Attch B - Past Performance Questionaire.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Attached to
- C1DA--Arc flash (VA-22-00048214) Arc Flash Electrical Study Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C24622R0056
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and cover letter template for federal architecture and engineering contractors, as well as information on a related federal contract opportunity.
The opportunity involves procuring architecture and engineering services from a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business for an arc flash analysis and electrical study at the Hampton VA Medical Center. Interested firms must submit a Standard Form 330 by July 6th, 2022 to be considered for the negotiated firm-fixed-price contract. The contract period of performance is 150 calendar days with an anticipated award date of August 1st, 2022. The scope involves performing an electrical system study and arc flash analysis in compliance with NFPA and IEEE standards. The estimated value is not disclosed. The procuring agency is the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration VISN 6.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24622R0056.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attch A - A-E Evaluation Project.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE AND COVER LETTER
Complete one set of letters and forms for at least three (3) projects identified in your firm’s SF 330 Section F, Example Projects Which Best Illustrate Proposed Team’s Qualifications for this Contract. Additional space or blank sheets may be added to answer any question.
Transmittal Letter to Accompany Past Performance Questionnaire
FROM: [Insert Company Official Name, Title, and Company Name]
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Contract(s):
[Insert Company Name] is currently responding to VHA Network Contracting Office 6 and the Durham VA Medical Center, regarding a request for SF 330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications for Project 558-20-103, Renovate 2E Labs. This Request for SF 330’s requires respondents to identify customers and solicit their response regarding [Insert Company Name] performance.
[Insert Company Name] is providing past performance data to VHA Network Contracting Office 6 relating to our performance on contract [Insert contract name/number] and have identified [Insert name of reference] as the point of contact for this contract.
The request for SF 330 instructs that respondents provide customers with the attached questionnaire. Please complete the questionnaire (Sections B and C) and return it by no later than 3:30 PM EDT, Thursday September 3, 2020. Return the completed questionnaire directly to the Government Contracting Officer, Guy K. Brooks, via email at guy.brooks@va.gov.
*Do not return this form to the A/E firm requesting the reference.*
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
A-E FIRM TO BE EVALUATED:
Firm Name:
Address:
DUNS Number:
Project Title: _____________________________________
Description of Project:
Description of A-E Firms’ Responsibilities:
Contract Number: ______________________ Dollar Amount: ______________________
Contract Period of Performance: _______________________
The A-E Firm performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor/Consultant/Team Member
Percent of work performed by A-E Firm:
B. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:
Evaluator’s Company or Agency Name:
Company or Agency Address:
Evaluator’s Name:
Title of Evaluator:
Telephone:
E-mail:
C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate rating that most accurately describes the A/E’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ALL RATINGS OF Marginal or Unsatisfactory on page 7 under Narrative Summary.
| Exceptional (5) |
| Very Good (4) |
| Satisfactory (3) |
| Marginal (2) |
| Unsatisfactory (1) |
| N/A |
-Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded many of your company’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects or reflected few minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be highly effective or corrective actions taken were effective.
| -Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded some of your company’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects or reflected some minor problems and corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective or Corrective actions taken were effective. |
| -Performance meets or met contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects or reflected some minor problems. Corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective or Corrective actions taken were effective. |
| -Performance does or did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects or reflected serious problems(s) for which the contractor has not yet identified acceptable corrective actions or did not provide acceptable corrective actions. |
| -Performance does or did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely or did not occur. The contractual performance contains or contained serious problem (s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective or were ineffective. |
| -Not applicable or rater has not observed performance in this area. |
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the above definitions matrix.
Item
FACTORS TO BE RATED
| Exceptional (5) |
| Very Good (4) |
| Satisfactory (3) |
| Marginal (2) |
| Unsatisfactory (1) |
| N/A |
Design Services:
| 1. |
| Overall skill level and technical competence of A/E’s personnel. |
| 2. |
| A/E’s ability to identify and resolve design issues expeditiously. |
| 3. |
| A/E’s responsiveness to design review questions. |
| 4. |
| A/E’s ability to effectively coordinate, integrate and manage their consultants/subcontractors/team |
| 5. |
| A/E’s effectiveness and responsiveness in interfacing with the Client’s staff |
| 6. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness and coordination of final design documents. (Quality) |
| 7. |
| A/E’s ability to provide detailed, accurate cost estimates. |
| 8. |
| A/E’s ability to meet contract schedule. |
Follow-On Construction Support Services:
| 9. |
| Thoroughness and timely review of construction submittals. |
| 10. |
| Timely resolution of construction design issues. |
| 11. |
| Overall quality, responsiveness and timeliness of A/E follow-on construction support services. |
LEED (If Applicable):
| 12. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of LEED documentation. |
| 13. |
| A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall LEED process. |
BIM (If Applicable):
| 14. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of BIM documentation. |
| 15. |
| A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall BIM process. |
Owner’s Representative on Design/Build Projects (If applicable):
| 16. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of requirements documents and bridging documents. |
| 17. |
| A/E’s ability, thoroughness, timeliness and support as Owner’s Representative throughout the project. |
Overall:
| 18. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s ability to control cost? |
| 19. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s overall management performance on this contract? |
| 20. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s overall technical/quality performance on this contract? |
| 21. |
| Would you use this A/E again? (If “No”, please comment in the Narrative Summary) |
YES
NO
Number of A/E Design Errors & Omissions on Project: _______________ Increased Project Cost Due to A/E Design Errors & Omissions:_______________
NARRATIVE SUMMARY REGARDING PERFORMANCE:
| Item |
| COMMENTS |
D. SEND COMPLETED QUESTIONAIRE, VIA EMAIL, TO:
Guy K. Brooks, Contracting Officer Email: guy.brooks@va.gov VISN 6 Networking Contracting Office (NCO 6)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .