Cost_Proposal_Instructions_Non-APC(Apr_13).docx
DOCX document 409 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ESPA Augmented Geostationary Laboratory Experiments (EAGLE) Hypertemporal Imaging (HTI) Space Experiment (SpX) Instrument Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- BAA-RVKV-2013-0006
About this file
Cost Proposal Instructions.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| BAA-RVKV-2013-0006_-_Revised1.pdf | ||
| HTI_Model_Contract_27_Sep.pdf | ||
| BAA-RVKV-2013-0006_Model_Contract.pdf | ||
| HTI_BAA_Reps_and_Certs.pdf | ||
| BAA-RVKV-2013-0006.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
COST PROPOSAL
INSTRUCTIONS
FAR Requirement (Non-APC)
DET 8 AFRL/RVK
3550 ABERDEEN AVE SE
KIRTLAND AFB, NM 87117
1.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:
A. When cost or pricing data is required, prepare and submit the cost proposal in accordance with Table 15-2 of FAR 15.408.
B. Provide complete responses to the attached Contractor Information document for the Prime and each Subcontractor. If preferred by the offeror, the responses to the information requested may be provided on a similar form or listed on the first page of the cost proposal. (Attachment 1) C. For sole-source situations when the value will exceed the threshold for obtaining certified cost or pricing data, ensure the DET 8 AFRL, Air Force Adequacy Checklist (AFPAC) is completed and submitted as part of the proposal. (Attachment 2) D. Indicate whether Government approval of respective accounting, estimating, and purchasing systems has been obtained. If so, provide evidence of such approval.
E. Round all dollar amounts to the nearest dollar. Round all labor rates to the nearest penny.
F. Furnish Tables 1 thru 4 (sample tables are at paragraph 3 below), or in the contractor’s format containing the information outlined in these instructions, for the entire performance period (supported by rationale required by paragraph 2) in hard copy and on CD as IBM PC compatible, Microsoft Excel, to include all cell formulas. Include a separate Cost Element Summary by Offeror Fiscal Year (OFY), for each contract line item (CLIN), for the basic and each option or task order as proposed. (For purposes of these instructions, CLIN refers to contract line items that are required to be priced separately.)
G. Provide all cost summaries by OFY.
NOTE: In accordance with DFARs 215.404-71-2(e)(3)(i), poor quality, untimely proposals, failure to provide an adequate analysis of subcontractor costs, hindrance of the evaluation and negotiation of the proposal, a marginal estimating system, and submission of an inadequate proposal will adversely impact the assignment of values under weighted guidelines and the resultant fee amount.
2. PROPOSED COST ELEMENTS:
The detail required for each major cost element is described below. Address all cost elements applicable to the proposed effort and provide a narrative to support the basis of estimate. Explain the basis of estimate for each cost element to include the basis for proposed rates. As applicable, provide the following information for each cost element. If a portion of the required information is not applicable for a particular cost element, so state.
A. DIRECT COSTS:
(1) DIRECT LABOR:
| (a) | As part of Table 1, list the proposed hours, rates, and calculated amounts for each direct labor category by OFY, by CLIN. If separately priced CLINs apply, also include a roll-up to Total Program Summary. |
| (b) | As part of the basis of estimate narrative, provide rationale for proposed hours and labor mix. Explain how the proposed labor hour skill mix has been derived. Explain why the cost element requires an average, higher, or lower than average skill mix. (Information such as historical cost information, judgment, analogy to other similar efforts, etc. is generally accepted as a method of projecting direct labor hours). |
| (c) | Provide the base labor rates for each category. If composite or blended rates are used, provide the calculations used in deriving the composite rates. Identify the source of the proposed rates and explain the methodology used to project each rate for subsequent years. If applicable, identify the proposed escalation factors applied to future estimates and rationale for the proposed factors. Submit source data for proposed direct labor rates. If evidence of Forward Pricing Rate Agreement (FPRA), Forward Pricing Rate Recommendation (FRPR), or recent DCAA audited direct labor rates are not available for submission, submit the following source data listed in order of preference, current payroll data, or signed employee agreements, or salary survey, etc. to support proposed direct labor rates. |
(2) SUBCONTRACTS/INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFERS (IOTs):
NOTE: Highly recommend the offeror provide these cost proposal instructions to all subcontractors. Fully disclosed Subcontractor/IOT proposals are required for ALL subcontractors (including Tables 1 thru 4), and must be submitted to the government by the closing date identified in this solicitation.
It is especially important that adequate data on subcontractors be provided. Rates are particularly important. Note that the absence of adequate data on subcontractors is a frequent source of prime contractor inadequate proposals and avoidable delay in contract award.
(a) As part of Table 1, list each subcontractor/IOT cost separately by OFY by CLIN.
(b) Obtain cost or pricing data from prospective sources for those exceeding the threshold set forth in FAR 15.403-4 ($700,000) and not otherwise exempt, in accordance with FAR 15.403-1(b) (i.e., adequate price competition, commercial items, prices set by law or regulation or waiver).
(c) Provide a list of anticipated subcontractors/IOTs using Table 2.
To ensure compliance with FAR 52.215-22, Limitations on Pass-Through Charges - Identification of Subcontract Effort: Use Table 2 to identify the cost of work to be performed by each subcontractor by contract or task order as applicable. If the offeror subcontracts more than 70 percent of the total cost of work to be performed, comply with the requirements of the provision.
(d) Provide an analysis of the proposed subcontract in accordance with FAR 15.404-3(b). Provide an analysis concerning the reasonableness, realism and completeness of each subcontractor’s proposal. Explain the use of decrement factors if applied. If the analysis is based on comparison with prior prices, identify the basis on which the prior prices were determined to be reasonable. If the subcontract exceeds the TINA threshold and no exception applies, the cost analysis should include, but not be limited to, an analysis of: materials, labor, travel, other direct costs and proposed profit or fee rates. Differences between the subcontractor/IOT proposed amounts and the prime contractor proposed amounts must be fully explained.
(e) In accordance with FAR 15.404, Table 15-2 IIA(1), obtain competition to the maximum extent practicable when selecting subcontractors.
(i) If the offeror has obtained competitive quotes from potential subcontractors, provide copies of the quotes.
(ii) If the offeror has selected other than the low subcontractor bid for inclusion in their proposal or intends to award the subcontract effort on a sole-source basis, provide rationale for that decision.
(iii) If the subcontractor is not yet determined, include a list of the tasks to be performed, an explanation of the method used to estimate the subcontract price, and the reason proposals/quotes cannot be requested/provided at this time.
(f) If the proposed subcontractor’s fee rate is higher than the prime’s fee, provide rationale as to why the subcontractor’s risk is greater than the prime’s.
(g) If the IOT is proposed at other than cost, provide support in accordance with FAR 31.205-26(e).
(3) CONSULTANTS:
(a) If the offeror proposes the use of consultants, provide the following FOR EACH NAMED CONSULTANT:
(1) The specific project or area in which such services are to be used.
(2) Identification of all cost elements included in the consultant's costs. (i.e.: number of hours, the consultant's rate per hour, plus a detailed explanation of any costs that would be charged over and above labor costs
(3) A signed consulting agreement between the offeror and the consultant to include a statement from the consultant that the proposed rate is a "most favored customer rate,” or the reason such a rate was not offered.
(4) A determination by the offeror that the rate proposed is comparable to the rates of other consultants doing similar types of work.
(b) In those cases where a consultant IS NOT NAMED but the offeror realizes a need will exist, support the proposed consultant rate by supplying a basis of estimate and source documentation to support the proposed rate.
(4) MATERIALS (if not Baselined):
(a) As part of Table 1, list total material/equipment costs by OFY by CLIN. Using Table 4, provide a more detailed consolidated priced summary of individual material/equipment quantities and the basis for pricing by OFY, by CLIN. As part of the basis of estimate narrative, provide information regarding the rationale/methodology used to derive the proposed material/equipment estimate.
(b) Include raw materials, parts, components, assemblies, special tooling or test equipment, and services to be produced or performed by others.
(c) If a purchase order exceeds the TINA threshold, provide an analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-3(c).
(d) Provide copies of supporting documentation (Purchase Orders, Vendor Quotes, Invoice Prices, Catalog Prices, or Historical Information) to substantiate a MINIMUM of 70% of the proposed material costs.
Specifically, provide supporting documentation for the highest unit prices.
(5) OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODCs) (if not Baselined):
As part of Table 1, list ODC costs by OFY by CLIN. As part of the basis of estimate narrative, separately identify other direct costs. Provide rationale for proposed other direct costs.
(a) ODCs - Travel
i. Identify the following information for each trip: location of origin and destination; number of travelers;
duration; airfare cost; rental car cost; per diem (meals and lodging) cost; any other costs.
ii. As part of Table 1, list travel costs by OFY by CLIN. Using Table 3, separately identify costs for travel.
Note that Table 3 is a summary format and may be expanded to include more detailed travel rate information and calculations. As part of the basis of estimate narrative, provide a listing of all proposed travel rates (if not already provided as part of Table 3). Provide the purpose/rationale for the proposed trips, basis for the proposed travel rates and whether the proposal complies with FAR 31.205-46(a)(2).
(b) ODCs - Other
i. Using Table 4, identify and provide a detailed description of any other direct costs that do not fit into the ODC categories above, including the basis for determining those costs (e.g., vendor quotes, catalog pricing data, company estimating procedures, etc.).
ii. Provide an explanation/rationale for all other proposed ODCs.
B. INDIRECT COSTS
(1) As part of Table 1, list the proposed base, rate/factor and calculated amount for each indirect cost by OFY, by CLIN.
(2) As part of the basis of estimate narrative, identify all indirect cost rates/factors (such as Fringe Benefits, Labor Overhead, Subcontractor/Material Overhead, G&A, Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCOM), etc.) and the applicable allocation bases.
(3) Identify the basis of proposed rates (e.g., FPRA and date of agreement, bidding rates and submission date, actual rates and effective date, billing rates and approval date, etc.). Submit source data for all proposed indirect rates. If evidence of FPRA, FPRR, approved Provisional Billing Indirect Rates, or recent DCAA audited indirect rates are not available for submission, submit the following source data in order of preference, certified incurred cost submissions, or budgetary data to include details of the indirect rate cost pools, or supporting historical trend data.
(4) Address whether or not the proposed indirect rates consider a change in Business Base pending award of this effort. Provide support data for the impact to indirect rates if applicable.
(5) If proposing FCCOM, submit a properly executed DD Form 1861. Provide the basis for proposed percentage of land buildings and equipment.
(6) Identify any other indirect cost element being proposed which has not been included above and identify the various cost elements for which the rate is applied.
C. FEE
Identify the Fee rate(s) and the total Fee cost proposed and identify the various cost elements for which the Fee is being applied. Explain the basis for the proposed rate and application base.
D. NEW MEXICO GROSS RECEIPTS TAX (NMGRT)
(1) NMGRT may be applicable to the proposed effort. For assistance in determining the extent to which NMGRT may apply and applicable rates, contact the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department, 5301 Central Ave., NE, PO Box 8485, Albuquerque, NM 87198, (505) 841-6200, http://www.tax.newmexico.gov/All-Taxes/Pages/Gross-Receipts-Tax.aspx. Identify the cost elements and amounts included in the NMGRT base, if applicable. Demonstrate the method of calculating total tax dollars included in the proposal.
(2) As part of Table 1, list the proposed base, rate/factor and calculated amount for each NMGRT line item cost by OFY, by CLIN.
(3) Identify the location(s) where the work will be performed, whether nexus applies, and where the final deliverables will be initially used.
E. BASELINED OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODCS) if specified in the solicitation:
Acknowledge whether the offer complies with the CLIN description of baselined ODCs.
3. SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL TABLES (Revise to comply with established accounting practices):
A. Table 1 (Sample): Cost Element Summary. If applicable, list each Subcontractor and IOT separately.
B. TABLE 2 (Sample): SUBCONTRACTORS/IOTs
C. TABLE 3 (Sample): TRAVEL
D. Table 4 (Sample): BILL OF MATERIALS & ODCs (other than Travel & Consultants)
Det 8 AFRL/RVK Cost Proposal Instructions Det 8 AFRL/RVK Cost Proposal Instructions
Revised: 8 Apr 13 Page 1 of 12 Revised: 8 Apr 13 Page 12 of 12
Attachment 1
Air Force Proposal Adequacy Checklist (AFPAC) Attachment 2
| ITEM # |
| ITEM DESCRIPTION |
| FAR |
REFERENCE or Cost Proposal Instruction (CPI)
| Y |
| N |
or N/A
| PROVIDE EXPLANATION IF EITHER “NO or N/A” (use continuation page if necessary) |
| PROP REF PAGE |
| 1 |
| Is there a properly completed first page of the proposal in accordance with Table 15-2 I.A or as specified by the Contracting Officer (CO) in the solicitation? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 I.A |
CPI 1B
| 2 |
| Is an Index, appropriately referenced, of all cost or pricing data and information accompanying or identified in the proposal, provided? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 I.B |
| 3 |
| Are there any exceptions to submission of certified cost or pricing data pursuant to FAR 15.403-1(b)? If so, is supporting documentation included in the proposal? |
| FAR 15.403-1(b) |
| 4 |
| Does the proposal include EXCEL spreadsheets of all applicable tables, on CD ROM WITH FORMULAS? |
| CPI 1F |
| 5 |
| Is there a TABLE 1 cost element summary by major cost element by Offeror Fiscal Year (OFY) for each contract line item (CLIN) (i.e. basic period of performance and each option (if applicable) and/or Task, etc.). |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 I.D, E |
CPI 1F
| 6 |
| If more than one CLIN (Contract Line Item Number) is proposed, are summaries of total amounts covering all line items for each cost element provided? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, I. D, E |
CPI 1F & G
| 7 |
| Does the proposal reflect all specific requirements established by the CO? |
| CPI |
| 8 |
| If an incentive contract type, is contract geometry included (e.g. contractor proposed target cost, target profit or fee, min/max, ceiling, share ratio)? |
MATERIAL
| Note |
| Consolidated Bill of Material (CBOM). A CBOM is a consolidated priced summary of individual material quantities and subcontract items included in the various tasks, orders, or contract line items being proposed and the basis for pricing (negotiated/invoice prices, vendor quotes, average unit pricing, prior purchase history, long term agreements, etc). The offeror’s CBOM shall include estimated raw materials, parts, components, assemblies, subcontracts and services to be produced or performed by others, identifying as a minimum; the item, source, quantity and cost. |
| 9 |
| Is there a completed Table 4 priced summary of individual material/equipment quantities and the basis for pricing (vendor quotes, invoice prices, etc.) provided by OFY by CLIN? |
| CPI 2A(4) |
SUBCONTRACTS (Purchased material or services)
| 10 |
| Are fully disclosed subcontractor/IOT proposals (Including Tables 1 through 4) submitted to the government by the closing date identified in the RFP? |
| FAR 15.404-3(c) |
CPI 2A(2)
| 10.1 |
| Is Table 2 completed identifying the cost of work to be performed by each subcontractor by contract or task order as applicable |
| CPI 2A(2)(c) |
| 10.2 |
| If the subcontract or purchase order exceeds the threshold for certified cost or pricing data and none of the exceptions to TINA apply, does the proposal include the prime contractor’s Price/Cost Analysis establishing the reasonableness of each subcontract price? |
| FAR 15.404-3(b) |
CPI 2A(2)(d) & 2A(4)(c)
| Note |
| Analyses not provided with the proposal may result in a delay to audit, fact-finding and negotiations. Analyses not included with the proposal shall be provided as soon as possible after the proposal submission date and shall be accomplished in sufficient time to support the definitization/contract award schedule. |
| 10.3 |
| If the subcontractors were selected on a sole-source basis, is the rationale for this decision provided? |
| CPI 2A(2)(e)(ii) |
| 10.4 |
| If differences between the subcontractor/IOT proposed amount and prime contractor proposed amounts exist, is the reason for the difference fully explained? |
| CPI 2A(2)(d) |
| 10.5 |
| Are decrement factors development and application fully explained? |
| CPI 2A(2)(d) |
INTERORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFERS
| 11.1 |
| For inter-organizational transfers proposed at cost, does the proposal include a complete fully disclosed cost proposal in compliance with Table 15-2 and this checklist? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 II.A.(2) |
CPI 2A(2)
| Note |
| Inter-organizational work is considered to be part of the certified cost or pricing data submission of the prime. As such, the prime contractor’s responsibility for conducting subcontractor Cost/Price Analysis does not apply to inter-organizational transfers. However, prior to the submission of the proposal, the prime contractor shall (a) ensure that all statement of work tasks are addressed without duplication and are consistent with the overall program performance schedule and, (b) ensure ground rules and assumptions are consistent with the prime proposals. |
| 11.2 |
| For inter-organizational transfers proposed at price in accordance with FAR 31.205-26(e), does the proposal provide an analysis by the prime that supports the exception from certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-1? |
| FAR 31.205-26(e), FAR 15.403-1 |
CPI 2A(2)(g)
| 12 |
| CONSULTANTS |
| If consultants are proposed, does the proposal include a copy of the consultant agreements? Are the proposed consultant rates comparable to other consultant rates for work of similar nature? Is the need for the proposed consultant services substantiated? |
| CPI 2A(3) |
ADEQUATE PRICE COMPETITION
| 13 |
| Does the proposal support the degree of competition and the basis for establishing the source and reasonableness of price for each subcontract or purchase order priced on a competitive basis exceeding the threshold for certified cost or pricing data? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 II.A.(1) |
CPI 2A(2)(e)
COMMERCIAL ITEM DETERMINATIONS
| 14 |
| Is the contractor proposing commercial or modified commercial items either at the prime or subcontractor level that would be exempt from certified cost or pricing data requirements? |
| FAR 2.101, |
FAR 15.403-1 (b)(3) or (b)(5)
LABOR
| 15 |
| As part of Table 1, was a list provided of the proposed hours, rates and calculated amounts for each direct labor category by OFY by CLIN? |
| CPI 2A(1)(a) |
| 16 |
| As part of the basis of estimate narrative was rationale provided for the proposed hours and labor mix? Is the source of the base rates and methodology used to project each rate for subsequent years fully explained? Are the proposed escalation factors applied to future estimates identified and rationale for the proposed factors provided? |
| CPI 2A(1)(b)&(c) |
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
| 17 |
| Does the proposal include other direct costs and the basis for pricing by OFY by CLIN? Is there a fully completed Table 3 listing all proposed travel, by basic, each option or task order (as applicable) by OFY? If travel is discretely estimated does the proposal include number of trips, number of people, number of days per trip, locations, and rates (e.g. airfare, per diem, hotel, car rental, etc)? Does the proposal identify the basis for the proposed travel rates and rationale for the proposed trips? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 II.D |
CPI 2A(5)(a)&(b)
NEW CONTRACTS (INCLUDING LETTER CONTRACTS)
| 18 |
| Does the proposal identify actual hours, and cost incurred as well as hours/cost to complete and the time phasing associated with these hours/costs? This information/data is to be provided consistent with cost element summaries as identified in checklist item 9. |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, III |
CHANGE ORDERS, MODIFICATIONS AND CLAIMS
| 19 |
| If the proposal is for a modification or change order, have cost of work deleted (credits) and cost of work added (debits) been provided in the format described in FAR 15.408, Table 15-2.III.B? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 III.B |
PRICE REVISIONS/REDETERMINATIONS
| 20 |
| For price revisions/redeterminations, does the proposal follow the format in FAR 15.408, Table 15-2.III.C? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 III.C |
FACILITIES COST OR MONEY
| 21 |
| If facilities capital cost of money is proposed, does the proposal include a schedule of COM factors? submission of Form CASB-CMF or reference to an FPRP/FPRA and show the calculation of the proposed amount? |
| FAR 31.205-10 FAR Table 15-2,II.F |
CPI 2B(5)
RATES AND FACTORS
| 22 |
| Does the proposal include all rates and factors by year that are utilized in the development of the proposal and the basis of those rates and factors (FPRA/FPRP)? Identify the official submittal of such rate and factor data. |
| CPI 2B |
OTHER
| 23 |
| Does the proposal identify the location and point of contact for any certified cost or pricing data which is referenced, but not included, in the proposal? |
| 24 |
| Does the proposal disclose the judgmental factors applied and the mathematical or other methods used in the estimate, including those used in projecting from known data? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, I.C.(2)(i) |
| 25 |
| Does the proposal disclose the nature and amount of any contingencies included in the proposed price? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 I.C.(2)(ii) |
| 26 |
| If Royalties exceed $1,500 does the proposal provide the information/data identified in FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 Paragraph II. E.? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 II. E. |
w
| 27 |
| If Economic Price Adjustments are being proposed, does the proposal show the rationale and application for the proposed indices? |
| FAR 16.203-4(a)(1) |
| 29.1 |
| Is the contractor proposing Performance-Based Payments? |
| FAR 32.10 |
| 28.2 |
| If so, has the contractor provided an expenditure profile, proposed events and their projected dates, proposed values for each event, completion criteria, and identification of which events are severable or cumulative? |
| FAR 32.10 |
| 29 |
| Excessive Pass-through Charges – Identification of Subcontract Effort, if the offeror intends to subcontract more than 70% of the total cost of work to be performed, does the proposal identify: (i) the amount of the offeror’s indirect costs and profit applicable to the work to be performed by the subcontractor(s); and (ii) a description of the added value provided by the offeror as related to the work to be performed by the subcontractor(s)? |
| FAR 15.408(n) DPAP Memo 23 Dec 2009 (DARS Tracking Number 2009-O0015) |
CCPI 2A(2)(c)
| 30 |
| Does the proposal explain the basis of all cost estimating relationships (CERs) (labor hrs or material) proposed on other than a discrete basis? |
| Note |
| Calculations/formulas/logic made to generate “CER” costs should be presented with proposal. |
| 31 |
| Does the proposal identify the need for government furnished material/tooling/test equipment? Include the lending contract number and CO contact information if known. |
| FAR 15.408, Table15-2, I A. (7) |
| 32 |
| Does the proposal include identification of any CAS non-compliances, or other estimating deficiencies that may impact the proposed price? |
| FAR Table 15-2.I.A.(8) |
image2.emf image3.emf image4.emf image5.emf image6.jpg image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .