ATT_J.2__PP_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
DOCX document 155 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FISMA Annual Independent Audit Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- CSOSA16R0021
About this file
Attachment J-2
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF30_Amendment_2.pdf | ||
| ATT_J.2__PP_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx | DOCX document | |
| QA_FISMA_Amendment_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_J-1_Personal_Statement_of_Independence.docx | DOCX document | |
| SECTION_M_-_Final__7-15-16.docx | DOCX document | |
| SECTION_J_LIST_OF_ATTACHMENTS.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQ_Letter-Final_7-15-16.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sections_A_-_F_SF1449_Price_Schedule_SOW_Deliverables_-Final_7-15-16.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE When Filled In This document Is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
ATTACHMENT J-2
RFQ CSOSA-16R0021 Re: Audit Services iaw FISMA
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER
1. The survey should be completed by the individual most knowledgeable of the Contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall condition of services being rendered. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the Contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in their organization, as applicable.
2. Handwritten responses are sufficient. Please make them legible.
3. Please provide explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible. These narratives need not be lengthy, just descriptive. Space for narrative comments is included on the last page of the survey. If more space is needed, additional pages may be added.
4. As the survey relates to an ongoing source selection for the services for “GPS Equipment and Monitoring Services for Tracking Offenders,” we request that all information provided within the survey be safeguarded against unauthorized disclosure.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: Telephone Number: Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Address:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work: *
Contract Number Provided by Offeror:
Dollar Amount: $ *
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: *
*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel. B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: Title:
Company Name/Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
Email Address:
C. E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Lawrence B Toperoff at lawrence.toperoff@csosa.gov
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE When Filled In This document Is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1, 2 OR 3..
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
NEUTRAL
UNSATIS-
FACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
SCHEDULE
| 1. |
| Contractor’s responsiveness/timeliness in |
providing the required services.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 2. |
| Contractor’s responsiveness/timeliness to |
administrative functions of the contract.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 3. |
| Contractor’s responsiveness/timeliness in |
responding to questions or correspondence.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 4. |
| Contractor’s compliance with contract |
terms and conditions.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE When Filled In This document Is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER
| 5. |
| Were any contract |
concessions/changes/terminations made due to the contractor’s failure to accurately plan?
| Yes |
| No |
MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
| 6. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel |
during the contract period.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7. |
| Contractor’s preparation & training of |
personnel.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 8. |
| Contractor’s ability to effectively manage |
subordinates.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
QUALITY OF SERVICES
| 9. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or |
inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 10. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 11. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner |
and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 12. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract |
discrepancies.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 13. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 14. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to |
problems.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE When Filled In This document Is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER
| 15. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 16. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 17. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 18. |
| Contractor’s ability to assimilate & |
accommodate changes in contractual requirements and/or priority.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 19. |
| Contractor’s exhibited knowledge of and |
compliance with Government (or other) regulations.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 20. |
| Contractor’s demonstration of technical |
expertise in providing all contractual services.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 21. |
| Contractor possession/utilization of |
tools/equipment necessary for adequately providing the required services.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 22. |
| Contractor’s accomplishment in meeting |
the Quality standards specified for:
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| a. Technical Performance |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| b. Administrative Performance |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| c. Safety & Health |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 23. |
| Has the Contractor ever failed to |
effectively control the quality of services provided? If yes, please explain in Remarks Section.
| Yes |
| No |
| 24. |
| Has a Contract Discrepancy Report |
(or equivalent) ever been issued? If yes, please explain in the Remarks Section
| Yes |
| No |
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE When Filled In This document Is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER
| 25. |
| Has a Cure Notice or Show Cause Letter |
ever been issued? If yes, please explain in the Remarks Section
| Yes |
| No |
| 26. |
| Have there been any disputes/claims |
relative to the contract? If yes, please explain in the Remarks Section
| Yes |
| No |
| 27. |
| Has a Contractor demonstrated the ability |
to correct any of the problems referenced above? If yes, please explain in the Remarks Section
| Yes |
| No |
| 28. |
| Has a Contract been terminated for |
default? If yes, please explain in the Remarks Section
| Yes |
| No |
| 29. |
| Has an election ever been made to not |
exercise an option due to the Contractor’s poor performance? If yes, please explain in the Remarks Section
| Yes |
| No |
BUSINESS RELATIONS
| 30. |
| Contractor’s management of subcontracts. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 31. |
| Have there been any labor disputes? If |
yes, please explain in the Remarks Sect ion
| Yes |
| No |
| 32. |
| Have there been any violations of Public |
Law, especially the Service Contract Act? If yes, please explain in the Remarks Section
| Yes |
| No |
| 33. |
| Contractor’s ability/willingness to |
consistently provide prompt and courteous service.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE When Filled In This document Is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER
| 34. |
| Contractor’s ability/willingness to |
promptly and courteously resolve customer complaints.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 35. |
| Contractor’s overall commitment to |
customer satisfaction.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 36. |
| Contractor’s overall cooperation relative to |
this contract.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 37. |
| How would you rate the integration and |
coordination of all activity needed to perform this contract?
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 38. |
| How would you the Contractor’s overall |
performance?
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 39. |
| Would you award another contract to this |
Contractor? If not, please explain in the Remarks Section
| Yes |
| No |
Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .