SATPC0039154 Tab 04 4 SOW..pdf

NASA Langley Research Center

X-Ray systems Service Contract Agreement Statement of Work

7/17/2025

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 This Statement of Work (SOW) describe the requirements of the Contractor to provide

NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) (Government) to provide maintenance and repair services for NESB LES Dual/Single Mount and XTH225ST X-Ray equipment as provided for in the attached quote.

1.2 Scope

The Contractor shall provide the services as outlined below.

2. Information Provided Included with this SOW are the electronic files containing the following attachments to the SOW:

FILE NAME DESCRIPTION

NMI Quotation A-2250290A Annual Service Contract.pdf Quote from Nikon Metrology

3. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Unclassified

4. GLOSSARY

NDE- Non-Destructive

QA&IP- Quality Assurance and Inspection

SOW- Statement of Work COR – Contracting Officer Representative CO – Contracting Officer TR – Technical Representative

5. PLACE OF PERFORMANCE:

Work shall be performed at Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, Building

6. PERIOD OF PERFORMNACE:

The period of performance will be from the date the task issuance for a period of 12 months.

7. NASA TECHNICAL REPRESENATIVE (TR):

The TR will serve as the task technical liaison between the Contractor and the COR and will assist the COR in performing his/her duties.

8. SELECTION CRITERIA

Recommendation of requestor is to negotiate with a specific vendor as detailed in the accompanying sole source solicitation document. Sole source selection criteria:

• The systems needing maintenance coverage are highly complex X-ray CT units. One was manufactured by the vendor of recommendation while the other is a one-of-a-kind system. The vendor of recommendation has also previously been under contract to provide routine service and emergency repair for the units; as such, vendor is very familiar with the operation of the units, including the mechanisms for failure

(enabling quick repair response). Both equipment are utilized nearly continuously when functional – timely repair is very important, and this vendor is very familiar with both units.

• Contracting the repair to another vendor would involve extensive equipment evaluation, including NASA personnel spending a significant amount of time explaining to another vendor exactly how the equipment operates. Such would add significant cost to the service agreement and would add significant delay to the start of service coverage.