Past_Performance.pdf

PDF 36 KB Posted

Attached to
Greenhouse Roof Panel Replacement Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
AG-32SC-S-17-0022
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Central Program Planning Coordination and Support

About this file

Attachment 5 - SF 1420, Past/Present Evaluation Form

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Greenhouse Roof Panel Replacement, newest first.
File Type Posted
AG-32SC-S-17-0022_Amd_000001.pdf PDF
Q&A.pdf PDF
Daily_Inspection_Form.pdf PDF
General_Specifications.pdf PDF
GH4_-_picture_3.jpg JPG image
GH4_-_picture_4.jpg JPG image
GH4_-_picture_5.jpg JPG image
ARS372.pdf PDF
ARS371.pdf PDF
GH4_-_picture_2.jpg JPG image
Statement_of_Work.pdf PDF
AG-32SC-S-17-0022.pdf PDF
AD-1197fill.pdf PDF
GH4_-_picture_1.jpg JPG image
of0306.pdf PDF
Person_Model_PII_Sheet_-_Revised_April_2015.pdf PDF
Hot_Work_Permit.pdf PDF
Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

(WHEN COMPLETED)

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS

1. CONTRACT NUMBER

1. CONTRACTOR (Name, address, and ZIP code) 3. TYPE

OF

CONTRACT

(Check)

4. COMPLEXITY OF WORK

DIFFICULT ROUTINE

5. DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION OF WORK

6. FISCAL

DATA

7. SIGNIFICANT

DATES

a. AMOUNT OF BASIC

CONTRACT

b. TOTAL AMOUNT OF

MODIFICATION

c. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES

ASSESSED

d. NET AMOUNT PAID

CONTRACTOR

a. DATE OF AWARD b. ORIGINAL CONTRACT

COMPLETION DATE

c. REVISED CONTRACT

COMPLETION DATE

d. DATE WORK ACCEPTED

8. TYPE AND EXTENT OF SUBCONTRACTING

PART II PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CONTRACT (Check appropriate box)

9. PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS OUTSTANDING SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY

a. QUALITY OF WORK

b. TIMELY PERFORMANCE

c. EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT

d. COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR STANDARDS

e. COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY STANDARDS

10. OVERALL EVALUATION

OUTSTANDING (Explain in Item 13, on reverse) SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY (Explain in Item 14, on reverse)

11. EVALUATED BY

a. ORGANIZATION (Type or print)

B. NAME AND TITLE (Type or print) C. SIGNATURE d. DATE

12. EVALUATION REVIEWED BY

d. DATEC. SIGNATUREB. NAME AND TITLE (Type or print)

a. ORGANIZATION (Type or print)

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

Previous edition is usable

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

(When completed)

STANDARD FORM 1420 (10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(b)

A. ADVERTISED

B. NEGOTIATED

CPFF

FIRM

FIXED

PRICE

OTHER

(Specify)

13. REMARKS ON OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE - AS INDICATED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE ON THIS CONTRACT. IF YOU CONSIDER THE CONTRACTOR TO BE OUTSTANDING, SET FORTH FACTUAL DATA SUPPORTING THIS OBSERVATION. THESE DATA MUST BE IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO ASSIST CONTRACTING OFFICERS IN SELECTING CONTRACTORS THAT HAVE DEMONSTRATED OUTSTANDING QUALITY OF WORK AND RELIABILITY. (Continue separate sheet, if needed.)

14. EXPLANATION OF UNSATISFACTORY EVALUATION. FOR EACH UNSATISFACTORY ELEMENT, PROVIDED FACTS CONCERNING SPECIFIC EVENTS OR ACTIONS TO JUSTIFY THE EVALUATION (e.g., extent of Government inspection required, rework required, subcontracting, cooperation of contractor, quality of workmen and adequacy of equipment). THESE DATA MUST BE IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO ASSIST CONTRACTING OFFICERS IN DETERMINING THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY.

(Continue on separate sheet, if needed.)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

(When completed)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

(When completed)

STANDARD FORM 1420 (10-83) BACK

RFP - TOC USNA FH.pdf
SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICE/COSTS

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .