ACMPbSurveyReport.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Z2DA--Correct Tunnel Water Protection Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
Not on record
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 8

About this file

This document provides the results of an asbestos and lead survey conducted at a Veterans Affairs medical center. The survey identified asbestos-containing floor tile and mastic and recommends inclusion in an operations and maintenance program as well as abatement by a licensed contractor prior to renovation. No lead-containing paint was found. The survey outlines sampling procedures, analytical results, and conclusions regarding identified materials. It also notes limitations due to inaccessible areas.

The related federal contract opportunity notice seeks proposals to correct tunnel water protection issues at a Veterans Affairs medical center. Proposals are due by September 8, 2022 for project number 573-18-604 being conducted by the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 8. The notice amends a previous solicitation and responds to requests for information in a question and answer format, while keeping the proposal due date unchanged.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Z2DA--Correct Tunnel Water Protection, newest first.
File Type Posted
Site Visit Sign in Sheet 573-18-604.pdf PDF
S02 - SF30 Amendment 36C24822R0156 0001.pdf PDF
29450 Final Report (Piezometers at Pedestrian Tunnel)_digi.pdf PDF
RFIs 573-18-604 with responses 24 Aug 22.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

2228 NW 40th Terrace, Suite C Gainesville, Florida 32605

352-335-6648 • Fax 352-335-6187

LIMITED RENOVATION

ASBESTOS AND LEAD-CONTAINING

PAINT SURVEY REPORT

MRI Tunnel and Exterior Malcom Randall VAMC 1601 SW Archer Road

Gainesville, Florida

GLE Project No.: 20950-00570

Prepared for:

Mr. Charles R. Massey Toland Mizell Molnar

590 Means Street, NW Suite 200 Atlanta, Georgia 30318

July 2020

Prepared by:

GLE Associates, Inc.

2228 NW 40th Terrace, Suite C | Gainesville, Florida 32605 | 352-335-6648 | Fax: 352-335-6187

Tampa | Orlando | Ft. Lauderdale | Miami | Jacksonville | Atlanta | Nashville Architecture AA 0002369 Engineer CA 5483 Asbestos ZA 0000034 Geology GB 0000297

July 30, 2020

Mr. Charles R. Massey Toland Mizell Molnar 590 Means Street, NW Suite 200 Atlanta, Georgia 30318

RE: Limited Renovation Asbestos and Lead-Containing Paint Survey Report

MRI Tunnel and Exterior Malcom Randall VAMC 1601 SW Archer Road Gainesville, Florida

GLE Project No.: 20950-00570

Dear Mr. Massey GLE Associates, Inc. (GLE) performed a limited renovation survey for asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and lead containing paint (LCP) on June 15 and July 14, 2020, at the MRI Tunnel and Exterior, located in Gainesville, Florida. The survey was performed by Mr. Artiom Chacon and Mr. Michael D. Harrell with GLE. This report outlines the sampling and testing procedures, and presents the results along with our conclusions and recommendations.

GLE appreciates the opportunity to serve as your consultant on this project. If you should have any questions, or if we can be of further service, please do not hesitate to call.

Sincerely, Artiom Chacon Robert B. Greene, PE, PG, CIH, LEED AP Senior Project Manager President

Florida LAC# EA 0000009

AC/RBG/lr

G:\Work\Asbestos\'20\20950 - VA\00570 - TMM MRMC MRI Tunnel ACM Pb\Report\ACMPbSurveyReport.docx

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Introduction 1

1.2 Facility Description 1

2.0 ASBESTOS 2

2.1 Asbestos Survey Procedures 2

2.2 Identified Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials 3

Table 2.2-1 — Summary of Homogeneous Sampling Areas

3.0 LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT 5

3.1 Lead-Containing Paint Survey Procedures 5

3.2 Identified Suspect Lead-Containing Paint 5

Table 3.2-1 — Summary of Suspect Lead-Containing Paint Analytical Results

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6

4.1 Asbestos - General 6

4.1.1 Asbestos - Specific 7

4.2 Lead-Containing Paint 7

5.0 LIMITATIONS AND CONDITIONS 8

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Analytical Results and Chains of Custody Appendix B – Personnel and Laboratory Certifications

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this limited renovation survey was to identify accessible asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and lead-containing paint (LCP) and their general locations within the MRI Tunnel and Exterior, located at Malcom Randall VAMC, 1601 SW Archer Road in Gainesville, Florida. This survey was limited in scope to moisture impacted ceilings and floors of the aforementioned location, as well as the cementitious coating of the exterior of the MRI building, and the below-grade waterproof membrane. The survey was conducted pursuant to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP, 40 CFR 61) requirements, associated with the scheduled renovation plans. The survey was performed on June 15 and July 14, 2020, by Mr. Artiom Chacon and Mr. Michael D. Harrell, Environmental Protection Agency/Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (EPA/AHERA) accredited inspectors and EPA Lead Risk Assessor. The scope of this survey did not include demolition of any building components, evaluation of architectural plans, or the quantification of materials for abatement purposes, or removal cost estimating.

1.2 FACILITY DESCRIPTION

A summary of the facility investigated is outlined in the table below.

Facility Type: Hospital Construction Date: Unknown Number of Floors: 1 in Scope

Exterior Floor Support: Concrete Slab on Grade Wall Support: Concrete Block (CMU), Concrete Exterior Finish: Paint, Stucco

Interior Floor Finishes: Vinyl Floor Tile Ceiling System: Suspended Ceiling System Ceiling Finishes: Suspended Ceiling Tiles

2.0 ASBESTOS

2.1 ASBESTOS SURVEY PROCEDURES

The survey was performed by visually observing accessible areas within the scope of work.

EPA/AHERA accredited inspectors performed the visual observations (refer to Appendix B for personnel qualifications).

After the overall visual survey was completed, representative sampling areas were determined.

The surveyors delineated homogeneous areas of suspect materials and samples of each material were obtained, in general accordance with regulations as established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and NESHAP. The field surveyors determined sample locations based on previous experience. Both friable and non-friable materials were sampled. A friable material is one that can be crushed when dry by normal hand pressure. This survey did not include the demolition of building components to access suspect material.

After completion of the fieldwork, the samples were delivered to GLE’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory for analysis. The samples were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining, in general accordance with EPA-600/R-93/116. Utilizing this procedure, the various asbestos minerals (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, actinolite, tremolite, and anthophyllite) can be determined. The percentages of asbestos minerals in the samples were visually determined by the microscopist. Please note that the EPA designates all materials containing greater than one percent asbestos as an “asbestos-containing material” (ACM).

Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM) is defined as (a) Friable asbestos materials,

(b) Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category I non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, or (d) Category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations regulated by this subpart.

Category I and Category II non-friable ACM, as defined by the EPA:

Category I non-friable ACM means asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor covering, asphalt roofing products, and pliable sealants and mastics that are in good condition and not friable, containing more than one percent asbestos, as determined using the method specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR Part 763, Section 1, PLM.

Category II non-friable ACM means any material, excluding Category I non-friable ACM, containing more than one percent asbestos as determined using the methods specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR Part 763 Section 1, PLM that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

2.2 IDENTIFIED SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

A total of 15 samples of suspect building materials were collected from the facility during the survey, representing five different identified homogeneous areas. The results of the laboratory analyses are included in Appendix A.

A summary of the homogenous sampling areas of suspect ACM determined to be present is outlined in the following table.

ASBESTOS CONTENT

Expressed as percent

* = The facility owner has the option of point-counting by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) those RACM whose asbestos content is less than 10% in order to more accurately determine the asbestos content therein.

PC = Results based on Point-Count analysis TEM NOB = Transmission Electron Microscopy of Non-Friable Organically Bound Material

FRIABILITY F = Friable Material NF = Non-Friable Material

ACM CATEGORY RACM = Regulated ACM CAT I = Category I non-friable ACM CAT II = Category II non-friable ACM

ABBREVIATIONS: NA = Not Applicable ND = None Detected NIS = Not in Scope C = Chrysotile A = Amosite

HA = Homogeneous Area SF = Square Feet LF = Linear Feet CF = Cubic Feet

TABLE 2.2-1: SUMMARY OF HOMOGENEOUS SAMPLING AREAS

MRI TUNNEL AND EXTERIOR – GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA

HA # HOMOGENEOUS MATERIAL

DESCRIPTION

HOMOGENEOUS MATERIAL

LOCATION

FRIABILITY

(F /NF)

% ASBESTOS* # OF SAMPLES

COLLECTED

APPROXIMATE

QUANTITY

ACM

CATEGORY

CT-01 2’x4’ White Fissured Ceiling Tile Ceiling Throughout F ND 3 NA NA

FT-01

12”x12” White Floor Tile and

Black Mastic VA Tunnel Flooring NF

Tile-7%C;

Black Mastic-5%C;

Yellow Mastic-ND

3 7,550 SF CAT I

FT-02

12”x12” Tan Floor Tile and Black

Mastic MRI Entrance NF ND 3 NA NA

S-01 White Over Tan Stucco Exterior Parapet Walls NF ND 3 NA NA

M-01 Gray Clay Waterproofing Material

Under Styrofoam Insulation Waterproof Membrane

Approximate 18” Below Grade

NF ND 3 NA NA

3.0 LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT

3.1 LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT SURVEY PROCEDURES

The lead-containing paint survey was performed by visually observing accessible painted component surfaces throughout the structure. The protocol used in this lead paint survey is a modified version of the survey methodology established by HUD. The protocol was modified to conform to the specific parameters of this project.

During the walk through of the facility, each area was observed and an inventory of painted surfaces was developed. The surveyor then subdivided the areas into homogeneous areas of apparent similar paint history.

One paint chip sample was collected from representative painted surfaces associated with the facility.

Testing of the painted surfaces was performed by collecting representative paint chips. All samples were submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc., an accredited laboratory recognized under EPA’s National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP), located in Kernersville, North Carolina. These samples were analyzed by EPA Method 3050B/7000B and the results are reported in percentage of lead by weight of the paint sample (% Wt).

3.2 IDENTIFIED SUSPECT LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT

The identified suspect lead-containing coatings are described in the following table:

TABLE 3.2-1: SUMMARY OF SUSPECT LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

MRI TUNNEL AND EXTERIOR – GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA

SAMPLE

NUMBER

LOCATION COLOR COMPONENT

FAAS RESULT

(% WEIGHT)

L-01 Knee Wall Cream Stucco < 0.0080 1 BOLD result indicates lead-containing paint.

2 The requirements of the OSHA Lead in Construction Standard 29CFR 1926.62 are invoked if any amount of lead is present in the sample; there is no minimum concentration.

The results of the laboratory analyses are included in Appendix A.

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1 ASBESTOS – GENERAL

Asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) were identified in the scope of this survey. General and specific conclusions and recommendations are provided below.

The EPA, OSHA and the State of Florida have promulgated regulations dealing with asbestos.

For commercial building owners, the EPA NESHAP (40 CFR 61) regulations require removal of RACM, prior to conducting activities which might disturb the material. They also deal with notification, handling and disposal of asbestos.

No homogenous areas of suspect RACM were determined to contain less than 10 percent asbestos by PLM analysis. According to the NESHAP, when the asbestos content of a bulk sample of suspect RACM is determined to be less than 10 percent by PLM visual estimation, you may:

1. Assume the amount to be greater than one percent and treat the material as asbestos-containing; or

2. Conduct confirmatory verification by point-counting. Note, the results obtained by point-counting are considered the definitive analytical result.

The EPA recommends that an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Program be developed for any facilities with ACM, and this Program should address all ACM (known and/or assumed) present. The O&M Program establishes notification and training requirements along with special procedures for working around the ACM. The O&M Program would remain in effect until all asbestos is removed.

Category I and Category II non-friable materials, as defined by the EPA, may remain within a facility during demolition with no potential cessation of work, provided they remain non-friable and the appropriate engineering controls (i.e., wet methods) are utilized, with the resulting waste disposed of as asbestos-containing waste. However, there is no guarantee that these materials will remain non-friable. If the materials become friable, then they are classified as RACM.

RACM, as defined by the EPA, must be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities that may disturb the materials.

The OSHA regulations deal with employee exposure to airborne asbestos fibers. The regulations restrict employee exposure, and require special monitoring, training and handling procedures when dealing with asbestos. Additionally, OSHA has regulations that may supersede the EPA regulations. In order to protect the worker, OSHA has established a permissible exposure limit (PEL), which limits employee exposure to airborne fiber concentrations. OSHA requires objective evidence that the PEL will not be exceeded, as justification that personal air monitoring and engineering controls will not be required. OSHA has also established rules requiring the containerization and labeling of asbestos waste.

The State regulations require that anyone involved in asbestos consulting activities be a licensed asbestos consultant and that anyone involved in asbestos abatement, with the exception of roofing materials, be a licensed asbestos abatement contractor.

4.1.1 ASBESTOS – SPECIFIC

12”x12” White Floor Tile and Associated Black Mastic

These materials are defined by the EPA as a Category I non-friable materials. These materials do not appear to present a significant issue, as observed, at the time of the survey. We recommend that the identified ACM be maintained as part of an O&M Program and periodically monitored for any changes in condition. Additionally, we recommend that a licensed asbestos abatement contractor properly remove and dispose of the ACM prior to conducting renovation activities that might disturb the ACM.

4.2 LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT

No lead-containing paint was identified in the scope of this survey.

5.0 LIMITATIONS AND CONDITIONS

As a result of previous renovations, there may be hidden materials, such as floor tile, sheet vinyl flooring, insulation, etc. These materials may be found in various areas hidden under existing flooring materials or in wall cavities. Any materials or coatings found during construction activities, either not addressed in this survey report, or similar to the ACM or LCP identified in this survey report should be assumed to be ACM or LCP until sampling and analysis documents otherwise.

Because of the hidden nature of many building components (i.e. within mechanical chases), it may be impossible to determine if all of the suspect building materials have been located and subsequently tested. Destructive testing in some instances is not a viable option. We cannot, therefore, guarantee that all potential ACM or LCP has been located. For the same reasons, estimates of quantities and/or conditions are subject to readily apparent situations, and our findings reflect this condition. We do warrant, however, that the investigations and methodology reflect our best efforts based upon the prevailing standard of care in the environmental industry.

The information contained in this report was prepared based upon specific parameters and regulations in force at the time of this report. The information herein is only for the specific use of the client and GLE. GLE accepts no responsibility for the use, interpretation, or reliance by other parties on the information contained herein, unless prior written authorization has been obtained from GLE.

APPENDIX A

Analytical Results and Chains of Custody

SUMMARY OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS

TMM; MRI Tunnel and Exterior 20950-00570

Sample Sample Type Fiber Type

CT-01A 2' X 4' White Fissured

Ceiling Tile 100% Mineral Wool

CT-01B 2' X 4' White Fissured

Ceiling Tile 100% Mineral Wool

CT-01C-QC 2' X 4' White Fissured

Ceiling Tile 100% Mineral Wool

FT-01A 12" X 12" White Floor

Tile

7% Chrysotile Asbestos

93% Polymer, Quartz, Calcite, Clay, Mica

Black Mastic 5% Chrysotile Asbestos

95% Bitumen

Yellow Mastic 100% Polymer

FT-01B 12" X 12" White Floor

Tile & Black Mastic Positive Stop/Sample not analyzed

Yellow Mastic 100% Polymer

FT-01C 12" X 12" White Floor

Tile & Black Mastic Positive Stop/Sample not analyzed

Yellow Mastic 100% Polymer

FT-02A 12" X 12" Tan Floor Tile

& Black Mastic 100% Polymer, Quartz, Calcite, Clay, Mica, Bitumen

FT-02B 12" X 12" Tan Floor Tile

& Black Mastic 100% Polymer, Quartz, Calcite, Clay, Mica, Bitumen

FT-02C 12" X 12" Tan Floor Tile

& Black Mastic 100% Polymer, Quartz, Calcite, Clay, Mica, Bitumen

Darryl Neldner

* Polarized Light Microscopy coupled with dispersion is the technique used for identification in accordance with EPA 600/M4-82-020, EPA 600/R-93/116, and NIOSH Method 9002.

** The percentage of each component is visually estimated. The result of this analysis relate only to the material tested.

The report shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

(>1% greater than one percent, <1% less than one percent) QC - Sample reanalyzed for QA/QC.

Analysis performed by GLE Associates, Inc. NVLAP Code 102003-0, CO AL-17485, TX 30-0337

*** This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. GLE Report # 25392

Analyst / Approved

Signatory:

Feedback regarding laboratory performance should be addressed to lab@gleassociates.com.

Report Date: 6/18/2020

20950-00570

Sample Sample Type Fiber Type

S-01A White over Tan Stucco 100% Quartz, Calcite, Clay, Mica

S-01B White over Tan Stucco 100% Quartz, Calcite, Clay, Mica

S-01C White over Tan Stucco 100% Quartz, Calcite, Clay, Mica

Darryl Neldner

* Polarized Light Microscopy coupled with dispersion is the technique used for identification in accordance with EPA 600/M4-82-020, EPA 600/R-93/116, and NIOSH Method 9002.

** The percentage of each component is visually estimated. The result of this analysis relate only to the material tested.

The report shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

(>1% greater than one percent, <1% less than one percent) QC - Sample reanalyzed for QA/QC.

Analysis performed by GLE Associates, Inc. NVLAP Code 102003-0, CO AL-17485, TX 30-0337

*** This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. GLE Report # 25392

Analyst / Approved

Signatory:

Report Date: 6/18/2020

20950-00570

Sample Sample Type Fiber Type

M-01A Gray Clay Waterproofing

Material Under Styrofoam

Insulation

100% Polymer, Quartz, Calcite, Clay, Mica

M-01B Gray Clay Waterproofing

Material Under Styrofoam

Insulation

100% Polymer, Quartz, Calcite, Clay, Mica

M-01C-QC Gray Clay Waterproofing

Material Under Styrofoam

Insulation

100% Polymer, Quartz, Calcite, Clay, Mica

Darryl Neldner

* Polarized Light Microscopy coupled with dispersion is the technique used for identification in accordance with EPA 600/M4-82-020, EPA 600/R-93/116, and NIOSH Method 9002.

** The percentage of each component is visually estimated. The result of this analysis relate only to the material tested.

The report shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

(>1% greater than one percent, <1% less than one percent) QC - Sample reanalyzed for QA/QC.

Analysis performed by GLE Associates, Inc. NVLAP Code 102003-0, CO AL-17485, TX 30-0337

*** This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. GLE Report # 25475

Analyst / Approved

Signatory:

Report Date: 7/20/2020

ConcentrationAnalyzed Weight RDL LeadClient SampleDescription Collected

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

706 Gralin Street, Kernersville, NC 27284 Phone/Fax: (336) 992-1025 / (336) 992-4175 http://www.EMSL.com greensborolab@emsl.com

Attn: Paul Zak GLE Associates 2228 N.W. 40th Terrace Suite C Gainesville, FL 32605

Received: 7/15/2020 09:45 AM

20950-00570 MRI Tunnel

Fax:

Phone: (352) 335-6648

Project:

Collected:

022004067 CustomerID: GLEA51B CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

<0.0080 % wt7/16/2020 .2772 g 022004067-0001

0.0080L-01 % wt

Page 1 of 1Test Report PB w/RDL-2.0.0.0 Printed: 7/17/2020 8:28:03 AM

James Cole, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. The report reflects the samples as received.

Results are generated from the field sampling data (sampling volumes and areas, locations, etc.) provided by the client on the Chain of Custody. Samples are within quality control criteria and met method specifications unless otherwise noted.

Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.008% wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. "<" (less than) result signifies the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. Definitions of modifications are available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Kernersville, NC EMSL Lab ID 102564 is accredited by the AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Program (AIHA-LAP), LLC in the Environmental Lead accreditation program for Lead in Paint Chips.

Initial report from 07/17/2020 08:28:03 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:greensborolab@emsl.com

OrderID: 022004067

APPENDIX B

Personnel and Laboratory Certifications

Halsey Beshears, SecretaryRon DeSantis, Governor

STATE OF FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION

ASBESTOS LICENSING UNIT

THE ASBESTOS BUSINESS ORGANIZATION HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE

PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 469, FLORIDA STATUTES

GLE ASSOCIATES INC

Do not alter this document in any form.

ROBERT BLAIR GREENE

LICENSE NUMBER: ZA0000034

EXPIRATION DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 2021

This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document.

5405 CYPRESS CENTER DRIVE

SUITE 110

TAMPA FL 33609

Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=2c9db36082555fee1afe88b159c9ca06

JONATHAN ZACHEM, SECRETARYRICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR

STATE OF FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION

ASBESTOS LICENSING UNIT

THE ASBESTOS CONSULTANT - ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE

PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 469, FLORIDA STATUTES

GREENE, ROBERT BLAIR

Do not alter this document in any form.

GLE ASSOCIATES INC

LICENSE NUMBER: EA0000009

EXPIRATION DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 2020

This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document.

5405 CYPRESS CENTER DR

SUITE 110

TAMPA FL 33609

Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=10324f95ba50b55978623c96241000ac has fulfilled the requirements of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 402, and has received certification to conduct lead-based paint activities pursuant to 40 CFR Part 745.226

All EPA Administered Lead-based Paint Activities Program States, Tribes and Territories

This certification is valid from the date of issuance and expires March 03, 2021

Certification #

LBP-2060-1

Issued On

January 25, 2018

Michelle Price, Chief

Lead, Heavy Metals, and Inorganics Branch

AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC acknowledges that

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

706 Gralin Street, Kernersville, NC 27284

Laboratory ID: 102564 along with all premises from which key activities are performed, as listed above, has fulfilled the requirements of the AIHA Laboratory Accreditation

Programs (AIHA-LAP), LLC accreditation to the ISO/IEC 17025:2005 international standard, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and

Calibration Laboratories in the following:

LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAMS

INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Accreditation Expires:

ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD Accreditation Expires: September 01, 2020

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY Accreditation Expires:

FOOD Accreditation Expires:

UNIQUE SCOPES Accreditation Expires:

Specific Field(s) of Testing (FoT)/Method(s) within each Accreditation Program for which the above named laboratory maintains accreditation is outlined on the attached Scope of Accreditation. Continued accreditation is contingent upon successful on-going compliance with ISO/IEC 17025:2005 and AIHA-LAP, LLC requirements. This certificate is not valid without the attached Scope of Accreditation. Please review the AIHA-LAP, LLC website (www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org) for the most current Scope.

Elizabeth Bair

Chairperson, Analytical Accreditation Board

Cheryl O. Morton

Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC

Revision 16: 03/21/2018 Date Issued: 07/31/2018 http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org/

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .