PastPerformanceQuestionnaire401(k).doc

DOC document 42 KB Posted

Attached to
Defined Contribution Plan Provider Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
CC-08-HQ-R-0021
Issued by
Department of the Treasury Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Defined Contribution Plan Provider, newest first.
File Type Posted
SF30Amend4.pdf PDF
SF30Amend3.pdf PDF
SF30Amend2.pdf PDF
ResponsestoRFPQuestions.doc DOC document
Locations.xls XLS spreadsheet
FAR522123Reps Certs.rtf RTF text file
SF30A.pdf PDF
401kSTATEMENTOFWORK021108.docm DOCM document
SF1449.pdf PDF
401(k)FeeDisclosureForm.pdf PDF
RFPCC-08-HQ-R-0021.rtf RTF text file
401KSummaryPlanDescriptionupdate0707.doc DOC document
401kSTATEMENTOFWORK021108.doc DOC document
AnnualNIST800-53SecuritySelf-AssessmentTemplateFIPS199LevelModer —
20080126OCC-ITSecurityQualQuestions-Primary800-53.doc DOC document
EvaluationQuestionaireVersion6.doc DOC document
Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation CC-08-HQ-R-0021 For

Company Name

INSTRUCTIONS

The company referenced above is proposing on a solicitation to provide a Defined Contribution Plan to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Past Performance is an extremely important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition and your input is important. When you have completed this questionnaire, please email to Marguerite Brown at Marguerite.Brown@occ.treas.gov or fax to (301) 433-6309. If you have questions, please contact Ms. Brown at (202) 874-5096.

I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Company Name (same as above):________________________________

B. Contract Number: ____________________________________________

C. Period of Performance: from _________________ to _____________

Date date

II. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator name: _____________________________________________

B. Evaluator title: _______________________________________________

C. Evaluator phone number: _______________________________________

D. Evaluator email address: _______________________________________

E. Evaluator signature: ___________________________________________

III. EVALUATION

Please circle one response for each question. When responding to the questions, select the letter that most accurately describes the company’s performance or situation. Select “N” for Neutral if the company has no record of past performance relevant to a particular question.

E
G
A
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Neutral
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the Government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the Government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems, and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance did not meet contractual requirements. There were serious problems, and the contractor’s’ corrective actions were ineffective.
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.

1. How would you rate the quality of this company’s products and service?

E G A M U N

2. How well did the contractor provide for effective overall contract management?

3. Did the contractor commit adequate resources to the contract in a timely fashion to meet the requirement?

4. How would you rate the quality of the company’s investment products?

5. How would you rate the quality of the company’s administrative services?

6. How would you rate the quality and timeliness of reports the company prepares for you?

7. How would you rate the quality of the company’s customer support?

8. How would you rate your employees’ satisfaction with the company?

9. How well did the company meet its implementation schedule?

10. How well did the company handle any problems that occurred during the implementation (conversion)?

11. How would you rate your dealings with company personnel for on-going activities (administration, employee communications, technical support, fund management, trustee services, etc.)?

E G A M U N

12. How would you rate the quality of the staff assigned to support your plan?

13. How would you rate the support the company provided for initial training and plan introduction?

14. Is there any other information you think we should be aware of when considering this company as our 401(k) service provider?

PAGE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .