ATTACHMENT 4 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.DOCX
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CyberSpace Capabilities Developer Technician (CCDT) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W9124921R0005
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for evaluating contractor performance on prior federal contracts. The template requests information on contract details including the contractor, contract number, type and costs; customer agency details; evaluator details; and ratings for technical, program management, cost, small business, and narrative performance factors. Respondents are asked to explain marginal or unsatisfactory ratings and note any partial or complete contract terminations. The purpose is to collect past performance references to evaluate contractors for a new CyberSpace Capabilities Developer Technician contract from the Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Eustis for personnel, supervision and services to perform defined duties except for government furnished property and services, in accordance with contract standards.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W9124921R0005 A0002.pdf | ||
| W9124921R0005 A0001.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT 2 - CONSENT FORM FOR RELEASE OF PAST PERFORMANCE - Copy.DOCX | DOCX document | |
| W9124921R0005 Solicitation.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT 3 - SPECIFIC RELEVANT CONTRACT REFERENCE SHEETS - Copy.DOCX | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT 6 - WAGE DETERMINATION - FT. GORDON.PDF | ||
| ATTACHMENT 5- Pricing Worksheet_v2_26Oct2020.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 4
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
1. Contractor: _______________________________________________________________________________
1. Cage Code: _________________________________
1. Contract number: _______________________________________
1. Contract type: ______________________________
1. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
1. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
1. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
1. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
1. Description of service provided: ______________________________________________________________
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
1. Customer or agency name: _______________________________________________________________________________________
1. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _______________________________________________________________________________________
1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
1. Evaluator's name: ______________________________________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's title: ______________________________________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ______________________________________________________________________________________
1. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
S SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
US UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
NA NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
The questions shown below should be tailored to the Factors/Subfactors of the instant acquisition.
| Technical Performance |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| NA |
T1. Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.
T2. Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts
T3. Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts
T4. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
T5. Ability to implement current standard practices for computer hardware design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control
T6. Ability to implement current standard practices for computer software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control
T7. Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures
| Program Management |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| NA |
P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements
P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations
P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management
P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
| Transition/phase-in |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| NA |
T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.
T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.
| Employee Retention/Attraction |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| NA |
E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.
| Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| NA |
S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan
S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.
| Cost Performance |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| NA |
C1. Accuracy in forecasting contract costs
C2. Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs
C3. Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur
C4. Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting
1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
| Yes____ | Default____ | Convenience____ | Pending Terminations____ |
| No ____ |
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Mailing Address:
Or FAX/E-mail to:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .