Amendment_00001(06-18-19).pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES 1 3

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4 REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ NO. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 00001 06/18/2019 N/A

6. ISSUED BY Code 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6.) Code N/A Commanding Officer USCG Surface Forces Logistics Center 300 East Main Street, Suite 550 Norfolk, VA 23510 757-628-4597

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

70Z080-19-Q-P30C0700 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) 29 May 2019

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers _____ is extended _X___ is not extended .

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copy of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14. ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATION CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103 (b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER: (specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return 1 copy to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

DECISIVE DD

This amendment answers the following questions:

See page 2

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR (Same as Item 8) 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.1-83) 0224-3(10-90)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

FAR (49 CFR) 53.243

06/18/2019

70Z080-19-Q-P30C0700

Amendment 00001

Question #1: Schedule B pricing sheet identifies Item Description as 650 SQ-FT. Work Item paragraph 3.4.1 identifies 850 square feet. Is the requirement for paragraph 3.4.1 650 square feet?

Answer: Go with the work item spec, 850 sqft.

Question #2: Paragraph 3.7.2 includes notes regarding use of decals and vinyl adhesive letters and numbers.

Are the visual identification markings identified in paragraph 3.7.2 allowed to be decals and vinyl adhesive letters and numbers?

Answer: Yes, the visual identification markings identified in paragraph 3.7.2 (other than stripes and draft marks) are allowed to be decals and vinyl adhesive letters and numbers.

Question #3: Table 1 does not identify the type of strainer to be installed. Are the new strainers Duplex strainers or Simplex strainers?

Answer: Assume all strainers are duplex for purpose of bid, since they are listed under the duplex strainer overhaul work item. Yes, new strainer plug valves require test and acceptance per specification. Paragraph 3.6 means cutter interior surfaces, as designated in SFLC Std Spec 6310.

Strainers shall be preserved 100%.

Question #4: Paragraphs 3.5.1 through 3.1.5.4 include requirements for use of cofferdams. Strainer repairs will occur while the vessel is located in a drydock. There is no need for cofferdams for this work specification. What is the purpose of inclusion of cofferdam requirements?

Answer: Sea Strainers Duplex (All Sizes), Overhaul Contractor is correct. There is no need for cofferdam for this DD avail.

Question #5: Temporary Services, Table 1, includes a requirement for contractor to provide Steam (Sub- Paragraph 3.3.11) Steam is not typically required for USCG 210 Class vessels. Is the contractor required to provide Steam for this solicitation?

Answer: The cutter does not need steam.

Question #6 (40): Paragraph 3.2 states to renew and test the designated strainers shown on the 3 identified drawings. Are the strainers on these drawings the only ones required to be renewed?

Will the government identify the manufacturer/model numbers and provide the appropriate reference drawings and bill of materials for each of the strainers required to be renewed? If not, please advise on the method to be used to determine cost estimates for strainer replacement.

Answer : Gov't can find the manufacturer/model numbers.

Question #7 (41): The strainers identified in Table 1 are removed, repaired, and reinstalled by work item 19. It appears the intent of work item 20 is to renew those strainers which cannot be repaired successfully by work item

19. Is it the intent of the government to have the new strainer/s disassembled to grease/test the plug valves?

Paragraph 3.6 requires preservation of" interior surfaces" and refers to sea strainer surfaces. Are the "interior surfaces" the internal surfaces of the sea strainers or the exterior surfaces of the sea strainers?

Answer : The new valves should also be tested. The interior surface is the interior of the strainers.

Question #8 (42) : Paragraph 3.4.1.2 identifies that up to 10 linear feet of 7.5# T-beam in the engine room is to be replaced. The identified reference drawings provide structural detail and web fram structural detail but to not specify the repair location. Shipcheck did not identify the location of repair.

70Z080-19-Q-P30C0700

Amendment 00001

What is the location of the repair area, stifferner number/frame/port or starboard, etc.?

Answer : It should be on the port side, forward, just above the deckplate level on the lower deck.

Question #9 (43) : Paragraph 3.4.1.3 states to "Reattach fire pump foundation to the hull plating."

Ship check reveals that the existing fire pump foundation is structurally deteriorated beyond what can reasonably be expected to be rewelded/re-attached. Is it the government intention to issue a change order to compensate the contractor for steel replacement in order to "re-attach" the foundation to the hull plating? If not, what is to be included in the estimated reattachment cost estimate?

Answer : The foundation is what needs to be replaced and reattached to the hull. If the hull needs to be replaced, we will issue a CR.

Question #10 (44) : Is it the intent of the government to issue a change order for removal and reinstallation of R/O unit components if the deck and/or foundation plating identified for renewal is beneath the existing equipment? If not, please identifiy the government expectation for cost estimate development for plating replacement.

Answer : The RO is listed as an interference, no CR should be needed.

*** A vendor requested additional drawings that were not part of the consolidated list of drawings and references.

The KO is waiting for a response from the APM about the drawings. If they are necessary, they will be sent out to every vendor who requested the drawings from the KO for this solicitation.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT