Attachment_III_-_QASP_Report.pdf
PDF 186 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Janitorial Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- AG-32SD-RFQ-15-MD06
About this file
Attachment III-QASP Report
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q_ _A's_(5-27-2015).pdf | ||
| Attachment_I_-_Performance_Work_Statement.pdf | ||
| Attachment_V_-_Service_Wage_Rates _Kerr_Co..pdf | ||
| AG-32SD-RFQ-15-MD06.pdf | ||
| Attachment_II_-_Matrix_of_Services.pdf | ||
| Attachment_IV_-_Map-Layout_of_Buildings.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment III
Janitorial Services
Appendix B.
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan and Performance Measure Record
USDA, ARS, PA
Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory
Kerrville, Texas
RFQ No.: AG-32SD-RFQ-14-MD06
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
Solicitation Number AG-32SD-RFQ-15-MD06
Appendix B.
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN AND PERFORMANCE MEASURE
RECORD
(Insert Contract Name)
Objective: This quality assurance surveillance plan (QASP) serves as the principal basis for assessing overall performance quality by the contractor. This document will be used by the Government to assess the effectiveness of the Contractor's performance. This QASP provides the methodology by which the Contractor's performance will be monitored to determine compliance with established performance objectives and to establish benchmarks that ensure a quantifiable basis for measuring effectiveness. This plan is designed so that surveillance is limited to that which is necessary to verify the Contractor is performing satisfactorily and relates directly to performance objectives of the performance objectives identified in the SOW. Monitoring will be continuous, but performance ratings will be determined no more frequently than on a quarterly basis. The Contractor will be kept informed of their performance and ratings by the Facilities Representative with a copy furnished to the Contracting Officer.
Performance Rating Criteria: Performance Standards Conformance
Excellent – Problems that are encountered are minor and resolved in a highly effective manner.
Acceptable – Problems encountered are minor and resolved in a satisfactory manner.
Unacceptable – Re-performance or rework required; substantial problems were encountered and resolved in a less than satisfactory manner and/or 2 or more complaints noted during the rating period.
Criterion
Number
Tasks/Deliverables Method Of
Surveillance
Performance Rating
1 3.1 Clean Restrooms Visual
Inspection
2 3.2 Clean Offices Visual
3 3.3 Clean Laboratory Visual
4 3.4 Clean Hallways Visual
5 3.5 Clean Common Areas Visual
6 3.6 Clean Interior Entrances Visual
7 3.7 Clean Windows Visual
8 3.8 Bi-Annual Floor Clean Visual
Solicitation Number AG-32SD-RFQ-15-MD06
(Facility Representative)
Concur/Do Not Concur
Location Site Manager (LSM) or Contracting Officer
Further explanation provided here for Non-concurrence.
| Attachments Options.pdf |
| Appendix B. QASP Report.pdf |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .