Attachment J.5 - Little Rock-Fac 1348 (Tank 1)-FINAL-2017.pdf
PDF 9 MB Posted
- Attached to
- CMP-API 653 FUELING FACILITY TANK INSPECTIONS Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W9128F23Q0038
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
| US | Army | Corps | of | Engineers |
| Omaha | District |
| API‐653 | In‐Service |
| Inspection | Report |
| Little | Rock | AFB, | Jacksonville, | AR |
| Tank | #1 |
| Facility | 1348 | |||||||||||
| US | Army | Corps | of | Engineers | Center | of | Expertise | for | Petroleum, | Oils, | and | Lubricants |
(USACE POL‐MCX)
7/26/2017
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report Tank #1 (Facility1348)
Little Rock AFB, AR
| Table | of | Contents |
| ACRONYMS | AND | ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ 3 |
GENERAL SUMMARY
INSPECTION DATE
PREVIOUS INSPECTION DATES
RECOMMENDED FUTURE INSPECTION DATES (CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED)
A. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
1. API 653 Inspection
2. Site Information
B. TANK INSPECTION COMMENTS
1. Tank Construction
2. Tank Foundation
3. Tank Shell
4. Tank Appurtenances
5. Tank Coating
6. Tank Piping System
7. Fire Protection System
8. Secondary Containment
C. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. MANDATORY REPAIRS per API 653, UFC 3‐460‐01, or AW 78‐24‐27 Standards
2. REQUIRED REPAIRS to Fully Comply with API 653, or, Federal, State, and Local Codes
| 3. RECOMMENDED | REPAIRS | TO | FULLY | COMPLY | WITH | UFC | 3‐460‐01, | AW | 78‐24‐27 |
| Standards | or | as | Part | of | Regular | Maintenance ................................................................................. 16 |
APPENDIX A: ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX B: ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
APPENDIX C: ENGINEERING DATA
APPENDIX D: TANK HISTORY
APPENDIX E: API 653 CHECKLISTS FOR TANK INSPECTIONS
APPENDIX F: PHOTOGGRAPHS
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
API American Petroleum Institute
ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASNT American Society of Non‐Destructive Testing
ATG Automatic Tank Gauge
BBL Barrel
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CP Cathodic Protection
DFT Dry Film Thickness
HLA High Level Alarm
HLCS High Level Control Shutoff
HHLA High‐High Level Alarm
LLA Low Level Alarm
LLLA Low‐Low Level Alarm
MFL Magnetic Flux Leakage
MT Magnetic Particle Testing
NACE National Association of Corrosion Engineers
NDT Non‐Destructive Testing
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
PSI Pounds per Square Inch
PT Penetrant Testing
P/V Pressure/Vacuum
RP Recommended Practice
PST Product Saver Tank
RT Radiography Testing
TML Thickness Measurement Location
TRV Thermal Relief Valve
UFC Unified Facilities Criteria
UFGS Unified Facilities Guide Specifications
ULS Ultra Low Sulfur
UT Ultrasonic Testing
VT Visual Testing
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
| GENERAL | SUMMARY | |
| Summary | of | Inspection |
| An | API | Standard | 653 | In‐Service | inspection | of | Tank | #1 | (Facility | 1348) | at | Little | Rock | Air | Force | Base |
| (AFB) | in | Jacksonville, | AR | was | completed | on | July | 26, | 2017. | The | shell | service | life | evaluation | ||
| performed | as | having | greater | than | 30 | years | of | remaining | shell | life | under | current | conditions. |
| Significant | Findings | (overview) | |||||||||||
| 1. The | HDPE | liner | of | the | secondary | containment | has | holes, | tears, | and | other | failures, | with |
| vegetation | growth | around | the | sump, | circumferential | stairways, | and | pipe | supports. | The | |||
| secondary | containment | is | not | capable | of | containing | product, | and | the | product | will | most | likely |
| escape | before | cleanup | occurs | as | required | by | 40 | CFR | 112.7. |
| 2. The | expansion | joints | of | the | walkway | around | the | tank | have | approximately | 20‐40 | LF | of | failed | |
| sealant, | with | vegetation | growth. | The | secondary | containment | is | not | capable | of | containing | ||||
| product, | and | the | product | will | most | likely | escape | before | cleanup | occurs | as | required | by | 40 | CFR |
112.7.
| 3. The | sealant | between | the | ringwall | and | walkway | has | approximately | 20‐40 | LF | of | failed | sealant, | |
| with | vegetation | growth. | The | secondary | containment | is | not | capable | of | containing | product, | and | ||
| the | product | will | most | likely | escape | before | cleanup | occurs | as | required | by | 40 | CFR | 112.7. |
| 4. The | weld | spacing | between | the | diamond | shaped | reinforcement | pad | of | the | 36‐inch | manhole | and | |
| the | first | to | second | shell | course | butt‐weld | measured | 1‐inch. | The | minimum | weld | spacing | is | 3‐ |
| inches | in | accordance | with | API | Std. | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2. |
| 5. The | weld | spacing | between | the | diamond | shaped | reinforcement | pad | of | the | 12‐inch | receipt | line |
| and | shell‐to‐bottom | weld | measured | 2‐inches. | The | minimum | weld | spacing | is | 3‐inches | in | ||
| accordance | with | API | Std. | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2. |
| 6. The | weld | spacing | between | the | diamond | shaped | reinforcement | pad | of | the | 6‐inch | issue | line | and |
| shell‐to‐bottom | weld | measured | 0‐inches. | The | minimum | weld | spacing | is | 3‐inches | in | accordance | |||
| with | API | Std. | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2. |
| 7. The | weld | spacing | between | the | diamond | shaped | reinforcement | pad | of | the | 8‐inch | issue | line | and |
| shell‐to‐bottom | weld | measured | 0‐inches. | The | minimum | weld | spacing | is | 3‐inches | in | accordance | |||
| with | API | Std. | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2. |
| 8. The | weld | spacing | between | the | diamond | shaped | reinforcement | pad | of | the | 8‐inch | blanked | valve |
| (old | issue | line) | and | shell‐to‐bottom | weld | measured | 0‐inches. | The | minimum | weld | spacing | is | 3‐ |
| inches | in | accordance | with | API | Std. | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2. |
| 9. The | weld | spacing | between | the | diamond | shaped | reinforcement | pad | of | the | 3‐inch | low | suction |
| line | and | shell‐to‐bottom | weld | measured | 1‐inch. | The | minimum | weld | spacing | is | 3‐inches | in | |
| accordance | with | API | Std. | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2. |
| 10. The | 36‐inch | manhole | has | a | hinged | cover | and | does | not | have | a | davit | arm. | ||||
| 11. The | oval | shaped | manhole | does | not | have | a | davit | arm. | ||||||||
| 12. The | 8‐inch | issue | line | near | the | receipt | line | does | not | have | a | check | valve | to | prevent | overfilling | the |
| tank | through | the | issue | line. | Both | lines | are | connected | to | the | truck | offload/transfer | line. | ||
| 13. The | 8‐inch | issue | line | near | the | receipt | line | and | the | receipt | line | have | cascading | thermal | relief |
valves.
| 14. The | roof | does | not | have | any | API | scaffold | supports. | ||
| 15. The | product | saver | tank | does | not | have | a | ground | strap. | |
| 16. The | tank | does | not | have | independent | low | and | low‐low | level | alarms. |
| 17. The | tank | does | not | have | a | floating | roof | and | associated | appurtenances. |
| 18. The | original | name | plate | is | not | affixed | to | the | tank. |
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
19. There are five (5) 1‐inch threaded plugs on the shell along the span of the circumferential stairway.
| 20. The | roof | does | not | have | a | handrail | around | the | perimeter. | |||||||
| 21. The | fixed | roof | exterior | coating | has | heavy | chalking | and | is | at | the | end | of | its | useful | life. |
| 22. The | shell | exterior | coating | has | heavy | chalking; | many | areas | of | top | coat | are | peeling | from | the |
| primer, | and | there | is | rust | bleeding | through. | The | top | coat | was | easily | removed | from | the | primer |
| with | duct | tape. | The | coating | is | beyond | its | useful | life. |
| 23. The | fixed | roof | has | mildew | on | the | coating. | ||||||||
| 24. The | shell | has | mildew | on | the | coating | under | the | circumferential | stairway. | |||||
| 25. The | ENRAF | ATG | display | at | the | bottom | of | the | circumferential | stairway | is | not | functioning. | ||
| 26. The | flanges | and | valves | of | the | receipt | line | and | issue | line | have | heavy | coating | failure | and |
corrosion.
| INSPECTION | DATE | |||||
| API | In‐Service | Inspection | Date: | July | 26, | 2017 |
| Equipment | Used: | Ultra‐Sonic | Thickness | Meter | ||
| Manufacturer: | General | Electric | ||||
| Model: | DMS | 2 | ||||
| Calibration | Methods | Used: | Zeroing | Procedure, | Copper | Coating |
| Calibration | Procedure, | and | Two | Point |
| Calibration | Procedure |
| Inspector(s): | Wayne | K. | Bailey | ||
| API | 653 | Inspector | No. | 1331 |
| Equipment | Used: | Surveying | Tool | ||
| Manufacturer: | Leica | ||||
| Model: | 3D | DISTO | |||
| Calibration | Methods | Used: | Manufacturer | ||
| Inspector(s): | Wayne | K. | Bailey | ||
| API | 653 | Inspector | No. | 1331 |
| PREVIOUS | INSPECTION | DATES | ||||
| API | Out‐of‐Service | (Internal) | Inspection | Date: | NOV | 2012 |
| API | In‐Service | (External) | Inspection | Date: | NOV | 2012 |
| RECOMMENDED | FUTURE | INSPECTION | DATES | (CALCULATIONS | SHALL | BE | PROVIDED) |
| API | Out‐of‐Service | (Internal) | Inspection | Date: | MAY | 2023 | |
| API | In‐Service | (External) | Inspection | Date: | JUL | 2022 |
Wayne K. Bailey, API-653 #1331
| GENERAL | TANK | INFORMATION |
| ITEM | DESCRIPTION |
| Owner | Little | Rock AFB | |||
| Location | Bulk | Storage | |||
| Facility | Number | 1348 | |||
| Tank | Number | 1 | |||
| State | / | Country | Arkansas, | United | States |
| City | Jacksonville | ||||
| Inspection | Date | July | 26, | 2017 |
| Tank | Manufacturer | |||||
| Original: | Unknown | |||||
| Upgraded: | Chicago | Bridge | & | Iron | Co. | |
| Upgraded: | CAPE | Environmental | Management, | Inc. |
Design Standard API Standard 12C
| Date | of | Construction | |
| Original: | 1954 | ||
| Upgraded: | 1966 | & | 2012 |
| Tank | Contents | Jet | A |
| Tank | Serial | Number | Unknown |
| Tank | Diameter | 60’ | 0” |
| Shell | Height | 40’ | 8‐1/2” |
| Product | Height | 39’ | 10” |
| Tank | Capacity | 20,000 | Barrels |
| Foundation | Concrete | Ringwall |
Construction
| Bottom | Lap‐Welded | |
| Shell | Butt‐Welded | (Cylindrical) |
| Floating | Roof NA | |
| Fixed | Roof Lap‐Welded |
Material
| Bottom | Carbon | Steel, | Unknown | Grade |
| Shell | Carbon | Steel, | Unknown | Grade |
| Floating | Roof NA | |||
| Fixed | Roof Carbon | Steel, | Unknown | Grade |
| Cathodic | Protection | Impressed | Current | |||
| Interior | Coating | System | Unknown | |||
| Exterior | Coating | System | Thin | Film | Epoxy/Polyurethane | |
| Level | Gauging | SHAND&JURS MTG, | ENRAF ATG, | and | VITO | Water/Temperature |
| Overfill | Protection | |||||||
| Hydraulically | Operated | High | Level | Shut‐Off | Valve | with | Dedicated | Float |
| (Unknown | Set | Point) |
Piping
| Receipt | 12" Carbon | Steel | |
| Issue | 8"& | 6” Carbon | Steel |
| Low | Suction 3” Carbon | Steel | |
| Water | Draw‐Off 2" Carbon | Steel |
Level Alarms & Controls
| Description BARTON | ATG Independent | |||||
| High‐High | Level | Alarm: | 34’ | 11‐00/16” 34’ | 11‐00/16” | |
| High | Level | Alarm: | 33’ | 05‐00/16” 33’ | 05‐00/16” | |
| Low | Level | Alarm: | 3’ | 06‐00/16” None | ||
| Low‐Low | Level | Alarm: | 0’ | 01‐12/16” None | ||
| High | Level | Control | Shut‐off: 34’ | 0” |
Type of Internal Floating Roof
None
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
A. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
| 1. API | 653 | Inspection | ||||||||||
| This | project | will | perform | API | 653 | inspections | of | various | tanks | at | facilities | throughout |
| the | United | States. | Additional | consideration | is | given | to | federal, | state, | and | local | |
| regulations, | as | well | as | applicable | military | criteria | and | general | industry | standards. |
An API Standard 653 In‐Service inspection was performed for Tank #1 (Facility 1348).
| 2. Site | Information | |||||||||||||||
| On | July | 26, | 2017 | Burns | & | McDonnell | and | our | sub‐consultant | (InterSpec, | LLC) | performed | ||||
| an | API | 653 | Out‐of‐Service | inspection | of | Tank | #1 | (Facility | 1348), | located | at | Little | Rock | |||
| Air | Force | Base | (AFB) | in | Jacksonville, | AR. | Little | Rock | AFB | is | a | United | States | Air | Force | |
| base | located | approximately | 17 | miles | northeast | of | Little | Rock, | Arkansas. |
B. TANK INSPECTION COMMENTS
| 1. Tank | Construction | |||||||||||||||
| Tank | #1 | (Facility | 1348) | is | a | nominal | 20,000 | barrel, | 60’ | 0” | diameter | by | 40’ | 8‐1/2” | tall, | Jet |
| A, | aboveground | vertical | storage | tank. | The | upgraded | nameplates | were | affixed | to | the | tank | ||||
| and | are | legible. | The | nameplate | lists | the | tank | as | being | upgraded | to | API | Standard | 650 | by | |
| Chicago | Bridge | & | Iron | Co. | in | 1966 | and | CAPE | Environmental | Management, | Inc. | in | 2012. |
| 2. Tank | Foundation | |||||||||||
| The | tank | rests | on | a | concrete | ringwall. | The | tank | has | cathodic | protection, | secondary |
| containment, | and | bottom | leak | detection. | The | foundation | was | visually | evaluated | during | ||
| the | inspection | for | broken | concrete, | spalling, | cracks, | and | vegetation | against | the | bottom | |
| of | the | tank. | A | shell | settlement | survey | was | performed | during | the | inspection | in |
| accordance | with | Appendix | B | of | API | Standard | 653. | Settlement | results | are | listed | in |
| Appendix | A. |
| 3. Tank | Shell | |||||||||||||||
| The | shell | is | constructed | of | carbon | steel | material. | The | shell | is | a | cylindrical | design, | butt‐ | ||
| welded | together, | consisting | of | five | (5) | courses. | The | shell | exterior | has | a | thin | film | epoxy | ||
| coating | system. | The | coating | was | inspected | for | disbonding, | adhesion, | deterioration, | and | ||||||
| discoloration; | which | is | not | in | satisfactory | condition. | The | shell | was | evaluated | for | |||||
| remaining | metal | thickness | utilizing | ultrasonic | technology. | The | ultrasonic | thickness | ||||||||
| measurements | and | thickness | measurement | locations | (TML) | are | listed | in | the | Shell | Plate | |||||
| Thickness | Measurements | table | in | Appendix | A. | A | shell | service | life | evaluation | performed | |||||
| on | all | shell | courses | shows | the | shell | has | a | remaining | life | of | greater | than | 30 | years | under |
| current | conditions. | The | shell | service | life | evaluation | is | shown | in | the | Shell | Service | Life | |||
| Evaluation | table | in | Appendix | A. | Roundness, | plumbness, | peaking, | and | banding | of | the | shell | ||||
| are | all | within | the | allowable | tolerances | of | API | Standard | 653. | The | tank | appears | to | be |
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
| stable | and | does | not | appear | to | be | in | danger | of | overturning | or | buckling | due | to | high | winds |
| or | seismic | conditions. |
4. Tank Appurtenances
a. Gauging
| An | ENRAF | ATG | and | VITO | water/temperature | are | installed | for | electronic | ||
| gauging. | Manual | sampling | and | gauging | is | afforded | through | a | manual | sample | |
| stilling | well. | The | tank | has | a | SHAND&JURS | mechanical | tape | level | gauge. |
| b. Level | Alarms | |||||||||||
| High | and | high‐high | level | alarms | are | mounted | on | the | exterior | of | the | |
| circumferential | stairway | platform, | which | is | independent | of | the | ENRAF | ATG | |||
| tank | gauging | system. | The | tank | is | not | equipped | with | low | and | low‐low | level |
| alarms | independent | of | the | ENRAF | ATG | tank | gauging | system. | The | electronic | ||
| gauging | is | equipped | with | high | and | high‐high | level | and | low | and | low‐low | level |
alarms.
| c. Stairs | and | Platforms | ||||||||||
| The | tank’s | fixed | cone | roof | is | accessible | by | a | circumferential | stairway | ||
| mounted | on | the | shell | of | the | tank. | The | exterior | coating | on | the | circumferential |
| stairway | and | platforms | was | in | satisfactory | condition. |
| d. Grounding | and | Bonding | ||||||||
| The | tank | has | four | grounding | cables | connected | to | the | tank | shell. |
| 5. Tank | Coating | |||||||||||||
| The | exterior | coating | is | an | epoxy | with | polyurethane | top | coat | that | was | applied | during | one |
| of | the | upgrades; | the | exterior | coating | is | not | in | satisfactory | condition. |
| 6. Tank | Piping | System | |||||||||||||
| Fuel | is | received | by | trucks | and | issued | to | underground | day | tanks | at | two | (2) | pump | houses. |
| 7. Fire | Protection | System | ||||||||||||||
| There | are | two | fire | hydrants | located | on | the | service | road. | The | tank | also | has | foam | piped | to |
it.
| 8. Secondary | Containment | |||||||||||||
| 40 | CFR | 112.7(c) | states | that | the | entire | secondary | containment | system, | “including | walls | |||
| and | floor, | must | be | capable | of | containing | oil | and | must | be | constructed | so | that | any |
| discharge | from | a | primary | containment | system | ... | will | not | escape | containment | before | |||
| cleanup | occurs.” | 40 | CFR | 112.8(c)(2) | and | 40 | CFR | 112.12(c)(2) | state | that | diked | areas | ||
| must | be | “sufficiently | impervious | to | contain | oil.” | The | purpose | of | the | secondary | |||
| containment | requirement | is | to | prevent | discharges, | as | described | in | 40 | CFR | 112.1(b); | |||
| therefore, | effective | secondary | containment | methods | must | be | able | to | contain | oil | until | the | ||
| oil | is | cleaned | up. | The | secondary | containment | area | consists | of | an | earthen | floor | with | |
| sloped | earthen | walls | that | is | covered | with | a | flexible | membrane | liner. | An | informal | ||
| containment | evaluation | was | conducted. | The | containment | appears | to | be | of | sufficient | size |
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
| to | contain | a | total | tank | loss | per | UFC | 3‐460‐1, | paragraph | 8‐14.2.1, | “The | containment | area | |
| needs | to | have | sufficient | capacity | to | contain | the | tank | contents | plus | one | foot | of | freeboard. |
| If | the | containment | has | the | capacity | to | contain | the | tank | contents | plus | one | foot | of |
| freeboard, | the | containment | area | is | sufficient.” | Therefore, | the | containment | is | in | ||||
| satisfactory | condition | based | on | size. | The | secondary | containment | area | appears | to | be | |||
| properly | graded | to | drain | water | away | from | the | tank | in | accordance | with | NFPA | 30. |
| C. FINDINGS | AND | RECOMMENDATIONS | ||||||||
| The | following | information | identifies | the | significant | findings | found | during | the | tank |
inspection:
| 1. MANDATORY | REPAIRS | per | API | 653, | UFC | 3‐460‐01, | or | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Standards | ||
| Mandatory | repairs | represent | items | that | require | immediate | attention, | in | order | to | ||
| prevent | imminent | risk | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the | adjacent | ||
| environment. | The | tank | should | remain | out | of | service | until | these | repairs | are | completed. |
a. None.
2. REQUIRED REPAIRS to Fully Comply with API 653, or, Federal, State, and Local Codes
| Recommended | repairs | represent | items | that | should | be | addressed | in | a | timely | manner, | in | ||
| order | to | prevent | future | potential | risks | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the | ||
| adjacent | environment. | These | items | may | be | required | by | federal, | state | and | local | codes, | or | |
| by | military | criteria. |
| a. Secondary | Containment | Liner | ||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | HDPE | liner | of | the | secondary | containment | has | holes, | tears, | and | other | ||
| failures, | with | vegetation | growth | around | the | sump, | circumferential | stairways, | and | pipe | ||||
| supports. | The | secondary | containment | is | not | capable | of | containing | product | and | will | most | ||
| likely | escape | before | cleanup | occurs | as | required | by | 40 | CFR | 112.7. | The | activity | stated | that |
| a | MILCON | design | was | starting | in | 2017 | to | have | construction | started | in | 2018 | to | include |
| concrete | lining | the | secondary | containment. | ||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | 40 | CFR | 112.7 | ||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Repair | the | holes, | tears, | and | other | failures | in | the | HDPE | liner | around | ||
| the | sump, | circumferential | stairways, | and | pipe | supports. | Remove | the | vegetation | growth. |
| b. Walkway | Expansion | Joint | Sealant | ||||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | expansion | joints | of | the | walkway | around | the | tank | have | |||||||
| approximately | 20‐40 | LF | of | failed | sealant, | with | vegetation | growth. | The | secondary | |||||||
| containment | is | not | capable | of | containing | product, | and | the | product | will | most | likely | |||||
| escape | before | cleanup | occurs | as | required | by | 40 | CFR | 112.7. | ||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | 40 | CFR | 112.7 | and | UFGS | 07 | 92 | 00 | ||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Remove | the | damaged | joint | sealant | and | install | new | backer | rods | and | ||||||
| sealant | within | the | containment | area. | The | sealant | shall | be | adequate | to | accommodate | ||||||
| joint | compression | equal | to | 50 | percent | of | the | width | of | the | joint. | The | backer | rod | shall | be | |
| compressible | rod | stock | of | polyethylene | foam, | polyurethane | foam, | butyl | rubber | foam, | or | ||||||
| other | flexible, | non‐absorptive | material | as | recommended | by | the | sealant | manufacturer. | ||||||||
| The | sealant | shall | conform | to | UFGS | 07 | 92 | 00 | Joint | Sealant. |
| c. Walkway | to | Ringwall | Sealant | |||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | sealant | between | the | ringwall | and | walkway | has | approximately | 20‐40 | ||||||
| LF | of | failed | sealant, | with | vegetation | growth. | The | secondary | containment | is | not | capable | ||||
| of | containing | product, | and | the | product | will | most | likely | escape | before | cleanup | occurs | as | |||
| required | by | 40 | CFR | 112.7. | ||||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | 40 | CFR | 112.7 | and | UFGS | 07 | 92 | 00 | |||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Remove | the | damaged | joint | sealant | and | install | new | backer | rods | and | |||||
| sealant | within | the | containment | area. | The | sealant | shall | be | adequate | to | accommodate | |||||
| joint | compression | equal | to | 50 | percent | of | the | width | of | the | joint. | The | backer | rod | shall | be |
| compressible | rod | stock | of | polyethylene | foam, | polyurethane | foam, | butyl | rubber | foam, | or | |||||
| other | flexible, | non‐absorptive | material | as | recommended | by | the | sealant | manufacturer. | |||||||
| The | sealant | shall | conform | to | UFGS | 07 | 92 | 00 | Joint | Sealant. |
| d. 36‐inch | Manhole | Reinforcement | Weld | Spacing | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | weld | spacing | between | the | diamond | shaped | reinforcement | pad | of | the | ||||
| 36‐inch | manhole | and | the | first | to | second | shell | course | butt‐weld | measured | 1‐inch. | The | |||
| minimum | weld | spacing | is | 3‐inches | in | accordance | with | API | Standard | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2. | |||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | API | Standard | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2, | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 9.7, | and | |||
| API | Standard | 653 | Section | 4.3.9.1 | |||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Modify | the | reinforcement | pad | of | the | 36‐inch | manhole | in | ||||||
| accordance | with | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 9.7. | Note: | Magnetic | particle | test | all | nozzle | |||
| welds | as | an | alternative | to | repair | in | accordance | with | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 4.3.9.1. | It | |
| is | suggested | to | repair | the | weld | spacing | in | lieu | of | testing, | to | prevent | future | repeat | or |
| question | of | any | previous | magnetic | particle | testing | during | future | inspections. | The | cost | of | |||
| repair | verses | the | cost | of | testing | is | comparable. |
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
| e. 12‐inch | Receipt | Line | Reinforcement | Weld | Spacing | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | weld | spacing | between | the | diamond | shaped | reinforcement | pad | of | the | ||||
| 12‐inch | receipt | line | and | shell‐to‐bottom | weld | measured | 2‐inches. | The | minimum | weld | |||||
| spacing | is | 3‐inches | in | accordance | with | API | Standard | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2. | |||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | API | Standard | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2, | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 9.7, | and | |||
| API | Standard | 653 | Section | 4.3.9.1 | |||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Modify | the | reinforcement | pad | of | the | 12‐inch | receipt | line | in | |||||
| accordance | with | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 9.7. | Note: | Magnetic | particle | test | all | nozzle | |||
| welds | as | an | alternative | to | repair | in | accordance | with | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 4.3.9.1. | It | |
| is | suggested | to | repair | the | weld | spacing | in | lieu | of | testing | to | prevent | future | repeat | or |
| question | of | any | previous | magnetic | particle | testing | during | future | inspections. | The | cost | of | |||
| repair | verses | the | cost | of | testing | is | comparable. |
| f. 6‐inch | Issue | Line | Reinforcement | Weld | Spacing | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | weld | spacing | between | the | diamond | shaped | reinforcement | pad | of | the | ||||
| 6‐inch | issue | line | and | shell‐to‐bottom | weld | measured | 0‐inches.The | minimum | weld | ||||||
| spacing | is | 3‐inches | in | accordance | with | API | Standard | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2. | |||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | API | Standard | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2, | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 9.7, | and | |||
| API | Standard | 653 | Section | 4.3.9.1 | |||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Modify | the | reinforcement | pad | of | the | 6‐inch | issue | line | in | |||||
| accordance | with | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 9.7. | Note: | Magnetic | particle | test | all | nozzle | |||
| welds | as | an | alternative | to | repair | in | accordance | with | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 4.3.9.1. | It | |
| is | suggested | to | repair | the | weld | spacing | in | lieu | of | testing | to | prevent | future | repeat | or |
| question | of | any | previous | magnetic | particle | testing | during | future | inspections. | The | cost | of | |||
| repair | verses | the | cost | of | testing | is | comparable. |
| g. 8‐inch | Issue | Line | Reinforcement | Weld | Spacing | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | weld | spacing | between | the | diamond | shaped | reinforcement | pad | of | the | ||||
| 8‐inch | issue | line | and | shell‐to‐bottom | weld | measured | 0‐inches. | The | minimum | weld | |||||
| spacing | is | 3‐inches | in | accordance | with | API | Standard | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2. | |||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | API | Standard | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2, | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 9.7, | and | |||
| API | Standard | 653 | Section | 4.3.9.1 | |||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Modify | the | reinforcement | pad | of | the | 8‐inch | issue | line | in | |||||
| accordance | with | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 9.7. | Note: | Magnetic | particle | test | all | nozzle | |||
| welds | as | an | alternative | to | repair | in | accordance | with | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 4.3.9.1. | It | |
| is | suggested | to | repair | the | weld | spacing | in | lieu | of | testing | to | prevent | future | repeat | or |
| question | of | any | previous | magnetic | particle | testing | during | future | inspections. | The | cost | of | |||
| repair | verses | the | cost | of | testing | is | comparable. |
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
| h. 8‐inch | Blanked | Valve | Reinforcement | Weld | Spacing | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | weld | spacing | between | the | diamond | shaped | reinforcement | pad | of | the | ||||
| 8‐inch | blanked | valve | (old | issue | line) | and | shell‐to‐bottom | weld | measured | 0‐inches. | The | ||||
| minimum | weld | spacing | is | 3‐inches | in | accordance | with | API | Standard | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2. | |||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | API | Standard | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2, | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 9.7, | and | |||
| API | Standard | 653 | Section | 4.3.9.1 | |||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Modify | the | reinforcement | pad | of | the | 8‐inch | blanked | valve | (old | |||||
| issue | line) | in | accordance | with | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 9.7 | or | remove | shell | nozzle | ||
| and | install | an | insert | plate | in | accordance | with | API | Standard | 653. | This | nozzle | is | no | |
| longer | being | used. | Note: | Magnetic | particle | test | all | nozzle | welds | as | an | alternative | to | ||
| repair | in | accordance | with | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 4.3.9.1. | It | is | suggested | to | repair | the | |
| weld | spacing | in | lieu | of | testing | to | prevent | future | repeat | or | question | of | any | previous | |
| magnetic | particle | testing | during | future | inspections. | The | cost | of | repair | verses | the | cost | of | ||
| testing | is | comparable. |
| i. 3‐inch | Low | Suction | Reinforcement | Weld | Spacing | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | weld | spacing | between | the | diamond | shaped | reinforcement | pad | of | the | ||||
| 3‐inch | low | suction | line | and | shell‐to‐bottom | weld | measured | 1‐inch. | The | minimum | weld | ||||
| spacing | is | 3‐inches | in | accordance | with | API | Section | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2. | |||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | API | Standard | 650 | Section | 5.7.3.2, | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 9.7, | and | |||
| API | Standard | 653 | Section | 4.3.9.1 | |||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Modify | the | reinforcement | pad | of | the | 3‐inch | low | suction | line | in | ||||
| accordance | with | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 9.7. | Note: | Magnetic | particle | test | all | nozzle | |||
| welds | as | an | alternative | to | repair | in | accordance | with | API | Standard | 653 | Section | 4.3.9.1. | It | |
| is | suggested | to | repair | the | weld | spacing | in | lieu | of | testing | to | prevent | future | repeat | or |
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
| question | of | any | previous | magnetic | particle | testing | during | future | inspections. | The | cost | of |
| repair | verses | the | cost | of | testing | is | comparable. |
| j. Secondary | Containment | Stairway | Handrail | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | handrail | on | the | stairway | over | the | product | piping | has | corroded | to | the |
| point | of | post | failure | and | could | cause | personnel | injury. | |||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | 29 | CFR | 1910 | |||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Repair | the | post | on | the | stairway | over | product | piping. |
| 3. RECOMMENDED | REPAIRS | TO | FULLY | COMPLY | WITH | UFC | 3‐460‐01, | AW | 78‐24‐27 | |||
| Standards, | or | as | Part | of | Regular | Maintenance | ||||||
| Recommended | repairs | represent | items | that | should | be | addressed | in | a | timely | manner, | in |
| order | to | prevent | future | potential | risks | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the |
| adjacent | environment. |
| a. 36‐inch | Manhole | Davit | ||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | 36‐inch | manhole | has | a | hinged | cover | and | does | not | have | a | davit | arm. |
| CODE | REFERENCE: | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Drawing | D.10 | Detail | 3 | |||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Replace | the | hinged | cover | with | a | davit | arm | on | the | 36‐inch | manhole. |
| b. 36‐inch | by | 22‐inch | Oval | Manhole | Davit | ||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | oval | shaped | 36‐inch | by | 22‐inch | manhole | does | not | have | a | davit | arm. |
| CODE | REFERENCE: | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Drawing | D.10 | Detail | 3 | ||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | a | davit | arm | on | the | oval | shaped | 36‐inch | by | 22‐inch | manhole. | |
| Consider | replacing | the | manhole | with | a | round | manhole. |
| c. Overfill | Prevention | ||||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | 8‐inch | issue | line | near | the | receipt | line | does | not | have | a | check | valve | to |
| prevent | overfilling | the | tank | through | the | issue | line. | Both | lines | are | connected | to | the | truck | |
| offload/transfer | line. | ||||||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | Good | Engineering | Practice | |||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | a | check | valve | to | prevent | overfilling | the | tank | through | the | ||||
| fill | line. |
| d. Cascading | Thermal | Relief | Valves | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | receipt | and | issue | lines | have | cascading | thermal | relief | valves. | Relief | ||
| valve | tags | are | coated, | set | pressures | for | relief | valves | unknown. | Threaded | connection | at | |
| tank | in | use. | |||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | Good | Engineering | Practice | |||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Conduct | a | thermal | relief | study. |
| e. Product | Saver | Tank | Grounding | |||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | product | saver | tank | does | not | have | a | ground | strap. |
| CODE | REFERENCE: | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Drawing | D.13 | Detail | 5 | |||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | a | ground | strap | on | the | product | saver | tank. |
| f. Threaded | Plugs | on | Shell | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | There | are | five | (5) | 1‐inch | threaded | plugs | on | the | shell | along | the | span | of |
| the | circumferential | stairway. | ||||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Drawing | D.10 | Detail | 1, | UFGS | 33 | 56 | 13.13 | Section | 3.5, | |
| API | Standard | 653 | Section | 9.3 | (lap), | and | API | Standard | 653 | Figure | 9‐1 | |||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Remove | the | plugs | and | install | patch | plates | in | accordance | with | API | |||
| Standard | 653 | Section | 9.3 | or | install | butt‐welded | inserts | in | accordance | with | API | Standard | ||
| 653 | Figure | 9‐1. |
| g. Fixed | Roof | Perimeter | Handrail | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | fixed | roof | does | not | have | a | handrail | around | the | perimeter. | ||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Drawing | D.11 | Detail | 5, | UFGS | 33 | 56 | 13.13 | Section | 2.13.8 |
| 29, | and | CFR | 1920.28(b)(1)(j). | ||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | a | handrail | around | the | perimeter | of | the | roof. |
| h. API | Scaffold | Supports | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | roof | does | not | have | any | API | scaffold | supports. | ||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | UFC | 3‐460‐01 | Table | 8‐1 | Item | (ff), | AW | 78‐24‐27, | UFGS | 33 | 56 | 13.13 |
| section | 2.13.17, | and | API | Standard | 650 | Section | 5.8.8 | ||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | two | (2) | API | scaffold | supports. |
| i. Independent | Low | and | Low‐Low | Level | Alarms | |||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | tank | does | not | have | independent | low | and | low‐low | level | alarms. | |
| CODE | REFERENCE: | UFC | 3‐460‐01 | Table | 8‐1 | Item | (l) | and | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Drawing | D.12 |
| Detail | 1 | |||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | independent | low | and | low‐low | level | alarms. |
| j. Floating | Roof | and | Associated | Appurtenances | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | tank | does | not | have | a | floating | roof | and | associated | appurtenances. | |||
| Tanks | storing | mission‐critical | fuel, | if | located | in | a | hot | climate, | should | have | an | aluminum | |
| honeycomb | floating | roof | to | eliminate | the | fuel/air | interface | in | accordance | with | UFC | 3‐ | ||
| 460‐01 | Section | 8‐8.2. | The | floating | roof | should | have | flexible | wiper | squeegee | seals | |||
| made | of | closed | cell | cast | urethane, | UFGS | 33 | 56 | 13.13 | Section | 2.13.2.7. | Internal | ||
| floating | roofs | require | appurtenances | such | as | shell | overflow/circulation | vents, | ||||||
| bolted | cover | in | the | roof | for | installation, | roof | inspection | hatch/circulation | vents, | ||||
| internal | ladder, | etc. | In | general, | all | Air | Force | tanks | have | internal | floating | roofs | for | |
| bulk | storage | tanks | containing | aviation | fuels. | |||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | UFC | 3‐460‐01 | Section | 8‐8.2 | and | UFGS | 33 | 56 | 13.13 | Section | 2.13.2.7 | ||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Design | and | install | an | internal | floating | roof | and | associated |
appurtenances.
| k. Fixed | Roof | Exterior | Coating | System | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | fixed | roof | exterior | coating | has | heavy | chalking | and | is | at | the | end | of | its |
| useful | life. | ||||||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | UFGS | 09 | 97 | 13.27 | ||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Replace | the | coating | on | the | fixed | roof | exterior | and | appurtenances | in | ||||
| accordance | with | UFGS | 09 | 97 | 13.27, | Exterior | Coating | of | Steel | Structures. | Abrasive | blast | |||
| steel | surfaces | to | near‐white | metal | in | accordance | with | SSPC | SP | 10/NACE | No. | 2, | as | ||
| recommended | by | manufacturer. | The | epoxy‐polyamide | primer | coat | shall | be | formula | 159, | |||||
| Type | IV, | Green | (3‐5 | Mils | DFT). | The | epoxy | intermediate | coat | shall | be | formula | 152, | Type | |
| IV, | White | (3‐5 | Mils | DFT). | The | topcoat | formula | shall | be | formula | 152, | Type | IV, | White | (3‐5 |
| Mils | DFT). |
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
| l. Fixed | Roof | Mildew | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | fixed | roof | has | mildew | on | the | coating. | ||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | Good | Engineering | Practice | ||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Pressure | wash | the | fixed | roof | to | remove | the | mildew | if | the | coating |
| system | is | not | replaced. |
| m. Shell | Exterior | Coating | System | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | shell | exterior | coating | has | heavy | chalking; | many | areas | of | top | coat | ||
| are | peeling | from | the | primer, | and | there | is | rust | bleeding | through. | The | top | coat | was |
| easily | removed | from | the | primer | with | duct | tape. | The | coating | is | beyond | the | useful |
life.
| CODE | REFERENCE: | UFGS | 09 | 97 | 13.27 | ||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Replace | the | coating | on | the | shell | exterior | and | shell | appurtenances | in | ||||
| accordance | with | UFGS | 09 | 97 | 13.27, | Exterior | Coating | of | Steel | Structures. | Abrasive | blast | |||
| steel | surfaces | to | near‐white | metal | in | accordance | with | SSPC | SP | 10/NACE | No. | 2, | as | ||
| recommended | by | manufacturer. | The | epoxy‐polyamide | primer | coat | shall | be | formula | 159, | |||||
| Type | IV, | Green | (3‐5 | Mils | DFT). | The | epoxy | intermediate | coat | shall | be | formula | 152, | Type | |
| IV, | White | (3‐5 | Mils | DFT). | The | topcoat | formula | shall | be | formula | 152, | Type | IV, | White | (3‐5 |
| Mils | DFT). |
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
| n. Shell | Mildew | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | shell | has | mildew | on | the | coating | under | the | circumferential | stairway. |
| CODE | REFERENCE: | Good | Engineering | Practice | |||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Pressure | wash | the | shell | to | remove | the | mildew | if | the | coating |
| system | is | not | replaced. |
| o. ENRAF | Display | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | ENRAF | ATG | display | at | the | bottom | of | the | circumferential | stairway | is |
| not | functioning. | |||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | Provide | regular | maintenance | and | repair | to | avoid | system | shutdowns, | ||
| prevent | fuel | contamination, | and | decrease | fire, | safety, | and | health | hazards | per | UFC | 3‐460‐ |
| 03 | section | 1.1. | ||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Repair | the | ENRAF | ATG | display | at | the | bottom | of | the | circumferential |
stairway.
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
| p. Flanges | and | Valves | Inside | Secondary | Containment | ||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | flanges | and | valves | of | the | receipt | line | and | issue | line | have | heavy |
| coating | failure | and | corrosion. | ||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | Good | Engineering | Practice | |||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Preserve | the | failed | coating | and | localized | corrosion. |
| q. Original | Name | Plate | ||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | original | name | plate | is | not | affixed | to | the | tank. |
| CODE | REFERENCE: | General | Observation | |||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | No | recommendations | for | the | missing | original | name | plate. |
A-1 t min t min t nom t act t prev t nom
D H
H c
G Y
T
S Y T Y T
S
E E E
E E
L r
C r
I ut
I v
Y t prev t act tmin
H DG
SE
Lr tact tmin
Cr Cr tprev tact Y Iut tact tmin Cr
Iv tact tmin
Cr
A-2
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
D = G = Y =
H S E t min t prev t act t prev t nom tprev tact tmin
A-3
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
C r L r I v I ut
C r
Corrosion Rate
A-4
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
Thickness tmin
A-5
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
A-6
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
A-7
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
S max
L D N D N Y E H
D N L Y E H L
S max
A-8
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
S i | U i U i-1 U i+1
S i | U i i
U i U i+1 U i-1 S i S i
A-9
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
Fe et
Data Points
A-10
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
Shell Plumbness and Roundness Evaluation
The purpose of this study is to determine the tank shell out-of-roundness, locations of buckled areas, flat spots, and peaking and banding at weld joints. Shell distortion can be caused by many conditions, such as foundation settlement, over- or under-pressuring, high wind, poor shell fabrication, or various repair techniques or tank modifications.
Methodology The vertical shell profiles were obtained externally at equally spaced planes arround the circumference of the tank with measurements recorded at 6-inch intervals along each vertical profile. All measurements were recorded using an aoutomatic laser scanning surveying instrument, Lieca® 3D DISTO.
Plumbness Evaluation The maximum allowable out-of-plumbness for this tank is 4.885 inches in accordance with API Standard 653. The maximum calculated out-of-plumbness for this tank is 1.683 inches.
-The tank shell out-of-plumbness is within the limits of API Standard 653.
Roundness Evaluation The maximum allowable out-of-roundness at 1-foot shell height for this tank is 1.5 inches in accordance with API Standard 653. Evaluation of roundness at 1-foot shell height can only be accurately performed from inside the tank.
-The shell out-of-roundness at 1-foot was not evaluated.
A-11
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
(Shell Plumbness Evaluation)
Height from Bottom (feet)
Vertical Profile
#1 Radius
(inches)
Vertical Profile
#2 Radius
(inches)
Vertical Profile
#3 Radius
(inches)
Vertical Profile
#4 Radius
(inches)
Vertical Profile
#5 Radius
(inches)
Vertical Profile
#6 Radius
(inches)
Vertical Profile
#7 Radius
(inches)
Vertical Profile
#8 Radius
(inches)
0.0 0.279 -0.328 -0.429 -0.212 -0.207 -0.404 -0.026 0.019
0.5 -0.015 -0.141 -0.275 -0.097 -0.102 -0.193 -0.088 0.105
1.0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1.5 -0.036 0.119 0.151 0.129 0.022 0.105 0.067 -0.112
2.0 -0.181 0.011 0.391 0.229 -0.121 0.166 0.207 -0.057
2.5 -0.053 -0.006 0.582 0.300 -0.153 0.160 0.366 -0.014
3.0 0.132 -0.172 0.670 0.268 -0.138 0.205 0.534 0.013
3.5 0.214 -0.270 0.739 0.293 -0.121 0.272 0.653 0.000
4.0 0.206 -0.465 0.797 0.291 -0.139 0.259 0.795 -0.004
4.5 0.220 -0.464 0.710 0.279 -0.132 0.277 0.986 0.025
5.0 0.261 -0.553 0.730 0.328 -0.102 0.299 1.149 -0.024
5.5 0.285 -0.710 0.678 0.301 -0.089 0.314 1.151 -0.006
6.0 0.296 -1.008 0.571 0.186 -0.083 0.280 1.136 -0.014
6.5 0.259 -1.293 0.576 0.185 0.007 0.274 1.124 -0.002
7.0 0.208 -1.243 0.489 -0.063 0.252 1.073 0.007
7.5 0.142 -0.977 0.528 0.244 -0.051 0.200 1.031 0.069
8.0 0.153 -0.824 0.747 -0.038 0.262 1.041 0.149
8.5 0.096 -0.721 0.762 0.322 -0.037 0.224 0.969 0.204
9.0 0.051 -0.607 0.796 0.380 -0.061 0.220 0.898 0.207
9.5 -0.026 -0.517 0.884 0.462 -0.056 0.192 0.860 0.217
10.0 -0.114 -0.456 0.935 0.505 -0.054 0.192 0.747 0.177
10.5 -0.153 -0.402 0.935 0.546 -0.060 0.234 0.708 0.146
11.0 -0.230 -0.355 0.944 0.592 -0.058 0.179 0.652 0.108
11.5 -0.254 -0.260 0.921 0.606 -0.067 0.191 0.607 0.111
12.0 -0.315 -0.214 0.894 0.611 -0.058 0.160 0.552 0.097
12.5 -0.378 -0.133 0.887 0.635 -0.086 0.172 0.444 0.105
13.0 -0.404 -0.131 0.943 0.632 -0.097 0.137 0.355 0.104
13.5 -0.495 -0.097 0.862 0.624 -0.128 0.136 0.253 0.084
14.0 -0.551 -0.088 0.881 0.592 -0.156 0.090 0.193 -0.006
14.5 -0.628 -0.027 0.901 0.653 -0.127 0.133 0.152 -0.076
15.0 -0.797 -0.104 0.737 0.457 -0.178 0.075 0.153 -0.174
15.5 -0.859 -0.133 0.661 0.545 -0.201 0.079 0.229 -0.163
16.0 -0.798 -0.123 0.714 0.483 -0.154 0.104 0.344 -0.131
16.5 -0.709 -0.123 0.668 0.563 -0.126 0.118 0.404 -0.100
17.0 -0.699 -0.165 0.663 0.511 -0.127 0.115 0.459 -0.121
17.5 -0.684 -0.151 0.685 0.497 -0.042 0.035 0.511 -0.127
18.0 -0.645 -0.183 0.673 0.487 -0.078 0.013 0.545 -0.124
18.5 -0.572 -0.239 0.740 0.503 -0.079 0.002 0.564 -0.142
19.0 -0.539 -0.282 0.744 0.451 -0.127 0.040 0.635 -0.142
19.5 -0.593 -0.251 0.747 0.488 0.068 0.041 0.676 -0.166
20.0 -0.620 -0.281 0.741 0.421 0.020 0.077 0.782 -0.173
20.5 -0.613 -0.345 0.730 0.423 0.047 0.805 -0.190
21.0 -0.639 -0.367 0.687 0.338 0.240 0.065 0.884 -0.184
21.5 -0.635 -0.445 0.618 0.329 0.290 0.053 0.859 -0.257
22.0 -0.698 -0.485 0.631 0.277 0.470 0.048 0.874 -0.248
22.5 -0.768 -0.465 0.604 0.157 0.474 0.045 0.886 -0.284
23.0 -0.743 -0.441 0.735 0.040 0.065 0.929 -0.126
23.5 -0.810 -0.420 0.798 -0.108 0.010 0.920 -0.102
24.0 -0.903 -0.364 0.822 -0.200 0.193 0.081 0.922 -0.058
24.5 -0.926 -0.409 0.844 -0.233 0.192 0.041 0.889 -0.104
25.0 -0.944 -0.443 0.839 -0.250 0.178 0.034 0.907 -0.127
25.5 -0.952 -0.478 0.878 -0.324 0.180 0.039 0.922 -0.180
26.0 -0.923 -0.495 0.858 -0.319 0.064 0.886 -0.184
26.5 -0.906 -0.521 0.829 -0.333 0.074 0.923 -0.217
A-12
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
Height from Bottom (feet)
Vertical Profile
#1 Radius
(inches)
Vertical Profile
#2 Radius
(inches)
Vertical Profile
#3 Radius
(inches)
Vertical Profile
#4 Radius
(inches)
Vertical Profile
#5 Radius
(inches)
Vertical Profile
#6 Radius
(inches)
Vertical Profile
#7 Radius
(inches)
Vertical Profile
#8 Radius
(inches)
27.0 -0.938 -0.567 0.831 -0.241 0.221 0.034 0.953 -0.261
27.5 -0.964 -0.560 0.796 -0.147 0.100 0.952 -0.265
28.0 -0.944 -0.605 0.738 -0.068 0.140 1.007 -0.267
28.5 -0.954 -0.612 0.756 0.008 0.374 0.124 1.021 -0.305
29.0 -0.965 -0.621 0.761 0.038 0.094 1.015 -0.302
29.5 -1.000 -0.656 0.711 0.115 -0.011 1.039 -0.344
30.0 -1.013 -0.731 0.666 0.174 0.998 -0.382
30.5 -1.074 -0.753 0.587 0.216 0.583 0.992 -0.384
31.0 -1.045 -0.728 0.557 0.388 0.428 0.266 1.036 -0.378
31.5 -1.057 -0.729 0.497 0.318 0.171 1.008 -0.330
32.0 -1.077 -0.688 0.547 0.404 0.172 1.035 -0.248
32.5 -1.067 -0.644 0.613 0.465 0.521 0.139 1.010 -0.197
33.0 -1.115 -0.643 0.619 0.293 0.483 0.049 0.995 -0.141
33.5 -1.101 -0.591 0.601 0.327 0.445 0.912 -0.142
34.0 -1.107 -0.553 0.625 0.333 0.428 0.896 -0.107
34.5 -1.166 -0.567 0.622 0.334 0.393 0.833 -0.102
35.0 -1.203 -0.557 0.611 0.267 0.355 0.062 0.804 -0.092
35.5 -1.276 -0.570 0.610 0.234 0.304 0.047 0.787 -0.101
36.0 -1.387 -0.609 0.538 0.134 0.194 -0.094 0.728 -0.155
Minimum: -1.387 -1.293 -0.429 -0.333 -0.207 -0.404 -0.088 -0.384
Maximum: 0.296 0.119 0.944 0.653 0.583 0.314 1.151 0.217 Plumbness: 1.683 1.412 1.373 0.986 0.790 0.719 1.240 0.601 Allowed: 4.885 4.885 4.885 4.885 4.885 4.885 4.885 4.885
Condition: Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory
A-13
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
Vertical Profile #1 Vertical Profile #2 Vertical Profile #3 Vertical Profile #4
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
-4 -2 0 2 4 0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
-4 -2 0 2 4 0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
-4 -2 0 2 4 0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
-4 -2 0 2 4
A-14
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
Vertical Profile #5 Vertical Profile #6 Vertical Profile #7 Vertical Profile #8
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
-4 -2 0 2 4 0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
-4 -2 0 2 4 0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
-4 -2 0 2 4 0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
-4 -2 0 2 4
A-15
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
(Shell Roundness Evaluation)
Diameter (inches) Condition
Diameter (inches) Condition
Diameter (inches) Condition
Diameter (inches) Condition
0.0 0.072 Satisfactory -0.732 Satisfactory -0.455 Satisfactory -0.194 Satisfactory
0.5 -0.118 Satisfactory -0.333 Satisfactory -0.363 Satisfactory 0.008 Satisfactory
1.0 0.000 Satisfactory 0.000 Satisfactory 0.000 Satisfactory 0.000 Satisfactory
1.5 -0.014 Satisfactory 0.224 Satisfactory 0.218 Satisfactory 0.017 Satisfactory
2.0 -0.302 Satisfactory 0.177 Satisfactory 0.598 Satisfactory 0.172 Satisfactory
2.5 -0.206 Satisfactory 0.154 Satisfactory 0.948 Satisfactory 0.286 Satisfactory
3.0 -0.006 Satisfactory 0.033 Satisfactory 1.204 Satisfactory 0.281 Satisfactory
3.5 0.093 Satisfactory 0.002 Satisfactory 1.392 Satisfactory 0.293 Satisfactory
4.0 0.067 Satisfactory -0.206 Satisfactory 1.592 Satisfactory 0.287 Satisfactory
4.5 0.088 Satisfactory -0.188 Satisfactory 1.696 Satisfactory 0.304 Satisfactory
5.0 0.159 Satisfactory -0.254 Satisfactory 1.879 Satisfactory 0.304 Satisfactory
5.5 0.195 Satisfactory -0.395 Satisfactory 1.830 Satisfactory 0.295 Satisfactory
6.0 0.213 Satisfactory -0.727 Satisfactory 1.708 Satisfactory 0.173 Satisfactory
6.5 0.266 Satisfactory -1.020 Satisfactory 1.700 Satisfactory 0.183 Satisfactory
7.0 0.145 Satisfactory -0.992 Satisfactory 1.562 Satisfactory NA
7.5 0.091 Satisfactory -0.777 Satisfactory 1.559 Satisfactory 0.312 Satisfactory
8.0 0.116 Satisfactory -0.562 Satisfactory 1.788 Satisfactory NA
8.5 0.059 Satisfactory -0.497 Satisfactory 1.731 Satisfactory 0.527 Satisfactory
9.0 -0.011 Satisfactory -0.387 Satisfactory 1.694 Satisfactory 0.587 Satisfactory
9.5 -0.082 Satisfactory -0.325 Satisfactory 1.744 Satisfactory 0.680 Satisfactory
10.0 -0.168 Satisfactory -0.264 Satisfactory 1.682 Satisfactory 0.682 Satisfactory
10.5 -0.214 Satisfactory -0.168 Satisfactory 1.643 Satisfactory 0.693 Satisfactory
11.0 -0.288 Satisfactory -0.176 Satisfactory 1.595 Satisfactory 0.699 Satisfactory
11.5 -0.321 Satisfactory -0.069 Satisfactory 1.528 Satisfactory 0.717 Satisfactory
12.0 -0.372 Satisfactory -0.054 Satisfactory 1.446 Satisfactory 0.708 Satisfactory
12.5 -0.465 Satisfactory 0.039 Satisfactory 1.331 Satisfactory 0.741 Satisfactory
13.0 -0.501 Satisfactory 0.006 Satisfactory 1.298 Satisfactory 0.736 Satisfactory
13.5 -0.623 Satisfactory 0.039 Satisfactory 1.115 Satisfactory 0.708 Satisfactory
14.0 -0.707 Satisfactory 0.001 Satisfactory 1.073 Satisfactory 0.587 Satisfactory
14.5 -0.755 Satisfactory 0.106 Satisfactory 1.054 Satisfactory 0.577 Satisfactory
15.0 -0.974 Satisfactory -0.029 Satisfactory 0.889 Satisfactory 0.283 Satisfactory
15.5 -1.059 Satisfactory -0.054 Satisfactory 0.890 Satisfactory 0.382 Satisfactory
16.0 -0.952 Satisfactory -0.019 Satisfactory 1.058 Satisfactory 0.352 Satisfactory
16.5 -0.836 Satisfactory -0.006 Satisfactory 1.072 Satisfactory 0.463 Satisfactory
17.0 -0.825 Satisfactory -0.050 Satisfactory 1.122 Satisfactory 0.390 Satisfactory
17.5 -0.726 Satisfactory -0.116 Satisfactory 1.196 Satisfactory 0.371 Satisfactory
18.0 -0.723 Satisfactory -0.170 Satisfactory 1.218 Satisfactory 0.363 Satisfactory
18.5 -0.651 Satisfactory -0.238 Satisfactory 1.304 Satisfactory 0.361 Satisfactory
19.0 -0.665 Satisfactory -0.242 Satisfactory 1.379 Satisfactory 0.310 Satisfactory
19.5 -0.526 Satisfactory -0.210 Satisfactory 1.423 Satisfactory 0.322 Satisfactory
20.0 -0.600 Satisfactory -0.205 Satisfactory 1.523 Satisfactory 0.248 Satisfactory
20.5 NA -0.298 Satisfactory 1.536 Satisfactory 0.233 Satisfactory
21.0 -0.399 Satisfactory -0.301 Satisfactory 1.572 Satisfactory 0.154 Satisfactory
21.5 -0.345 Satisfactory -0.392 Satisfactory 1.477 Satisfactory 0.073 Satisfactory
22.0 -0.227 Satisfactory -0.436 Satisfactory 1.505 Satisfactory 0.029 Satisfactory
22.5 -0.293 Satisfactory -0.420 Satisfactory 1.490 Satisfactory -0.127 Satisfactory
23.0 NA -0.376 Satisfactory 1.664 Satisfactory -0.086 Satisfactory
23.5 NA -0.410 Satisfactory 1.718 Satisfactory -0.210 Satisfactory
24.0 -0.711 Satisfactory -0.283 Satisfactory 1.744 Satisfactory -0.258 Satisfactory
24.5 -0.735 Satisfactory -0.367 Satisfactory 1.733 Satisfactory -0.337 Satisfactory
25.0 -0.766 Satisfactory -0.409 Satisfactory 1.746 Satisfactory -0.377 Satisfactory
25.5 -0.772 Satisfactory -0.439 Satisfactory 1.800 Satisfactory -0.504 Satisfactory
26.0 NA -0.431 Satisfactory 1.744 Satisfactory -0.504 Satisfactory
26.5 NA -0.448 Satisfactory 1.752 Satisfactory -0.549 Satisfactory
27.0 -0.717 Satisfactory -0.533 Satisfactory 1.784 Satisfactory -0.502 Satisfactory
Height from Bottom (feet)
Vertical Profiles #1 and #5
Vertical Profiles #2 and #6
Vertical Profiles #3 and #7
Vertical Profiles #4 and #8
A-16
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
Diameter (inches) Condition
Diameter (inches) Condition
Diameter (inches) Condition
Diameter (inches) Condition
Height from Bottom (feet)
Vertical Profiles #1 and #5
Vertical Profiles #2 and #6
Vertical Profiles #3 and #7
Vertical Profiles #4 and #8
27.5 NA -0.460 Satisfactory 1.748 Satisfactory -0.413 Satisfactory
28.0 NA -0.466 Satisfactory 1.746 Satisfactory -0.335 Satisfactory
28.5 -0.580 Satisfactory -0.489 Satisfactory 1.778 Satisfactory -0.297 Satisfactory
29.0 NA -0.527 Satisfactory 1.776 Satisfactory -0.263 Satisfactory
29.5 NA -0.667 Satisfactory 1.750 Satisfactory -0.229 Satisfactory
30.0 NA NA 1.664 Satisfactory -0.209 Satisfactory
30.5 -0.492 Satisfactory NA 1.579 Satisfactory -0.168 Satisfactory
31.0 -0.617 Satisfactory -0.462 Satisfactory 1.593 Satisfactory 0.010 Satisfactory
31.5 NA -0.558 Satisfactory 1.505 Satisfactory -0.012 Satisfactory
32.0 NA -0.516 Satisfactory 1.582 Satisfactory 0.155 Satisfactory
32.5 -0.546 Satisfactory -0.505 Satisfactory 1.623 Satisfactory 0.267 Satisfactory
33.0 -0.632 Satisfactory -0.594 Satisfactory 1.614 Satisfactory 0.152 Satisfactory
33.5 -0.656 Satisfactory NA 1.513 Satisfactory 0.185 Satisfactory
34.0 -0.679 Satisfactory NA 1.522 Satisfactory 0.226 Satisfactory
34.5 -0.773 Satisfactory NA 1.455 Satisfactory 0.232 Satisfactory
35.0 -0.849 Satisfactory -0.495 Satisfactory 1.415 Satisfactory 0.175 Satisfactory
35.5 -0.973 Satisfactory -0.522 Satisfactory 1.397 Satisfactory 0.132 Satisfactory
36.0 -1.193 Satisfactory -0.703 Satisfactory 1.266 Satisfactory -0.021 Satisfactory
A-17
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
Vertical Profiles # 1 & #5
Vertical Profiles # 2 & #6
Vertical Profiles # 3 & #7
Vertical Profiles # 4 & #8
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
-4 -2 0 2 4 0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
-4 -2 0 2 4 0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
-4 -2 0 2 4 0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
-4 -2 0 2 4
A-18
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
(Top View Overlay) a
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
1 Foot Elevation 18 Foot Elevation 36 Foot Elevation
A-19
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
B-1
O w ne r/
O pe ra to r:
In sp ec tio n F irm
D at e:
R ev is io n
N um be r:
R ev is io n D at e:
D ra w in g T itl e:
T an k D es cr ip tio n:
D ra w in g
N um be r:
Li ttl e R oc k
A F
B
In te rS pe c
LL
C
/2
5/
N
/A N
/A
T an k #1
F ac ili ty
8)
S -1
S he ll La yo ut
R em ar ks
/L eg en d:
S ea m is th e fir st s ea m le ft of th e fir st m an ho le le ft of th e st ai rw ay in th e fir st s he ll co ur se v ie w in g fr om th e ou ts id e.
T he n um be r in th e up pe r le ft co rn er o f e ac h pl at e id en tif ie s th e pl at e by th e co ur se a nd po si tio n of th e pl at e in th at c ou rs e.
0G R
A P
H
IC
S C
A
LE
D im en si on s ar e in fe et
1-
A
IN
S -1
2-
4-
5-
1-
3-
A
6"
M an ho le
IN
S
-2
IN
S -3
B-2
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report ne r/
O pe ra to r:
In sp ec tio n F irm
D at e:
R ev is io n
N um be r:
R ev is io n D at e:
D ra w in g T itl e:
T an k D es cr ip tio n:
D ra w in g
N um be r:
Li ttl e R oc k
A F
B
In te rS pe c
LL
C
/2
5/
N
/A N
/A
T an k #1
F ac ili ty
8)
S -2
S he ll La yo ut
R em ar ks
/L eg en d:
S ea m is th e fir st s ea m le ft of th e ho le le ft of th e st ai rw ay in th e fir st s he ll co ur se v ie w in g fr om th e ou ts n um be r in th e up pe r le ft co rn er o f e ac h pl at e id en tif ie s th e pl at e by th e co ur se tio n of th e pl at e in th at c ou rs e.
0G R
A P
H
IC
S C
A
LE
D im en si on s ar e in fe et
1-
B
C
IN
S
-4
2-
3-
4-
5-
1-
D
E
F
A T
G
2-
3-
4-
5-
B
2"
R ec ei pt
L in e C
Is su e
Li ne
D
P lu g E
P lu g
F
P lu g
IN
S
-3
B-3
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report ne r/
O pe ra to r:
In sp ec tio n F irm
D at e:
R ev is io n
N um be r:
R ev is io n D at e:
D ra w in g T itl e:
T an k D es cr ip tio n:
D ra w in g
N um be r:
Li ttl e R oc k
A F
B
In te rS pe c
LL
C
/0
5/
N /A
N /A
T an k #1
F ac ili ty
8)
S -3
S he ll La yo ut
R em ar ks
/L eg en d:
S ea m is th e fir st s ea m le ft of th e ho le le ft of th e st ai rw ay in th e fir st s he ll co ur se v ie w in g fr om th e ou ts n um be r in th e up pe r le ft co rn er o f e ac h pl at e id en tif ie s th e pl at e by th e co ur se tio n of th e pl at e in th at c ou rs e.
0G R
A P
H
IC
S C
A
LE
D im en si on s ar e in fe et
1-
G
H
I
J
K L
O
IN
S -5
2-
3-
4-
5-
1-
P Q
R
IN
S
-62-
3-
4-
5-
G
P lu g H
H os e
C on ne ct io n
I -
P lu g
J
F oa m L in e
K
H ig h Le ve l S hu t-
O ff/
H ig h Le ve l A la rm
L
2"
H ig h Le ve l S hu t-
O ff/
H ig h Le ve l A la rm
M
B la nk ed V al ve
N
B la nk ed
V al ve O
W at er
D ra w -O ff P
B la nk ed V al ve
Q
Lo w
S uc tio n
Li ne
R
6" x
2" M an ho le
NM
B-4
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report ne r/
O pe ra to r:
In sp ec tio n F irm
D at e:
R ev is io n
N um be r:
R ev is io n D at e:
D ra w in g T itl e:
T an k D es cr ip tio n:
D ra w in g
N um be r:
Li ttl e R oc k
A F
B
In te rS pe c
LL
C
/2
5/
N
/A N
/A
T an k #1
F ac ili ty
8)
S -4
S he ll La yo ut
R em ar ks
/L eg en d:
S ea m is th e fir st s ea m le ft of th e ho le le ft of th e st ai rw ay in th e fir st s he ll co ur se v ie w in g fr om th e ou ts n um be r in th e up pe r le ft co rn er o f e ac h pl at e id en tif ie s th e pl at e by th e co ur se tio n of th e pl at e in th at c ou rs e.
0G R
A P
H
IC
S C
A
LE
D im en si on s ar e in fe et
1-
2-
3-
4-
5-
B-5
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
R em ar ks
/L eg en d:
O w ne r/
O pe ra to r:
In sp ec tio n F irm
D at e:
R ev is io n
N um be r:
R ev is io n D at e:
D ra w in g T itl e:
T an k D es cr ip tio n:
D ra w in g
N um be r:
Li ttl e R oc k
A F
B
In te rS pe c
LL
C
/2
5/
N
/A N
/A
T an k #1
F ac ili ty
8)
R -1
F ix ed R oo f L ay ou t
M ea su re d D ia m et er is
1.
fe et
F ix ed r oo f h as pl at es
0G R
A P
H
IC
S C
A
LE
D im en si on s ar e in fe et y x N W y x
N E y x
S E y xS W
X Y
O rie nt at io n
X Y
O rie nt at io n is in r ef er en ce to
P la n N or th
51 52
A
B
C
E F
D
G
H
A
E m er ge nc y
V en t B
4" M an w ay C
E m er ge nc y V en t
D
A T
G F lo at
G ui de W ire E
A
T G
F lo at F
A
T G
F lo at W ire G ui de
G
P lu g H
E
N R
A F
I -
S am pl e S til lin g W el l
J
V en t K
V
IT
O
W at er
T em pe ra tu re
L
2" C ap
6"
P at ch P la te s
K
J
I
L
L
L
B-6
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
C om pa ny
D ra w n
B y:
D at e:
R ev . N o.
S ca le
D ra w in g T itl e:
Li ttl e R oc k
A F
B
In te rS pe c
LL
C
/2
6/
N /A
1/ fe et
S ec on da ry C on ta in m en t
T an k #1
F ac
T an k
#2 F ac
T an k #3
F ac
T ra ns fe r/
T ru ck S ta nd
O ff
B as e R ec ei pt
O ff
B as e R ec ei pt
T ra ns fe r/ T ru ck
S ta nd
B-7
API-653 In‐Service Inspection Report
C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
C-6
C-7
D-1
D-2
E-1
E-2
E-3
E-4
E-5
E-6
E-7
NOTES:
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .