Amendment_01.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

P00001

KSC

Timothy M. Freeland

The purpose of Amendment P00001 is to revise the solicitation as described in detail within the Continuation Page of the SF 30.

Prospective Offerors are cautioned to review this amendment carefully and in its entirety to discern all changes. Where appropriate, replacement pages are attached to this amendment. Amendment P00001 incorporates the following:

Continued...

NASA/John F. Kennedy Space Center Office of Procurement Mail Code ML2-SEB Kennedy Space Center FL, 32899

80KSC018R0032

1 3

07/20/2018

06/29/2018

TIMOTHY FREELAND

Digitally signed by TIMOTHY

FREELAND

Date: 2018.07.20 09:15:45 -04'00'

7/20/2018

80KSC018R0032 Page 2 of 3 Amendment P00001

This is Amendment P00001 to the solicitation entitled Mobile Launcher 2 (ML2), solicitation number 80KSC018R0032, which was posted on June 29, 2018.

Potential Offerors are notified of the following changes:

1. Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Section 4.3.1 is hereby revised as follows:

2. RFQ Section 4.3.2 paragraph 2 is hereby revised as follows:

3. RFQ Section 4.3.4.2 paragraph 4 is hereby deleted in its entirety:

4. RFQ Section 4.3.5 paragraph 2, item 3 is hereby revised as follows:

80KSC018R0032 Page 3 of 3 Amendment P00001

5. RFQ Section 5.11 paragraph 2 is hereby revised as follows:

6. RFQ Attachment E, the last paragraph is revised as follows:

Where an entire document replacement did not occur, the new “slip sheets” attached are to be used in place of the pages that were posted on June 29, 2018.

All other information within the RFQ remains unchanged.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Mobile Launcher 2

80KSC018R0032 15 Issued: June 29, 2018

4.2.4 OCI Mitigation Plan Requirements. The offeror must provide an OCI Mitigation Plan as part of its Phase 1 proposal, if the results of its assessment indicate a potential OCI. This plan must address the offeror’s process for recognizing, evaluating, and resolving conflicts or potential conflicts of interest throughout the design and construction of ML2. The plan must also include the offeror’s (and any subcontractor’s) specific mitigation of any existing conflicts of interest identified as part of its OCI assessment. The plan, if approved by the Contracting Officer, will be included in any resulting contract.

4.2.5 Submission. The offeror must submit its OCI Assessment and any OCI Mitigation Plan by

3:00PM EDT on July 16, 2018. This submission must meet the following additional requirements: (a) the offeror must submit an original and two copies; (b) the offeror must label the original; (c) the offeror must include an electronic version of the entire submission in searchable PDF format on a CD- or DVD-ROM.

4.2.6 Representation. By submission of its offer, the offeror represents, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that there are no relevant facts that could give rise to an OCI, as defined in FAR Part

2, or the offeror has disclosed all relevant information regarding any actual or potential conflicts of interest. If the successful offeror was aware, or should have been aware, of an actual or potential OCI before award of this contract and failed to fully disclose that conflict to the

Contracting Officer, the Government may terminate the contract for default.

4.2.7 Waiver. The agency reserves the right to waive the requirements of FAR subpart 9.5, in accordance with FAR 9.503.

4.3 Phase 1 Proposal Instructions

4.3.1 Number of Copies. The offeror must submit an original and four hardcopies of its proposal for

Phase 1. The offeror must label the original as such. The offeror must also include an electronic version of the entire submission in searchable PDF format on a CD- or DVD-ROM. The offeror may submit multiple files within a single disc.

4.3.2 Text. Proposals are limited to no more than 55 total pages. A page is defined as one side of a sheet, 8 1/2" x 11", with at least one inch margins on all sides, using minimum 12-point type.

Foldouts count as an equivalent number of 8 1/2" x 11" pages. The metric standard format most closely approximating the described standard 8 1/2" x 11" size may also be used.

The following proposal material is excluded from the 55-page count limitation:

(1) Title pages

(2) Table of contents

(3) SF1442

(4) Attachments C, E, F, and G, and any required sub-attachments

(5) Any response to section 4.1 and 4.2

Information that can be construed as belonging in one of the page limited proposal section that is provided as part of a non-page limited section of the proposal will be so construed and counted against the page limitation.

80KSC018R0032 17 Issued: June 29, 2018

4.3.4.2 Past Performance. Offerors must provide Attachment F, Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) to the owner/customer point of contact (POC) for each of the projects submitted under 4.3.4.1, Relevant Projects. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that POCs submit the completed questionnaires directly to the Contracting Officer for arrival no later than the deadline date for receipt of Phase 1 proposals. The Government will not consider any PPQs that are submitted by the offeror instead of the POC.

POCs must submit their completed PPQs directly to the Contracting Officer via mail or email:

Timothy Freeland, Contracting Officer

Mail Code: ML2-SEB

Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899

KSC-ML-2-info@mail.nasa.gov

In addition, offerors must provide a copy of the first page of each PPQ sent to POCs in their

Phase 1 Proposal. The Government may contact POCs, but is under no obligation to do so.

4.3.4.3 Safety Past Performance. Offerors must submit Attachment G, Safety Past Performance, as part of the REPP section of their Phase 1 Proposal.

4.3.5 Factor 2: Technical Approach.

The offeror must submit its proposed approach to the ML2 project, which must include but not be limited to:

The offeror’s proposed organizational structure:

(1) Describe roles and responsibilities of key positions. Identify and describe the

Design-Build Project Manager and Designer of Record (DOR) responsibilities in the overall design-build process, construction, and commissioning phases.

(2) Describe the proposed decision-making processes for technical, schedule, and financial aspects of the design and construction. Identify the decision-making authorities and delegations of authority within the team.

(3) Describe the proposed team. For teaming arrangements or joint ventures, include a clear description of each company’s roles and responsibilities on the project. At a minimum, the offeror must address the proposed team including the company serving as the prime contractor, the lead design company, and the lead construction company.

Describe any contractual arrangements that the offeror has established among those firms.

The offeror’s proposed management and integration plan:

(1) Describe the process for managing technical integration across all phases of the work.

Provide the offeror’s approach to integration between; the designer-builder-

Government, subsystems, and the design and construction phases of the work.

Describe the process for ensuring that communication is effective throughout the

80KSC018R0032 18 Issued: June 29, 2018 organization, management through field personnel.

(2) Describe the offeror’s proposed quality control management structure. Describe quality control processes including a description of corporate systems and capabilities to maintain quality control of the design and construction.

(3) Describe the proposed configuration management system and the approach to maintaining integrity of the design, change control and revision management, and verification of design expectations.

The offeror must provide a description of its corporate EVMS, including, but not limited to, the software packages used, other tools to enhance utilization of this software, and the associated business processes that the project team uses to effectively implement EVM. If available, the offeror should provide a copy of any Government agency approval or certification of its EVMS in compliance with Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA) Standard 748 (EIA-748). If the offeror’s

EVMS has not been previously approved or certified, the offeror must submit a plan for compliance with EIA-748.

Cost-reimbursement type contracts require the offeror and cost-type subcontractors to have an accounting system that is adequate for determining costs applicable to the contract or order in accordance with FAR 16.301-3(a)(3). The offeror must provide Defense Contract Audit Agency

(DCAA), Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), NASA, or other Government agency audits, agreements, audit number and date completed for Accounting System, Cost Accounting

Standards (CAS) Disclosure Statements, and EVM System. If the offeror or subcontractor is using a third-party accounting firm to certify its accounting system, the offeror must provide a copy of the certification with supporting documentation.

Provide the name, address, phone number, and email for the cognizant DCAA, DCMA, NASA or other Government agency with cognizance over the offeror’s rates, factors and systems audits.

The Government will use this information to expedite rates and factors evaluations, pre-award accounting system audits, and financial capability evaluations.

4.3.6 Factor 3: Specialized Experience. For each project submitted for Factor 1, REPP, the offeror must describe the following specialized experience for the performing entity. This narrative should be separate from Attachment E and will count towards the total page count requirements.

The offeror must address the following, as applicable:

(1) Describe the applicable integrated design-build, design, or construction processes and any technology solutions used;

(2) Describe in detail, from award through commissioning and closeout, the business practices that the offeror used to foster a highly collaborative and successful project environment with customers. Describe change authority responsibilities and any delegations of change authority within the teams;

(3) Provide a detailed description of the design verification and quality-control processes, including requirements and configuration control, design review format and comment incorporation, timely management of requests for information, any use of 3D modeling (or building information modeling) to integrate multiple subsystems, constructability review approach utilized which may include involvement of the builder during designs, field coordination of subcontractors for installation of complex and diverse systems, and physical installation conflict resolution;

(4) Include corporate methodology and analysis tools used to drive and/or verify design

80KSC018R0032 25 Issued: June 29, 2018

The SEB will utilize the following definitions for deficiency, weakness, significant weakness, strength, and significant strength:

Deficiency

A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Weakness

A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Weakness

A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Strength

An aspect of the proposal that will have some positive impact on the successful performance of the contract.

Significant Strength

Some aspect of the proposal that greatly enhances the potential for successful contract performance.

5.9 Relative Importance of Phase 1 Evaluation Factors. Specialized Experience is more important than REPP, which is more important than the Technical Approach.

5.10 Relative Importance of Phase 2 Evaluation Factors. All evaluations factors other than cost, when combined, will be significantly more important than cost.

5.11 Advancement to Phase 2. The Contracting Officer, with the SSA’s concurrence, will select a maximum of five offerors to advance to Phase 2 and to submit Phase 2 proposals. Advancement of offerors to Phase 2 does not imply, obligate, or commit the Government in any manner.

The offeror may not change the prime contractor, the lead design company, or the lead construction company after the Phase 1 proposal submission without the Contracting Officer’s approval. The Contracting Officer may grant approval to substitute team members only if, based on the Phase 1 evaluation factors, the Contracting Officer determines that the proposed substitute team member possesses qualifications equal to or better than those of the team member in the offeror’s Phase 1 that the offeror proposes to replace. The Government will not consider any changes after the Final Phase 2 RFP release. In the absence of such a determination and approval by the Contracting Officer, an offeror that changes team members after the Phase 1 proposal shall not be eligible for further consideration in Phase 2. After award, the offeror may not change teaming arrangements without the Contracting Officer’s approval. The Contracting Officer will not give such approval unless the Contracting Officer considers the proposed substitute to be equal to or better than the originally proposed team member in all respects and that the substitution is in the best interests of the Government.

5.12 Notification and Debriefing of Unsuccessful Offerors. The Contracting Officer will notify unsuccessful offerors in accordance with FAR Subpart 15.5. An unsuccessful offeror may request

ATTACHMENT E – RELEVANT PROJECTS

80KSC018R0032 37 Issued: June 29, 2018

Offeror’s Name

Name of Project

Location of Project

Period of Contract Performance (beginning and ending dates)

Type of Contract (e.g. Firm Fixed Price, Cost Plus Award Fee, etc.)

Name, telephone number, and email address of the Contracting Officer, owner, or equivalent customer contact

(POC). If work was performed as a subcontractor, the Prime can be used as the POC.

Your Company role (Prime, Joint Venture, Subcontractor, etc.)

Type of services performed by company (e.g. design, design-build, construction, etc.)

Dollar value of contract as initially awarded

Please attach a one page (8 1/2" x 11") summary of your company role for self-performing services on this contract, including, but not limited to:

Rationale demonstrating this project is comparable to this acquisition with a discussion on the relevant technical requirements and unique schedule requirements.

Photo(s), diagram(s) or other informational format is allowable within the single page summary