ATTACHMENT 3 - SPECIFIC RELEVANT CONTRACT REFERENCE SHEETS - Copy.DOCX
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CyberSpace Capabilities Developer Technician (CCDT) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W9124921R0005
About this file
This document contains a template for offerors to provide past performance references relevant to a solicitation for CyberSpace Capabilities Developer Technician services. Offerors must list prior contracts demonstrating experience providing similar services, including the contract number and award/completion dates. For each reference, offerors must provide pricing details showing original and final costs, as well as any schedule changes. Contact information is required for the procuring contracting officer, administrative contracting officer, and government technical representative. Offerors must explain the relevancy of each past performance reference and describe objectives, costs, schedule performance, and any corrective actions taken. The template also requests disclosure of any cure notices, show cause letters, or discrepancies received. This solicitation is issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Eustis to provide CyberSpace Capabilities Developer Technician services.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W9124921R0005 A0002.pdf | ||
| W9124921R0005 A0001.pdf | ||
| W9124921R0005 Solicitation.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT 6 - WAGE DETERMINATION - FT. GORDON.PDF | ||
| ATTACHMENT 5- Pricing Worksheet_v2_26Oct2020.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTACHMENT 4 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.DOCX | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT 2 - CONSENT FORM FOR RELEASE OF PAST PERFORMANCE - Copy.DOCX | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 3
Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet
The offeror shall provide documentation outlining the offeror’s past performance with contracts, as a prime or major subcontractor, which is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this Solicitation. The submittal shall include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and how it was determined that the work performed previously was the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the work specified by this solicitation. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate.
1. Contract Number, Award Date and Contract type.
2. Price/Cost – original awarded AND final (or projected final, if contract is current).
3. Delivery Schedule – original AND final (or projected final, if the contract is current).
4. Contact Information - Address and telephone number for the Government (or commercial) procuring contracting activity AND contract administrative activity (if applicable). Name, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address for the following:
5. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
6. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
7. Government or commercial technical representative or COR Identify in specific detail for each contract listed, why or how you consider that effort relevant or similar to the effort required by this solicitation. In determining relevancy, consideration should be given but not limited to such things as product/service similarity, product/service, size and complexity, contract type, contract environment, division of company proposing, and subcontractor interaction.
8. Narrative explanation on each contract listed describing the objectives achieved and the following data: any cost growth or schedule delays encountered. For any Government contracts which did not/do not meet original requirements with regard to cost, schedule, or technical performance, a brief explanation of the reason(s) for such shortcomings and any demonstrated corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence. Offerors may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk. Merely having problems does not automatically equate to a Limited or a No Confidence rating, since the problems encountered may have been on a more complex program, or an offeror may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to overcome the problems encountered. The offeror is required to clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. This may allow the offeror to be considered a Substantial Confidence or Satisfactory Confidence candidate.
9. Negative Performance Documentation. A copy of any cure notices, show cause letters or contract discrepancy reports received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action by the offeror or proposed subcontractor.
10. Completion Date/Delivery Schedule. The contractor shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary.
1.
Contract Number __________________________ Award Date________________________________ Contract type_______________________________
2. Completion Date/Delivery Schedule.
Original completion/delivery date ______________________________________________ Revised completion/delivery date ______________________________________________
3. Price/Cost – original awarded price__________________________________________
4. Modified Price/Cost - ____________________________________________________
5. Completion Date or Delivery Schedule – original AND final (or projected final, if the contract is current). _______________________________________________________
6. Changed Dates - ________________________________________________________
7. Contact Information - Address and telephone number for the Government (or commercial) procuring contracting activity AND contract administrative activity (if applicable). Name, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address for the following:
8. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO).
Address: _____________________________________________________________ Phone Number: _______________________________________________________ Fax Number: _________________________________________________________ E-Mail Address: ______________________________________________________
9. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO).
Address: _____________________________________________________________ Phone Number: _______________________________________________________ Fax Number: _________________________________________________________ E-Mail Address: ______________________________________________________
10. Government or commercial technical representative or COR.
Address: ____________________________________________________________ Phone Number: _______________________________________________________ Fax Number: _________________________________________________________ E-Mail Address: _______________________________________________________
11. Relevancy Description.__________________________________________________
12. Narrative explanation.__________________________________________________
13. Negative Performance Documentation.______________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .