SATPC0036200 Tab 06 RDSS..pdf

Page 1 V2.0 3-15-2017

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER

RECOMMENDATION AND DETERMINATION TO SOLICIT FROM ONE SOURCE

OR BRAND NAME

PICK ONE

Sole Source:

☒I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate with Phillips Corporation, Federal Division only for VN400Q (LN3W) Wire-EDM. The total estimated cost of this effort is and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is 4 weeks ARO.

OR

Brand Name Justification:

☐I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate with only with vendors who can provide the subject band name from Manufacture Name for Enter Supply or Service to be procured. The total estimated cost of this effort is Enter Dollar amount and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is Date.

This recommendation is for the acquisition of supplies or services determined to be reasonably available from only one source/only one manufacture. Competition is impractical for the following reasons (please answer the questions below):

1. What are the reasons for soliciting only the suggested source/suggested brand name? Please provide the unique characteristics of the items or services along with the supporting rationale and the market research performed to substantiate your reason for the suggested source/brand name.

The sole sourcing of the VN400Q Wire-EDM system from Phillips Corporation is justified by the critical requirement for an exact drop-in replacement of an existing Wire-EDM system. This specific system is essential to maintain uninterrupted operations and prevent delays in NASA projects. Any alternative system would necessitate the development or procurement of custom fixturing and tooling, significantly increasing costs and extending project timelines. Comprehensive market research has confirmed that Phillips Corporation is the exclusive provider of the VN400Q Wire-EDM system, making it the only viable option to meet the project's stringent requirements. By selecting this system, NASA ensures operational continuity, maximizes cost efficiency, and mitigates the risks associated with implementing a new system that might require extensive modifications or adaptations.

2. What is the impact to the government if another vendor/brand is used? Include any dollar, schedule, or compatibility impacts if possible.

Selecting a vendor other than Phillips Corporation for the VN400Q Wire-EDM system would have significant negative impacts on the government. Primarily, it would result in substantial schedule delays due to the necessity to accommodate the new system. These delays could potentially impact critical NASA project timelines and deliverables. Additionally, the government would incur significant unforeseen costs associated with the development of custom tooling and the integration of a new system into existing operations. These expenses could easily escalate, exceeding the projected budget for the project. Furthermore, the compatibility of a different Wire-EDM system with the existing infrastructure cannot be guaranteed, potentially leading to further delays, increased costs, and operational disruptions.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

NA