced site visits and inspections
| Patient Safety |
| 4a (1b), |
4h, 9e (2),
| Contractors must have emergency and disaster plans with written protocols that are posted to guide staff response to crises including, but not limited to, manmade and natural disasters, episodes of infectious diseases, physical injury, program participants suicide or suicide attempts, overdoses, and domestic or other violence. |
| All contractor staff must be trained on emergency procedures and protocols. |
| 100% |
| Periodic Inspection, staff training, documentation provided by the Contractor |
| Transportation |
| 5g, 6d(13)(15), |
8f The Contractor will ensure that transportation is available for Veterans to attend medical/mental health appointments, search for transitional or permanent housing and
| Contractor shall assist all Veterans with local transportation through the provision of bus passes, utilization of cab services or use of Contractor transportation. |
| 95% |
| Periodic Inspection |
Veteran complaints Customer satisfaction feedback address other care needs.
| Admissions |
| 6b, 8b |
| Contractor shall have the ability to accommodate admissions from 24 hours per day seven (7) days per week. If unable to verify Veteran's eligiblity during off tour hours, a homeless person should be accepted conditionally" |
| Contractor has a process in place to accommodate admissions after normal business hours and on weekends. |
Any denial of admission will be submitted in writing to the VA Liaison within 24 hours with justification based on safety concerns.
| 100% |
| Periodic Inspection |
| Admissions |
| 4c, 8b. |
| The program cannot deny entry to a Veteran based on length of abstinence from alcohol or non- prescribed |
controlled Any denial of admission will be submitted in writing to the VA Liaison within 24 hours with justification based on safety concerns. The
| 100% |
| Direct Observation |
Periodic Inspection Veteran complaints substances, number of treatment episodes, time interval since the last program entry, legal history, or use of prescribed controlled substances.
Abstinence from alcohol or drugs cannot be a condition of admission or continued stay date of admission must be approved by the VA Liaison for billing purposes.
| Individualized Service Plan (ISP) |
| 6d(4-7) . |
10j,m,o
6d(6) Complete a written ISP with the primary goal of obtaining housing signed by the Contractor, the Veteran, and the VA Liaison.
Review ISP in a clinical meeting with the Veteran.
All completed ISP shall be completed within the first 7 days of program admission.
All ISP reviews shall be completed every 30 days.
All updated ISPs shall be communicated to the VA Liaison 100%
100%
95% Periodic Inspection, random sampling, site visits, periodic inspections, documentation provided by contractor within 3 business days
| Case Management |
| 4a(1)c, |
6d(12), 9e(3), 10m
| Contractor will take primary responsibility for housing case management to include assisting Veterans in completing housing applications and other benefits paperwork as needed |
| Contractor will assist Veterans in obtaining the needed documentation required for complete applications including but not limited to, birth |
certificates, driver’s license, income verification and any additional information required by housing resources and potential income supports. Case management services will be documented in the Veterans individual clinical record.
| 95% |
| Periodic inspection, site visits, Veteran complaints, participant satisfaction feedback |
| Therapeutic Services |
| 6d(14-15). |
10n
| Contractor will provide structured groups and activities to promote social skills building and |
| Contactor can demonstrate groups & activities that were provided each month and |
sign-in sheets of
| 95% |
| Periodic inspection, site visits, documentation |
| healthy lifestyles or provide referrals to community agencies offering these groups |
| Veteran participation or evidence of referrals to outside offerings. |
Documentation of Veteran’s participation should also be in the Veteran individual clinical record.
provided by the contractor
| Suicidal and Homicidal Risk |
| 6d(8) |
| Screen each Veteran for suicidal and homicidal risk. |
| All screenings must be documented in regular progress notes. |
| 100% |
| Periodic Inspection, Random Sampling |
| Collaborative Relationship |
| 6d(9) |
| Contractor will participate in weekly case conferences. |
| 100% of updates and changes in Veterans’ care |
plans and progress on goals shall be provided to the VA Liaison.
| 95% |
| Direct observation, documentation provided by contractor |
| Critical Incidents |
| 6e |
| Contractor will notify VA through the VA of any critical incident occurring with a Veteran. |
| All incidents will be reported within 24 hours of incident, if not sooner. |
| 100% |
| Documentation provided by Contractor |
| Staffing and 24/7 availability |
| 6b, 7, 8b |
| There must be, as a minimum, at least one (1) administrative staff member or designee of equivalent professional capability, on duty on the premises or residing at the house and available for emergencies 24 hours a day, seven (7) days a week. |
| 100% compliance |
| 100% |
| Direct Observation, site visits, periodic inspections |
| Extensions Beyond 90 Days |
| 2, 6d(4), |
8a. 8a (2- 4), 8d-e, 10b, 10j,
| Contractor seeks approval from the VA Liaison for any extension of BDOC for Veterans approaching the end of their approved BDOC. |
| Any extension requests beyond 90 days must be submitted within 7 days of the end of approved bed days of care and must be approved by the VA Liaison. |
| 95% |
| Direct observation, site visits, periodic inspections |
| Discharges |
| 8f-h, 10e(2)(c). |
10p
| Contractor shall provide discharge planning and referrals for each Veteran, regardless of |
| All written discharge reports shall be provided to COR within 24 hours of Veteran’s discharge. |
| 100% |
| Periodic Inspection, Random Sampling, direct observation |
character of discharge.
| Sign-in Sheets |
| 10g(1) |
| Daily sign-in sheets signed by program Veterans, to document and verify Veterans’ presence at the facility for billing purposes. |
| All sign-in sheets will be provided monthly to the VA Liaison for review. |
| 95% |
| Direct Observation, site visits, and periodic inspections |
| Scheduled and Unscheduled Absences |
| 10e |
| Payment for scheduled absences must have the reason documented in the Veteran’s case file or service plan. |
Payments for unscheduled absences must have evidence of active outreach to reengage the Veteran in their case file or service plan.
| All absences must be properly documented. |
| 95% |
| Direct Observation, site visits, and periodic inspections |
| Performance Measures |
| 9a, b, c |
| HCHV |
performance metrics and targets will be reviewed quarterly
| Contractor will be expected to complete a written action plan for any |
| 100% |
| Periodic inspection |
| and annually. Any performance measure target not being met will require Contractor to develop an action plan. |
| performance measure not meeting established targets within 30 days of notification. |
| Documentation |
| 10q, 11a |
4a(1)c, 10g(2), 10i
10p Contractor expected to enter Veterans into HMIS system
The Contractor shall maintain an individual clinical record on each Veteran housed under this contract
A final discharge summary on each Veteran who leaves the program to include a description of beneficial changes realized during the residential period, reasons for All Veterans must be entered into HMIS within 2 weeks of being entered into the contract and within 2 weeks of being discharged from the contract.
All individual clinical records will contain an initial biopsychosocial assessment completed within 7 days of program admission.
Discharge summary should be entered within 2 weeks of Veteran being discharged
| 95% |
| Direct Observation, site visits, and periodic inspections |
leaving, the Veteran’s future plans, after-care referrals and connections, and follow up locator information.
| Outreach |
| 5.h |
| Contractors will maintain occupancy by engaging in outreach services and will be knowledgeable about outreach best practices generally accepted in the community. |
| Outreach will be conducted by the CERS provider and VA homeless outreach staff in conjunction with community street outreach teams within VA catchment area. |
| 95% |
| Direct Observation |
periodic inspections
7. CPAR RATINGS ASSIGNED TO QASP ITEMS:
Metrics and methods are designed to determine rating for a given standard and acceptable quality level. The following ratings shall be used (Reference: CPARS User Manual https://www.cpars.gov/pdfs/CPARS- Guidance.pdf p. A2-1):
| EXCEPTIONAL: |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the |
Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Note: To justify an Exceptional rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. However a singular event could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
| VERY GOOD: | |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the | Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
Note: To justify a Very Good rating, you should identify a significant event in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. Also there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
| SATISFACTORY: |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
Note: To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. Also there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
| MARGINAL: | |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual | performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
Note: To justify Marginal performance, you should identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g. Management, Quality, Safety or Environmental Deficiency Report or letter).
| UNSATISFACTORY: | ||
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery | is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. | |
| Note: To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular problem could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g. Management, Quality, Safety or | Environmental Deficiency Reports, or letters). |
8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE
a. The Government shall document positive and/or negative performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action and preparing annual past performance using CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (CPAR).
b. If contractor performance does not meet the Acceptable Quality level, the CO shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the CO shall document the discussion and place it in the contract file. When the COR and the CO determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Report (CR), and present it to CO. The CO will in turn review and will present to the contractor's program manager for corrective action.
The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CR in writing. The CR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the CO. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance and the acceptability of the Contractor’s corrective action plan.
Any CRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO. See Sample CR on the following page.
9. COR AND CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF QASP
SIGNED:
COR NAME/TITLE DATE
SIGNED:
CONTRACTOR NAME/TITLE DATE
CONTRACT REPORT
| 1. CONTRACT NUMBER |
| 2. REPORT NUMBER FOR THIS DISCREPANCY |
| 3. TO: (Contracting Officer) |
| 4. FROM: (Name of COR) |
5. DATES
| a. CR PREPARED |
| b. RETURNED BY CONTRACTOR: |
| c. ACTION COMPLETE |
6. Issue Identified (Describe in detail. Include reference to PWS Directive; attach continuation sheet if necessary.)
| 7. SIGNATURE OF COR |
| Date: |
| 8. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER |
| Date: |
| 9a. TO (Contracting Officer) |
| 9a. FROM (Contractor) |
10. CONTRACTOR RESPONSE AS TO CAUSE AND ACTIONS TO PREVENT
RECURRENCE. (Cite applicable quality control program procedures or new procedures. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)
11. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE
Date:
12. GOVERNMENT EVALUATION.
13. GOVERNMENT ACTIONS
14. CLOSE OUT
| NAME |
| TITLE |
| SIGNATURE |
| DATE |
CONTRACTOR NOTIFIED
COR
CONTRACTING OFFICER
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .