Past_Performance_Survey_Attachment_3.doc
DOC document 52 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Satellite Imagery Acquisition, Archiving, Processing, Distribution and Management of Decision Support Systems Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- AG-3151-S-13-0009
About this file
Past Performance Survey (Word Version)
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_0002.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0001.pdf | ||
| AG-3151-S-13-0009.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 4
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY
Satellite Imagery Acquisition, Archiving, Processing, Distribution and Management of Decision Support Systems
Solicitation: AG-3151-S-13-0009
PLEASE EMAIL OR FAX WITHIN 2 DAYS OF RECEIPT TO: US DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
ATTN: Jeffrey McRae
EMAIL: Jeffrey.Mcrae@wdc.usda.gov FAX # 202-690-3320 or 1626
| FROM: (Offeror shall insert name, title, and address of reference) |
| DATE SURVEY COMPLETED: |
1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR):
2. CONTRACT NUMBER OR IDENTIFIER TYPE OF CONTRACT* AWARD DATE COMPLETION DATE VALUE
*INCLUDE ALL THAT APPLY: FIRM-FIXED PRICE (FFP); FIXED-PRICE, ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (FP-EPA); COST-PLUS-FIXED-FEE (CPFF), COMPLETION OR TERM; COST-PLUS-INCENTIVE-FEE (CPIF); COST-PLUS-AWARD -FEE (CPAF) ; COST; COST-SHARING; INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ); BASIC ORDERING AGREEMENT (BOA); FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE; REQUIREMENTS; LABOR HOUR; TIME AND MATERIALS (T&M); OTHER
3. DESCRIPTION(S) OF PRODUCTS OR SERVICES PROVIDED:
4. USING THE ATTACHED PERFORMANCE RATING GUIDELINES CHART, PLEASE RATE THE COMPANY LISTED IN 1 ABOVE ON THE CONTRACTS/PROJECTS LISTED IN 2 ABOVE. PROVIDE COMMENTS FOR RATINGS OF EXCELLENT, POOR, OR UNSATISFACTORY
4a. QUALITY OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
FORMCHECKBOX
Outstanding FORMCHECKBOX Excellent FORMCHECKBOX acceptable FORMCHECKBOX marginal FORMCHECKBOX Unacceptable Comments:
4b. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
FORMCHECKBOX
Outstanding FORMCHECKBOX Excellent FORMCHECKBOX acceptable FORMCHECKBOX marginal FORMCHECKBOX Unacceptable Comments:
4c. COST CONTROL
FORMCHECKBOX
Outstanding FORMCHECKBOX Excellent FORMCHECKBOX acceptable FORMCHECKBOX marginal FORMCHECKBOX Unacceptable Comments:
4d. BUSINESS RELATIONS:
FORMCHECKBOX
Outstanding FORMCHECKBOX Excellent FORMCHECKBOX acceptable FORMCHECKBOX marginal FORMCHECKBOX Unacceptable Comments:
5. WOULD YOU SELECT THIS FIRM AGAIN AND WHY? PLEASE INCLUDE COMMENTS REGARDING ANY SPECIFIC KEY PERSONNEL ON YOUR CONTRACT(S) THAT ARE RELEVANT. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NECESSARY.
6a. PRINTED/TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE OF PREPARER OF SURVEY RESPONSE:
6b. TELEPHONE NUMBER:
PERFORMANCE RATING GUIDELINES
IF A FACTOR IS NOT APPLICABLE (FOR EXAMPLE, COST CONTROL ON A FIXED-PRICE CONTRACT), THEN MARK THAT FACTOR AS n/a IN THE COMMENTS ON THE RATING SHEET.
| MEASUREMENT CATEGORIES AND APPROPRIATE CRITERIA |
| QUALITY OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES |
-Compliance with contract requirements
-Accurate reporting
-Use of appropriate personnel
-Technical excellence
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
-Performance milestones & delivery schedules reliably met
-Responsive to technical direction
-Timely completion, including wrap-up & contract admin.
-No liquidated damages
COST CONTROL
-Performance within budget/targeted costs
-Current, accurate and complete billings
-Actual costs in line with negotiated costs
-Cost efficient
-No change orders due to poor cost control
BUSINESS RELATIONS
-Effective management
-Businesslike communications
-Prompt notification of problems
-Reasonable, cooperative, flexible, pro-active
-Effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting
| OUTSTANDING |
| There were no quality problems. |
| There were no delays. |
| There were no cost issues |
| Responses to inquiries and technical/service issues were consistently effective and responsive. |
| EXCELLENT |
| Non-conformances had no effect on achievement of contract requirements. |
| Delays had no effect on achievement of contract requirements. |
| Cost issues had no effect on achievement of contract requirements. |
| Responses to inquiries and technical/service issues was usually effective and responsive. |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| Non-conformances required minor resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Delays required minor resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Cost issues required minor resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Responses to inquiries and technical/service issues were occasionally effective and responsive. |
| MARGINAL |
| Non-conformances required significant resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Delays required significant resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Cost issues required significant resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Responses to inquiries and technical/service issues were marginally effective and responsive. |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| Non-conformances compromised achievement of contract requirements. |
Delays compromised compliance with contract requirements.
| Cost issues compromised achievement of contract performance requirements. |
| Responses to inquiries and technical/service issues were consistently ineffective and unresponsive. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .