AmendedRFPSection J-10 Attach.doc
DOC document 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- 9th SOW Quality Improvement Contracts Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- CMS-2007-QIO9thSOW-NAHC
About this file
Amended Section J Attachment J10
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
9th SOW Quality Improvement Contracts has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Section J, Attachment J-10, Appendix A: Details on Measures (Revised 2/18/2008)
Section:
1. Details on Evaluation Measures, incl. Proportion of Transitions Table
2. Example of Power Calculation
3. Databases from claims and their uses, with data elements
4. Timeframe for Evaluation of Measures
5. Measures to Monitor Adverse Effects
6. Analytic Tools from the VALUE project
6.a. Medical Record from Claims
6.b. Hospital (or community) Practice Pattern
7. Timeline of periods of data generation and resulting reports
8. Management of Reports
9. Overview of CARE instrument and plans
10. Screen shots of Internet Platform as of January 2008
11. Sites proposed for the CARE demonstration
12. The SQUIRE Guidelines
Section 1: Details on Evaluation Measures, incl. Proportion of Transitions Table
Contents:
1. Measures – I-1,2,3,4,6
2. Measure – I- 5
3. Measures - O-1a and O-1b
4. Measure —O-2
5. Measure -- O-3
6. Measure -- O-4
7. Measure – O-5a, b, and c
8. Measure-- O-6
9. The Proportion of Transitions Table (basis of Measures I-1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and O-3) (with example)
1. Measures – I-1,2,3,4,6
For measures I-1, I-2, I-3, I-4, and I-6 (and O-3 and O-6, which are listed separately below), the QIO will report the relevant rate for each provider that the Theme QIO listed in the area, along with a justification for their estimate. The Theme QIO will enter these six rates, by provider, monthly throughout the project. The rate for each measure for each provider will be multiplied by the proportion of transitions represented by that provider in the Table of Proportions of Transitions (in #9 below) to yield the proportion of transitions involved in that measure. The Proportion of Transitions measure will be calculated annually. For each measure, those rates by provider will be summed to yield the proportion of transitions affected by the local project. An example of this calculation for I-1 and I-6 are given in the example presented in #9 below.
One patient transition may have been affected by more than one intervention; thus, the reporting of rates for each provider by the QIO will have to take account of the overlap and avoid double-counting transitions. The process for doing this will be included in the justification for the estimate of the provider table supplied monthly by the QIO. The explanation will be reviewed by the Support QIO.
An “intervention” reported here consists of an aim, a working group guiding the intervention, an intervention strategy, and a measurement strategy. An “intervention” in this meaning does not include activities limited to planning. Complex interventions and monitors may be reported as one coherent project or as split in meaningful ways, as preferred by the QIO and approved by the GTL; that choice will not affect the key monitors of progress as given below.
The Specific Measures:
I-1 Description: Percentage of patient care transitions (FFS Medicare) in the specified geographic area that are attributable to providers who agree to participate.
The rate at which providers are coming to meetings, agreeing in writing (including by Email), or otherwise participating in decision-making or intervention implementation. This is meant to be as inclusive as possible, and the rate may fall as well as rising from month to month (e.g., when a provider institution decides to withdraw from the project or new management stops participating). In general, the presence of a representative of a provider “at the table” will indicate 100% participation for the transitions represented by that provider. However, non-institutional providers will have to have their rate of participation estimated, and institutional providers might have different branches or other reasons why a particular representative reflects only part of their population.
I-2 Description: Percentage of patient care transitions (FFS Medicare) in the specified geographic area that are the potential subject of an implemented intervention that addresses hospital/community system wide processes. (Task 2.2.a).
I-3 Description: Percentage of patient care transitions (FFS Medicare) in the specified geographic area that are the potential subject of an implemented intervention that addresses AMI, CHF, or pneumonia. (Task 2.2.b)
I-4: Description: Percentage of patient care transitions (FFS Medicare) in the specified geographic area that are the potential subject of an implemented intervention that addresses specific reasons for readmission (Task 2.2.c)
I-6. Description: Percentage of patient care transitions (FFS Medicare) in the specified geographic area to which implemented and measured (as in I-5) interventions apply.
(O-3 and O-6 also use the Proportion of Transitions Table, but they are listed separately below.)
2. Measure – I- 5
Description: Percentage of implemented interventions in the specific geographic area that are measured. Calculated by dividing the sum of the interventions implemented for which measures are being collected, by the total number of interventions tallied. This ratio should always be as close to 1 as possible, since interventions without measurement are unlikely to provide insight.
3. Measures O-1a and O-1b
Description: Percentage of patients 65 years old and older who rate hospital performance as meeting HCAHPS performance standard for communication about medicines (O-1a) or discharge information (O-1b)
For O-1a, Communication about medicines
16. Before giving you any new medicine, how often did hospital staff tell you what the medicine was for?
Never(1
Sometimes(2
Usually(3
Always(4
17. Before giving you any new medicine, how often did hospital staff describe possible side effects in a way you could understand?
1 Never
Sometimes(2
Usually(3
Always(4 For O-1b, Discharge information
19. During this hospital stay, did doctors, nurses or other hospital staff talk with you about whether you would have the help you needed when you left the hospital?
Yes(1
No(2
20. During this hospital stay, did you get information in writing about what symptoms or health problems to look out for after you left the hospital?
Yes(1
No(2
Method:
1. Existing data collection has each hospital completing 300 surveys per year, collecting the surveys quarterly.
2. After each quarter, construct rolling annual sets of H-CAHPS reports on the four data elements for all targeted hospitals in each project site (from the list submitted by the QIO) and for comparison sites.
3. Combine all targeted hospitals and split out the respondents age 65 or older.
4. Using the same approach as the two nationally reported measures (see explanatory section immediately following this list); calculate the two measures from the survey questions 16 and 17 (for communication about medicines) and 19 and 20 (for discharge information).
5. Report rolling measures from the preceding year, quarterly, for each target community and each comparison community (as well as the publicly reported national and state reports on all hospitals’ data, annually).
How will composites be computed? How will missing data be handled? (Explanation and example from HCAHPS specifications)
There are seven domain-level composites included in the HCAHPS measure: communication with doctors, communication with nurses, responsiveness of hospital staff, pain control, communication about medicines, cleanliness and quiet of the hospital environment, and discharge information. The basic approach to the production of composite scores is described below.
Communication with doctors
This composite is produced by combining responses to three questions that ask:
· “During this hospital stay, how often did doctors listen carefully to you?”
· “During this hospital stay, how often did doctors explain things in a way you could understand?”
· “During this hospital stay, how often did doctors treat you with courtesy and respect?”
Respondents could answer “never,” “sometimes,” “usually,” or “always” to each. The basic steps in calculating a hospital’s composite score follow:
Step 1 – Calculate the proportion of cases in each response category for each question
P11 = Proportion of respondents who said “never” to the first question
P12 = Proportion of respondents who said “sometimes” to the first question
P13 = Proportion of respondents who said “usually” to the first question
P14 = Proportion of respondents who said “always” to the first question
Follow the same steps for calculating the proportion of cases in a response category to obtain proportions for the second question:
P21 = Proportion of respondents who said “never” to the second question
P22 = Proportion of respondents who said “sometimes” to the second question
P23 = Proportion of respondents who said “usually” to the second question
P24 = Proportion of respondents who said “always” to the second question
Follow the same steps for calculating the proportion of cases in a response category to obtain proportions for the third question:
P31 = Proportion of respondents who said “never” to the third question
P32 = Proportion of respondents who said “sometimes” to the third question
P33 = Proportion of respondents who said “usually” to the third question
P34 = Proportion of respondents who said “always” to the third question
Step 2 – Combine responses from the three questions to form the composite
Calculate the average proportion responding to each category across the three questions in the composite
PC1 = Composite proportion who said “never” = (P11+P21+P31) / 3
PC2 = Composite proportion who said “sometimes” = (P12+P22+P32) / 3
PC3 = Composite proportion who said “usually” = (P13+P23+P33) / 3
PC4 = Composite proportion who said “always” = (P14+P24+P34) / 3
A hospital’s score on the “doctor communication” composite is the proportion of cases in each response category.
If data are missing for any of the questions included in the composite, the respondent would not be included in the calculation of the proportion of respondents answering each of the response categories for that question.
HCAHPS public reporting will use the combination of “never” and “sometimes” as the main publicly reported rate, and the Care Transitions Theme will follow that precedent. So the “Communication about Medications” will be (P11+P21+P31 +P12+P22+P32) / 6 and the “Discharge information” will be (proportion with “No” on Question 19 + proportion with “No” on Question 20)/2)
4. Measure —O-2
Description: Percentage of patients discharged from an “acute care” hospital to a community setting and readmitted within 30 days who are seen by a physician between discharge and readmission.
Numerator: Medicare FFS beneficiaries discharged alive from “acute care” hospital who are readmitted within 30 days and for whom a physician (including nurse practitioner or physician assistant) claim was submitted for services in the time between discharge and readmission.
Denominator: Medicare FFS beneficiaries discharged alive from acute care hospital who are readmitted within 30 days.
Data Sources:
1. Medicare claims for the specified geographic areas for codes listed below.
List of E&M codes
New patient, office – 99201- 99205
Established patient, office – 99211- 99215
Consultations, office or outpatient – 99241 – 99245
Nursing facility, new or established – 99304 – 99310, 99315-99316, 99318
Domiciliary and assisted living – new – 99324 – 99328
Domiciliary and assisted living – established – 99334- 99337 and 99339-40
Home care – new – 99341- 99345
Home care – established – 99347 – 99350
Exclusions:
1. Claim for dates of service for institutional post acute care in the time between discharge and readmission.
2. Claim for hospice or home care in the time between discharge and readmission.
5. Measure -- O-3
The QIOs will report narrative and time series reports, using the SQUIRE guidelines for reporting (see Appendix E) and will estimate the rate of implementation of improvements, by provider, using the method described for the Interim Reports, #2 above.
Description: Percentage of patient care transitions (FFS Medicare), in the specified geographic area, for which implemented and measured interventions show improvement.
Method: In addition to the narrative and time-series reports, the QIO will report the proportion of transitions affected by interventions that showed improvement in quality, by provider. This report follows the method of the interim measures, using the Table of Proportions of Transitions, including being summed to an overall rate at which improvements affect transitions in the community. This rate will be reported quarterly.
6. Measure -- O-4
Description: Percentage of patients from the specified geographic area re-hospitalized within 30 days of discharge from an acute care hospital.
“Acute care” hospitals will not include critical access hospitals for the purposes of this measure.
Data source:
· Claims for beneficiaries hospitalized in the target area for each project (and for the comparison sites) (defined by ZIP codes),
· 1 quarter + 1 month of claims; 2 quarters + 1 month of claims
Frequency of calculation: Quarterly for test of trend, Semi-annually for evaluation measure.
Denominator: Each QIO will specify a population by ZIP Code of residence in the enrollment file (see specifications and exclusions below). The only exclusions from among beneficiaries in traditional Medicare at the time of hospitalization are for enrollees discharged dead, or discharged to another acute care hospital (and admitted to that other hospital on the same day).
Numerator: From those in the denominator, the number of Medicare beneficiaries who were readmitted at least once within 30 days of discharge from their initial hospital stay within the target period.
7. Measure -- O- 6
Description: Percentage of patient transitions within the specified geographic area for which a CARE instrument was used.
Data Sources:
1. CARE instrument data from OIS.
2. Proportions of transitions table.
Method: The Theme QIO will report the proportion of transitions for which at least the upstream provider used the CARE instrument, so that it was available to the downstream provider. The rate follows the method of the interim measures, using the Table of Proportions of Transitions, including being summed to an overall rate at which CARE was employed in transitions in the community. This rate will be reported quarterly.
8. Measures – O-5a, b, and c.
Using the methods established for the national reporting, except the readmission rates will be calculated quarterly without adjustment for purposes of tracking change, and annually for purposes of public reporting. The evaluation measure will be the annual, risk-adjusted rate, but the quarterly (unadjusted) rates will be used for monitoring and the Support QIO will assess them with tests of trend.
9. The Proportion of Transitions Table (basis of Measures I-1, 2, 3, 4, 6, O-3, and O-6) (with example)
Data:
From Medicare claims:
· Beneficiary Zip code of residence at the time of hospital discharge
· Admission and Discharge dates for “acute care” (IPPS) hospitalizations in 2007 (initially, then repeated annually) with follow-up through January 2008 (initially, then repeated annually).
· Calculated by August 2008 (and annually in 2009, 2010)
· Admission and discharge dates for all SNF, IRF, LTAC, psychiatric hospitals, and critical access hospitals for the same time periods.
Procedure:
1. For the ZIP codes specified by each QIO, pull all hospitalizations in 2007.
2. Exclude discharges dead.
3. Test for whether there is a new hospitalization on the same day as the initial hospital discharge. If so, discard the initial hospitalization and count only the ensuing hospitalization
4. For each beneficiary discharged alive in 2007, pull all other institutional use (admission and discharge date) for each beneficiary.
5. Assign 2 variables for each of the 30 days after the initial discharge: the day after discharge and the Medicare provider number where the beneficiary resides on that day. If the beneficiary is not residing in any of the target settings, then assign a neutral provider number (I will use “9” in the example below). This will yield a table with days 0 through 30 and provider numbers for each. Day 0 will have the provider number of the index hospital doing the discharge. If the patient is in two facilities on the same day (by having a discharge date and an admission date that match, then assign the patient to the admission setting for that day. This yields tables like the following:
Example #1 - For a patient who only has a hospital discharge from hospital #1
Bene ID # xxx-xx-xxxxx
| Day after discharge |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| 11 |
| 12 |
| 13 |
| 14 |
| 15 |
| 16 |
| 17 |
| 18 |
| 19 |
| 20 |
| 21 |
| 22 |
| 23 |
| 24 |
| 25 |
| 26 |
| 27 |
| 28 |
| 29 |
| 30 |
| Provider number |
| #1 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
Example #2 - For a patient who only has a readmission to hospital #2, on the 10th day
Bene ID # xxx-xx-xxxxx
| Day after discharge |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| Provider number |
| #1 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| #2 |
Example #3 - For that patient, who is discharged from hospital #2 a few days later, resetting the clock. This time, the person uses an SNF, #3, from day 5 through day 12 but is not readmitted to a hospital
Bene ID # xxx-xx-xxxxx
| Day after discharge |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| 11 |
| 12 |
| 13 |
| 14 |
| 15 |
| 16 |
| 17 |
| 18 |
| 19 |
| 20 |
| 21 |
| 22 |
| 23 |
| 24 |
| 25 |
| 26 |
| 27 |
| 28 |
| 29 |
| 30 |
| Provider number |
| #2 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| #3 |
| #3 |
| #3 |
| #3 |
| #3 |
| #3 |
| #3 |
| #3 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 9 |
Example #4 - For a patient who goes direct from hospital #1 to an IRF (#4) for four more days, then to SNF (#5) for all of the rest of the month
Bene ID # xxx-xx-xxxxx
| Day after discharge |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| 11 |
| 12 |
| 13 |
| 14 |
| 15 |
| 16 |
| 17 |
| 18 |
| 19 |
| 20 |
| 21 |
| 22 |
| 23 |
| 24 |
| 25 |
| 26 |
| 27 |
| 28 |
| 29 |
| 30 |
| Provider number |
| #1 |
| #4 |
| #4 |
| #4 |
| #4 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
| #5 |
6. If the patient is readmitted to an “acute care” hospital within 30 days, truncate the table on the day of readmission, and count the new discharge as a new start date for the 30 day follow-up.
7. Test for whether each beneficiary’s table has changes in provider number and create a list in which the provider number on the day before a change is listed as “sender” and the provider number on the day after a change is listed as “receiver.”
For the examples above –
Example #1 yields one transition in which #1 is a sender and “9” is a receiver
Example #2 yields two transitions, one in which #1 is a sender and “9” is a receiver, and one in which “9” is a sender and #2 is a receiver
Example #3 yields three transitions, one in which #2 is a sender and “9” is a receiver, one in which “9” is a sender and #3 is a receiver, and one in which #3 is a sender and “9” is a receiver
Example #4 yields two transitions, one in which #1 is a sender and #4 is a receiver, one in which #4 is a sender and #5 is a receiver.
Thus, if these were all hospitalizations, the tally would be
| Provider number |
| Transitions as sender |
| Transitions as receiver |
| Sum of parties to transitions |
| #1 |
| 3 |
| 0 |
| 3 |
| #2 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| #3 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| #4 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| #5 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| “9” (non-institutional providers) |
| 2 |
| 4 |
| 6 |
| Sum |
| 8 transitions |
| 8 transitions |
| 16 parties to transitions |
8. The sum of transitions on the list is the number of transitions.
9. The number of parties to transitions is double the number of transitions.
10. Tally the number of times each provider number is a sender or a receiver.
11. (Report the entire table to the QIO).
12. Match the provider number with the list that the QIO provided in order to create the institutional list in the Table: Proportions of Transitions Attributable to Each Institutional Provider. So, in this example, if provider #4 and # 5 are not in the QIO list, then the table above becomes
| Provider number |
| Transitions as sender |
| Transitions as receiver |
| Sum of parties to transitions |
| #1 |
| 3 |
| 0 |
| 3 |
| #2 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| #3 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| Institutional providers not in target group |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| “9” (non-institutional providers) |
| 2 |
| 4 |
| 6 |
| Sum |
| 8 transitions |
| 8 transitions |
| 16 parties to transitions |
The following steps are needed in order to estimate the proportion of non-institutional providers that are not in the target area.
13. The proportion of institutional providers that are “out of area” = 1 – [N of times that a targeted institution is party to transitions/ total N of times that an institution is party to transitions]
14. The proportion of non-institutional providers presumed to be “out of area” is assumed to be the same as the proportion of institutional providers that are “out of area,” as in #13.
15. Multiply the number of times that the “9” (or other neutral provider code) is party to transitions by the proportion of non-institutional providers that are “out of area” (#14) to get the number of transitions attributable to non-institutional providers “out of area.”
16. Subtract the product in #15 from the number of times that the “9” is party to transitions in order to obtain the non-institutional providers that are “in area.”
17. Fill in the last two lines of the Table with the numbers obtained in #15 and #16.
An empty final table and the further calculation of the simple example above follow:
| Provider |
| Proportion |
| Hospital 1 |
| xx.x% |
| Hospital 2 |
| xx.x% |
(Other area hospitals)…
| Out of Area hospitals |
| xx.x% |
| SNF 1 |
| xx.x% |
| SNF 2 |
| xx.x% |
(Other “post acute care” institutions)
| Non-institutional providers in area |
| xx.x% |
| Non-institutional providers out of area |
| xx.x% |
| SUM |
| 100% |
And for the example above, the table would be the first and last columns in this table
| Provider number |
| Number of times that this provider is party to transitions |
| Proportion |
| #1 |
| 3 |
| 3/16 = 18.75% |
| #2 |
| 2 |
| 1/16 = 12.5% |
| #3 |
| 2 |
| 2/16 = 12.5% |
| Institutional providers not in target group |
| 3 |
| 3/16 = 18.75% |
| “9” (non-institutional providers) in area |
| 6 x [7/10] = ~4 |
| 4/16 = 25% |
| “9” non-institutional providers not in area |
| 6 x [3/10] = ~ 2 |
| 2/16 = 12.5% |
| Sum |
| 16 parties to transitions |
| 100% |
Section 2: Example of a Power Calculation to Determine Population Size:
To determine the minimum sample size needed at an 80% likelihood of detecting a difference:
--the "unit of analysis" is a discharge --the measure is the percent of discharges resulting in re-hospitalization within 30 days (a discharge gets a code of 1 if there is a re-hospitalization within 30 days and a code of 0 if there is not)
--there are two samples (baseline and for the 28 month evaluation) --PROVIDED THAT the baseline rehospitalization rate is 20% (approximately the national average) --AND PROVIDED THAT THE PROPOSAL AIMS TO DETECT a drop in rehospitalization rate of 2 percentage points or more (from 20% to 18% or lower) --the alpha level (Probability of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the percentage values) is .05.
Using the "two samples test" version for percentages of the statistical power calculator found at: http://www.dssresearch.com/toolkit/spcalc/power_p2.asp The minimum sample sizes needed would be:
4800 discharges (at baseline and at 28 months) (live, fee-for-service, Medicare beneficiaries)
For a semi-annual rate of 4800 discharges, at the national rate of about 350 discharges per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries per year (from Dartmouth Atlas, 2003 data, www.dartmouthatlas.org ), the population would have to have about
4800 discharges x (1000 Medicare beneficiaries/175 discharges) = 27,400 Medicare beneficiaries.
If about 15 % of the populations are Medicare beneficiaries, then the total population is
27,400 Medicare beneficiaries x (100 total population/15 Medicare beneficiaries) = 183,000 total population
Each partner community and comparison community will have to have their actual rates applied for this calculation.
Section 3: Databases from claims and their uses. (Provisional – subject to change during development)
| Content |
| Initial time period |
| Repeat |
| Delivery Date |
| Use |
| Live discharges in target ZIP codes for each proposed project and comparison community, selected by ZIP code only, with one month follow-up, Part A inpatient facility |
| Calendar Year 2007 |
| Annually |
| August 2008 and annually thereafter |
| Proportion of Transitions Table, calculated by ISG/IFMC; |
| Live discharges selected by being in the potential ZIP code list or being served by a target hospital, for each proposed community and comparison community, Part A inpatient hospital discharges only |
| Calendar Year 2007 |
| Not repeated |
| April 2008 for partner communities, October 2008 for comparison communities |
| Checking and finalizing the ZIP code lists and target provider lists. Analyses by Support QIO. |
| Live discharges in a quarter, Part A and Part B claims for a year earlier and 6 months after, selected by being in the ZIP code list or being served by a target hospital |
| 7/1/07 through 9/30/07 with 1 year look-back and 6 month follow-up |
| Annually |
| 9/08 and annually thereafter |
| To Theme QIO (if desired) and Support QIO, for |
Guiding intervention (descriptive analyses) and monitoring adverse effect (180 – day re-hospitalization)
| Live discharges in a quarter, Part A claims for 1 month after discharge, selected by being in the ZIP code list or being served by a target hospital |
| 1/1/08 – 3/31/08 discharges with 1 year look-back and 1 month follow-up |
| Quarterly |
| 9/08 and quarterly thereafter |
| To Theme QIO (if desired) and Support QIO, for monitoring core measure – 30-day rehospitalization |
| Live discharges in a quarter, selected by being in the ZIP code list or being served by a target hospital, Part A and Part B claims for a year earlier and 1 month after |
| 1/1/08 – 3/31/08 discharges with 1 year look-back and 1 month follow-up |
| Every other quarter |
| 9/08 and semi-annually thereafter |
| To Theme QIO (if desired) and Support QIO, for guiding intervention (descriptive analyses) |
Initial List of Variables (for each claim) in the Part A and Part B databases supplied will be settled by the Support QIO, building from the experience in VALUE and from consultation with the Theme QIOs
Section 4: Timeframe for 28-Month Evaluation of Measures
Measure
Number
| Brief Measure Name |
| Baseline |
| 28 Month Evaluation |
| Data Collection |
| Reported |
| Data Collection |
| Reported |
| O-1a |
| Percentage of patients over 65 years who rate hospital performance as “never” or “sometimes” meeting standards for information about medicines. (also will calculate test of trend) |
| 7/1/07 – 6/30/08 |
| 12/08 |
| 7/1/09 – 6/30/10 |
| 11/10 |
| O-1b |
| Percentage of patients over 65 years who rate hospital performance as “no” for discharge information. (also will calculate test of trend) |
| 7/1/07 – 6/30/08 |
| 12/08 |
| 7/1/09 – 6/30/10 |
| 11/10 |
| O-2 |
| Percentage of patients discharged to community and readmitted within 30 days who are seen by a physician between discharge and readmission. (also will calculate test of trend on quarterly rates) |
| 1/1/08 – 4/30/08 (for hospital discharges 1/1/08 – 3/31/08) |
| 9/08 |
| 1/1/10 – 4/30/10 (for hospital discharges 1/1/10 – 3/31/10) |
| 9/10 |
| O-3 |
| Percentage of patient care transitions (FFS Medicare), in the specified geographic area, for which implemented and measured interventions show improvement. |
| None |
| N/A |
| 7/1/10 – 9/30/10 |
| 11/10 |
| O-4 |
| Percentage of patients from the specific geographic area re-hospitalized within 30 days of discharge from an acute care hospital. (also will calculate test of trend) |
| 10/1/07 – 4/30/08 (for hospital discharges 10/1/07 – 3/31/08) |
| 9/08 |
| 10/1/09 – 4/30/10 (for hospital discharges 10/1/09 – 3/31/10) |
| 9/10 |
| O-5 |
| Percent of patients from the specific geographic area re-hospitalized within 30 days of discharge from an acute care hospital for any of the following admission diagnoses (any one of the 3 risk-adjusted measures – also will calculate the test of trend from quarterly measures) |
| O-5a |
| AMI Discharge and All-Cause Readmission Rates – quarterly measures, test of trend throughout |
| 1/1/08 – 4/30/08 (for hospital discharges 1/1/08 – 3/31/08) |
| 9/08 |
| 1/1/10 – 4/30/10 (for hospital discharges 1/1/10 – 3/31/10) |
| 9/10 |
| Risk Adjusted AMI Discharge and All-Cause Readmit |
| 7/1/07-6/30/08 (for hospital discharges 7/1/07 – 6/1/08) |
| 3/09 |
| 3/1/09 – 2/28/10 (for hospital discharges 3/1/09 – 2/1/10) |
| 11/10 |
| O-5b |
| CHF Discharge and All-Cause Readmission Rates |
| 1/1/08 – 4/30/08 (for hospital discharges 1/1/08 – 3/31/08) |
| 9/08 |
| 1/1/10 – 4/30/10 (for hospital discharges 1/1/10 – 3/31/10) |
| 9/10 |
| Risk Adjusted CHF Discharge and All-Cause Readmit |
| 7/1/07-6/30/08 (for hospital discharges 7/1/07 – 6/1/08) |
| 3/09 |
| 3/1/09 – 2/28/10 (for hospital discharges 3/1/09 – 2/1/10) |
| 11/10 |
| O-5c |
| Pneumonia Discharge and All-Cause Readmission Rates |
| 1/1/08 – 4/30/08 (for hospital discharges 1/1/08 – 3/31/08) |
| 9/08 |
| 1/1/10 – 4/30/10 (for hospital discharges 1/1/10 – 3/31/10) |
| 9/10 |
| Risk Adjusted Pneumonia Discharge and All-Cause Readmit |
| 7/1/07-6/30/08 (for hospital discharges 7/1/07 – 6/1/08) |
| 3/09 |
| 3/1/09 – 2/28/10 (for hospital discharges 3/1/09 – 2/1/10) |
| 11/10 |
| O-6 |
| Percentage of patient transitions within the specified geographic area for which a CARE instrument was used. |
| None |
| N/A |
| 7/1/10 – 9/30/10 |
| 11/10 |
Section 5: Measures to Monitor Adverse Effects
180-day Rehospitalization
Description: Percentage of patients from the specified geographic area re-hospitalized within 180 days of discharge from an acute care hospital.
1. Numerator: Number of hospital live discharges of patients from the specified geographic area that were re-admitted within 180 days.
2. Denominator: Number of hospital live discharges of patients from the specified geographic area.
3. Data Source:
Medicare Part A claims
4. Exclusions:
Transfers to another acute care hospital
Specific Diagnosis Discharge, Mortality within 30 days.
Description: Specific Diagnosis Discharge/All-Condition 30 – day Readmission Rates (3 measures)
1. Measure: 30-day all-cause risk standardized mortality rates following HF, AMI and Pneumonia hospitalizations
2. Population/Index Hospitalizations: Discharges for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries age 65 or over admitted to the hospital with a principal ICD-9-CM discharge diagnosis of HF, AMI or Pneumonia and discharged alive.
iii.
Risk Standardized Mortality Rates:
P (predicted)
= ------------------------- * National Rate
E (expected)
Numerator: The number of deaths predicted by the hierarchical model among a hospital’s patients, given the patients’ risk factors and the hospital-specific effect
Denominator: The expected mortality among that hospital’s patients given the patients’ risk factors and the average of all hospital-specific effects in the nation
National Rate:
Number of 30-day mortalities in the nation
Number of discharges in the nation iv.
Data Source: Medicare administrative data including hospital inpatient and outpatient claims, physician practice claims and Medicare Enrollment Data Base file.
Section 6: Analytic Tools from the VALUE project
Section 6.a. Medical Record from Claims– Samples of claims sequence for individual patients (note: fictitious patients)
These are fictitious patients)
VALUE Project Claims-based Electronic Medical Record Recorded Claims July 1, 2005 through December 31, 2006
CASE ID: Jane Doe AGE: 87 SEX: Male RACE: XX DEATH DT: XX STATE: XX
INDEX EVENT DATE: XXXXXXXXXXX INDEX EVENT: Earliest 2005q3 Inp AMI, HF, or PN as Prin Discharge Dx CARE COST: $211,785
Service MD Days Fr Event Payment
Type Place Spec. Start End Amount Diagnoses HCPCS/CPT4 Procedures ICD9 Procedures
HSP Hospce 118 128 $1,541 ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE
HSP Hospce 88 117 $4,203 ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE
HSP Hospce 57 87 $4,343 ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE
HSP Hospce 27 56 $4,049 ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE
HSP Hospce 0 26 $3,644 ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE
INP Inp -7 0 $47,931 PNEUMONIA, ORGANISM NOS ENTRAL INFUS NUTRIT SUB
RETENTION URINE NOS VENOUS CATH NEC
CONVULSIONS NEC
DVRTCLO COLON W/O HMRHG
PERIPH VASCULAR DIS NOS
HYPERTENSION NOS
DMII WO CMP NT ST UNCNTR
THRUSH
INT INF CLSTRDIUM DFCILE
medical Off Neurol -17 -17 $66 ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE Office/outpatient visit, est
OTP Otp -25 -16 $385 CONVULSIONS NEC Wheelchair mngement training
72887 Therapeutic activities
Therapeutic exercises
Pt evaluation medical Off Podiat -31 -31 $31 FX MEDIAL MALLEOLUS-CLOS Office/outpatient visit, est
EDEMA
70714 medical Off Podiat -64 -64 $42 FX MEDIAL MALLEOLUS-CLOS Office/outpatient visit, est
EDEMA
SNF SNF -65 -49 $5,505 CONVULSIONS NEC CB103
PERIPH VASCULAR DIS NOS
HYPERTENSION NOS
ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE
DMII WO CMP NT ST UNCNTR
OTP Otp -94 -94 $5,151 FX MEDIAL MALLEOLUS-CLOS Emergency dept visit
HX-VEN THROMBOSIS/EMBOLS Extremity study
BONE & CARTILAGE DIS NOS Injection (IV)
URIN TRACT INFECTION NOS Antibiotic sensitivity, MIC
HYPERTENSION NOS Urine culture, colony count
ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE 87077
29410 Automated hemogram
HYPOSMOLALITY Urinalysis nonauto w/o scope
DMII WO CMP NT ST UNCNTR Urinalysis, auto, w/scope
See data set for more detail
SNF SNF -96 -66 $13,771 CONVULSIONS NEC RMB02
PERIPH VASCULAR DIS NOS CB103
HYPERTENSION NOS
ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE
DMII WO CMP NT ST UNCNTR
medical Off Neurol -107 -107 $42 EPIL PAR CONT W INTR EPI Office/outpatient visit, est
SNF SNF -126 -97 $14,604 CONVULSIONS NEC RVB11
PERIPH VASCULAR DIS NOS RVB07
HYPERTENSION NOS RMB02
ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE
DMII WO CMP NT ST UNCNTR
SNF SNF -135 -127 $4,908 CONVULSIONS NEC RVB11
PERIPH VASCULAR DIS NOS
HYPERTENSION NOS
ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE
DMII WO CMP NT ST UNCNTR
INP Inp -138 -135 $11,552 PART EPIL W/O INTR EPIL
HX-CIRCULATORY DIS NEC
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE
HYPERTENSION NOS
ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE
HYPOPOTASSEMIA
HYPOSMOLALITY
DIS MAGNESIUM METABOLISM
DMII WO CMP NT ST UNCNTR
HHA Home -176 -141 $5,440 PHYSICAL THERAPY NEC HCGM1
ENCNTR OCCUPATNAL THRPY G0155
CONVULSIONS NEC G0154
72887 G0152
LATE EFFECT CV DIS NOS G0151
DMII WO CMP NT ST UNCNTR
OTP Otp -185 -179 $432 ABNORMALITY OF GAIT Therapeutic activities
MALAISE AND FATIGUE NEC Gait training therapy
Therapeutic exercises
Pt evaluation
SNF SNF -199 -186 $17,999 REHABILITATION PROC NEC RHC01
HX-CIRCULATORY DIS NEC
CONVULSIONS NEC
70703
URIN TRACT INFECTION NOS
PNEUMONIA, ORGANISM NOS
ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE
29410
DMII WO CMP NT ST UNCNTR
INP Inp -207 -199 $33,465 7837 COLONOSCOPY
ACCIDENT IN PLACE NOS SM BOWEL ENDOSCOPY NEC
CONVULSIONS NEC
URIN TRACT INFECTION NOS
BLOOD IN STOOL
AGRANULOCYTOSIS
HYPOVOLEMIA
DMII WO CMP NT ST UNCNTR
E. COLI INFECT NOS
medical Off GP/IM -211 -211 $0 CHEST PAIN NOS Office/outpatient visit, est
78321
MALAISE AND FATIGUE NEC
HYPERTENSION NOS
HHA Home -245 -232 $1,400 PHYSICAL THERAPY NEC HCGJ1
ABNORMALITY OF GAIT G0151
MALAISE AND FATIGUE NEC
CONVULSIONS NEC
PAIN IN THORACIC SPINE
SNF SNF -253 -246 $8,923 REHABILITATION PROC NEC RHA01
HX-CIRCULATORY DIS NEC
DEBILITY NOS
CONVULSIONS NEC
FOOD/VOMIT PNEUMONITIS
HYPERTENSION NOS
ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE
29410
DMII WO CMP NT ST UNCNTR
INP Inp -255 -253 $17,586 CONVULSIONS NEC
HX-CIRCULATORY DIS NEC
URINARY INCONTINENCE NOS
FOOD/VOMIT PNEUMONITIS
HYPERTENSION NOS
ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE
29410
DMII WO CMP NT ST UNCNTR
medical Off GP/IM -273 -273 $65 DMII UNSPF UNCNTRLD Office/outpatient visit, est
V0481
CONVULSIONS NEC
HYPERTENSION NOS
medical Off Neurol -284 -284 $65 ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE Office/outpatient visit, est medical Off GP/IM -304 -304 $65 EDEMA Office/outpatient visit, est
CONVULSIONS NEC
STOMACH FUNCTION DIS NEC
HYPERTENSION NOS
OTP Otp -309 -309 $3,591 MALAISE AND FATIGUE NEC Emergency dept visit
STATUS AMPUT FOOT Electrocardiogram, tracing
HX-CIRCULATORY DIS NEC Urine culture, colony count
CONVULSIONS NEC Automated hemogram
HYPERTENSION NOS Glucose blood test
ALZHEIMER*S DISEASE Urinalysis nonauto w/o scope
DMII WO CMP NT ST UNCNTR Urinalysis, auto, w/scope
80053
Chest x-ray
See data set for more detail medical Off GP/IM -325 -325 $65 DMII UNSPF UNCNTRLD Office/outpatient visit, est
EDEMA
CONVULSIONS NEC
medical Off GP/IM -339 -339 $65 DMII UNSPF UNCNTRLD Office/outpatient visit, est
EDEMA
CONVULSIONS NEC
HYPERTENSION NOS
OTP Otp -379 -379 $772 CONVULSIONS NEC Electroencephalogram (EEG) medical Off GP/IM -393 -393 $65 DMII UNSPF UNCNTRLD Office/outpatient visit, est
MALAISE AND FATIGUE NEC
RHINITIS DUE TO POLLEN
VALUE Project Claims-based Electronic Medical Record Recorded Claims July 1, 2005 through December 31, 2006
CASE ID: John Doe STATE: XX AGE: 68 SEX: Male
RACE: XX DEATH DT: XX
INDEX EVENT DATE: XXXXXXX
INDEX EVENT: Earliest 2005q3 Inp AMI, HF, or PN as Prin D/C Dx CARE COST: $1,259,813
Service MD Days Fr Event Payment
Type Place Spec. Start End Amount Diagnoses HCPCS/CPT4 Procedures ICD9 Procedures
SNF SNF 344 345 $1,012 FX NECK OF FEMUR NOS-OPN RML05
EDEMA
78099
GASTROINTEST HEMORR NOS
ACUTE PANCREATITIS
STOMACH FUNCTION DIS NOS
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
ANXIETY STATE NOS
ANEMIA NOS
INP Inp 337 344 $26,533 28529 PACKED CELL TRANSFUSION
INF MCRG RSTN PNCLLINS SM BOWEL ENDOSCOPY NEC
OTHER POSTOP INFECTION VENOUS CATH NEC
CHRONIC PANCREATITIS
DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE
ORGANIC BRAIN SYND NOS
STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS
SNF SNF 325 337 $8,800 FX NECK OF FEMUR NOS-OPN RML35
POSTTRAUM WND INFEC NEC
78099
GASTROINTEST HEMORR NOS
STOMACH FUNCTION DIS NOS
HYPERTENSION NOS
ANXIETY STATE NOS
ANEMIA NOS
INP Inp 322 325 $29,007 INTERTROCHANTERIC FX-CL PACKED CELL TRANSFUSION
FX BASE FEMORAL NCK-CLOS CLOSED RED-INT FIX FEMUR
SKIN DISORDERS NEC
PULMONARY COLLAPSE
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
HYPOTENSION NOS
VENOUS THROMBOSIS NEC
HEART DISEASE NOS
ANEMIA NOS
OTP Otp 278 282 $17,299 52100 Leukocyte poor blood, unit
ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX G0378
CHRONIC PERIODONTITIS Non-covered item or service
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC Pulmonary service/procedure
42830 Measure blood oxygen level
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Aerosol or vapor inhalations
HYPERTENSION NOS Airway inhalation treatment
TOBACCO USE DISORDER Electrocardiogram, tracing
ANEMIA NOS Compatibility test
See data set for more detail
OTP Otp 229 254 $1,293 CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC Self care mngment training
78099 Therapeutic activities
STOMACH FUNCTION DIS NOS Gait training therapy
PNEUMONIA, ORGANISM NOS Therapeutic exercises
ACUTE PHARYNGITIS Therapeutic exercises
HYPOTENSION NOS Ot evaluation
CHR PULMON HEART DIS NEC Pt evaluation
INP Inp 211 226 $135,425 SEPTICEMIA NOS CONT MECH VENT < 96 HRS
ACUTE RESPIRATRY FAILURE ENTRAL INFUS NUTRIT SUB
PULMONARY COLLAPSE INSERT ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE
FOOD/VOMIT PNEUMONITIS CONT POS AIRWAY PRESSURE
OBS CHR BRNC W ACT EXA CONTR PULMON ARTERIOGRAM
42830 VENOUS CATH NEC
27651
MIXED ACID-BASE BAL DIS
PROTEIN-CAL MALNUTR NOS
OTP Otp 177 177 $1,607 ABDMNAL PAIN EPIGASTRIC Fentanyl citrate injeciton
INTESTINAL BYPASS STATUS Upper gi endoscopy,diagnosis
HEARING LOSS NOS
BLINDNESS, ONE EYE
OTP Otp 113 113 $383 HEADACHE Emergency dept visit
ABDMNAL PAIN UNSPCF SITE
OTP Otp 90 90 $55 BRAIN INJURY NEC Office/outpatient visit, est
SNF SNF 43 54 $4,604 PEPTIC ULCER NOS RVA11
BRAIN INJURY NEC RMA07
78099
72887
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
PNEUMONIA, ORGANISM NOS
SNF SNF 35 42 $4,611 PEPTIC ULCER NOS RVA11
BRAIN INJURY NEC
78099
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
PNEUMONIA, ORGANISM NOS
INP Inp 16 35 $191,473 CHR DUODEN ULCER W HEM CONT MECH VENT 96+ HRS
SURG COMP-DIGESTV SYSTEM INSERT ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE
PANCREAT CYST/PSEUDOCYST CHOLECYSTECTOMY
CHRONIC PANCREATITIS ENTEROSTOMY NEC
PARALYTIC ILEUS GASTROENTEROSTOMY NEC
POST TRAUM PULM INSUFFIC TRUNCAL VAGOTOMY
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
PNEUMONIA, ORGANISM NOS
PROTEIN-CAL MALNUTR NOS
INP Inp 0 16 $40,591 CHR DUODEN ULC NOS-OBSTR
CONVULSIONS NEC
ACQ PYLORIC STENOSIS
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
ANEMIA NOS
PROTEIN-CAL MALNUTR NOS
INP Inp -18 0 $165,201 PNEUMONIA, ORGANISM NOS CONT MECH VENT 96+ HRS
99591 ENTRAL INFUS NUTRIT SUB
SPLEEN HEMATOMA-CLOSED INSERT ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE
FX MULT RIBS NOS-CLOSED OTHER LOCAL DESTRUC SKIN
78552 NONEXCIS DEBRIDEMENT WND
CHR DUODEN ULC NOS-OBSTR VENOUS CATH NEC
ACUTE RESPIRATRY FAILURE
PROTEIN-CAL MALNUTR NOS
SEPTICEMIA NOS
OTP Otp -24 -23 $499 HEADACHE Emergency dept visit
ABDMNAL PAIN EPIGASTRIC Automated hemogram
HHA Home -28 -27 $125 LUMBAGO HCHJ1
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC G0154
OTP Otp -29 -29 $4,159 MYALGIA AND MYOSITIS NOS Emergency dept visit
V462 Electrocardiogram, tracing
EMPHYSEMA NEC Injection (IV)
MONONEURITIS NOS IV infusion therapy, 1 hour
TOBACCO USE DISORDER Automated hemogram
Assay CK (CPK)
Urinalysis, auto, w/scope
80053
Chest x-ray
CAT scan of head or brain
INP Inp -44 -42 $20,408 CHR STOMACH ULC W HEM PACKED CELL TRANSFUSION
LT EFF INTRACRANIAL INJ SM BOWEL ENDOSCOPY NEC
CONVULSIONS NEC VENOUS CATH NEC
EMPHYSEMA NEC
HYPOTENSION NEC
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE
HYPERTENSION NOS
CHR BLOOD LOSS ANEMIA
PROTEIN-CAL MALNUTR NOS
OTP Otp -44 -44 $85 CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Office/outpatient visit, est
LONG-TERM USE MEDS NEC
OTP Otp -48 -48 $1,170 HYPOPOTASSEMIA Emergency dept visit
BONE & CARTILAGE DIS NOS Thromboplastin time, partial
MYALGIA AND MYOSITIS NOS Prothrombin time
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Automated hemogram
ANEMIA NOS 80053
OTP Otp -65 -65 $166 HEADACHE Emergency dept visit
V462
CHRONIC PANCREATITIS
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE
TOBACCO USE DISORDER
OTP Otp -70 -70 $85 CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Office/outpatient visit, est
LONG-TERM USE MEDS NEC
OTP Otp -86 -86 $6,885 WRIST DROP Emergency dept visit
LONG-TERM USE ANTICOAGUL Electrocardiogram, tracing
V462 Thromboplastin time, partial
EMPHYSEMA NEC Prothrombin time
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Automated hemogram
TOBACCO USE DISORDER 80048
3d/holograph reconstr add-on
Magnetic image, neck spine
Chest x-ray
See data set for more detail
OTP Otp -91 -91 $85 CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Office/outpatient visit, est medical Off GP/IM -97 -97 $89 REHABILITATION PROC NEC G0181
V5423
42833
HHA Home -100 -68 $2,624 DEBILITY NOS HBGL1
HEAD INJURY NOS G0156
HEADACHE G0154
G0152
G0151
SNF SNF -110 -102 $4,977 PNEUMONIA, ORGANISM NOS RMB07
SHOCK W/O TRAUMA NEC RHB35
MUSCSKEL SYMPT LIMB NEC
GASTROINTEST HEMORR NOS
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
HEARING LOSS NOS
SNF SNF -117 -111 $6,252 PNEUMONIA, ORGANISM NOS RHB35
SHOCK W/O TRAUMA NEC
MUSCSKEL SYMPT LIMB NEC
GASTROINTEST HEMORR NOS
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
HEARING LOSS NOS
INP Inp -137 -117 $117,510 PNEUMONIA, ORGANISM NOS CONTR PULMON ARTERIOGRAM
SHOCK W/O TRAUMA NEC EGD WITH CLOSED BIOPSY
CELLULITIS OF LEG EGD WITH CLOSED BIOPSY
ACUTE RENAL FAILURE NOS ENDOSC CONTROL GAST HEM
CHR DUODEN ULCER W HEM ENDOSC CONTROL GAST HEM
PULMONARY COLLAPSE VENOUS CATH NEC
OBS CHR BRNC W ACT EXA
AC POSTHEMORRHAG ANEMIA
HYPOVOLEMIA
INP Inp -147 -143 $15,787 CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE
PRSNL HST PEPTIC ULCR DS
LT EFF INTRACRANIAL INJ
70710
OBS CHR BRNC W ACT EXA
CHR PULMON HEART DIS NOS
BRAIN CONDITION NOS
HYPOPOTASSEMIA
PROTEIN-CAL MALNUTR NOS
OTP Otp -156 -156 $85 CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Office/outpatient visit, est
ASPHYXIA
OTP Otp -163 -163 $85 CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Office/outpatient visit, est
LONG-TERM USE MEDS NEC
ASPHYXIA
OTP Otp -182 -182 $85 78321 Office/outpatient visit, est
LONG-TERM USE MEDS NEC
56400
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE
SNF SNF -200 -189 $7,285 ACUTE PANCREATITIS RHB07
MUSCSKEL SYMPT LIMB NEC
GASTROINTEST HEMORR NOS
ACUTE RESPIRATRY FAILURE
OBS CHR BRNC W ACT EXA
SNF SNF -216 -201 $10,337 ACUTE PANCREATITIS RHB11
INF MCRG RSTN PNCLLINS RHB07
MUSCSKEL SYMPT LIMB NEC
GASTROINTEST HEMORR NOS
ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX
ACUTE RESPIRATRY FAILURE
OBS CHR BRNC W ACT EXA
AC POSTHEMORRHAG ANEMIA
INP Inp -230 -216 $105,505 CHR DUODEN ULCER W HEM SERUM TRANSFUSION NEC
PARALYTIC ILEUS PACKED CELL TRANSFUSION
AC VASC INSUFF INTESTINE CONT MECH VENT < 96 HRS
ACUTE RESPIRATRY FAILURE INSERT ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE
PULMONARY COLLAPSE SM BOWEL ENDOSCOPY NEC
PLEURAL EFFUSION NOS VENOUS CATH NEC
OBS CHR BRNC W ACT EXA
AC POSTHEMORRHAG ANEMIA
CANDIDAL ESOPHAGITIS
OTP Otp -230 -230 $565 HEMATEMESIS A0429
DIARRHEA A0425
SNF SNF -231 -230 $169 ACUTE PANCREATITIS SE207
ANEMIA NOS
OTP Otp -242 -242 $2,439 CHRONIC PANCREATITIS Fentanyl citrate injeciton
V462 Emergency dept visit
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC Injection (IV)
HYPOVOLEMIA Automated hemogram
Assay lipase
Urinalysis, auto, w/o scope
80053
Chest x-ray
36556
SNF SNF -246 -232 $10,836 ACUTE PANCREATITIS SE311
ANEMIA NOS SE207
INP Inp -267 -246 $51,107 CHRONIC PANCREATITIS
LT EFF INTRACRANIAL INJ
PLEURAL EFFUSION NOS
EMPYEMA W/O FISTULA
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
ANEMIA NOS
PROTEIN-CAL MALNUTR NOS
DMII WO CMP NT ST UNCNTR
HYPOTHYROIDISM NOS
INP Inp -281 -267 $121,697 CHRONIC PANCREATITIS PERCU ABDOMINAL DRAINAGE
PANCREAT CYST/PSEUDOCYST VENOUS CATH NEC
PLEURAL EFFUSION NOS INSERT INTERCOSTAL CATH
OBS CHR BRNC W ACT EXA
CHR PULMON HEART DIS NOS
PARAPLEGIA NOS
ANEMIA NOS
PROTEIN-CAL MALNUTR NOS
HYPOTHYROIDISM NOS
SNF SNF -292 -282 $5,944 CELLULITIS, SITE NEC RVB01
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
SNF SNF -293 -293 $854 CELLULITIS, SITE NEC RHB01
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
INP Inp -310 -293 $100,033 PLEURAL EFFUS NEC NOT TB PARENT INFUS NUTRIT SUB
RESPIRATORY ABNORM NEC NONEXCIS DEBRIDEMENT WND
CELLULITIS OF LEG VENOUS CATH NEC
PANCREAT CYST/PSEUDOCYST THORACENTESIS
CHRONIC PANCREATITIS INSERT INTERCOSTAL CATH
PULMONARY COLLAPSE
OBS CHR BRNC W ACT EXA
HYPERTENSION NOS
TOBACCO USE DISORDER
SNF SNF -322 -311 $4,405 CELLULITIS NOS RHC01
REHABILITATION PROC NEC Therapeutic activities
MALAISE AND FATIGUE NEC Therapeutic activities
ACUTE PANCREATITIS Ot evaluation
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC Ot evaluation
VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY NOS
TOBACCO USE DISORDER
ANEMIA NOS
PROTEIN-CAL MALNUTR NOS
INP Inp -326 -322 $26,314 CELLULITIS OF LEG EXC WOUND DEBRIDEMENT
70719 VENOUS CATH NEC
ACUTE RENAL FAILURE NOS
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE
COAGULAT DEFECT NEC/NOS
HYPOVOLEMIA
HYPOSMOLALITY
PROTEIN-CAL MALNUTR NOS
OTP Otp -329 -329 $85 BURN NOS Office/outpatient visit, est
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE
OTP Otp -336 -336 $85 CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Office/outpatient visit, est
TRAUMATIC SUBDURAL HEM
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
OTP Otp -338 -338 $690 ABDMNAL PAIN UNSPCF SITE CAT scan of abdomen medical Off Gastr -342 -342 $42 PANCREAT CYST/PSEUDOCYST Office/outpatient visit, est
OTP Otp -359 -359 $85 CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Office/outpatient visit, est
LONG-TERM USE MEDS NEC
78099
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
OTP Otp -366 -366 $55 EDEMA Office/outpatient visit, est
OTP Otp -373 -373 $85 CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Office/outpatient visit, est
TRAUM SUBARACHNOID HEM
ASPHYXIA
CHR AIRWAY OBSTRUCT NEC
VALUE Project Claims-based Electronic Medical Record Recorded Claims July 1, 2005 through December 31, 2006
CASE ID: James Doe AGE: 72 SEX: Male RACE: XX DEATH DT: n/a STATE: XX
INDEX EVENT DATE: XXX INDEX EVENT: Earliest 2005q3 Inp AMI, HF, or PN as Prin Discharge Dx CARE COST: $116,913
Service MD Days Fr Event Payment
Type Place Spec. Start End Amount Diagnoses HCPCS/CPT4 Procedures ICD9 Procedures medical Off Other 315 315 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 302 302 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 287 287 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 273 273 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Office/outpatient visit, est
ASTHMA W/O STATUS ASTHM Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off GP/IM 258 258 $42 CVA Office/outpatient visit, est medical Off Other 253 253 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 245 245 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection
OTP Otp 233 233 $3,300 V7651 Colon ca scrn barium enema
INT HEMORRHOID W/O COMPL
medical Off Other 233 233 $182 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Antigen therapy services medical Off GP/IM 231 231 $0 ROUTINE MEDICAL EXAM Preventive visit,new,65 & ove medical Off Other 231 231 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 217 217 $42 RHINITIS DUE TO POLLEN Office/outpatient visit, est
ASTHMA W/O STATUS ASTHM Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 208 208 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 205 205 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 196 196 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 190 190 $0 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 187 187 $0 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 175 175 $0 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 169 169 $0 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 159 159 $0 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 153 153 $1 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 147 147 $0 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 141 141 $0 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 135 135 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 126 126 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Office/outpatient visit, est
ASTHMA W/O STATUS ASTHM Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 114 117 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 105 105 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 100 100 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Immunotherapy, one injection medical Off Other 92 92 $12 ALLERGIC RHINITIS NOS Office/outpatient visit, est
Immunotherapy, one injection
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .