B.08.03_FTW420_AM#04_20R0007.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

PROJECT TITLE/LOCATION: FTW420 Repair Building 3448, Fort Wainw right , Alaska

a. This amendment provides changes to the solicitation as indicated on the continuation pages of this document

b. PROPOSAL DATE HAS NOT BEEN EXTENDED

c. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS AMENDMENT ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS STANDARD FORM 1442

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 15-Jan-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W911KB20R0007

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11-Oct-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

15-Jan-2020

CODE

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, AK

CEPOA-CT (W911KB)

PO BOX 6898

JBER AK 99506-0898

W911KB 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911KB20R0007

AM#04

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

a. The following drawing is substituted for the superseded documents/sections:

NONE

b. The following revised documents/sections are substituted for the superseded documents/sections.

Proposal Schedule replaced in its entirety

SECTION 00 22 20 PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND

BASIS OF AWARD

Replaced in its entirety

NOTE: Revisions within the following documents do not contain the above referenced identifiers:

c. The following sections are deleted:

d. The following documents are added:

e. The following revisions are incorporated:

f. Other:

(End of Summary of Changes)

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS SHALL REMAIN THE SAME.

PS-1

FTW420 AM#04

PROPOSAL SCHEDULE

REPAIR BLDG 3448

FT WAINWRIGHT, ALASKA

BASE ITEMS

Item No.

Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount

0001 Design of repair B3448, Complete 1 Job $ $

0002 Repair B3448, Complete 1 Job $ $

0003 Design of sprinkler and standpipe system B3448, Complete

1 Job $ $

0004 Install sprinkler and standpipe system B3448, Complete

1 Job $ $

0005 Design of exterior features B3448, Complete 1 Job $ $

0006 Repair Exterior Features of B3448, Complete 1 Job $ $

0007 Design of HVAC & Controls B3448, Complete 1 Job $ $

0008 Repair HVAC & Controls B3448, Complete 1 Job $ $

Total of Base Items 0001 thru 0008 $

OPTION ITEMS

Item No.

Description Estimated Quantity

Unit Unit Price Amount

0009 Design Insulated Metal Panels on exterior B3448, Complete

1 Job $ $

0010 Install Insulated Metal Panels on exterior B3448, Complete

1 Job $ $

0011 Arms Room Renovation Design, Complete

1 Job $ $

PS-2

$ Total of Base and Optional Items 0001 thru 0016

0012 Arms Room Renovation, Complete

1 Job $ $

0013 Expansion of Dryer Capacity Design, Complete

1 Job $ $

0014 Expansion of Dryer Capacity, Complete

1 Job $ $

0015 Medical Care Facility Design, Complete

1 Job $ $

0016 Medical Care Facility, Complete

1 Job $ $

Total of Option Items 0009 thru 0016 $

Proposed Contract Duration:

*CLINs 0009 and 0016 may be exercised up to 90 days from award. No additional time will be added to the contract completion date if this option is exercised.

EVALUATION OF OFFERS.

1. AWARD: Award will be made in accordance with Section 00 22 20 – Phase 2 Design-Build Selection Procedures and Basis of Award

2. INCOMPLETE OFFERS: Failure to submit an offer on all items in the schedule constitutes an incomplete offer. Incomplete offers may be rejected. Lump sum or unit prices must be shown for each item within the schedule.

3. EXTENSIONS: All extensions of the unit prices shown will be subject to verification by the Government. In case of variation between the unit price and the extension, the unit price will be considered to be the offer.

4. SPECIAL CONDITION: If a modification to an offer based on unit prices is submitted which provides for a lump sum adjustment to the total estimated cost, the application of the lump sum adjustment to each unit price in the proposal schedule must be stated. If it is not stated, the offeror agrees that the lump sum adjustment shall be applied on a pro rata basis to every unit price in the proposal schedule.

-- END OF PROPOSAL SCHEDULE --

00 22 20

SECTION 00 22 20

PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND

BASIS OF AWARD

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

2.1 BETTERMENTS

2.2 COMLETENESS

3.0 STIPEND FOR UNSUCCESSFUL PHASE 2 OFFERORS

4.0 PHASE 2 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATIVE EVALUATION FACTORS,

SUBFACTORS AND ELEMENTS

5.0 VOLUME 1 – FACTOR 1 – DESIGN-TECHNICAL

5.1 GENERAL

5.2 VOLUME 1 – TAB A – SUBFACTOR 1 – BUILDING AESTHETICS

5.3 VOLUME 1 – TAB B – SUBFACTOR 2 – QUALITY OF BUILDNG SYSTEMS AND

MATERIALS

5.4 VOLUME 1 – FACTOR 2 – PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND SUMMARY

SCHEDULE

5.5 VOLUME 2 – FACTOR 1 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

5.6 TAB B – REQURIED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

6.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

6.1 GENERAL

6.2 DISCUSSION

1.0 OVERVIEW

Those Offerors short-listed in Phase 1 are invited to submit a Phase 2 proposal, as indicated below. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria described herein, using the evaluation rating systems outlined in the Phase 1 Design-Build selection procedures. Price information will be evaluated for fairness, reasonableness, and for material unbalancing, as described herein. The Phase 2 evaluation will be conducted in accordance with FAR Part 15 and will utilize the Tradeoff Process described in FAR 15.101-1.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

The Contracting Officer will award a firm fixed-price contract to that responsible Phase 2 Offeror whose proposal the Source Selection Authority determines conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering the non-price factors described herein, and price. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are considered significantly more important than the price; however, the contract award may not exceed the funds available for this project.

The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal within the cost limitation. There is no obligation to approach or match the cost limitation in the offer. After the Government individually evaluates and rates each proposal, the Source Selection Authority will compare proposals to determine which proposal represents the best value. Proposals will not be ranked. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. If there is a lower priced, conforming offer(s), the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Authority must determine that the added value of a more expensive proposal (within the funds available) would justify award to that Offeror.

2.1. BETTERMENTS

As part of the evaluation, the Government will evaluate betterments in proposals relative to the minimum standards in the RFP to determine if they offer additional value to the Government. In addition, innovations in proposals will be evaluated to determine if creative ideas of the Offeror are a better value to the Government compared to the minimum criteria.

2.2. COMPLETENESS

Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint.

Do no assume Offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals.

3.0 STIPEND FOR UNSUCCESSFUL PHASE 2 OFFERORS

A stipend is not currently authorized for this acquisition.

4.0 PHASE 2 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATIVE EVALUATION FACTORS,

SUBFACTORS AND ELEMENTS

VOLUME 1 – DESIGN TECHNICAL

FACTOR /

SUBFACTOR

LOCATION DESCRIPTION RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

FACTOR 1 DESIGN-

TECHNICAL

Most important factor

Subfactor 1 Vol. 1 TAB A Building Functional Aesthetics and Space

Equally important to Subfactor 2 (slightly more important than Subfactor 3 and more important than Factor 2)

Subfactor 2 Vol. 1 TAB B Quality of Building Systems and Materials

Equally important to Subfactor 1 (slightly more important than Subfactor 3 and more important than Factor 2)

Subfactor 3 Vol. 1 TAB C Proposed Contract Duration and Summary Schedule

2nd most important subfactor (slightly less important than subfactors 1 and 2)

VOLUME 2 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

FACTOR /

SUBFACTOR

LOCATION DESCRIPTION RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

FACTOR 2 Vol. 2 TAB A Price (Standard Form 1442 and Proposal Schedules)

2nd most important Factor (significantly less important than Factors 1)

N/A Vol. 2 TAB B Required Pre-Award Information

Not rated

5.0 VOLUME 1 – FACTOR 1 – DESIGN-TECHNICAL

5.1. GENERAL

The Design-Technical Factor consists of conceptual level drawings, technical approach narratives and information regarding material and system quality. It must clearly define the proposed scope of work and quality levels that the design-build team is offering to the Government in enough detail for the Government and the Offeror to mutually understand whether or not the proposal meets or exceeds the minimum solicitation requirements.

The use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) to prepare or submit proposal is NOT required. Fully developed drawings, details and/or specifications are not required. The Government will not be performing a detailed engineering analysis or design review at the proposal stage.

The proposal submission and review process will focus on the proposed quality levels of materials and systems, and will not involve detailed design effort or a detailed engineering review. If the Government evaluators have actual knowledge or strong suspicion that a proposed product or solution is inappropriately sized, being used in the wrong application or otherwise does not meet the contract requirement, the Government will inform the Offeror in the event that discussions are conducted with the firm, but the Government is not asking for design analyses in the proposal and is not obligated to perform an engineering design review at this stage. After award, in the event of conflict between the Contractor’s accepted proposal and the requirements in the final amended RFP, the order of precedence is indicated in Special Contract Requirements SCR-DB040, DESING/BUILD CONTRACT – ORDER OF PRECEDENCE. The Offeror shall identify what it considers to be Betterments in its proposal for Subfactors 1 through 3 of Factor 1 (see Section 00 73 00, SCR “Proposed Betterments”).

Betterments included in the technical submission must also be included in the base price under Factor 2. Do not describe in the narratives or show in the drawings any betterments that are not included in the base price.

The final design must comply with the RFP requirements except that accepted betterments become the new contract minimum requirements. Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, where indicated below.

5.2. VOLUME 1 – TAB A – SUBFACTOR 1 – BUILDING FUNCTIONAL AESTHETICS and

SPACE

5.2.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

5.2.1.1 Drawings

Drawings required at this stage are not required to be dimensioned, detailed, or scheduled. Some drawings will necessarily require callouts for typical materials, basic heights, and quality of materials. Limit drawings to no more than twenty-five (25) sheets to include the following:

1. Four (4) overall floor plans, indicating the extent of the work on each floor.

2. Detail floor plans as necessary to indicate the extent of work in the CQ Office and in the Barracks Toilet Rooms and Barracks Kitchens.

3. Interior elevations as necessary to indicate the extent of work in the Barracks Rooms, the Barrack Toilet Rooms and Barracks Kitchens.

4. One exterior elevation indicating the OPTIONAL metal panels and how the building might look if that OPTION is exercised.

5. A color board including primary interior materials. Format shall be in accordance with Section 01 33 16.00 29 Design After Award.

5.2.1.2 Technical Approach Narrative

Provide a technical approach narrative defining the elements of the proposal. This narrative shall be no longer than five (5) typewritten pages. The page limit does not include the space and facility tables.

1. Building Aesthetics. Describe the architectural themes of the facility and spaces which demonstrate how the proposal achieves the results desired by the Statement of Work. The narrative should address how the selection of materials and colors enhance the exterior and interior aesthetics of the facilities and improve the work and living conditions for the populations who will utilize the building. This narrative is not intended to be a complete material listing, but to explain and reflect how the selections were made and how they address the requirements.

2. Technical Engineering Description: Describe in terms of coordination how the proposal addresses the technical systems requirements of the Statement of Work. Specifically, describe how the proposal addresses coordination of new sprinkler, HVAC, plumbing, finishes, and other systems required by the Statement of Work with the building aesthetics, creating a seamless design. This is NOT a design analysis document but will describe how these systems are taken in to account by the proposal.

5.2.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

The following two elements are equal in importance and not rated separately.

5.2.2.1 Building Aesthetics

This element considers the overall appeal of the facility and the ability of the proposed construction to present a professional, attractive appearance. Exterior considerations include the basement window profile and finish and the exterior metal panel profile, finish and color. Interior considerations include appropriateness and durability of finishes and materials, lighting improvements, and color and pattern schemes.

5.2.2.2 Technical Completeness

This element considers how well the proposal addresses coordination of such technical portions of the design as acoustic control and separation, life safety improvements, natural lighting control, and HVAC system design with the building aesthetics and architectural design. While the proposers are not required to design each system, this element considers whether these technical components have been considered and incorporated neatly and systemically into the proposal.

5.3. VOLUME 1 – TAB B – SUBFACTOR 2 – QUALITY OF BUILDING SYSTEMS AND

MATERIALS

5.3.1 GENERAL

As part of this Subfactor, the Government has identified certain items as desirable features or preferable items. Desirable features are identified below in the evaluation criteria. Preferable items are listed in order of priority. These items, along with any Offeror-identified betterments, will be given additional consideration during the evaluation process, provided that they are included in the proposed base price and are within the contract cost limitation (CCL) identified in the Solicitation.

5.3.2 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

5.3.2.1 Drawings

The Offeror has the option of providing concept level drawings for specific materials and/or systems which the Offeror feels are necessary to describe the proposed systems or materials in the drawings provided under Tab A.

5.3.2.2 Technical Approach Narrative

Provide technical approach narrative, both qualitative and quantitative, defining the elements of the systems of the proposal. It is the responsibility of the proposer to ensure that all aspects identified in the evaluation criteria below are addressed. Maximum total length for the narrative shall be ten (1) typewritten pages.

1. Architectural Finishes: Describe how the materials selected provide for a suitable environment for the expected population of the facility. The narrative concerning finishes should focus on durability and maintenance of the finishes proposed. The aesthetics of the finishes was addressed under Subfactor 1 above.

2. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems: Describe how the HVAC systems proposed provide for a highly efficient environmental control system including provisions for indoor air quality. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Focus the narrative upon maintenance considerations, limiting energy consumption and suitability of the proposed system for the expected use.

3. Plumbing System: Describe how the improvements to the plumbing system provide for a highly efficient domestic hot water system and an efficient piping system. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Focus the narrative upon maintenance considerations, limiting energy consumption and suitability of the proposed system for the expected use.

4. Fire Protection System: Describe fire suppression, detection and alarm systems with associated site and equipment needs. Discuss general life safety and building code implications. Discuss how the system provides value to the Government and addresses the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Focus the narrative upon maintenance considerations and how the proposed systems will interface with existing and future facilities.

5. Interoperability: Describe how systems integrated into the new work will interface with existing installation-wide systems. As a minimum, discuss the following systems: Fire Alarm, Mass Notification, Telephone, Cable Television, UMCS, and privatized utility companies where applicable.

6. Security: Describe how secure areas will effectively meet and protect the mission, including how the various areas of the building will be secured, how cable runs will be safeguarded, and how intrusion detection will operate. Provide a schedule and certification process demonstrating how, when and what will be approved. Discuss how the building communications systems and electrical systems will be kept secure and tamper-free.

5.3.2.3 Proposed Material Identification

In the proposed material identification submission, the Offeror shall include only major materials for each of the areas shown. There is no need to include materials such as fasteners, adhesives, sealants, wire and the like. Provide this information in tabular form, supported by catalog information. The table should include the manufacturer’s name, model number or model series number, length of warranty, size and/or capacity where known, efficiency where applicable, country of origin and any other notes or information selected by the Offeror. Catalog cuts shall be organized and tabbed in accordance with the disciplines listed blow and each section shall contain a table of contents identifying the products included. On catalog cut sheets that show more than one product, clearly identify the specific product proposed for this project.

Provide one hard copy of catalog cut sheets with the original proposal. Provide a CD-ROM with catalog cut sheets for each copy of the proposal. Information on the CD shall be bookmarked.

1. The Government will evaluate and consider materials and equipment proposed by brand name and model series or number as a quality standard. Unless substitution of a manufacturer, brand name or model is otherwise specifically prohibited in the contract, if the successful Offeror desires to substitute manufacturers, brand names or models after award, the substituted project must meet the contract requirements and be approved by the Designer of Record and the Government as equal in function, performance, quality and salient features to that initially proposed.

2. Acceptance of a proposal is not a guaranty that the proposed products meet the contractual requirements. See below under Evaluation Criteria for more explanation.

Provide Material Identification for the following items:

a. Architectural Finishes:

Interior Wall Surfaces Floors Ceilings Any Special Features Hardware Systems (not individual hardware sets) Door Systems and Types (not individual doors) Window Systems and Types (not individual windows) Railing Systems and Types Exterior Metal Insulated Panel Types.

b. Mechanical Systems

Central Heating/Cooling Equipment Pumps Air Handling Equipment HVAC System Control Equipment Energy Conservation Features

c. Plumbing Systems

Fixtures Domestic Hot Water Generator

d. Electrical Systems

Lighting Fixtures Main Switchgear and Panels Fire Alarm, DDC and Mass Notification Systems Data, Telephone, Cable TV, Intercom, CCTV, and Other Special Systems as

Identified in the SOW

e. Fire Protection Systems

Fire Pumps

5.3.2.4 Quality Improvements

Provide a list of quality improvements that are above the minimum stated in the performance specifications. Develop the follow table or similar, to identify desirable features (see 5.3.3.2), preferable items (see 5.3.1) and other Offeror identified betterments. Mark the appropriate column for each item.

Desirable features, preferable items and Offeror-identified betterments shall be included in the following table only if included in the base price.

Desirable Feature

Preferable Item

Contractor Betterment

Concise Description of Improved Quality

Location of Catalog Information (Page Number)

Architectural Finishes

Mechanical Systems

Plumbing Systems

Electrical Systems

Fire Protection Systems

5.3.3 EVALUATION CRITERIA

5.3.3.1 General

It is the Army’s objective that this building will have a 50 year useful life. The design and construction should provide an appropriate level of quality to ensure the continued use of the facility over that time period with the application of reasonable preventative maintenance and repairs that would be industry-acceptable to a major civilian sector project Owner. The Army may repurpose the building or perform a major renovation at some point over that 50 year life; the design of systems should be flexible and adaptable to possible future uses different than the current to the extent practical, while still meeting operational and functional requirements defined within the Scope of Work. It is assumed that mechanical and electrical systems and interior architectural finishes shall perform for an average of 20 to 30 years with minor repairs and without replacement; historically the Army repurposes a facility once in the first 25 years. The Government will evaluate the Offeror selected systems and components proposed in terms of extended warranties provided, maintenance considerations (frequency, cost, access, equipment locations), operability (ease of use, placement of control features, simplicity), durability (withstanding warfighter usage, ease of cleaning), sustainability, and energy consumption (particularly HVAC, lighting and power). Residential or similar grade finishes and materials are not acceptable for inclusion in this proposal.

5.3.3.2 The Government encourages the Offeror to place emphasis on those design features which optimize and emphasize functional/operational requirements; interior/exterior finishes and systems; and life cycle/energy efficiency. The features that the Government has identified below as desirable features, the items that the Government has identified in paragraph 5.3.1 as preferable and Offeror-identified betterments may be given additional consideration during the evaluation process, provided they are included within contract cost limitation identified in the solicitation and the Offeror’s proposed base contract price. The order of importance for proposed betterments for rating purposes is as follows:

desirable features, preferable items and other Offeror-identified betterments. The Government will identify those Offeror-identified betterments that are not desired, or are otherwise objectionable or unacceptable, if discussions are conducted with that Offeror. Unsubstantiated claims or unsubstantiated narrative information will not be given evaluation credit during the evaluations. The following elements (not rated separately) will be considered in the evaluation of the building systems and materials of the facility:

1. Architectural Finishes, Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include finishes, components and systems which provide usable spaces for the intended purposes.

Proposals will receive additional consideration for materials and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility. Desirable features include:

solid wood cabinetry solid surface counter tops ceramic tile; increased R-values for exterior wall panels high efficiency windows and doors welded door frames in heavy use/shop/storage areas

2. Mechanical Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic environmental control function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include:

extended warranties longer life expectancies reduced energy consumption sustainability maintainability (cyclical maintenance, access, equipment placement) enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

3. Plumbing Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include:

extended warranties longer life expectancies sustainability durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements enhance the overall life- cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

Desirable features:

lifetime domestic hot water storage tank warranty high efficiency equipment easy/local availability of replacement/repair parts zoned/valved sub-systems to allow repair without building shutdown.

4. Electrical Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include:

extended warranties longer life expectancies sustainability durability (stand up to troop usage) have low maintenance requirements enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

Desirable features:

all copper conductors additional telephone/data/cable TV outlets

Holocom interlocking PDS.

5. Fire Protection Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic suppression, detection, alarm, and life safety functions necessary.

Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems that improve life safety include extended warranties improved maintainability longer life expectancies improved interface with existing and future facilities.

6. Interoperability: Fire Alarm, Telephone, Cable Television, Mass Notification System, UMCS, and privatized utility systems (where applicable) must be integrated into the new facilities which require connection and interface with existing installation-wide systems and must be accommodated in the proposed project.

5.4 VOLUME 1 – TAB C - SUBFACTOR 3 – PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND

SUMMARY SCHEDULE

5.4.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

5.4.1.1 Proposed Contract Duration

The Offeror shall propose the contract duration where indicated in the Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Schedule and in the narrative provided under this Tab. Proposed contract duration shall not exceed the maximum contract duration specified in FAR 52.211-10.

5.4.1.2 Summary Schedule

Submit a summary level schedule for integrated design and construction. Schedules or diagrams may be provided separately in a size that is easily read, but shall be bound and clearly labeled as Tab D. This summary schedule will, after contract award, be replaced with a project schedule as required by Section 01 32 01.00 29 Project Schedule. The summary schedule shall be task-oriented, indicating the number of calendar days after the notice to proceed (NTP) date of 16 February 2020. This date is solely to assist in evaluation of Offeror’s proposals and shall not be construed as a contractual NTP date. Offeror may use a critical path or other method of his choice; however, schedule shall be graphically represented. The proposed project schedule shall reflect the proposed contract duration. Give particular attention to the follow features but limit the narrative information to no more than three (3) pages total.

1. Narrative:

a. Provide the proposed contract duration.

b. Provide a narrative describing the design packaging plan for separate design packages, based upon the Offeror’s plan for fast tracking. Describe all design and construction to be “fast-tracked” (see Section 01 33 16.00 29 Design After Award). If long lead item equipment must be opr4derred prior to completion of a design phase, describe the requirement in the narrative and show the required ordering date in the schedule.

c. Complete the following matrix summarizing the proposed design package review schedule. This matrix is NOT counted as one of the schedule narrative pages.

Submittal Package Name (e.g.

Site/Utilities)

Stage (Interim, Final, Design Complete)

Submittal Date

Review Start Date

Review End Date

Review Conference Date (if applicable)

2. Summary Schedule

a. Show the design phase, including events associated with coordinating the interim and final design submittals for each package and the proper handling of the review comments for each design package (see Section 01 33 16.00 29). For each submittal package noted in 5.4.1.2.1.c. above, show date submitted to the Government, Government review period, and Review Conference on summary schedule.

b. Show the overall construction phase for the facility and for utilities. Show fast track starts for design packages but it is not necessary to show the detailed breakdown of construction by trades of the facilities and utilities.

c. Show commissioning activities.

d. Show turnover of the facility. Identify any proposed phased turnovers. The time to complete the facility and turnover to the Government must consider the requirement for the Contractor’s CQC completion inspection and the subsequent joint Contractor-Government turnover inspections.

e. Constraints: Offeror must demonstrate the capability and flexibility to plan and schedule the complete project to meet the proposed contract completion period.

Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented, for example, labor or material availability, permits, weather, or other considerations. Indicate the anticipated overall critical path on the schedule.

5.4.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

5.4.2.1 Proposed Contract Duration

The Offeror’s proposed contract duration will become the contractually binding completion period and will replace the duration stated in FAR 52.211-10 upon contract award. The Government will evaluate the contract duration, as proposed by the Offeror under this Tab and in the Contract Line Item Schedule, not to exceed the maximum allowed duration stated in FAR 52.211-10. In assessing the reasonableness of the proposed contract duration, the Government may take into account how well the proposed summary schedule supports the proposed duration, as well as use other information, such as but not limited to, independent judgment concerning logic, constraints and typical construction durations. Include all significant milestones to include design schedule, demolition, long lead items, commissioning and both pre-final and final inspections in the submitted schedule

5.4.2.2 Summary Schedule

In addition to the proposed contract duration, the Government will evaluate the summary schedule for integrated design and construction. The length of the schedule must match the Offeror’s proposed contract duration. If it is shorter than the proposed contract duration, it offers no advantage to the Government because it is non-binding, only representing a preliminary planned schedule. A schedule shorter than the proposed contract duration may indicate the Offeror is placing additional risk on the Government for any delays between the scheduled completion date and the required contract completion period. Both parties shall assume field overhead costs are included in the contract price for the full proposed contract duration. Therefore, the Government believes that there is no valid need to shorten the schedule less than the full proposed contract duration. The Government will evaluate the schedule to assess the strength of understanding of the project scope, restrictions which must be considered in the schedule, for example, permitting (see Section 01 10 00), long lead items, and the like. The Government will evaluate the strength of understanding of events associated with coordinating design submittals, reviews and incorporating review comments, the Offeror's capability to schedule the complete project within the proposed contract duration, and the realism of the schedule. The Government will evaluate the design packaging plan for logic, reasonableness, how it facilitates meeting the proposed contract duration and how it facilitates the Government’s ability to timely perform its design reviews. The packaging plan should minimize risk to the Contractor and to the Government for tear-out and coordination for reviews.

A schedule that offers advantage(s) to the Government over one that merely indicates an adequate understanding of the scope, restrictions, major milestones and general understanding of the various events that can affect start and completion of construction will receive additional consideration.

5.5 VOLUME 2, FACTOR 2 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

5.5.1 GENERAL

Submit the Pro Forma information in a separate envelope labeled: “Phase 2, Volume 2 – Pro Forma Requirements.”

5.5.2 VOLUME 2 – FACTOR 2 – PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442 AND CONTRACT LINE ITEM

SCHEDULE)

5.5.2.1 Submission Requirements

Submit the properly filled out and executed SF 1442, along with the CLIN Schedule, containing proposed line item and total pricing, as well as the proposed contract duration. See instructions in Section 00 21 00, “Instructions to Offerors.”

5.5.2.2 Supplemental Price Breakdown

If deemed necessary to evaluate the price proposals, the Government will request a Phase 2 price breakdown of the Contract Line items in a sealed envelope marked “Phase 2 Price Breakdown Information,” in Excel format. The Government will provide details on where and how to send the breakdown. This information will not be needed sooner than three (3) working days after the proposal submission due date. This information may be required for the initial Phase 2 proposal and, if requested, for any revised proposals. This information is not an opportunity for an Offeror to revise its non-price or price proposal.

5.5.3 EVALUATION CRITERIA

Price will not be rated or scored, but will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis. Price analysis will be used to clearly demonstrate that proposed prices are reasonable compared with current or recent prices for the same or similar items, adjusted to reflect changes in market conditions, economic conditions, quantities, or terms and conditions under contracts that resulted from adequate price competition. The price evaluators will also check for appearance of unbalanced line item prices. Offerors are cautioned to distribute direct costs, such as material, labor, equipment, subcontracts, etc. and to evenly distribute indirect costs, such as job overhead, home office overhead, bond, etc., to the appropriate contract line items. Both parties shall presume that field overhead costs through the proposed contract duration are inclusive in the offered price for the contract.

5.5.3.1 If deemed necessary, the supplemental price breakdown information will be used to assist the Government in performing the price evaluations described above.

5.5.3.2 Award may not be made for project cost for design and construction exceeding the contract cost limitation described herein.

5.6 VOLUME 2, TAB B – REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

5.6.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Submit this information for the Contracting Officer’s determination of Offeror responsibility:

1. A list of present commitments, including the dollar value thereof, and name of the organization under which the work is being performed. Include names and telephone numbers of personnel within each organization who are familiar with the prospective contractor’s performance.

2. A certified statement listing; (1) each contract awarded within the preceding three month period exceeding $1,000,000.00 in value with a brief description of the contract; and (2) each contract awarded within the preceding three year period not already physically completed and exceeding $5,000,000.00 in value with a brief description of the contract.

If the prospective contractor is a joint venture, each joint venture member will be required to submit the above defined certification.

3. Competed Representations and Certifications included by full text in Section 00 45 00.

Provide for any certification where vendor indicated in the System for Award Management (SAM) that certification would be provided with specific offer.

4. One copy of the following information shall be provided:

a. Proof of Financial Ability (Most recent financial statement covering assets and liabilities).

b. Number of years the firm has been in business.

c. Name, address and telephone number of firm’s bonding company.

d. Information showing offeror’s bondability for this project. Submit a letter from the prime contractor’s bonding company indicating the offeror’s ability to obtain performance and payment bonds in the amount of their proposal price.

e. Name, address and telephone numbers of two credit/trade references.

5.6.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

In addition to the other Phase 1 and Phase 2 proposal information, the Contracting Officer shall use this information in making an affirmative responsibility determination for award to the Successful Offeror, in accordance with FAR Part 9.

6.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES:

6.1 GENERAL

The Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) will evaluate the proposals and assign a consensus rating for each evaluation factor and subfactor, utilizing the evaluation and rating system described in Section 00 22 10, except for past performance, which has its own rating scale.

6.2 DISCUSSION (If Necessary)

6.2.1 During Phase 2, the Government intends to award without discussions. A “Competitive Range” is a subjective determination of the most highly rated Phase 2 proposals in the event that discussions with Offerors are required in Phase 2. In such an event, the Contracting Officer will establish a competitive range of all the most highly rated Phase 2 proposals.

6.2.2 If discussions are held, the Government may engage in a broad give and take with each Offeror in the competitive range, in accordance with FAR 15.306 (d). During discussions, the Government may ask the Offeror to further explain its proposal and to answer questions about it.

6.2.3 Upon conclusion of discussions, those Offerors still considered the most highly rated, will be afforded an opportunity to submit their Phase 2 proposal revisions for final evaluation and selection.

End of Section 00 22 20