Attachment 4 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.doc

DOC document 66 KB Posted

Attached to
Water Treatment for HVAC Systems Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA449721R0027
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal contractor. The questionnaire requests performance ratings and commentary for a contractor that provided water treatment services for HVAC systems under contract number FA449721R0027 with the Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command. The services included controlling corrosion, slime, and algae in condensers, thermal ice storage systems, closed loop heating and cooling systems, gas-fired heating hot water systems, and water softeners at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware. The questionnaire asks the respondent to rate the contractor's performance, management, quality control, timeliness, problem-solving, scheduling, and overall performance. It also inquires if the contractor was issued any cure notices, would be awarded future work, and is included in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Water Treatment for HVAC Systems, newest first.
File Type Posted
Solicitation HVAC Water Treatment v2.pdf PDF
HVAC Site Visit Questions.pdf PDF
DAFB July 2021 Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - FY22-FY26 PWS-H2O Treatmt.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - BID SCHEDULE.xls XLS spreadsheet
Solicitation HVAC Water Treatment.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation Number: FA449721R0027

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent:

_____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________

Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________

Fax Number:

Email Address: _____________________

C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

Lauren Reed-Smart

Contracting Officer/ 436 CONS

639 Atlantic St

Dover AFB, DE 19902

Fax: 302-677-2907 Phone: 302-677-5211

Email: Lauren.Reed-Smart@us.af.mil D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
13.
Met established project schedules.
14.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.
17.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
22.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
23.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
24.
Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES/NO
25.
Did the contractor perform water treatment for HVAC systems for this contract?
YES/NO
26.
Is the contractor capable of servicing a complex of large facilities (100) comparable to an Air Force base?
YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________

Remarks:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

A4 - 3

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .