Attachment 01 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 191 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FMO Drayage Services - Italy Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W564KV-22-R-0007
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation. The U.S. Army 409th Contracting Support Brigade is seeking drayage distribution services for Government-owned furniture and domestic appliances from warehouses in Livorno and Vicenza, Italy. The services include installation and removal of domestic appliances for Army Family and Unaccompanied Personnel Housing as well as warehouse augmentation and preparation of furniture and appliances for reissue. Respondents to the past performance questionnaire are asked to evaluate offerors on recent and relevant contracts regarding compliance, project management, timeliness, customer satisfaction and provide any other comments by April 14, 2022. The solicitation number for the drayage services is W564KV-22-R-0007.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W564KV-22-R-0007 Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| W564KV22R0007 Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 01 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| W564KV22R0007 Drayage Solicitation Questions Italy.pdf | ||
| Attachment 03 Certification of Capability to Provide Adequate Staffing.pdf | ||
| Attachment 04 Estimated Workload Data Italy (6July).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 04 Estimated Workload Data Italy.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 02 Historical Workload Data 2018-2021 Italy.pdf | ||
| Attachment 12 Cubic Meter Listing.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W564KV22R0007.pdf | ||
| Attachment 03 Certification of Capability to Provide Adequate Staffing.pdf | ||
| Attachment 11 Addresses and Radius.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Performance Assessment
Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter
409th Contracting Support Brigade Theater Contracting Center
UNIT 23156
APO AE 09227
March 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Quote (RFQ) W564KV-22-Q-0016 FMO Drayage Services - Italy
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army 409th Contracting Support Brigade is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFQ. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 484210. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.
Please complete the enclosure and return to the 409th Contracting Support Brigade Theater Contracting Center no later than 15 days after receipt of request or the proposal due date, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to the Contract Specialist, Mr. Warren Stropes, warren.l.stropes.civ@army.mil and the Contracting Officer, Ms. Shea Korth, shea.korth2.civ@army.mil.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the Contract Specialist or the Contracting Officer identified above.
Sincerely, Shea Korth Contracting Officer mailto:warren.l.stropes.civ@army.mil mailto:shea.korth2.civ@army.mil
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
| 2022-04-14T14:24:17+0200 | |
| KORTH.SHEA.1157919373 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .