Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 359 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cylindrical OD Grinder (Updated 9/2/2021) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911KF-21-Q-0038
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for a CNC cylindrical OD grinder. The past performance questionnaire relates to solicitation W911KF-21-Q-0038 and requests information about a contractor's previous work on similar projects. It includes rating scales and questions about customer satisfaction, schedule adherence, technical requirements, responsiveness, and overall assessment. The federal contract opportunity is also for solicitation W911KF-21-Q-0038 and seeks a CNC cylindrical OD grinder for delivery and installation at Anniston Army Depot. Responses are due by the solicitation closing date, and the procurement is full and open competition. The North American Industry Classification code is 333517 and size standard is 500 employees. The Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Detroit Arsenal is the issuing agency.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 21Q0038 Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| SOW for OD Grinding Equipment Updated 2SEP21.pdf | ||
| W911KF-21-Q-0038 Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - SioanForm380-2 Personal Data Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 -DD Form 1423 - CDRL Outside Dimension Grinders (1).pdf | ||
| Attachment 7- DD Form 1664 for Outside Dimension Grinder.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Evidence of Authority To Sign Offers.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Request for Technical Literature.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - SOW OD Grinder.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire This Questionnaire relates to solicitation requirements for CNC Vertical Machine Center
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE –
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection for Anniston Army Depot.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail Director of Contracting Anniston Army Depot 7 Frankford Ave.
Anniston, AL 36201-4199
ATTN: Kishawn Banks, Contract Specialist Phone: 256-235-6231 Email: kishawn.n.banks.civ@mail.mil
Desired Response Date is the closing date of this solicitation.
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
Proposed prime contractor
1. OFFEROR NAME OFFEROR ADDRESS
Contractor Name and Address and contract/project information being addressed in this questionnaire
2. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO.:
3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
7. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT REQUIREMENTS:
W911KF-21-Q-0038
8. Point of Contact: Provide the following information for the company and individual completing this questionnaire:
Company/Agency Name and Address:
Name of person completing this questionnaire:
Title:
Role/responsibility for the effort being addressed in the survey:
Phone Number:
E-Mail:
Rating Scale:
EXCELLENT: Superior performance. Objectives/requirements essentially always achieved or exceeded, with inconsequential exceptions.
GOOD: Highly satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements achieved with only rare exceptions, and the exceptions had minor consequences.
ADEQUATE: Generally satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements generally achieved with occasional exceptions, and, in most cases, the exceptions had minor consequences.
MARGINAL: Occasionally unsatisfactory performance of significance.
Objectives/requirements were not fully achieved, with significant consequences in some cases.
POOR: Frequently unsatisfactory performance of significance. Objectives/requirements frequently not achieved, with significant consequences.
UNKNOWN: Unable to rate, not observed, or not a significant aspect of performance.
9. Questionnaire: Please indicate the rating that best reflects your experience with this contractor and provide a short narrative addressing the basis for the ratings assigned. Address compliance with requirements, actual performance, problems encountered and problem resolution. Use additional sheets if necessary. Excellent contract management, attention to Detail and Quality Assurance.
A. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s business-like concern for its customers, including such factors as dependability, flexibility, early problem identification, communication, and responsiveness.
B. Schedule – Assess the contractor’s adherence to delivery commitments; responsiveness to requests for accelerations; and early identification and mitigation of schedule slippages.
C. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s performance in conforming to contract specifications:
D. Technical Responsiveness – Assess the contractor’s ability to identify and resolve technical problems effectively and in a timely manner, including correction of faulty work and warranty claims:
Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown
Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown
Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown
Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown
E. Overall Assessment: Provide your overall assessment.
Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown
Past Performance Questionnaire
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .