Attachment B-QASP Trash_ Recycle Waste Disposal.pdf

PDF 163 KB Posted

Attached to
S222-Solid Waste Removal Services for CAVHCS Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C24724Q0586
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 7

About this file

This document is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for a federal contract opportunity involving trash and recycling services for the Department of Veterans Affairs Tuskegee/Montgomery facilities.

The QASP outlines the government's roles and responsibilities, performance standards, incentives, and methods for monitoring contractor performance. Key requirements include the contractor providing tools, labor, and supervision for solid waste and cardboard removal services, with specific details on container sizes, pickup frequencies, and waste estimates for the Montgomery and Tuskegee campuses. The contractor will be evaluated on timely service calls, monthly reporting, invoicing, and overall service effectiveness. The government will use the QASP to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets, or fails to meet performance standards, which will impact contract options and past performance assessments.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to S222-Solid Waste Removal Services for CAVHCS, newest first.
File Type Posted
36C24724P0862_1 Award Notice.docx DOCX document
Award Notification- Beta Sam 36C24724P0862 Beta Sam.docx DOCX document
36C24724Q0586_1.docx DOCX document
Attachment A-Statement of Work.pdf PDF
Attachment C- Wage Determination_Montgomery.pdf PDF
Attachment D-FAR PROVISIONS AND CLAUSES.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

For: Trash and Recycle Services for Tuskegee/Montgomery Contract Number: TBD

Contract Description: The VA Tuskegee/Montgomery has a need for Non-Regulated Refuse Disposal and Glass/Plastic Recycling Services located within the VA. Non-Regulated Refuse will be transported and disposed/recycled in compliance with Federal, State and Local regulation

Non-Regulated Refuse Disposal and Glass/Plastic Recycling Services consist of physically collecting and disposing/recycling of refuse on a regularly scheduled basis. Individual weight tickets for Non-Regulated Refuse and recyclable items are required as described in specifications. Contractor will not make any change in where Non-Regulated Refuse is hauled to without prior written approval by the Contracting Officer.

Contractor’s name: TBD

1. PURPOSE

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:

• What will be monitored.

• How monitoring will take place.

• Who will conduct the monitoring.

• How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.

This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.

This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis.

However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.

2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

a. Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.

Assigned CO:

Organization or Agency:

b. Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.

Primary COR: Darrell Morgan Department of Veterans Affairs 215 Perry Hill Road Montgomery, AL. 36109 Alternate COR: Byron Straughn Department of Veterans Affairs 215 Perry Hill Road Montgomery, AL. 36109

c. Other Key Government Personnel: Byron Straughn, Assistant Chief, EMS

3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES

The following employees of the contractor serve as Contractor’s Program Manager(s) for this contract.

a. Program Manager: TBD

b. Other Contractor Personnel: TBD

4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.

Task ID Indicator Standard Acceptable

Quality Level Method of

Surveillance Incentive

Rating

Maintenance and Support

Vendor responds to service calls

Replacement of damaged containers will take place within 24 hours after the service call is made.

Replacement completed within standard 100% of the time

Periodic Inspection

See Paragraph

Excellent = < 24 hours

Satisfactory = 24 hours

Unsatisfactory = > 24 hours

Monthly Reports

Vendor to provide monthly poundage summary of trash/waste disposed of.

Vendor to provide report of how much waste was disposed of within monthly timeframe

Must be provided at least 30 days after last work day of month.

Periodic Inspection

See Paragraph

Satisfactory = reports received on time

Unsatisfactory = not received on time or not at all

Monthly Reports

Vendor to provide monthly summary of recycling poundage disposed of.

Vendor to provide report of how much recycling was disposed of within monthly timeframe

Must be provided at least 30 days after last work day of month.

Periodic Inspection

See Paragraph

Satisfactory = reports received on time

Unsatisfactory = not received on time or not at all

Monthly Reports

Vendor to provide accurate and timely monthly invoices

Vendor to provide accurate and timely invoices clearly stating all dates, quantities, weights and rates of services received monthly

Must be provided at least 30 days after last work day of month.

Periodic Inspection

See Paragraph

Satisfactory = reports received on time

Unsatisfactory = not received on time or not at all

Task ID Indicator Standard Acceptable

Quality Level Method of

Surveillance Incentive

Rating

Daily Reports

All waste containers properly serviced as indicated in contract

SOW

Waste containers will be serviced as outlined in

SOW

schedule

100% compliance

Validated User/Customer Complaint

See Paragraph

Satisfactory = 95% or greater effectiveness level

Unsatisfactory = >%95 effectiveness level

5. INCENTIVES

The Government shall use exercise of option period and past performance as incentives. Incentives shall be based on exceeding, meeting, or not meeting performance standards.

6. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE

Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.

PERIODIC INSPECTION: Inspections may be scheduled quarterly.

Performance Standard ID – 1,2,3,4

VALIDATED USER/CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS. (Relies on the patient to identify deficiencies. Complaints are then investigated and validated.)

Performance Standard ID – 5,

7. RATINGS

Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used:

Excellent = Exceeds Standards Satisfactory = Meets Standards Unsatisfactory = Fails To Meet Standards

8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE

a. ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE

The Government shall document positive performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action.

b. UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE

When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.

When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), and present it to the contractor's program manager with a copy to the Contracting Officer.

The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COR. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.

Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.

9. FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT

a. Frequency of Measurement.

During contract performance, the COR will periodically analyze whether the negotiated frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed.

b. Frequency of Performance Assessment Meetings.

The COR shall meet with the contractor monthly to assess performance and shall provide a written assessment.

<After award, both the contractor’s Program Manager and the COR shall sign this document.>

Signature – Contractor Program Manager

Signature – Contracting Officer’s Representative

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .