B08 - 140L0620Q0053 - Attachment 1 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 826 KB Posted

Attached to
INTERMEDIATE STAND MANAGEMENT - ROSEBURG OREGON Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140L0620Q0053
Issued by
Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management National Office

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to INTERMEDIATE STAND MANAGEMENT - ROSEBURG OREGON, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sol_140L0620Q0053_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140L0620Q0053_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140L0620Q0053.pdf PDF
B08 - 140L0620Q0053 - Attachment 2 - Wage Determination 1977-0079 Rev 62.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Contained herein is the past performance questionnaire that will be used to solicit past performance comments from firms that vendors have provided services, similar to this acquisition, for in the past.

Vendors shall submit the questionnaire to past performance references and request they return of the questionnaire to the Contracting Officer as soon as possible, past performance information shall be submitted prior to the closing date of the solicitation. Vendors will have to complete Section 1 of the questionnaire for each past performance reference.

SOLICITATION 14140L0620Q0053

ATTACHMENT 1

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 6

SECTIONS 1 : CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

(SECTION 1 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE VENDOR)

Past performance citation number:__________________________________________________________

Contractor:_____________________________________________________________________________

Contract or project number and program title:_________________________________________________

Contract Type:_______________________________________________________________________ (firm-fixed-priced, cost reimbursable, time and materials, etc.)

Period of performance:_________________________ Location of performance:_____________________

Contract value at award:________________________ Final/current value:__________________________

Reason for differences between initial contract value and final contract value:________________________

E-mail:________________________________________________________________________________

Phone Number: _______________________________________________________________________

It is essential that this office receive your official response not later than September 9, 2020.

Please email your response to dslade@blm.gov and elarson@blm.gov.

SOLICITATION 14140L0620Q0053

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 6

SECTION 2: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

(SECTIONS 2 THROUGH 4 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CUSTOMER/RESPONDENT)

Reference/Customer POC’s name:_________________________________________________________

Title:__________________________________________________________________________________

Organization and/or office symbol: _________________________________________________________

Phone number/fax number: ________________________________________________________________

E-mail address: _____________________________________________________________________

Dates of involvement in program/contract:___________________________________________________

Customer’s role on subject contract: ______________________________________________________

SECTION 3: DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT EFFORT (from citation w/clarifications from interview, if needed)

Based on my knowledge of cited contract I agree with the contractor’s assertions that cited contract is relevant to the Marbled Murrelett solicitation, except as follows (enter “N/A” if no objections)

SECTION 4: RESPONDENT PERFORMNCE EVALUATION

For each question below, please rate the contractor’s quality of performance from unsatisfactory to exceptional (as defined below) and please provide the basis for your rating. A rating of N/A should be used if either the question is not applicable or the answer is unknown.

EXCEPTIONAL (E): Performance met contractual requirements and EXCEEDED MANY to the client’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD (VG): Performance met contractual requirements and EXCEEDED SOME to the client’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY (S): Performance MET contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL (M): Performance DID NOT MEET SOME contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflected a serious problem for which the contractor has not identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear or were only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

SOLICITATION 14140L0620Q0053

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 6

UNSATISFACTORY (U): Performance DID NOT MEET MOST contractual requirements and recovery is not likely or was not in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contained serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A): Not applicable or unknown. Did not observe performance in this area.

SPECIFIC PAST PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS

1. CONTRACT MANAGEMENT:

- Clear, accurate, timely written and verbal communication of contract status and cost reporting

- Clear understanding of requirements in SOW and TO

- Professionalism and cooperative behavior with client

- Clear communications with COR

U M S VG E N/A

Basis for rating:

2. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT:

- Ability to lead, manage and control wildlife survey program

- Ability to recruit/retain personnel with required expertise

- Ability to manage performance at multiple locations

- Clear communication skills

- Subcontract Management

U M S VG E N/A

Basis for rating:

3. COST:

- Management of contract costs

- Cost within or below ceiling and still meet contract requirements

- Firm Fixed Price (FFP) unforeseen costs alerted in timely manner

U M S VG E N/A

Basis for rating:

4. SCHEDULE:

- Timeliness of all services and deliverables

- Adherence to proposed schedule

- Timely survey activity updates to COR -

U M S VG E N/A

SOLICITATION 14140L0620Q0053

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 4 of 6

Basis for rating:

5. TECHNICAL:

- Knowledge of SOW and TO Requirements

- Ability to lead, manage and control program

- Execution of contract requirements and development of technical solutions with minimum oversight

- Clear, accurate and timely written verbal communication

U M S VG E N/A

Basis for rating:

6. QUALITY:

- Quality of services and deliverables

- Effectiveness of quality control and adherence to contract quality requirements

- Communication skills

- Ability to identify issues/conflicts, display initiative in resolution

- Effectiveness and timeliness of corrective actions

U M S VG E N/A

Basis for rating:

OVERALL ASSESSMENT

1. Given the opportunity, would you hire this contractor again?

Yes_____________ No___________ Maybe_____________

Please explain:

2. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

SOLICITATION 14140L0620Q0053

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 5 of 6

STRENGTHS:__________________________________________________________________________

WEAKNESSES:________________________________________________________________________

SOLICITATION 14140L0620Q0053

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 6 of 6

Attachment 3
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Given the opportunity, would you hire this contractor again?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .